IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
EOVERFLOW will be used in the coming time64 syscalls support.
Signed-off-by: Zhangjin Wu <falcon@tinylab.org>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net>
Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Keep backwards compatibility through unions.
The compatibility macros like
#define st_atime st_atim.tv_sec
as documented in stat(3type) don't work for nolibc because it would
break with other stat-like structures that contain the field st_atime.
The stx_atime, stx_mtime, stx_ctime are in type of 'struct
statx_timestamp', which is incompatible with 'struct timespec', should
be converted explicitly.
/* include/uapi/linux/stat.h */
struct statx_timestamp {
__s64 tv_sec;
__u32 tv_nsec;
__s32 __reserved;
};
/* include/uapi/linux/time.h */
struct timespec {
__kernel_old_time_t tv_sec; /* seconds */
long tv_nsec; /* nanoseconds */
};
Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/3a3edd48-1ace-4c89-89e8-9c594dd1b3c9@t-8ch.de/
Co-authored-by: Zhangjin Wu <falcon@tinylab.org>
Signed-off-by: Zhangjin Wu <falcon@tinylab.org>
[wt: squashed Zhangjin & Thomas' patches into one to preserve "bisectability"]
Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
The child process forked during stackprotector tests intentionally gets
killed with SIGABRT. By default this will trigger writing a coredump.
The writing of the coredump can spam the systems coredump machinery and
take some time.
Timings for the full run of nolibc-test:
Before: 200ms
After: 20ms
This is on a desktop x86 system with systemd-coredumpd enabled.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net>
Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
It will be used to disable core dumps from the child spawned to validate
the stack protector functionality.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net>
Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Now that nolibc enable stackprotector support automatically when the
compiler enables it we only have to get the -fstack-protector flags
correct.
The cc-options are structured so that -fstack-protector-all is only
enabled if -mstack-protector=guard works, as that is the only mode
supported by nolibc.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net>
Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
The stackprotector support in nolibc should be enabled iff it is also
enabled in the compiler.
Use the preprocessor defines added by gcc and clang if stackprotector
support is enable to automatically do so in nolibc.
This completely removes the need for any user-visible API.
To avoid inlining the lengthy preprocessor check into every user
introduce a new header compiler.h that abstracts the logic away.
As the define NOLIBC_STACKPROTECTOR is now not user-relevant anymore
prefix it with an underscore.
Suggested-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230520133237.GA27501@1wt.eu/
Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net>
Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Previously each space character used for alignment during test execution
was written in a single write() call.
This would make the output from strace fairly unreadable.
Coalesce all spaces into a single call to write().
Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net>
Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Compiling nolibc-test.c for rv32 got such error:
tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c:599:57: error: ‘__NR_fstat’ undeclared (first use in this function)
599 | CASE_TEST(syscall_args); EXPECT_SYSER(1, syscall(__NR_fstat, 0, NULL), -1, EFAULT); break;
The generic include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h used by rv32 doesn't
support __NR_fstat, use the more generic __NR_statx instead:
Running test 'syscall'
69 syscall_noargs = 1 [OK]
70 syscall_args = -1 EFAULT [OK]
__NR_statx has been added from v4.10:
commit a528d35e8bfc ("statx: Add a system call to make enhanced file info available")
It has been supported by all of the platforms since at least from v4.20.
Suggested-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/ee8b1f02-ded1-488b-a3a5-68774f0349b5@app.fastmail.com/
Signed-off-by: Zhangjin Wu <falcon@tinylab.org>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net>
Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
syscall() is used by "normal" libcs to allow users to directly call
syscalls.
By having the same syntax inside nolibc users can more easily write code
that works with different libcs.
The macro logic is adapted from systemtaps STAP_PROBEV() macro that is
released in the public domain / CC0.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net>
Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
On s390 the arguments to clone() which is used by fork() are different
than other archs.
Make sure everything works correctly.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net>
Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
To make sure no non-compatible changes are introduced accidentally
validate the language standard when building the tests.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net>
Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Most of nolibc is already using C89 comments.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net>
Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Most of the code was migrated to C99-conformant __asm__ statements
before. It seems string.h was missed.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net>
Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
vfprintf() is complex and so far did not have proper tests.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net>
Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
This can be used to easily compare the behavior of nolibc to the system
libc.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net>
Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Some extra tests for various integer types and limits were added by
commit d1209597ff00 ("tools/nolibc: add tests for the integer limits
in stdint.h"), but we forgot to retest with glibc. Stddef and stdint
are now needed for the program to build there.
Cc: Vincent Dagonneau <v@vda.io>
Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Commit 9735716830f2 ("tools/nolibc: tests: add test for -fstack-protector")
brought a declaration inside the initialization statement of a for loop,
which breaks the build on compilers that do not default to c99
compatibility, making it more difficult to validate that the lib still
builds on such compilers. The fix is trivial, so let's move the
declaration to the variables block of the function instead. No backport
is needed.
Cc: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net>
Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Use a volatile pointer to write outside the buffer so the compiler can't
optimize it away.
Reported-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/c0584807-511c-4496-b062-1263ea38f349@p183/
Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net>
Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Enable the new stackprotector support for x86_64.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net>
Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Enable the new stackprotector support for i386.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net>
Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Test the previously introduce stack protector functionality in nolibc.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net>
Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
For the cflags to enable stack protectors to work properly they need to
be specified after -fno-stack-protector.
To do this fold all cflags into a single variable and move
-fno-stack-protector before the arch-specific cflags and another
one specific to stack protectors since we don't want to enable them
on all archs.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net>
Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Nothing ever modifies this structure.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net>
Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
These two tests always fail when the program is started natively as an
unprivileged user, and require the user to carefully check the output
of "make run-user" and ignore them.
Let's add an euid check and condition these two tests to euid==0. Now
the test case stops needlessly reporting failures. E.g.:
$ make -C tools/testing/selftests/nolibc run-user
...
CC nolibc-test
123 test(s) passed.
Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
This commit adds tests for the limits added in a previous commit. The
limits are defined in decimal in stdint.h and as hexadecimal in the
tests (e.g. 0x7f = 127 or 0x80 = -128). Hopefully it catches some of the
most egregious mistakes.
As we rely on the compiler to provide __SIZEOF_LONG__, we also test
whether it is defined.
Signed-off-by: Vincent Dagonneau <v@vda.io>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net>
Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
This commit enlarges the column width from 40 to 64 characters to make
room for longer tests
Signed-off-by: Vincent Dagonneau <v@vda.io>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net>
Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Stack protectors need support from libc.
This support is not provided by nolibc which leads to compiler errors
when stack protectors are enabled by default in a compiler:
CC nolibc-test
/usr/bin/ld: /tmp/ccqbHEPk.o: in function `stat':
nolibc-test.c:(.text+0x1d1): undefined reference to `__stack_chk_fail'
/usr/bin/ld: /tmp/ccqbHEPk.o: in function `poll.constprop.0':
nolibc-test.c:(.text+0x37b): undefined reference to `__stack_chk_fail'
/usr/bin/ld: /tmp/ccqbHEPk.o: in function `vfprintf.constprop.0':
nolibc-test.c:(.text+0x712): undefined reference to `__stack_chk_fail'
/usr/bin/ld: /tmp/ccqbHEPk.o: in function `pad_spc.constprop.0':
nolibc-test.c:(.text+0x80d): undefined reference to `__stack_chk_fail'
/usr/bin/ld: /tmp/ccqbHEPk.o: in function `printf':
nolibc-test.c:(.text+0x8c4): undefined reference to `__stack_chk_fail'
/usr/bin/ld: /tmp/ccqbHEPk.o:nolibc-test.c:(.text+0x12d4): more undefined references to `__stack_chk_fail' follow
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net>
Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
When developing tests, it is much faster to use the QEMU Linux
emulator instead of the system emulator, which among other things avoids
kernel-build latencies. Although use of the QEMU Linux emulator does have
its limitations (please see below), it is sufficient to test startup code,
stdlib code, and syscall calling conventions.
However, the current mainline Linux-kernel nolibc setup does not
support this. Therefore, add a "run-user" target that immediately
executes the prebuilt executable.
Again, this approach does have its limitations. For example, the
executable runs with the user's privilege level, which can cause some
false-positive failures due to insufficient permissions. In addition,
if the underlying kernel is old enough to lack some features that
nolibc relies on, the result will be false-positive failures in the
corresponding tests. However, for nolibc changes not affected by these
limittions, the result is a much faster code-compile-test-debug cycle.
With this patch, running a userland test is as simple as issuing:
make ARCH=xxx CROSS_COMPILE=xxx run-user
Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Tested-by: Ammar Faizi <ammarfaizi2@gnuweeb.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Building the kernel with ARCH=x86_64 works fine, but nolibc-test
only supports "x86", which causes errors when reusing existing build
environment. Let's permit this environment to be used as well by making
nolibc also accept ARCH=x86_64.
Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Tested-by: Ammar Faizi <ammarfaizi2@gnuweeb.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Test the getpagesize() function. Make sure it returns the correct
value.
Signed-off-by: Ammar Faizi <ammarfaizi2@gnuweeb.org>
Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Paul and I got trapped a few times by not seeing the effects of applying
a patch to the nolibc source code until a "make clean" was issued in
the nolibc directory. It's particularly annoying when trying to confirm
that a proposed patch really solves a problem (or that reverting it
reintroduces the problem).
The reason for the sysroot not being rebuilt was that it can be quite
slow. But in fact it's only slow after a "make clean" issued at the
kernel's topdir, because it's the main "make headers" that can take a
tens of seconds; as long as "usr/include" still contains headers, the
"headers_install" phase is only a quick "rsync", and rebuilding the
whole nolibc sysroot takes a bit less than one second, which is perfectly
acceptable for a test, even more once the time lost caused by misleading
results is factored in.
This patch marks the sysroot target as phony and starts by clearing
the previous sysroot for the current architecture before reinstalling
it. Thanks to this, applying a patch to nolibc makes the effect
immediately visible to "make nolibc-test":
$ time make -j -C tools/testing/selftests/nolibc nolibc-test
make: Entering directory '/k/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc'
MKDIR sysroot/x86/include
make[1]: Entering directory '/k/tools/include/nolibc'
make[2]: Entering directory '/k'
make[2]: Leaving directory '/k'
make[2]: Entering directory '/k'
INSTALL /k/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/sysroot/sysroot/include
make[2]: Leaving directory '/k'
make[1]: Leaving directory '/k/tools/include/nolibc'
CC nolibc-test
make: Leaving directory '/k/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc'
real 0m0.869s
user 0m0.716s
sys 0m0.149s
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221021155645.GK5600@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1/
Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
This adds 7 combinations of input values for memcmp() using signed and
unsigned bytes, which will trigger on the original code before Rasmus'
fix. This is mostly aimed at helping backporters verify their work, and
showing how tests for corner cases can be added to the selftests suite.
Before the fix it reports:
12 memcmp_20_20 = 0 [OK]
13 memcmp_20_60 = -64 [OK]
14 memcmp_60_20 = 64 [OK]
15 memcmp_20_e0 = 64 [FAIL]
16 memcmp_e0_20 = -64 [FAIL]
17 memcmp_80_e0 = -96 [OK]
18 memcmp_e0_80 = 96 [OK]
And after:
12 memcmp_20_20 = 0 [OK]
13 memcmp_20_60 = -64 [OK]
14 memcmp_60_20 = 64 [OK]
15 memcmp_20_e0 = -192 [OK]
16 memcmp_e0_20 = 192 [OK]
17 memcmp_80_e0 = -96 [OK]
18 memcmp_e0_80 = 96 [OK]
Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
After running the nolibc tests, the "git status" is not clean because
the generated files are not ignored. Create a `.gitignore` inside the
selftests/nolibc directory to ignore them.
Cc: Ammar Faizi <ammarfaizi2@gnuweeb.org>
Cc: Fernanda Ma'rouf <fernandafmr2@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Fernanda Ma'rouf <fernandafmr12@gnuweeb.org>
Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
It presents the supported targets, and becomes the default target to
save the user from having to read the makefile. The "all" target was
placed after it and now points to "run" to do everything since it's
no longer the default one.
Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
It's not convenient to rely on a sysroot built in another directory,
especially when running cross-compilation tests, where one has to
switch back and forth between directories.
Let's make it possible to install the sysroot directly in the test
directory. It's not big and even benefits from being copied by arch
so that it's easier to switch between archs if needed. The new
"sysroot" target does this, it just calls "headers_standalone" from
nolibc to install the sysroot right here.
Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
The "run" target will build the kernel and start it in QEMU. The
"rerun" target will not have the kernel dependency and will just try
to start QEMU. The QEMU architecture used to start the kernel is
derived from the configured ARCH. This might need to be improved
for archs which include different variants under the same name
(mips vs mipsel, +/-64, riscv32 vs riscv64). This could be tested
for i386, x86, arm, arm64, mips and riscv (the later two reporting
issues on some tests).
It is possible to pass a test specification for nolibc-test in the TEST
variable, which will be passed as-is as NOLIBC_TEST.
On success, the number of successful tests is printed. On failure, failed
lines are individually printed.
Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
While most archs will work fine with "make defconfig", not all will
do, and it's not always easy to remember the most suitable choice to
use for a specific architecture.
This adds a "defconfig" target to the Makefile so that one may easily
run "make -C ... defconfig" and make sure to clean and rebuild a fresh
config. This is *not* used by default because we want to preserve the
user's config by default.
Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
The "kernel" target rebuilds the kernel with the current config for the
selected arch, with an initramfs containing the nolibc-test utility.
Since image names depend on the architecture, the currently supported
ones are referenced and resolved based on the architecture.
Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Adding support for glibc can be useful to distinguish between bugs in
nolibc and bugs in the kernel when a syscall reports an unusual value.
It's not that much work and should not affect the long term
maintainability of the tests. The necessary changes can essentially be
summed up like this:
- set _GNU_SOURCE a the top to access some definitions
- many includes added when we know we don't come from nolibc (missing
the stdio include guard)
- disable gettid() which is not exposed by glibc
- disable gettimeofday's support of bad pointers since these crash
in glibc
- add a simple itoa() for errorname(); strerror() is too verbose (no
way to get short messages). strerrorname_np() was added in modern
glibc (2.32) to do exactly this but that 's too recent to be usable
as the default fallback.
- use the standard ioperm() definition. May be we need to implement
ioperm() in nolibc if that's useful.
Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
If /proc is not available (program run inside a chroot or without
sufficient permissions), it's better to disable the associated tests.
Some will be preserved like the ones which check for a failure to
create some entries there since they're still supposed to fail.
Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Most of the time the program will be run alone in an initramfs. There
is no value in requiring the user to populate /dev and /proc for such
tests, we can do it ourselves, and it participates to the tests at the
same time.
What's done here is that when called as init (getpid()==1) we check
if /dev exists or create it, if /dev/console and /dev/null exists,
otherwise we try to mount a devtmpfs there, and if it fails we fall
back to mknod. The console is reopened if stdout was closed. Finally
/proc is created and mounted if /proc/self cannot be found. This is
sufficient for most tests.
Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
