IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
These arguments are not used in functions, remove them for cleanup
and make kernel stack happy.
Signed-off-by: Zhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
objectid's init-value is not used in any case, remove it.
Signed-off-by: Zhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
We need error checking code for get_ref_objectid_v0() in
relocate_block_group(), to avoid unpredictable result, especially
for accessing uninitialized value(when function failed) after
this line.
Signed-off-by: Zhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
More than one code call set_block_group_ro() and restore rw in fail.
Old code use bool bit to save blockgroup's ro state, it can not
support parallel case(it is confirmd exist in my debug log).
This patch use ref count to store ro state, and rename
set_block_group_ro/set_block_group_rw
to
inc_block_group_ro/dec_block_group_ro.
Signed-off-by: Zhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
btrfs_force_chunk_alloc() return 1 for allocation chunk successfully.
This problem exists since commit c87f08ca4.
With this patch, we might fix some enospc problems for balances.
Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangshilong1991@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Tested-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
The return value of read_tree_block() can confuse callers as it always
returns NULL for either -ENOMEM or -EIO, so it's likely that callers
parse it to a wrong error, for instance, in btrfs_read_tree_root().
This fixes the above issue.
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
There are two problems in qgroup:
a). The PAGE_CACHE is 4K, even when we are writing a data of 1K,
qgroup will reserve a 4K size. It will cause the last 3K in a qgroup
is not available to user.
b). When user is writing a inline data, qgroup will not reserve it,
it means this is a window we can exceed the limit of a qgroup.
The main idea of this patch is reserving the data size of write_bytes
rather than the reserve_bytes. It means qgroup will not care about
the data size btrfs will reserve for user, but only care about the
data size user is going to write. Then reserve it when user want to
write and release it in transaction committed.
In this way, qgroup can be released from the complex procedure in
btrfs and only do the reserve when user want to write and account
when the data is written in commit_transaction().
Signed-off-by: Dongsheng Yang <yangds.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
We loop through all of the dirty block groups during commit and write
the free space cache. In order to make sure the cache is currect, we do
this while no other writers are allowed in the commit.
If a large number of block groups are dirty, this can introduce long
stalls during the final stages of the commit, which can block new procs
trying to change the filesystem.
This commit changes the block group cache writeout to take appropriate
locks and allow it to run earlier in the commit. We'll still have to
redo some of the block groups, but it means we can get most of the work
out of the way without blocking the entire FS.
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Marc Merlin sent me a broken fs image months ago where it would blow up in the
upper->checked BUG_ON() in build_backref_tree. This is because we had a
scenario like this
block a -- level 4 (not shared)
|
block b -- level 3 (reloc block, shared)
|
block c -- level 2 (not shared)
|
block d -- level 1 (shared)
|
block e -- level 0 (shared)
We go to build a backref tree for block e, we notice block d is shared and add
it to the list of blocks to lookup it's backrefs for. Now when we loop around
we will check edges for the block, so we will see we looked up block c last
time. So we lookup block d and then see that the block that points to it is
block c and we can just skip that edge since we've already been up this path.
The problem is because we clear need_check when we see block d (as it is shared)
we never add block b as needing to be checked. And because block c is in our
path already we bail out before we walk up to block b and add it to the backref
check list.
To fix this we need to reset need_check if we trip over a block that doesn't
need to be checked. This will make sure that any subsequent blocks in the path
as we're walking up afterwards are added to the list to be processed. With this
patch I can now mount Marc's fs image and it'll complete the balance without
panicing. Thanks,
Reported-by: Marc MERLIN <marc@merlins.org>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
When balance panics it tends to panic in the
BUG_ON(!upper->checked);
test, because it means it couldn't build the backref tree properly. This is
annoying to users and frankly a recoverable error, nothing in this function is
actually fatal since it is just an in-memory building of the backrefs for a
given bytenr. So go through and change all the BUG_ON()'s to ASSERT()'s, and
fix the BUG_ON(!upper->checked) thing to just return an error.
This patch also fixes the error handling so it tears down the work we've done
properly. This code was horribly broken since we always just panic'ed instead
of actually erroring out, so it needed to be completely re-worked. With this
patch my broken image no longer panics when I mount it. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
The parent_transid parameter has been unused since its introduction in
ca7a79ad8d ("Pass down the expected generation number when reading
tree blocks"). In reada_tree_block, it was even wrongly set to leafsize.
Transid check is done in the proper read and readahead ignores errors.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
The nodesize and leafsize were never of different values. Unify the
usage and make nodesize the one. Cleanup the redundant checks and
helpers.
Shaves a few bytes from .text:
text data bss dec hex filename
852418 24560 23112 900090 dbbfa btrfs.ko.before
851074 24584 23112 898770 db6d2 btrfs.ko.after
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
I've noticed an extra line after "use no compression", but search
revealed much more in messages of more critical levels and rare errors.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
This was done to allow NO_COW to continue to be NO_COW after relocation but it
is not right. When relocating we will convert blocks to FULL_BACKREF that we
relocate. We can leave some of these full backref blocks behind if they are not
cow'ed out during the relocation, like if we fail the relocation with ENOSPC and
then just drop the reloc tree. Then when we go to cow the block again we won't
lookup the extent flags because we won't think there has been a snapshot
recently which means we will do our normal ref drop thing instead of adding back
a tree ref and dropping the shared ref. This will cause btrfs_free_extent to
blow up because it can't find the ref we are trying to free. This was found
with my ref verifying tool. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
We needn't flush all delalloc inodes when we doesn't get s_umount lock,
or we would make the tasks wait for a long time.
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
During balance test, we hit an oops:
[ 2013.841551] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1174!
The problem is that if we fail to relocate tree blocks, we should
update backref cache, otherwise, some pending nodes are not updated
while snapshot check @cache->last_trans is within one transaction
and won't update it and then oops happen.
Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Previously, we will free reloc root memory and then force filesystem
to be readonly. The problem is that there may be another thread commiting
transaction which will try to access freed reloc root during merging reloc
roots process.
To keep consistency snapshots shared space, we should allow snapshot
finished if possible, so here we don't free reloc root memory.
signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
@nr is no longer used, remove it from select_reloc_root()
Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Convert all applicable cases of printk and pr_* to the btrfs_* macros.
Fix all uses of the BTRFS prefix.
Signed-off-by: Frank Holton <fholton@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
We have commited transaction before, remove redundant filemap writting and
waiting here, it can speed up balance relocation process.
Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
We hit a forever loop when doing balance relocation,the reason
is that we firstly reserve 4M(node size is 16k).and within transaction
we will try to add extra reservation for snapshot roots,this will
return -EAGAIN if there has been a thread flushing space to reserve
space.We will do this again and again with filesystem becoming nearly
full.
If the above '-EAGAIN' case happens, we try to refill reservation more
outsize of transaction, and this will return eariler in enospc case,however,
this dosen't really hurt because it makes no sense doing balance relocation
with the filesystem nearly full.
Miao Xie helped a lot to track this issue, thanks.
Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
I hit an oops when merging reloc roots fails, the reason is that
new reloc roots may be added and we should make sure we cleanup
all reloc roots.
Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Quota tree and UUID Tree is only cowed, they can not be snapshoted.
Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
I hit an oops when inserting reloc root into @reloc_root_tree(it can be
easily triggered when forcing cow for relocation root)
[ 866.494539] [<ffffffffa0499579>] btrfs_init_reloc_root+0x79/0xb0 [btrfs]
[ 866.495321] [<ffffffffa044c240>] record_root_in_trans+0xb0/0x110 [btrfs]
[ 866.496109] [<ffffffffa044d758>] btrfs_record_root_in_trans+0x48/0x80 [btrfs]
[ 866.496908] [<ffffffffa0494da8>] select_reloc_root+0xa8/0x210 [btrfs]
[ 866.497703] [<ffffffffa0495c8a>] do_relocation+0x16a/0x540 [btrfs]
This is because reloc root inserted into @reloc_root_tree is not within one
transaction,reloc root may be cowed and root block bytenr will be reused then
oops happens.We should update reloc root in @reloc_root_tree when cow reloc
root node, fix it.
Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
rename the function -- btrfs_start_all_delalloc_inodes(), and make its
name be compatible to btrfs_wait_ordered_roots(), since they are always
used at the same place.
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
It is very likely that there are lots of ordered extents in the filesytem,
if we wait for the completion of all of them when we want to reclaim some
space for the metadata space reservation, we would be blocked for a long
time. The performance would drop down suddenly for a long time.
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Use WARN_ON()'s return value in place of WARN_ON(1) for cleaner source
code that outputs a more descriptive warnings. Also fix the styling
warning of redundant braces that came up as a result of this fix.
Signed-off-by: Dulshani Gunawardhana <dulshani.gunawardhana89@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Zach Brown <zab@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
We define a 'int' to get extent's generation by mistake,fix it.
Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
I noticed with my horrible snapshot excercisor that we were taking forever to
relocate the larger the file system got. This appeared to be because we were
committing the transaction _constantly_. There were a few places where we do
braindead things with metadata reservation, like start a transaction and then
try to refill the block rsv, which not only keeps us from committing a
transaction during the enospc stuff, but keeps us from doing some of the harder
flushing work which will make us more likely to need to commit the transaction.
We also were checking the block rsv and committing the transaction if the block
rsv was below a certain threshold, but we were doing this in a place where we
don't actually keep anything in the block rsv so this was always ending up false
so we always committed the transaction in this case. I tested this to make sure
it didn't break anything, but it takes about 10 hours to get the box to this
state so I don't know how much of an impact it will really make. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
I noticed that if the free space cache has an error writing out it's data it
won't actually error out, it will just carry on. This is because it doesn't
check the return value of btrfs_wait_ordered_range, which didn't actually return
anything. So fix this in order to keep us from making free space cache look
valid when it really isnt. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
When we did space balance and snapshot creation at the same time, we might
meet the following oops:
kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/inode.c:3038!
[SNIP]
Call Trace:
[<ffffffffa0411ec7>] btrfs_orphan_cleanup+0x293/0x407 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa042dc45>] btrfs_mksubvol.isra.28+0x259/0x373 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa042de85>] btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_transid+0x126/0x156 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa042dff1>] btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_v2+0xd0/0x121 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa0430b2c>] btrfs_ioctl+0x414/0x1854 [btrfs]
[<ffffffff813b60b7>] ? __do_page_fault+0x305/0x379
[<ffffffff811215a9>] vfs_ioctl+0x1d/0x39
[<ffffffff81121d7c>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x32d/0x3e2
[<ffffffff81057fe7>] ? finish_task_switch+0x80/0xb8
[<ffffffff81121e88>] SyS_ioctl+0x57/0x83
[<ffffffff813b39ff>] ? do_device_not_available+0x12/0x14
[<ffffffff813b99c2>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
[SNIP]
RIP [<ffffffffa040da40>] btrfs_orphan_add+0xc3/0x126 [btrfs]
The reason of the problem is that the relocation root creation stole
the reserved space, which was reserved for orphan item deletion.
There are several ways to fix this problem, one is to increasing
the reserved space size of the space balace, and then we can use
that space to create the relocation tree for each fs/file trees.
But it is hard to calculate the suitable size because we doesn't
know how many fs/file trees we need relocate.
We fixed this problem by reserving the space for relocation root creation
actively since the space it need is very small (one tree block, used for
root node copy), then we use that reserved space to create the
relocation tree. If we don't reserve space for relocation tree creation,
we will use the reserved space of the balance.
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
A user reported a problem where they were getting csum errors when running a
balance and running systemd's journal. This is because systemd is awesome and
fallocate()'s its log space and writes into it. Unfortunately we assume that
when we read in all the csums for an extent that they are sequential starting at
the bytenr we care about. This obviously isn't the case for prealloc extents,
where we could have written to the middle of the prealloc extent only, which
means the csum would be for the bytenr in the middle of our range and not the
front of our range. Fix this by offsetting the new bytenr we are logging to
based on the original bytenr the csum was for. With this patch I no longer see
the csum errors I was seeing. Thanks,
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reported-by: Chris Murphy <lists@colorremedies.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Not used for anything, and removing it avoids caller's need to
allocate a path structure.
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
When doing space balance and subvolume destroy at the same time, we met
the following oops:
kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/relocation.c:2247!
RIP: 0010: [<ffffffffa04cec16>] prepare_to_merge+0x154/0x1f0 [btrfs]
Call Trace:
[<ffffffffa04b5ab7>] relocate_block_group+0x466/0x4e6 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa04b5c7a>] btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x143/0x275 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa0495c56>] btrfs_relocate_chunk.isra.27+0x5c/0x5a2 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa0459871>] ? btrfs_item_key_to_cpu+0x15/0x31 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa048b46a>] ? btrfs_get_token_64+0x7e/0xcd [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa04a3467>] ? btrfs_tree_read_unlock_blocking+0xb2/0xb7 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa049907d>] btrfs_balance+0x9c7/0xb6f [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa049ef84>] btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x234/0x2ac [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa04a1e8e>] btrfs_ioctl+0xd87/0x1ef9 [btrfs]
[<ffffffff81122f53>] ? path_openat+0x234/0x4db
[<ffffffff813c3b78>] ? __do_page_fault+0x31d/0x391
[<ffffffff810f8ab6>] ? vma_link+0x74/0x94
[<ffffffff811250f5>] vfs_ioctl+0x1d/0x39
[<ffffffff811258c8>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x32d/0x3e2
[<ffffffff811259d4>] SyS_ioctl+0x57/0x83
[<ffffffff813c3bfa>] ? do_page_fault+0xe/0x10
[<ffffffff813c73c2>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
It is because we returned the error number if the reference of the root was 0
when doing space relocation. It was not right here, because though the root
was dead(refs == 0), but the space it held still need be relocated, or we
could not remove the block group. So in this case, we should return the root
no matter it is dead or not.
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
This is a left over of how we used to wait for ordered extents, which was to
grab the inode and then run filemap flush on it. However if we have an ordered
extent then we already are holding a ref on the inode, and we just use
btrfs_start_ordered_extent anyway, so there is no reason to have an extra ref on
the inode to start work on the ordered extent. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
If we failed to actually allocate the correct size of the extent to relocate we
will end up in an infinite loop because we won't return an error, we'll just
move on to the next extent. So fix this up by returning an error, and then fix
all the callers to return an error up the stack rather than BUG_ON()'ing.
Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
btrfs_read_fs_root_no_name() already checks if btrfs_root_refs()
is zero and returns ENOENT in this case. There is no need to do
it again in three more places.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
u64 is "unsigned long long" on all architectures now, so there's no need to
cast it when formatting it using the "ll" length modifier.
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Previously we only added blocks to the list to have their backrefs checked if
the level of the block is right above the one we are searching for. This is
because we want to make sure we don't add the entire path up to the root to the
lists to make sure we process things one at a time. This assumes that if any
blocks in the path to the root are going to be not checked (shared in other
words) then they will be in the level right above the current block on up. This
isn't quite right though since we can have blocks higher up the list that are
shared because they are attached to a reloc root. But we won't add this block
to be checked and then later on we will BUG_ON(!upper->checked). So instead
keep track of wether or not we've queued a block to be checked in this current
search, and if we haven't go ahead and queue it to be checked. This patch fixed
the panic I was seeing where we BUG_ON(!upper->checked). Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
If our item isn't big enough to have an actual inline item when we have skinny
metadata enabled just return 1 in find_inline_backref so we can move on to the
next item. This probably wasn't causing a problem since we check the values of
ptr and end properly, but just in case this will keep us from doing extra work.
Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
I was hitting the BUG_ON() at the end of merge_reloc_roots() because we were
aborting the transaction at some point previously and then getting an error when
we tried to drop the reloc root. I fixed btrfs_drop_snapshot to re-add us to
the dead roots list if we failed, but this isn't the right thing to do for reloc
roots since it uses root->root_list for it's own stuff in order to know what
needs to be cleaned up. So fix btrfs_drop_snapshot to only do the re-add if we
aren't dropping for reloc, and handle errors from merge_reloc_root() by dropping
the reloc root we are processing since it won't be on the list of roots to
cleanup. With this patch my reproducer no longer panics. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
