IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
get_property() was an over complicated beast with BUGs. It used to believe that
cpufreq table is present in ascending or descending order, which might not
always be true.
Previous patch has created another freq table in descending order for us and we
better use it now. With that get_property() simply goes away and another helper
get_level() comes in.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
CPUFreq framework *doesn't* guarantee that frequencies present in cpufreq table
will be in ascending or descending order. But cpu_cooling somehow assumes that.
Probably because most of current users are creating this list from DT, which is
done with the help of OPP layer. And OPP layer creates the list in ascending
order of frequencies.
But cpu_cooling can be used for other platforms too, which don't have
frequencies arranged in any order.
This patch tries to fix this issue by creating another list of valid frequencies
in descending order. Care is also taken to throw warnings for duplicate entries.
Later patches would use it to simplify code.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
We already know the value of 'cpufreq_dev->max_level' and so there is no need
calculating that once again. For this, we need to send 'cpufreq_dev' to
get_property().
Make all necessary changes for this change. Because cpufreq_cooling_get_level()
doesn't have access to 'cpufreq_dev', it is updated to iterate over the list of
cpufreq_cooling_devices to get cooling device for the cpu number passed to it.
This also makes it robust to return levels only for the CPU registered via a
cooling device. We don't have to support anything that isn't registered yet.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
As we already have a list of cpufreq_cooling_devices now, lets use it instead of
a local counter.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
We don't use get_property() to find max levels anymore as it is done at boot
now. So, don't support GET_MAXL in get_property().
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
CPU frequency tables don't update after the driver is registered and so we don't
need to iterate over them to find total number of states every time
cpufreq_get_max_state() is called. Do it once at boot time.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
get_cpu_frequency() isn't doing much by itself, just calling get_property(). And
so this wrapper isn't required at all. Get rid of it.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
cpufreq_apply_cooling() has a single caller, cpufreq_set_cur_state() and
cpufreq_set_cur_state() is an unnecessary wrapper over cpufreq_apply_cooling().
Get rid of it by merging both routines.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
There is no point checking for validity of 'cpufreq_val' from
cpufreq_thermal_notifier() every time the routine is called. Its guaranteed to
be 0 on the first call but will be valid otherwise.
Lets update it once while the device registers.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
This makes life easy and bug free. And is scalable for future resource
allocations.
Acked-by: Javi Merino <javi.merino@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
Because get_cpu_frequency() has returned a valid frequency, it means that the
cpufreq policy is surely valid and so no point checking that again with
is_cpufreq_valid(). Get rid of the routine as well as there are no more users.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
All CPUs present in 'allowed_cpus' share the same 'struct cpufreq_policy'
structure and so calling cpufreq_update_policy() for each of them doesn't make
sense.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
In __cpufreq_cooling_register() we try to match min/max frequencies for all CPUs
passed in 'clip_cpus' mask. This mask is the cpumask of cpus where the frequency
constraints will be applied.
Same frequency constraint can be applied only to the CPUs belonging to the same
cluster (i.e. CPUs sharing clock line). For all such CPUs we have a single
'struct cpufreq_policy' structure managing them and so getting policies for all
CPUs wouldn't make any sense as they will all return the same pointer.
So, remove this useless check of checking min/max for all CPUs. Also update doc
comment to make this more obvious that clip_cpus should be same as
policy->related_cpus.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
We aren't supposed to return our own error type here. Return what we got.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
ret is initialized before it is used, so no need to set it to 0 in its declaration.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
It will be overwritten soon with return value of kzalloc().
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
This wasn't explained well anywhere and should be clearly specified. Lets add a
top level comment for this.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
cooling_cpufreq_lock isn't used to protect this structure and so the comment
over it is outdated. Fix it.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
cpufreq_cooling_register() expects mask of all the CPUs where frequency
constraint is applicable.
This platform has more than one CPU to which these constraints will apply and so
passing mask of only CPU0 wouldn't be sufficient. Also, this platform has a
single cluster of CPUs and the constraint applies to all CPUs.
If CPU0 is hoplugged out then we may face strange BUGs as cpu_cooling framework
isn't aware of any siblings sharing clock line.
Fix it by passing cpu_present_mask to cpufreq_cooling_register().
Cc: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
Cc: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Cc: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@samsung.com>
Cc: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
cpufreq_cooling_register() expects mask of all the CPUs where frequency
constraint is applicable.
This platform has more than one CPU to which these constraints will apply and so
passing mask of only CPU0 wouldn't be sufficient. Also, this platform has a
single cluster of CPUs and the constraint applies to all CPUs.
If CPU0 is hoplugged out then we may face strange BUGs as cpu_cooling framework
isn't aware of any siblings sharing clock line.
Fix it by passing cpu_present_mask to cpufreq_cooling_register().
Cc: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
cpufreq_cooling_register() expects mask of all the CPUs where frequency
constraint is applicable.
This platform has more than one CPU to which these constraints will apply and so
passing mask of only CPU0 wouldn't be sufficient. Also, this platform has a
single cluster of CPUs and the constraint applies to all CPUs.
If CPU0 is hoplugged out then we may face strange BUGs as cpu_cooling framework
isn't aware of any siblings sharing clock line.
Fix it by passing cpu_present_mask to cpufreq_cooling_register().
Cc: Hongbo Zhang <hongbo.zhang@linaro.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
In this patch, the cpu_cooling code checks for the usability of cpufreq
layer before proceeding with the CPU cooling device registration. The
main reason is: CPU cooling device is not usable if cpufreq cannot
switch frequencies.
Similar checks are spread in thermal drivers. Thus, the advantage now
is to have the check in a single place: cpu cooling device registration.
For this reason, this patch also updates the existing drivers that
depend on CPU cooling to simply propagate the error code of the cpu
cooling registration call. Therefore, in case cpufreq is not ready, the
thermal drivers will still return -EPROBE_DEFER, in an attempt to try
again when cpufreq layer gets ready.
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>
Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Naveen Krishna Chatradhi <ch.naveen@samsung.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
thermal_unregister_governors() and class_unregister() were being called in
the wrong order.
Fixes: 80a26a5c22b9 ("Thermal: build thermal governors into thermal_sys module")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Currently, userspace can request a governor change while the governor
itself is running. Grab the thermal zone lock when changing the
governor to prevent this race.
Signed-off-by: Javi Merino <javi.merino@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Ignore invalid trip temperature less or equal to zero. Some
buggy systems have invalid trips, causing system shutdown.
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
The Armada 375 Z1 SoC revision is no longer supported. This commit
removes the quirk needed for the thermal sensor.
Acked-by: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
Thermal is TS-ADC Controller module supports
user-defined mode and automatic mode.
User-defined mode refers,TSADC all the control signals entirely by
software writing to register for direct control.
Automaic mode refers to the module automatically poll TSADC output,
and the results were checked.If you find that the temperature High
in a period of time,an interrupt is generated to the processor
down-measures taken;If the temperature over a period of time High,
the resulting TSHUT gave CRU module,let it reset the entire chip,
or via GPIO give PMIC.
Signed-off-by: zhaoyifeng <zyf@rock-chips.com>
Signed-off-by: Caesar Wang <caesar.wang@rock-chips.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
The functions cpufreq_cooling_unregister() and thermal_zone_device_unregister()
test whether their argument is NULL and then return immediately.
Thus the test around the call is not needed.
This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
Prevents build warning:
st_thermal.c:278:12:
warning: ‘st_thermal_suspend’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
st_thermal.c:286:12:
warning: ‘st_thermal_resume’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
Acked-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@st.com>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
Existing code updates cupfreq policy only while executing
cpufreq_apply_cooling() function (i.e. when notify_device != NOTIFY_INVALID).
It doesn't apply constraints when cpufreq policy update happens from any other
place but it should update the cpufreq policy with thermal constraints every
time when there is a cpufreq policy update, to keep state of
cpufreq_cooling_device and max_feq of cpufreq policy in sync. For instance
while resuming cpufreq updates cpufreq_policy and it restores default
policy->usr_policy values irrespective of cooling device's cpufreq_state since
notification gets missed because (notify_device == NOTIFY_INVALID).
Another problem, is that userspace is able to change max_freq irrespective of
cooling device's state, as notification gets missed.
This patch modifies code to maintain a global cpufreq_dev_list and applies
constraints of all matching cooling devices for policy's cpu when there is any
policy update(ends up applying the lowest max_freq among the matching cpu
cooling devices).
This patch also removes redundant check (max_freq > policy->user_policy.max),
as cpufreq framework takes care of user_policy constraints already where ever
required, otherwise its causing an issue while increasing max_freq in normal
scenerio as it restores max_freq with policy->user_policy.max which is old
(smaller) value.
Signed-off-by: Yadwinder Singh Brar <yadi.brar@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
There is no longer need to share defines between exynos_tmu.c
and exynos_tmu_data.c (as they are now only used by the former
file) so move them accordingly. Then move externs for struct
exynos_tmu_init_data instances to exynos_tmu.h and remove no
longer needed exynos_tmu_data.h include.
There should be no functional changes caused by this patch.
Cc: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@samsung.com>
Cc: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>
Cc: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Tested-by: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
__EXYNOS5420_TMU_DATA macro is now identical to __EXYNOS5260_TMU_DATA
one and can be removed.
There should be no functional changes caused by this patch.
Cc: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@samsung.com>
Cc: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>
Cc: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Tested-by: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
Maximum theoretical size saving (i.e. with only Exynos5410
SoC support enabled in kernel config so all SoC dependend
Exynos thermal driver code was dropped) is 4096 bytes so
there is no much sense in keeping these ifdefs (especially
given that they are useless once the driver gets updated to
use device tree).
While at it remove needless 'void *' casts.
There should be no functional changes caused by this patch.
Cc: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@samsung.com>
Cc: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>
Cc: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Tested-by: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
Replace pdata->test_mux check in get_con_reg() by explicitly
checking for SoC type.
Also since the used pdata->test_mux value is always identical
use it directly and remove pdata->test_mux completely.
There should be no functional changes caused by this patch.
Cc: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@samsung.com>
Cc: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>
Cc: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Tested-by: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
Remove unused TMU_SUPPORT_MULTI_INST flag, no longer
needed TMU_SUPPORTS() macro and features field from
struct exynos_tmu_platform_data.
There should be no functional changes caused by this patch.
Cc: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@samsung.com>
Cc: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>
Cc: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Tested-by: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
Replace TMU_SUPPORT_ADDRESS_MULTIPLE flag check in exynos_map_dt_data()
by an explicit check for a SoC type (only Exynos5420 with TRIMINFO
quirk and Exynos5440 have TMU_SUPPORT_ADDRESS_MULTIPLE flag set in
their struct exynos_tmu_init_data instances).
Please note that this requires moving SoC type assignment and verification
from exynos_tmu_probe() to exynos_map_dt_data() so it happens earlier
(which is a good thing in itself).
There should be no functional changes caused by this patch.
Cc: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@samsung.com>
Cc: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>
Cc: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Tested-by: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
Replace TMU_SUPPORT_EMULATION flag check in exynos_tmu_set_emulation()
by an explicit check for a SoC type (all SoC types except Exynos4210
have TMU_SUPPORT_EMULATION flag set in their struct exynos_tmu_init_data
instances).
There should be no functional changes caused by this patch.
Cc: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@samsung.com>
Cc: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>
Cc: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Tested-by: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
Replace TMU_SUPPORT_EMUL_TIME flag check in get_emul_con_reg()
by an explicit check for a SoC type (all SoC types except
Exynos4210 and Exynos5440 have TMU_SUPPORT_EMUL_TIME flag set
in their struct exynos_tmu_init_data instances).
There should be no functional changes caused by this patch.
Cc: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@samsung.com>
Cc: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>
Cc: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Tested-by: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
Replace TMU_SUPPORT_FALLING_TRIP flag check in
exynos[4210,5440]_tmu_control() by an explicit check
for a SoC type (all SoC types except Exynos4210 have
TMU_SUPPORT_FALLING_TRIP flag set in their struct
exynos_tmu_init_data instances).
There should be no functional changes caused by this patch.
Cc: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@samsung.com>
Cc: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>
Cc: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Tested-by: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
Add ->tmu_clear_irqs method to struct exynos_tmu_data and use
it instead exynos_tmu_clear_irqs(). Then add ->tmu_clear_irqs
implementations for Exynos4210+ and Exynos5440. Finally
remove no longer needed reg->tmu_int[stat,clear] abstractions
and struct exynos_tmu_registers instances.
There should be no functional changes caused by this patch.
Cc: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@samsung.com>
Cc: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>
Cc: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Tested-by: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
Add ->tmu_set_emulation method to struct exynos_tmu_data and
use it in exynos_tmu_set_emulation(). Then add ->tmu_set_emulation
implementations for Exynos4412+ and Exynos5440. Finally remove
no longer needed reg->emul_con abstraction.
There should be no functional changes caused by this patch.
Cc: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@samsung.com>
Cc: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>
Cc: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Tested-by: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
Factor out code for preparing EMUL_CON register value from
exynos_tmu_set_emulation() into get_emul_con_reg().
This is a preparation for introducing per-SoC type
tmu_set_emulation method.
There should be no functional changes caused by this patch.
Cc: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@samsung.com>
Cc: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>
Cc: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Tested-by: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
Add ->tmu_read method to struct exynos_tmu_data and use it
in exynos_tmu_control(). Then add ->tmu_read implementations
for Exynos4210, Exynos4412+ and Exynos5440. Finally remove
no longer needed reg->tmu_cur_temp abstractions.
There should be no functional changes caused by this patch.
Cc: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@samsung.com>
Cc: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>
Cc: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Tested-by: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
Add ->tmu_control method to struct exynos_tmu_data and use it
in exynos_tmu_control(). Then add ->tmu_control implementations
for Exynos4210+ and Exynos5440. Finally remove no longer needed
reg->tmu_[ctrl,inten], reg->inten_rise[0,1,2,3]_shift and
reg->inten_fall0_shift abstractions.
There should be no functional changes caused by this patch.
Cc: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@samsung.com>
Cc: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>
Cc: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Tested-by: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
Factor out code for preparing TMU_CONTROL register value from
exynos_tmu_control() into get_con_reg().
This is a preparation for introducing per-SoC type tmu_control
method.
There should be no functional changes caused by this patch.
Cc: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@samsung.com>
Cc: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>
Cc: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Tested-by: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
Add ->tmu_initialize method to struct exynos_tmu_data and
use it in exynos_tmu_initialize(). Then add ->tmu_initialize
implementations for Exynos4210, Exynos4412+ and Exynos5440.
Finally remove no longer needed reg->threshold_th[0,1],
reg->intclr_[fall,rise]_shift and reg->intclr_[rise,fall]_mask
abstractions.
There are more improvements available in the future on top
of this patch like merging HW_TRIP level setting with setting
of other levels for Exynos4412+ or adding separate method
for clearing IRQs using INTCLEAR register (for Exynos5420,
Exynos5260 and Exynos4412+).
There should be no functional changes caused by this patch.
Cc: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@samsung.com>
Cc: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>
Cc: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Tested-by: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
Factor out code for preparing threshold register value from
exynos_tmu_initialize() into get_th_reg().
This is a preparation for introducing per-SoC type tmu_initialize
method.
There should be no functional changes caused by this patch.
Cc: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@samsung.com>
Cc: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>
Cc: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Tested-by: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
