IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
When loading struct_ops programs kernel requires BTF id of the
struct_ops type and member index for attachment point inside that
type. This makes impossible to use same BPF program in several
struct_ops maps that have different struct_ops type.
Check if libbpf rejects such BPF objects files.
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240306104529.6453-7-eddyz87@gmail.com
Extend struct_ops_module test case to check if it is possible to use
'___' suffixes for struct_ops type specification.
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240306104529.6453-5-eddyz87@gmail.com
Change the values of fields, including scalar types and function pointers,
and check if the struct_ops map works as expected.
The test changes the field "test_2" of "testmod_1" from the pointer to
test_2() to pointer to test_3() and the field "data" to 13. The function
test_2() and test_3() both compute a new value for "test_2_result", but in
different way. By checking the value of "test_2_result", it ensures the
struct_ops map works as expected with changes through shadow types.
Signed-off-by: Kui-Feng Lee <thinker.li@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240229064523.2091270-6-thinker.li@gmail.com
Test if the verifier verifies nullable pointer arguments correctly for BPF
struct_ops programs.
"test_maybe_null" in struct bpf_testmod_ops is the operator defined for the
test cases here.
A BPF program should check a pointer for NULL beforehand to access the
value pointed by the nullable pointer arguments, or the verifier should
reject the programs. The test here includes two parts; the programs
checking pointers properly and the programs not checking pointers
beforehand. The test checks if the verifier accepts the programs checking
properly and rejects the programs not checking at all.
Signed-off-by: Kui-Feng Lee <thinker.li@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240209023750.1153905-5-thinker.li@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
This commit marks kfuncs as such inside the .BTF_ids section. The upshot
of these annotations is that we'll be able to automatically generate
kfunc prototypes for downstream users. The process is as follows:
1. In source, use BTF_KFUNCS_START/END macro pair to mark kfuncs
2. During build, pahole injects into BTF a "bpf_kfunc" BTF_DECL_TAG for
each function inside BTF_KFUNCS sets
3. At runtime, vmlinux or module BTF is made available in sysfs
4. At runtime, bpftool (or similar) can look at provided BTF and
generate appropriate prototypes for functions with "bpf_kfunc" tag
To ensure future kfunc are similarly tagged, we now also return error
inside kfunc registration for untagged kfuncs. For vmlinux kfuncs,
we also WARN(), as initcall machinery does not handle errors.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Xu <dxu@dxuuu.xyz>
Acked-by: Benjamin Tissoires <bentiss@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/e55150ceecbf0a5d961e608941165c0bee7bc943.1706491398.git.dxu@dxuuu.xyz
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Create a new struct_ops type called bpf_testmod_ops within the bpf_testmod
module. When a struct_ops object is registered, the bpf_testmod module will
invoke test_2 from the module.
Signed-off-by: Kui-Feng Lee <thinker.li@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240119225005.668602-15-thinker.li@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
It is possible for bpf_kfunc_call_test_release() to be called from
bpf_map_free_deferred() when bpf_testmod is already unloaded and
perf_test_stuct.cnt which it tries to decrease is no longer in memory.
This patch tries to fix the issue by waiting for all references to be
dropped in bpf_testmod_exit().
The issue can be triggered by running 'test_progs -t map_kptr' in 6.5,
but is obscured in 6.6 by d119357d07435 ("rcu-tasks: Treat only
synchronous grace periods urgently").
Fixes: 65eb006d85a2 ("bpf: Move kernel test kfuncs to bpf_testmod")
Signed-off-by: Artem Savkov <asavkov@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/82f55c0e-0ec8-4fe1-8d8c-b1de07558ad9@linux.dev
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240110085737.8895-1-asavkov@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Not all uses of __diag_ignore_all(...) in BPF-related code in order to
suppress warnings are wrapping kfunc definitions. Some "hook point"
definitions - small functions meant to be used as attach points for
fentry and similar BPF progs - need to suppress -Wmissing-declarations.
We could use __bpf_kfunc_{start,end}_defs added in the previous patch in
such cases, but this might be confusing to someone unfamiliar with BPF
internals. Instead, this patch adds __bpf_hook_{start,end} macros,
currently having the same effect as __bpf_kfunc_{start,end}_defs, then
uses them to suppress warnings for two hook points in the kernel itself
and some bpf_testmod hook points as well.
Signed-off-by: Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com>
Cc: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231031215625.2343848-2-davemarchevsky@fb.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Adding test that puts kprobe on bpf_fentry_test1 that calls
bpf_kfunc_common_test kfunc, which has also kprobe on.
The latter won't get triggered due to kprobe recursion check
and kprobe missed counter is incremented.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230920213145.1941596-8-jolsa@kernel.org
The following ldsx cases are tested:
- signed readonly map value
- read/write map value
- probed memory
- not-narrowed ctx field access
- narrowed ctx field access.
Without previous proper verifier/git handling, the test will fail.
If cpuv4 is not supported either by compiler or by jit,
the test will be skipped.
# ./test_progs -t ldsx_insn
#113/1 ldsx_insn/map_val and probed_memory:SKIP
#113/2 ldsx_insn/ctx_member_sign_ext:SKIP
#113/3 ldsx_insn/ctx_member_narrow_sign_ext:SKIP
#113 ldsx_insn:SKIP
Summary: 1/0 PASSED, 3 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230728011336.3723434-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Add fentry_many_args.c and fexit_many_args.c to test the fentry/fexit
with 7/11 arguments. As this feature is not supported by arm64 yet, we
disable these testcases for arm64 in DENYLIST.aarch64. We can combine
them with fentry_test.c/fexit_test.c when arm64 is supported too.
Correspondingly, add bpf_testmod_fentry_test7() and
bpf_testmod_fentry_test11() to bpf_testmod.c
Meanwhile, add bpf_modify_return_test2() to test_run.c to test the
MODIFY_RETURN with 7 arguments.
Add bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_7/bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_7 in
bpf_testmod.c to test the struct in the arguments.
And the testcases passed on x86_64:
./test_progs -t fexit
Summary: 5/14 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
./test_progs -t fentry
Summary: 3/2 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
./test_progs -t modify_return
Summary: 1/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
./test_progs -t tracing_struct
Summary: 1/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong <imagedong@tencent.com>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230713040738.1789742-4-imagedong@tencent.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Adding missing prototypes for several kfuncs that are used by
test_verifier tests. We don't really need kfunc prototypes for
these tests, but adding them to silence 'make W=1' build and
to have all test kfuncs declarations in bpf_testmod_kfunc.h.
Also moving __diag_pop for -Wmissing-prototypes to cover also
bpf_testmod_test_write and bpf_testmod_test_read and adding
bpf_fentry_shadow_test in there as well. All of them need to
be exported, but there's no need for declarations.
Fixes: 65eb006d85a2 ("bpf: Move kernel test kfuncs to bpf_testmod")
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202306051319.EihCQZPs-lkp@intel.com
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230607224046.236510-1-jolsa@kernel.org
Moving kernel test kfuncs into bpf_testmod kernel module, and adding
necessary init calls and BTF IDs records.
We need to keep following structs in kernel:
struct prog_test_ref_kfunc
struct prog_test_member (embedded in prog_test_ref_kfunc)
The reason is because they need to be marked as rcu safe (check test
prog mark_ref_as_untrusted_or_null) and such objects are being required
to be defined only in kernel at the moment (see rcu_safe_kptr check
in kernel).
We need to keep also dtor functions for both objects in kernel:
bpf_kfunc_call_test_release
bpf_kfunc_call_memb_release
We also keep the copy of these struct in bpf_testmod_kfunc.h, because
other test functions use them. This is unfortunate, but this is just
temporary solution until we are able to these structs them to bpf_testmod
completely.
As suggested by David adding bpf_testmod.ko make dependency for
bpf programs, so they are rebuilt if we change the bpf_testmod.ko
module.
Also adding missing __bpf_kfunc to bpf_kfunc_call_test4 functions.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Acked-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230515133756.1658301-11-jolsa@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Add prog test for accessing integer type of variable array in tracing
program.
In addition, hook load_balance function to access sd->span[0], only
to confirm whether the load is successful. Because there is no direct
way to trigger load_balance call.
Co-developed-by: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com>
Signed-off-by: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com>
Signed-off-by: Feng Zhou <zhoufeng.zf@bytedance.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230420032735.27760-3-zhoufeng.zf@bytedance.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Adds a new test that tries to attach a program to fentry of two
functions of the same name, one located in vmlinux and the other in
bpf_testmod.
To avoid conflicts with existing tests, a new function
"bpf_fentry_shadow_test" was created both in vmlinux and in bpf_testmod.
The previous commit fixed a bug which caused this test to fail. The
verifier would always use the vmlinux function's address as the target
trampoline address, hence trying to create two trampolines for a single
address, which is forbidden.
The test (similarly to other fentry/fexit tests) is not working on arm64
at the moment.
Signed-off-by: Viktor Malik <vmalik@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/5fe2f364190b6f79b085066ed7c5989c5bc475fa.1678432753.git.vmalik@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Implement a trivial iterator returning same specified integer value
N times as part of bpf_testmod kernel module. Add selftests to validate
everything works end to end.
We also reuse these tests as "verification-only" tests to validate that
kernel prints the state of custom kernel module-defined iterator correctly:
fp-16=iter_testmod_seq(ref_id=1,state=drained,depth=0)
"testmod_seq" part is an iterator type, and is coming from module's BTF
data dynamically at runtime.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230308184121.1165081-9-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Now that we have the __bpf_kfunc tag, we should use add it to all
existing kfuncs to ensure that they'll never be elided in LTO builds.
Signed-off-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230201173016.342758-4-void@manifault.com
Adding 3 bpf_testmod_fentry_* functions to have a way to test
kprobe multi link on kernel module. They follow bpf_fentry_test*
functions prototypes/code.
Adding equivalent functions to all bpf_fentry_test* does not
seems necessary at the moment, could be added later.
Acked-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221025134148.3300700-7-jolsa@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Add various struct argument tests with fentry/fexit programs.
Also add one test with a kernel func which does not have any
argument to test BPF_PROG2 macro in such situation.
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220831152713.2080039-1-yhs@fb.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Instead of populating multiple sets to indicate some attribute and then
researching the same BTF ID in them, prepare a single unified BTF set
which indicates whether a kfunc is allowed to be called, and also its
attributes if any at the same time. Now, only one call is needed to
perform the lookup for both kfunc availability and its attributes.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220721134245.2450-4-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Add test for percpu btf_type_tag. Similar to the "user" tag, we test
the following cases:
1. __percpu struct field.
2. __percpu as function parameter.
3. per_cpu_ptr() accepts dynamically allocated __percpu memory.
Because the test for "user" and the test for "percpu" are very similar,
a little bit of refactoring has been done in btf_tag.c. Basically, both
tests share the same function for loading vmlinux and module btf.
Example output from log:
> ./test_progs -v -t btf_tag
libbpf: prog 'test_percpu1': BPF program load failed: Permission denied
libbpf: prog 'test_percpu1': -- BEGIN PROG LOAD LOG --
...
; g = arg->a;
1: (61) r1 = *(u32 *)(r1 +0)
R1 is ptr_bpf_testmod_btf_type_tag_1 access percpu memory: off=0
...
test_btf_type_tag_mod_percpu:PASS:btf_type_tag_percpu 0 nsec
#26/6 btf_tag/btf_type_tag_percpu_mod1:OK
libbpf: prog 'test_percpu2': BPF program load failed: Permission denied
libbpf: prog 'test_percpu2': -- BEGIN PROG LOAD LOG --
...
; g = arg->p->a;
2: (61) r1 = *(u32 *)(r1 +0)
R1 is ptr_bpf_testmod_btf_type_tag_1 access percpu memory: off=0
...
test_btf_type_tag_mod_percpu:PASS:btf_type_tag_percpu 0 nsec
#26/7 btf_tag/btf_type_tag_percpu_mod2:OK
libbpf: prog 'test_percpu_load': BPF program load failed: Permission denied
libbpf: prog 'test_percpu_load': -- BEGIN PROG LOAD LOG --
...
; g = (__u64)cgrp->rstat_cpu->updated_children;
2: (79) r1 = *(u64 *)(r1 +48)
R1 is ptr_cgroup_rstat_cpu access percpu memory: off=48
...
test_btf_type_tag_vmlinux_percpu:PASS:btf_type_tag_percpu_load 0 nsec
#26/8 btf_tag/btf_type_tag_percpu_vmlinux_load:OK
load_btfs:PASS:could not load vmlinux BTF 0 nsec
test_btf_type_tag_vmlinux_percpu:PASS:btf_type_tag_percpu 0 nsec
test_btf_type_tag_vmlinux_percpu:PASS:btf_type_tag_percpu_helper 0 nsec
#26/9 btf_tag/btf_type_tag_percpu_vmlinux_helper:OK
Signed-off-by: Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220304191657.981240-5-haoluo@google.com
Add several tests to check bpf_core_types_are_compat() functionality:
- candidate type name exists and types match
- candidate type name exists but types don't match
- nested func protos at kernel recursion limit
- nested func protos above kernel recursion limit. Such bpf prog
is rejected during the load.
Signed-off-by: Matteo Croce <mcroce@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220204005519.60361-3-mcroce@linux.microsoft.com
Completely remove the old code for check_kfunc_call to help it work
with modules, and also the callback itself.
The previous commit adds infrastructure to register all sets and put
them in vmlinux or module BTF, and concatenates all related sets
organized by the hook and the type. Once populated, these sets remain
immutable for the lifetime of the struct btf.
Also, since we don't need the 'owner' module anywhere when doing
check_kfunc_call, drop the 'btf_modp' module parameter from
find_kfunc_desc_btf.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220114163953.1455836-4-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Add a function to bpf_testmod that returns invalid kernel and user addresses.
Then attach an fexit program to that function that tries to read
memory through these addresses.
This logic checks that bpf_probe_read_kernel and BPF_PROBE_MEM logic is sane.
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Add a writable bare tracepoint in bpf_testmod module, and
trigger its calling when reading /sys/kernel/bpf_testmod
with a specific buffer length. The reading will return
the value in writable context if the early return flag
is enabled in writable context.
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211004094857.30868-4-hotforest@gmail.com
This adds selftests that tests the success and failure path for modules
kfuncs (in presence of invalid kfunc calls) for both libbpf and
gen_loader. It also adds a prog_test kfunc_btf_id_list so that we can
add module BTF ID set from bpf_testmod.
This also introduces a couple of test cases to verifier selftests for
validating whether we get an error or not depending on if invalid kfunc
call remains after elimination of unreachable instructions.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211002011757.311265-10-memxor@gmail.com
This test uses bpf_get_branch_snapshot from a fexit program. The test uses
a target function (bpf_testmod_loop_test) and compares the record against
kallsyms. If there isn't enough record matching kallsyms, the test fails.
Signed-off-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210910183352.3151445-4-songliubraving@fb.com
Reuse module_attach infrastructure to add a new bare tracepoint to check
we can attach to it as a raw tracepoint.
Signed-off-by: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210119122237.2426878-3-qais.yousef@arm.com
Add per-CPU variable to bpf_testmod.ko and use those from new selftest to
validate it works end-to-end.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Acked-by: Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210112075520.4103414-8-andrii@kernel.org
Add bpf_testmod module, which is conceptually out-of-tree module and provides
ways for selftests/bpf to test various kernel module-related functionality:
raw tracepoint, fentry/fexit/fmod_ret, etc. This module will be auto-loaded by
test_progs test runner and expected by some of selftests to be present and
loaded.
Pahole currently isn't able to generate BTF for static functions in kernel
modules, so make sure traced function is global.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20201203204634.1325171-7-andrii@kernel.org
