IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
We are incorrectly limiting the max allocation size as per the mm
max_order, which is effectively the largest power-of-two that we can fit
in the region size. However, it's normal to setup the region or
allocator with a non-power-of-two size(for example 3G), which we should
already handle correctly, except it seems for the early too-big-check.
v2: make sure we also exercise the I915_BO_ALLOC_CONTIGUOUS path, which
is quite different, since for that we are actually limited by the
largest power-of-two that we can fit within the region size. (Chris)
Fixes: b908be543e44 ("drm/i915: support creating LMEM objects")
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: CQ Tang <cq.tang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201021103606.241395-1-matthew.auld@intel.com
(cherry picked from commit 83ebef47f8ebe320d5c5673db82f9903a4f40a69)
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Just some prep work before we rework the lifetime handling, which
requires replacing all the drm_dev_put in selftests by something else.
v2: Don't go with a static inline, upsets the header tests and
separation.
Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200918132505.2316382-2-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch
i915_gem_ww_ctx is used to lock all gem bo's for pinning and memory
eviction. We don't use it yet, but lets start adding the definition
first.
To use it, we have to pass a non-NULL ww to gem_object_lock, and don't
unlock directly. It is done in i915_gem_ww_ctx_fini.
Changes since v1:
- Change ww_ctx and obj order in locking functions (Jonas Lahtinen)
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200819140904.1708856-6-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
When igt_random_offset() is a given a range of [0, PAGE_SIZE], it is
allowed to return 0. However, attempting to use a size of 0 for the
igt_lmem_write_cpu() byte poking, leads to call igt_random_offset() with
a range of [offset, offset + 0] and ask it to find a length of 4 within
it. This triggers the bug on that the requested length should fit within
the range!
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200806145728.16495-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Measure the memcpy bw between our CPU accessible regions, trying all
supported mapping combinations(WC, WB) across various sizes.
v2:
use smaller sizes
throw in memcpy32/memcpy64/memcpy_from_wc
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200129093343.194570-1-matthew.auld@intel.com
Create a vmap for discontinguous lmem objects to support
i915_gem_object_pin_map().
v2: Offset io address by region.start for fake-lmem
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200102204215.1519103-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
As the engine->kernel_context is used within the engine-pm barrier, we
have to be careful when emitting requests outside of the barrier, as the
strict timeline locking rules do not apply. Instead, we must ensure the
engine_park() cannot be entered as we build the request, which is
simplest by taking an explicit engine-pm wakeref around the request
construction.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191125105858.1718307-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Since drm provided us with a real struct file we can use for our
anonymous internal clients (mock_file), complete our transition to using
that as the primary interface (and not the mocked up struct drm_file we
previous were using).
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191107213929.23286-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
As drm now exports a method to create an anonymous struct file around a
drm_device for internal use, make use of it to avoid our horrible hacks.
Danial suggested that the mock_file_put() wrapper was suitable for
drm-core, along with the mock_drm_getfile() [and that the vestigal
mock_drm_file() in this patch should perhaps be the drm interface
itself]. However, the eventual goal is to remove the mock_drm_file() and
use the struct file and fput() directly, in this patch we take a simple
transition in that direction.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191107180601.30815-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
The trouble with having a plain nesting flag for locks which do not
naturally nest (unlike block devices and their partitions, which is
the original motivation for nesting levels) is that lockdep will
never spot a true deadlock if you screw up.
This patch is an attempt at trying better, by highlighting a bit more
of the actual nature of the nesting that's going on. Essentially we
have two kinds of objects:
- objects without pages allocated, which cannot be on any lru and are
hence inaccessible to the shrinker.
- objects which have pages allocated, which are on an lru, and which
the shrinker can decide to throw out.
For the former type of object, memory allocations while holding
obj->mm.lock are permissible. For the latter they are not. And
get/put_pages transitions between the two types of objects.
This is still not entirely fool-proof since the rules might change.
But as long as we run such a code ever at runtime lockdep should be
able to observe the inconsistency and complain (like with any other
lockdep class that we've split up in multiple classes). But there are
a few clear benefits:
- We can drop the nesting flag parameter from
__i915_gem_object_put_pages, because that function by definition is
never going allocate memory, and calling it on an object which
doesn't have its pages allocated would be a bug.
- We strictly catch more bugs, since there's not only one place in the
entire tree which is annotated with the special class. All the
other places that had explicit lockdep nesting annotations we're now
going to leave up to lockdep again.
- Specifically this catches stuff like calling get_pages from
put_pages (which isn't really a good idea, if we can call get_pages
so could the shrinker). I've seen patches do exactly that.
Of course I fully expect CI will show me for the fool I am with this
one here :-)
v2: There can only be one (lockdep only has a cache for the first
subclass, not for deeper ones, and we don't want to make these locks
even slower). Still separate enums for better documentation.
Real fix: don't forget about phys objs and pin_map(), and fix the
shrinker to have the right annotations ... silly me.
v3: Forgot usertptr too ...
v4: Improve comment for pages_pin_count, drop the IMPORTANT comment
and instead prime lockdep (Chris).
v5: Appease checkpatch, no double empty lines (Chris)
v6: More rebasing over selftest changes. Also somehow I forgot to
push this patch :-/
Also format comments consistently while at it.
v7: Fix typo in commit message (Joonas)
Also drop the priming, with the lmem merge we now have allocations
while holding the lmem lock, which wreaks the generic priming I've
done in earlier patches. Should probably be resurrected when lmem is
fixed. See
commit 232a6ebae419193f5b8da4fa869ae5089ab105c2
Author: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Date: Tue Oct 8 17:01:14 2019 +0100
drm/i915: introduce intel_memory_region
I'm keeping the priming patch locally so it wont get lost.
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: "Tang, CQ" <cq.tang@intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> (v5)
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> (v6)
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191105090148.30269-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch
[mlankhorst: Fix commit typos pointed out by Michael Ruhl]
Simple test writing to dwords across an object, using various engines in
a randomized order, checking that our writes land from the cpu.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191025153728.23689-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
We can create LMEM objects, but we also need to support mapping them
into kernel space for internal use.
Signed-off-by: Abdiel Janulgue <abdiel.janulgue@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve Hampson <steven.t.hampson@intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191025153728.23689-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
We currently define LMEM, or local memory, as just another memory
region, like system memory or stolen, which we can expose to userspace
and can be mapped to the CPU via some BAR.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Abdiel Janulgue <abdiel.janulgue@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191025153728.23689-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_memory_region.o: in function `igt_mock_contiguous':
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/intel_memory_region.c:166: undefined reference to `__umoddi3'
v2: promote target to u64 for consistency across all builds
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Fixes: 2f0b97ca0211 ("drm/i915/region: support contiguous allocations")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191013114509.3405-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Some kernel internal objects may need to be allocated as a contiguous
block, also thinking ahead the various kernel io_mapping interfaces seem
to expect it, although this is purely a limitation in the kernel
API...so perhaps something to be improved.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Abdiel Janulgue <abdiel.janulgue@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Michael J Ruhl <michael.j.ruhl@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191008160116.18379-3-matthew.auld@intel.com
Support memory regions, as defined by a given (start, end), and allow
creating GEM objects which are backed by said region. The immediate goal
here is to have something to represent our device memory, but later on
we also want to represent every memory domain with a region, so stolen,
shmem, and of course device. At some point we are probably going to want
use a common struct here, such that we are better aligned with say TTM.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Abdiel Janulgue <abdiel.janulgue@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Niranjana Vishwanathapura <niranjana.vishwanathapura@intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191008160116.18379-2-matthew.auld@intel.com
