IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
In mesh_fast_tx_flush_addr() we already hold the lock, so
don't need additional hashtable RCU protection. Use the
rhashtable_lookup_fast() variant to avoid RCU protection
warnings.
Fixes: d5edb9ae8d ("wifi: mac80211: mesh fast xmit support")
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
There were are a number of cases in mac80211 and iwlwifi (at
least) that used the sband->iftype_data pointer directly,
instead of using the accessors to find the right array entry
to use.
Make sparse warn when such a thing is done.
To not have a lot of casts, add two helper functions/macros
- ieee80211_set_sband_iftype_data()
- for_each_sband_iftype_data()
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
As previously reported by Alexander, whose commit 69403bad97
("wifi: mac80211: sdata can be NULL during AMPDU start") I'm
reverting as part of this commit, there's a race between station
destruction and aggregation setup, where the aggregation setup
can happen while the station is being removed and queue the work
after ieee80211_sta_tear_down_BA_sessions() has already run in
__sta_info_destroy_part1(), and thus the worker will run with a
now freed station. In his case, this manifested in a NULL sdata
pointer, but really there's no guarantee whatsoever.
The real issue seems to be that it's possible at all to have a
situation where this occurs - we want to stop the BA sessions
when doing _part1, but we cannot be sure, and WLAN_STA_BLOCK_BA
isn't necessarily effective since we don't know that the setup
isn't concurrently running and already got past the check.
Simply call ieee80211_sta_tear_down_BA_sessions() again in the
second part of station destruction, since at that point really
nothing else can hold a reference to the station any more.
Also revert the sdata checks since those are just misleading at
this point.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
When compiling with clang 16.0.6 and CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE=y, I've
noticed the following (somewhat confusing due to absence of an actual
source code location):
In file included from drivers/net/wireless/virtual/mac80211_hwsim.c:18:
In file included from ./include/linux/slab.h:16:
In file included from ./include/linux/gfp.h:7:
In file included from ./include/linux/mmzone.h:8:
In file included from ./include/linux/spinlock.h:56:
In file included from ./include/linux/preempt.h:79:
In file included from ./arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h:9:
In file included from ./include/linux/thread_info.h:60:
In file included from ./arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h:53:
In file included from ./arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h:5:
In file included from ./arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h:23:
In file included from ./arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h:11:
In file included from ./arch/x86/include/asm/cpumask.h:5:
In file included from ./include/linux/cpumask.h:12:
In file included from ./include/linux/bitmap.h:11:
In file included from ./include/linux/string.h:254:
./include/linux/fortify-string.h:592:4: warning: call to '__read_overflow2_field'
declared with 'warning' attribute: detected read beyond size of field (2nd
parameter); maybe use struct_group()? [-Wattribute-warning]
__read_overflow2_field(q_size_field, size);
The compiler actually complains on 'mac80211_hwsim_get_et_strings()' where
fortification logic inteprets call to 'memcpy()' as an attempt to copy the
whole 'mac80211_hwsim_gstrings_stats' array from its first member and so
issues an overread warning. This warning may be silenced by passing
an address of the whole array and not the first member to 'memcpy()'.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Antipov <dmantipov@yandex.ru>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230829094140.234636-1-dmantipov@yandex.ru
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
We currently call ieee80211_txq_teardown_flows() as part
of ieee80211_remove_interfaces(), but that's not really
right in case of HW registration failures, specifically
rate control. Call it separately to fix that issue.
Reported-by: Zhengchao Shao <shaozhengchao@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Since we're now protecting everything with the wiphy mutex
(and were really using it for almost everything before),
there's no longer any real reason to have a separate wdev
mutex. It may feel better, but really has no value.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
We now hold the wiphy mutex everywhere that we use or
needed the iflist_mtx, so we don't need this mutex any
more in mac80211. However, drivers may also iterate,
and in some cases (e.g. mt76) do so from high-priority
contexts. Thus, keep the mutex around but remove its
usage in mac80211 apart from those driver-visible parts
that are still needed.
Most of this change was done automatically with spatch,
with the parts that are still needed as described above
reverted manually.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
We now hold the wiphy mutex everywhere that we use or
needed the local->mtx, so we don't need this mutex any
more. Remove it.
Most of this change was done automatically with spatch.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
We now hold the wiphy mutex everywhere that we use or
needed the A-MPDU locking, so we don't need this mutex
any more. Remove it.
Most of this change was done automatically with spatch.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
We now hold the wiphy mutex everywhere that we use or
needed the chanctx_mtx, so we don't need this mutex any
more. Remove it.
Most of this change was done automatically with spatch.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
We now hold the wiphy mutex everywhere that we use or
needed the key_mtx, so we don't need this mutex any
more. Remove it.
Most of this change was done automatically with spatch.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
We now hold the wiphy mutex everywhere that we use or
needed the sta_mtx, so we don't need this mutex any
more. Remove it.
Most of this change was done automatically with spatch.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
We want to ensure everything holds the wiphy lock,
so also extend that to the MAC change callback.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
We want to extend the wiphy locking to the interface list,
so move that into the section locked with the wiphy lock.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
We want to replace the locking in mac80211 by just the wiphy
mutex, so hold the lock here around concurrency checks for
the future where the chanctx_mtx used inside goes away.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
We should hold the wiphy mutex here since we're going
to call the driver and want to remove the sta_mtx.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
This might seem pretty pointless rather than changing the locking
immediately, but it seems safer to run for a while with checks and
the old locking scheme, and then remove the wdev lock later.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
We have the RTNL here for the iteration, but we need to lock
each wiphy separately as well for using its data. Hold the
wiphy lock for all of the ones in the iteration. Note that
this implies we cannot already hold the wiphy mutex for the
wiphy passed by the argument, but that's true now.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Since we will want to remove the wdev lock in the future,
lock the wiphy here to iterate and for checking the status
of the connections.
Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Since we will want to remove the wdev lock in the future,
lock the wiphy here to iterate and check the flags.
Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Check that we hold the wiphy mutex in the ops when
calling the driver, since we're now on our way to
always hold it, and simplify the locking.
Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Again this should be per link and will get cancellation
issues, move it to a wiphy work.
Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
This work should be made per link as well, and then
will have cancellation issues. Moving it to a wiphy
work already fixes those beforehand.
Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
This again is intended for future cleanups that are
possible when mac80211 and drivers can assume the
wiphy is locked.
Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
One more work that will now execute with the wiphy
locked, for future cleanups.
Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
This way we hold the wiphy mutex there, as a step towards
removing some of the additional locks we have.
Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Again, to have the wiphy locked for it.
Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
This also has the wiphy locked here then. We need to use
the _locked version of cfg80211_sched_scan_stopped() now,
which also fixes an old deadlock there.
Fixes: a05829a722 ("cfg80211: avoid holding the RTNL when calling the driver")
Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Along with everything else, move the dynamic PS work
to be a wiphy work, to simplify locking later.
Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Lock the wiphy in the IP address notifier as another
place that should have it locked before calling into
the driver. This needs a bit of attention since the
notifier can be called while the wiphy is already
locked, when we remove an interface. Handle this by
not running the notifier in this case, and instead
calling out to the driver directly.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Again this serves to simplify the locking in mac80211
in the future, since this is a relatively complex work.
Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Move the scan work to wiphy work, which also simplifies
the way we handle the work vs. the scan configuration.
Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Move the radar detect work to wiphy work in order
to lock the wiphy for it without doing it manually.
Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Move the DFS CAC work over to hold the wiphy lock
there without worry about work cancellation.
Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Add more might_sleep() checks and check sdata-in-driver
for one additional place.
type=feature
ticket=jira:WIFI-314309
Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Convert the A-MPDU work to wiphy work so it holds the
wiphy mutex and we can later guarantee that to drivers.
It might seem that we could run these concurrently for
different stations, but they're all on the ordered
mac80211 workqueue, so this shouldn't matter for that.
Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Before converting more works to wiphy work, add
flushing in mac80211 where we also flush the
mac80211 workqueue. Not needed in suspend since
cfg80211 will have taken care of it.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
There may be sometimes reasons to actually run the work
if it's pending, add flush functions for both regular and
delayed wiphy work that will do this.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
It's no longer really needed to ensure that the debugfs
file isn't going away, debugfs handles that. So there's
no point in holding dev_base_lock or RTNL here, but we
should instead hold the wiphy lock since drivers will
be allowed to depend on that. Do that, which requires
splitting the sdata and link macros a bit.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Since we no longer really use the RTNL, there's no point
in locking it here. Most drivers don't really need to
have any locks here anyway, and the rest are probably
completely broken, but it's a debugfs-only callback so
it really doesn't matter much.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
The current SMPS status handling isn't per link, so we only
ever change the deflink, which is obviously wrong, it's not
even used for multi-link connections, but the request API
actually includes the link ID.
Use the new status_data changes to move the handling to the
right link, this also saves parsing the frame again on the
status report, instead we can now check only if it was an
SMPS frame.
Of course, move the worker to be a wiphy work so that we're
able to cancel it safely for the link.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
When the connection is a MLO connection, a SMPS request should be
sent on a specific link, as SMPS is BSS specific, and the DA and BSSID
used for the action frame transmission should be the AP MLD address, as
the underlying driver is expected to perform the address translation
(based on the link ID).
Fix the SMPS request handling to use the AP MLD address and provide the
link ID for the request processing during Tx.
Signed-off-by: Ilan Peer <ilan.peer@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Take one more free bit to indicate it's IDR vs. internal
usage, to be able to carve out some bits here for other
internal usage, other than IDR handling with a full ACK
SKB, that is.
Reviewed-by: Benjamin Berg <benjamin.berg@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ilan Peer <ilan.peer@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
