IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
The GEM object is grossly overweight for the practicality of tracking
large numbers of individual pages, yet it is currently our only
abstraction for tracking DMA allocations. Since those allocations need
to be reserved upfront before an operation, and that we need to break
away from simple system memory, we need to ditch using plain struct page
wrappers.
In the process, we drop the WC mapping as we ended up clflushing
everything anyway due to various issues across a wider range of
platforms. Though in a future step, we need to drop the kmap_atomic
approach which suggests we need to pre-map all the pages and keep them
mapped.
v2: Verify our large scratch page is suitably DMA aligned; and manually
clear the scratch since we are allocating plain struct pages full of
prior content.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200729164219.5737-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
The error code needs to be set on this path. It currently returns
success.
Fixes: ed2690a9ca89 ("drm/i915/selftest: Check that GPR are restored across noa_wait")
Reported-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200714143652.GA337376@mwanda
There is an error condition where err is not being set and an uninitialized
garbage value in err is being returned. Fix this by assigning err to an
appropriate error return value before taking the error exit path.
Addresses-Coverity: ("Uninitialized scalar value")
Fixes: ed2690a9ca89 ("drm/i915/selftest: Check that GPR are restored across noa_wait")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200713142551.423649-1-colin.king@canonical.com
Perf implements a GPU delay (noa_wait) by looping until the CS timestamp
has passed a certain point. This use MI_MATH and the general purpose
registers of the user's context, and since it is clobbering the user
state it must carefully save and restore the user's data around the
noa_wait. We can verify this by loading some values in the GPR that we
know will be clobbered by the noa_wait, and then inspecting the GPR after
the noa_wait completes and confirming that they have been restored.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Umesh Nerlige Ramappa <umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com>
Cc: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200709224504.11345-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
We infrequently use the direct i915 backpointer from the i915_request,
so do we really need to waste the space in the struct for it? 8 bytes
from the most frequently allocated struct vs an 3 bytes and pointer
chasing in using rq->engine->i915?
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Akeem G Abodunrin <akeem.g.abodunrin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200602220953.21178-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Pull the code to do the CS timestamp ns<->ticks conversion into
helpers and use them all over.
The check in i915_perf_noa_delay_set() seems a bit dubious,
so we switch it to do what I assume it wanted to do all along
(ie. make sure the resulting delay in CS timestamp ticks
doesn't exceed 32bits)?
Cc: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200302143943.32676-5-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
kHz isn't accurate enough for storing the CS timestamp
frequency on some of the platforms. Store the value
in Hz instead.
Cc: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200302143943.32676-2-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
A little bit of history :
Back when i915-perf was introduced (4.13), there was no way to
dynamically add new OA configurations to i915. Only the generated
configs baked in at build time were allowed.
It quickly became obvious that we would need to allow applications
to upload their own configurations, for instance to be able to test
new ones, and so by the next stable version (4.14) we added uAPIs
to allow uploading new configurations.
When adding that capability, we took the opportunity to remove most
HW configurations except the TestOa one which is a configuration
IGT would rely on to verify that the HW is outputting correct
values. At the time it made sense to have that confiuration in at
the same time a given HW platform added to the i915-perf driver.
Now that IGT has become the reference point for HW configurations (see
commit 53f8f541ca ("lib: Add i915_perf library"), previously this was
located in the GPUTop repository), the need for having those
configurations in i915-perf is gone.
On the Mesa side, we haven't relied on this test configuration for a
while. The MDAPI library always required 4.14 feature level and always
loaded its configuration into i915.
I'm sure nobody will miss this generated stuff in i915 :)
v2: Fix selftests by creating an empty config
v3: Fix unlocking on allocation error (Dan Carpenter)
v4: Fixup checkpatch warnings
v5: Fix incorrect unlock in error path (Umesh)
Signed-off-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Umesh Nerlige Ramappa <umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200317132222.2638719-1-lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com
As the engine->kernel_context is used within the engine-pm barrier, we
have to be careful when emitting requests outside of the barrier, as the
strict timeline locking rules do not apply. Instead, we must ensure the
engine_park() cannot be entered as we build the request, which is
simplest by taking an explicit engine-pm wakeref around the request
construction.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191125105858.1718307-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Gen12 only support a single report format :
I915_OA_FORMAT_A32u40_A4u32_B8_C8
Signed-off-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
Fixes: 00a7f0d7155c ("drm/i915/tgl: Add perf support on TGL")
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191029142826.20014-1-lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com
NOA configuration take some amount of time to apply. That amount of
time depends on the size of the GT. There is no documented time for
this. For example, past experimentations with powergating
configuration changes seem to indicate a 60~70us delay. We go with
500us as default for now which should be over the required amount of
time (according to HW architects).
v2: Don't forget to save/restore registers used for the wait (Chris)
v3: Name used CS_GPR registers (Chris)
Fix compile issue due to rebase (Lionel)
v4: Fix save/restore helpers (Umesh)
v5: Move noa_wait from drm_i915_private to i915_perf_stream (Lionel)
v6: Add missing struct declarations in i915_perf.h
Signed-off-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191012072308.30312-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
