IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
Writes to CURSURFLIVE in TGL are causing IOMMU errors and visual
glitches that are often reproduced when executing CPU intensive
workloads while a eDP 4K panel is attached.
Manually exiting PSR causes the frontbuffer to be updated without
glitches and the IOMMU errors are also gone but this comes at the cost
of less time with PSR active.
So using this workaround until this issue is root caused and a better
fix is found.
The current code is already ready to enable PSR after this exit if
there is not other frontbuffer modifications.
Adding a new if block in psr_force_hw_tracking_exit() instead of reuse
the else/gen8- block because the plan is to revert this workaround
as soon as a better solution is found.
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Tested-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201002231627.24528-1-jose.souza@intel.com
Another step towards PSR2 selective fetch, here programming plane
selective fetch registers and MAN_TRK_CTL enabling selective fetch but
for now it is fetching the whole area of the planes.
The damaged area calculation will come as next and final step.
v2:
- removed warn on when no plane is visible in state
- removed calculations using plane damaged area in
intel_psr2_program_plane_sel_fetch()
v3:
- do not shift 16 positions the plane dst coordinates, only src is
shifted
v4:
- only setting PLANE_SEL_FETCH_CTL_ENABLE and MCURSOR_MODE in
PLANE_SEL_FETCH_CTL
v5:
- not masking bits for cursor
BSpec: 55229
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201007195238.53955-3-jose.souza@intel.com
Due to the debugfs flag, has_psr2 in CRTC state could have a different
value than psr.psr2_enabled and it was causing PSR2 subfeatures(DC3CO
and selective fetch) to be set to not a expected state.
So here only taking in consideration the parameter and debugfs flag
when computing PSR state, this way the CRTC state will also have
the correct state.
intel_psr_fastset_force() was already broken as
intel_psr_compute_config() was already only enabling PSR when
psr_global_enabled() and all other PSR requirements are met.
So some changes was required in this function, now it iterates over
all connectors, if it is a eDP connector and is active force a modeset
in the CRTC driving this connector, what will cause the new PSR state
to be set based on the debugfs flag.
v2:
- end connector iterator in error cases
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201007195238.53955-2-jose.souza@intel.com
For platforms without selective fetch this register is reserved so
do not write 0 to it.
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201007195238.53955-1-jose.souza@intel.com
TGL made stepping a litte mess, workarounds refer to the stepping of
the IP(GT or Display) not of the GPU stepping so it would already
require the same solution as used in commit 96c5a15f9f39
("drm/i915/kbl: Fix revision ID checks").
But to make things even more messy it have a different IP stepping
mapping between SKUs and the same stepping revision of GT do not match
the same HW between TGL U/Y and regular TGL.
So it was required to have 2 different macros to check GT WAs while
for Display we are able to use just one macro that uses the right
revids table.
All TGL workarounds checked and updated accordingly.
v2:
- removed TODO to check if WA 14010919138 applies to regular TGL.
- fixed display stepping in regular TGL (Anusha)
BSpec: 52890
BSpec: 55378
BSpec: 44455
Reviewed-by: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivtsa@intel.com>
Cc: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>
Cc: Penne Lee <penne.y.lee@intel.com>
Cc: Guangyao Bai <guangyao.bai@intel.com>
Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200827233943.400946-1-jose.souza@intel.com
From the 3 WAs for PSR2 man track/selective fetch this is only one
needed when doing single full frames at every flip.
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200810174144.76761-2-jose.souza@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
All GEN12 platforms supports PSR2 selective fetch but not all GEN12
platforms supports PSR2 hardware tracking(aka RKL).
This feature consists in software programming registers with the
damaged area of each plane this way hardware will only fetch from
memory those areas and sent the PSR2 selective update blocks to panel,
saving even more power.
But as initial step it is only enabling the full frame fetch at
every flip, the actual selective fetch part will come in a future
patch.
Also this is only handling the page flip side, it is still completely
missing frontbuffer modifications, that is why the
enable_psr2_sel_fetch parameter was added.
v3:
- calling intel_psr2_sel_fetch_update() during the atomic check phase
(Ville)
BSpec: 55229
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200810174144.76761-1-jose.souza@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
We have a mix of dport, intel_dport, intel_dig_port and dig_port to
reference a intel_digital_port struct. Numbers are around
5 intel_dport
36 dport
479 intel_dig_port
352 dig_port
Since we already removed the intel_ prefix from most of our other
structs, do the same here and prefer dig_port.
v2: rename everything in i915, not just a few display sources and
reword commit message (from Matt Roper)
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200701045054.23357-1-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
Future patches will bring PSR2 selective fetch configuration
validation but most of the configuration checks will be used for HW
tracking and selective fetch so the reoder was necessary.
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200626010151.221388-2-jose.souza@intel.com
Start using device specific parameters instead of module parameters for
most things. The module parameters become the immutable initial values
for i915 parameters. The device specific parameters in i915->params
start life as a copy of i915_modparams. Any later changes are only
reflected in the debugfs.
The stragglers are:
* i915.force_probe and i915.modeset. Needed before dev_priv is
available. This is fine because the parameters are read-only and never
modified.
* i915.verbose_state_checks. Passing dev_priv to I915_STATE_WARN and
I915_STATE_WARN_ON would result in massive and ugly churn. This is
handled by not exposing the parameter via debugfs, and leaving the
parameter writable in sysfs. This may be fixed up in follow-up work.
* i915.inject_probe_failure. Only makes sense in terms of the module,
not the device. This is handled by not exposing the parameter via
debugfs.
v2: Fix uc i915 lookup code (Michał Winiarski)
Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkilä <juha-pekka.heikkila@intel.com>
Cc: Venkata Sandeep Dhanalakota <venkata.s.dhanalakota@intel.com>
Cc: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Acked-by: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200618150402.14022-1-jani.nikula@intel.com
The IO buffer Wake and Fast Wake bit size and value have been changed from
Gen12+. It programs the default value of IO buffer Wake and Fast Wake on
Gen12+. It adds definitions of IO buffer Wake and Fast Wake for pre Gen12
and Gen12+. And it aligns PSR2 definition macros.
v2: Fix macro definitions. (José)
v3: Addressed review comments from José
- Add missing default values of IO_BUFFER_WAKE and FAST_WAKE for GEN9+
- Change a style of macro naming in order to use lines as input.
- Update Todo comments.
v4: Add parentheses to macros to avoid precedence issues.
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200607143614.185246-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
This parameter is meant to be used when PSR issues are found as some
issues in the past was due wrong values set in VBT so this would be
a quick and easy way to ask users or for us to check if the issue is
due VBT values.
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200520212756.354623-1-jose.souza@intel.com
RKL doesn't have PSR2 HW tracking, it was replaced by software/manual
tracking. The driver is required to track the areas that needs update
and program hardware to send selective updates.
So until the software tracking is implemented, PSR2 needs to be disabled
for platforms without PSR2 HW tracking.
BSpec: 50422
BSpec: 50424
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200603211529.3005059-15-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
In order to use a common VSC SDP Colorimetry calculating code on PSR,
it uses a new psr vsc sdp compute routine.
Because PSR routine has its own scenario and timings of writing a VSC SDP,
the current PSR routine needs to have its own drm_dp_vsc_sdp structure
member variable on struct i915_psr.
In order to calculate colorimetry information, intel_psr_update()
function and intel_psr_enable() function extend a drm_connector_state
argument.
There are no changes to PSR mechanism.
v3: Replace a structure name to drm_dp_vsc_sdp from intel_dp_vsc_sdp
v4: Rebased
v8: Rebased
v10: When a PSR is enabled, it needs to add DP_SDP_VSC to
infoframes.enable.
It is needed for comparing between HW and pipe_state of VSC_SDP.
v11: If PSR is disabled by flag, it don't enable psr on pipe compute.
v12: Fix an inconsistent indenting
Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200514060732.3378396-15-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
The whole point of using OUIs is so that we can recognize certain
devices and potentially apply quirks for them. Normally this should work
quite well, but there appears to be quite a number of laptop panels out
there that will fill the OUI but not the device ID. As such, for devices
like this I can't imagine it's a very good idea to try relying on OUIs
for applying quirks. As well, some laptop vendors have confirmed to us
that their panels have this exact issue.
So, let's introduce the ability to apply DP quirks based on EDID
identification. We reuse the same quirk bits for OUI-based quirks, so
that callers can simply check all possible quirks using
drm_dp_has_quirk().
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200211183358.157448-2-lyude@redhat.com
Commit 60c6a14b489b ("drm/i915/display: Force the state compute phase
once to enable PSR") was forcing the state compute too earlier
causing errors because not everything was initialized, so here
moving to the end of i915_driver_modeset_probe() when the display is
all initialized.
Also fixing the place where it disarm the force probe as during the
atomic check phase errors could happen like the ones due locking and
it would cause PSR to never be enabled if that happens.
Leaving the disarm to the atomic commit phase, intel_psr_enable() or
intel_psr_update() will be called even if the current state do not
allow PSR to be enabled.
v2: Check if intel_dp is null in intel_psr_force_mode_changed_set()
v3: Check intel_dp before get dev_priv
v4:
- renamed intel_psr_force_mode_changed_set() to
intel_psr_set_force_mode_changed()
- removed the set parameter from intel_psr_set_force_mode_changed()
- not calling intel_psr_set_force_mode_changed() from
intel_psr_enable/update(), directly setting it after the same checks
that intel_psr_set_force_mode_changed() does
- moved intel_psr_set_force_mode_changed() arm call to
i915_driver_modeset_probe() as it is a better for a PSR call, all the
functions calls happening between the old and the new function call
will cause issue
Fixes: 60c6a14b489b ("drm/i915/display: Force the state compute phase once to enable PSR")
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1151
Tested-by: Ross Zwisler <zwisler@google.com>
Reported-by: Ross Zwisler <zwisler@google.com>
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200221212635.11614-1-jose.souza@intel.com
Add a basic description about how DC3CO works to help people not
familiar with it.
While at it, I also improved the delayed work handle and function
names and removed a debug message that is ambiguous and not much
useful, no changes in behavior here.
Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200205214945.131012-1-jose.souza@intel.com
A recent change in BSpec allow us to change EXTLINE while transcoder
is enabled so this allow us to change it even when doing the first
fastset after taking over previous hardware state set by BIOS.
BIOS don't enable PSR, so if sink supports PSR it will be enabled on
the first fastset, so moving the EXTLINE compute and set to PSR flows
allow us to simplfy a bunch of code.
This will save a lot of time in all the IGT tests that uses CRC, as
when PSR2 is enabled CRCs are not generated, so we switch to PSR1, so
the previous code would compute dc3co_exitline=0 causing a full
modeset that would shutdown pipe, enable and train link.
v2: only programming EXTLINE when DC3CO is enabled
BSpec: 49196
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200122182617.18597-2-jose.souza@intel.com
This will calculaet the DC3CO exit delay only once per full modeset.
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200122182617.18597-1-jose.souza@intel.com
Both activate functions and the dc3co disable function were doing the
same thing, so better move to a function and share.
Also while at it adding a WARN_ON to catch invalid values.
Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200113214603.52158-1-jose.souza@intel.com
Recent improvements in the state tracking in i915 caused PSR to not be
enabled when reusing firmware/BIOS modeset, this is due to all initial
commits returning ealier in intel_atomic_check() as needs_modeset()
is always false.
To fix that here forcing the state compute phase in CRTC that is
driving the eDP that supports PSR once. Enable or disable PSR do not
require a fullmodeset, so user will still experience glitch free boot
process plus the power savings that PSR brings.
It was tried to set mode_changed in intel_initial_commit() but at
this point the connectors are not registered causing a crash when
computing encoder state.
v2:
- removed function return
- change arguments to match intel_hdcp_atomic_check
v3:
- replaced drm includes in intel_psr.h by forward declaration(Jani)
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112253
Reported-by: <s.zharkoff@gmail.com>
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200106152128.195171-1-jose.souza@intel.com
eDP specification states that sink can have its PSR capability
changed, I have never found any panel doing that but lets add that
for completeness.
For now it is not reading back the PSR capabilities and if possible
re-enabling PSR, this will be added if a panel is found using this
feature.
v4:
Cleaning DP_PSR_CAPS_CHANGE
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191128014852.214135-4-jose.souza@intel.com
When this error happens sink link is not stable after the required
FW_EXIT_LATENCY period so it will miss the selective update.
As the other PSR errors, for now we are not trying to recover from
it.
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191128014852.214135-3-jose.souza@intel.com
eDP spec states that when sink enconters a problem that prevents it
to keep PSR running it should set PSR status to internal error and
set the reason why it happen to PSR_ERROR_STATUS but it is not how it
was implemented.
But also I don't want to change this behavior, who knows if there is
a panel out there that only set the PSR_ERROR_STATUS.
So here refactoring the code a bit to make more easy to read what was
state above as more checks will be added to this function.
v2:
returning a int instead of a bool in psr_get_status_and_error_status()
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191128014852.214135-2-jose.souza@intel.com
PSR2 HW only support a limited number of bits per pixel, if mode has
more than supported PSR2 should not be enabled.
BSpec: 50422
BSpec: 7713
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191128014852.214135-1-jose.souza@intel.com
Split up crtc_state->base to uapi. This is done using the following patch,
ran after the previous commit that splits out any hw references:
@@
struct intel_crtc_state *T;
@@
-T->base
+T->uapi
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191031112610.27608-5-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com
Split up crtc_state->base to hw where appropriate. This is done using the following patch:
@@
struct intel_crtc_state *T;
identifier x =~ "^(active|enable|degamma_lut|gamma_lut|ctm|mode|adjusted_mode)$";
@@
-T->base.x
+T->hw.x
@@
struct drm_crtc_state *T;
identifier x =~ "^(active|enable|degamma_lut|gamma_lut|ctm|mode|adjusted_mode)$";
@@
-to_intel_crtc_state(T)->base.x
+to_intel_crtc_state(T)->hw.x
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191031112610.27608-4-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com
We are still looking at drm_crtc_state in a few places, convert those
to use intel_crtc_state instead.
Changes since v1:
- Move to before uapi/hw split.
- Add hunks for intel_pm.c as well.
Changes since v2:
- Incorporate Ville's feedback.
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191031112610.27608-1-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com
'Link CRC error' will now have same error level as
other PSR2 errors like 'RFB storage error' and
'VSC SDP uncorrectable error'.
Signed-off-by: Ap Kamal <kamal.ap@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1571819128-3264-1-git-send-email-kamal.ap@intel.com
Reduce verbosity in code by renaming dsc_params member of crtc state to
simply dsc. There is enough context for this to be clear. No functional
changes.
Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191022133414.8293-1-jani.nikula@intel.com
DC3CO is useful power state, when DMC detects PSR2 idle frame
while an active video playback, playing 30fps video on 60hz panel
is the classic example of this use case.
B.Specs:49196 has a restriction to enable DC3CO only for Video Playback.
It will be worthy to enable DC3CO after completion of each pageflip
and switch back to DC5 when display is idle because driver doesn't
differentiate between video playback and a normal pageflip.
We will use Frontbuffer flush call tgl_dc3co_flush() to enable DC3CO
state only for ORIGIN_FLIP flush call, because DC3CO state has primarily
targeted for VPB use case. We are not interested here for frontbuffer
invalidates calls because that triggers PSR2 exit, which will
explicitly disable DC3CO.
DC5 and DC6 saves more power, but can't be entered during video
playback because there are not enough idle frames in a row to meet
most PSR2 panel deep sleep entry requirement typically 4 frames.
As PSR2 existing implementation is using minimum 6 idle frames for
deep sleep, it is safer to enable DC5/6 after 6 idle frames
(By scheduling a delayed work of 6 idle frames, once DC3CO has been
enabled after a pageflip).
After manually waiting for 6 idle frames DC5/6 will be enabled and
PSR2 deep sleep idle frames will be restored to 6 idle frames, at this
point DMC will triggers DC5/6 once PSR2 enters to deep sleep after
6 idle frames.
In future when we will enable S/W PSR2 tracking, we can change the
PSR2 required deep sleep idle frames to 1 so DMC can trigger the
DC5/6 immediately after S/W manual waiting of 6 idle frames get
complete.
v2: calculated s/w state to switch over dc3co when there is an
update. [Imre]
Used cancel_delayed_work_sync() in order to avoid any race
with already scheduled delayed work. [Imre]
v3: Cancel_delayed_work_sync() may blocked the commit work.
hence dropping it, dc5_idle_thread() checks the valid wakeref before
putting the reference count, which avoids any chances of dropping
a zero wakeref. [Imre (IRC)]
v4: Used frontbuffer flush mechanism. [Imre]
v5: Used psr.pipe to extract frontbuffer busy bits. [Imre]
Used cancel_delayed_work_sync() in encoder disable path. [Imre]
Used mod_delayed_work() instead of cancelling and scheduling a
delayed work. [Imre]
Used psr.lock in tgl_dc5_idle_thread() to enable psr2 deep
sleep. [Imre]
Removed DC5_REQ_IDLE_FRAMES macro. [Imre]
v6: Used dc3co_exitline check instead of TGL and dc3co allowed_dc_mask
checks, used delayed_work_pending with the psr lock and removed the
psr2_deep_slp_disabled flag. [Imre]
v7: Code refactoring, moved most of functional code to inte_psr.c [Imre]
Using frontbuffer_bits on psr.pipe check instead of
busy_frontbuffer_bits. [Imre]
Calculating dc3co_exit_delay in intel_psr_enable_locked. [Imre]
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191003081738.22101-6-anshuman.gupta@intel.com
For older gens PSR IIR and IMR have fixed addresses. From TGL onwards those
registers moved to each transcoder offset. The bits for the registers
are defined without an offset per transcoder as right now we have one
register per transcoder. So add a fake "trans_shift" when calculating
the bits offsets: it will be 0 for gen12+ and psr.transcoder otherwise.
v2 (Lucas): change the implementation to use trans_shift instead of
getting each bit value with a different macro
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190904213419.27547-3-jose.souza@intel.com
It was enabling and checking PSR interruptions in every transcoder
while it should keep the interruptions on the non-used transcoders
masked.
While doing this it gives us trouble on Tiger Lake if we are
reading/writing to registers of disabled transcoders since from gen12
onwards the registers are relative to the transcoder. Instead of forcing
them ON to access those registers, just avoid the accesses as they are
not needed.
v2 (Lucas):
- Explain why we can't keep accessing all transcoders
- Remove TODO about extending the irq handling to multiple instances:
when/if implementing multiple instances it's pretty clear by the
singleton psr that it needs to be extended
- Fix intel_psr_debug_set() calling psr_irq_control() with
psr.transcoder not set yet (from Imre). Now we only set the debug
register right away if psr is already enabled. Otherwise we just
record the value to be set when enabling the source.
- Do not depend on the value of TRANSCODER_A. Just be relative to it
(from Imre)
- handle psr error last so we don't schedule the work before handling
the other flags
v3:
- Adding a warning about setting reserverd bits on EDP_PSR_IMR
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190904213419.27547-2-jose.souza@intel.com
According to BSpc if link standby is set on TGL+, PSR will not be
enabled. Vendors should not use panels that requires link standby and
even if they do, panel should assert a PSR error that will cause PSR to
be disabled.
BSpec: 50434
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190823082055.5992-8-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
TGL PSR2 HW supports a bigger resolution, so lets add it
BSpec: 50422, 49199
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190823082055.5992-10-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
On TGL+ it's possible to have PSR1 enabled in other ports besides DDIA.
PSR2 is still limited to DDIA. However currently we handle only one
instance of PSR struct. Lets guard intel_psr_init_dpcd() against
multiple eDP panels and warn about it.
v2: Reword commit message to be TGL+ only and with the info where
PSR1/PSR2 are supported (Lucas)
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190823082055.5992-6-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
No need to unmask PSR interrutpion if PSR is not enabled, better move
the call to intel_psr_enable_source().
v2: Renamed intel_psr_irq_control() to psr_irq_control() (Lucas)
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190820223325.27490-3-jose.souza@intel.com
According to PSR2_CTL definition in BSpec there is only one instance
of PSR2_CTL. Platforms gen < 12 with EDP transcoder only support PSR2
on TRANSCODER_EDP while on TGL PSR2 is only supported by
TRANSCODER_A.
Since BDW PSR is allowed on any port, but we need to restrict by
transcoder.
v8: Renamed _psr2_supported_in_trans() to psr2_supported() (Lucas)
v9: Renamed psr2_supported() to transcoder_has_psr2() (Ville)
BSpec: 7713
BSpec: 20584
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190820223325.27490-2-jose.souza@intel.com
PSR registers are a mess, some have the full address while others just
have the additional offset from psr_mmio_base.
For BDW+ psr_mmio_base is nothing more than TRANSCODER_EDP_OFFSET +
0x800 and using it makes more difficult for people with an PSR
register address or PSR register name from from BSpec as i915 also
don't match the BSpec names.
For HSW psr_mmio_base is _DDI_BUF_CTL_A + 0x800 and PSR registers are
only available in DDIA.
Other reason to make relative to transcoder is that since BDW every
transcoder have PSR registers, so in theory it should be possible to
have PSR enabled in a non-eDP transcoder.
So for BDW+ we can use _TRANS2() to get the register offset of any
PSR register in any transcoder while for HSW we have _HSW_PSR_ADJ
that will calculate the register offset for the single PSR instance,
noting that we are already guarded about trying to enable PSR in other
port than DDIA on HSW by the 'if (dig_port->base.port != PORT_A)' in
intel_psr_compute_config(), this check should only be valid for HSW
and will be changed in future.
PSR2 registers and PSR_EVENT was added after Haswell so that is why
_PSR_ADJ() is not used in some macros.
The only registers that can not be relative to transcoder are
PSR_IMR and PSR_IIR that are not relative to anything, so keeping it
hardcoded. That changed for TGL but it will be handled in another
patch.
Also removing BDW_EDP_PSR_BASE from GVT because it is not used as it
is the only PSR register that GVT have.
v5:
- Macros changed to be more explicit about HSW (Dhinakaran)
- Squashed with the patch that added the tran parameter to the
macros (Dhinakaran)
v6:
- Checking for interruption errors after module reload in the
transcoder that will be used (Dhinakaran)
- Using lowercase to the registers offsets
v7:
- Removing IS_HASWELL() from registers macros(Jani)
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Zhi Wang <zhi.a.wang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190820223325.27490-1-jose.souza@intel.com
