IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
Ideally we'd want to simply kill the task rather than wake it, but for
now let's just add a startup check that causes the thread to exit.
This can only happen if io_uring_alloc_task_context() fails, which
generally requires fault injection.
Reported-by: Ubisectech Sirius <bugreport@ubisectech.com>
Fixes: af5d68f889 ("io_uring/sqpoll: manage task_work privately")
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Count the running time and actual IO processing time of the sqpoll
thread, and output the statistical data to fdinfo.
Variable description:
"work_time" in the code represents the sum of the jiffies of the sq
thread actually processing IO, that is, how many milliseconds it
actually takes to process IO. "total_time" represents the total time
that the sq thread has elapsed from the beginning of the loop to the
current time point, that is, how many milliseconds it has spent in
total.
The test tool is fio, and its parameters are as follows:
[global]
ioengine=io_uring
direct=1
group_reporting
bs=128k
norandommap=1
randrepeat=0
refill_buffers
ramp_time=30s
time_based
runtime=1m
clocksource=clock_gettime
overwrite=1
log_avg_msec=1000
numjobs=1
[disk0]
filename=/dev/nvme0n1
rw=read
iodepth=16
hipri
sqthread_poll=1
The test results are as follows:
Every 2.0s: cat /proc/9230/fdinfo/6 | grep -E Sq
SqMask: 0x3
SqHead: 3197153
SqTail: 3197153
CachedSqHead: 3197153
SqThread: 9231
SqThreadCpu: 11
SqTotalTime: 18099614
SqWorkTime: 16748316
The test results corresponding to different iodepths are as follows:
|-----------|-------|-------|-------|------|-------|
| iodepth | 1 | 4 | 8 | 16 | 64 |
|-----------|-------|-------|-------|------|-------|
|utilization| 2.9% | 8.8% | 10.9% | 92.9%| 84.4% |
|-----------|-------|-------|-------|------|-------|
| idle | 97.1% | 91.2% | 89.1% | 7.1% | 15.6% |
|-----------|-------|-------|-------|------|-------|
Signed-off-by: Xiaobing Li <xiaobing.li@samsung.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240228091251.543383-1-xiaobing.li@samsung.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
A previous commit moved to using just the private task_work list for
SQPOLL, but it neglected to update the check for whether we have
pending task_work. Normally this is fine as we'll attempt to run it
unconditionally, but if we race with going to sleep AND task_work
being added, then we certainly need the right check here.
Fixes: af5d68f889 ("io_uring/sqpoll: manage task_work privately")
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
This adds the sqpoll support to the io-uring napi.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Roesch <shr@devkernel.io>
Suggested-by: Olivier Langlois <olivier@trillion01.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230608163839.2891748-6-shr@devkernel.io
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Decouple from task_work running, and cap the number of entries we process
at the time. If we exceed that number, push remaining entries to a retry
list that we'll process first next time.
We cap the number of entries to process at 8, which is fairly random.
We just want to get enough per-ctx batching here, while not processing
endlessly.
Since we manually run PF_IO_WORKER related task_work anyway as the task
never exits to userspace, with this we no longer need to add an actual
task_work item to the per-process list.
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
A previous commit added a trylock for getting the SQPOLL thread info via
fdinfo, but this introduced a regression where we often fail to get it if
the thread is busy. For that case, we end up not printing the current CPU
and PID info.
Rather than rely on this lock, just print the pid we already stored in
the io_sq_data struct, and ensure we update the current CPU every time
we've slept or potentially rescheduled. The latter won't potentially be
100% accurate, but that wasn't the case before either as the task can
get migrated at any time unless it has been pinned at creation time.
We retain keeping the io_sq_data dereference inside the ctx->uring_lock,
as it has always been, as destruction of the thread and data happen below
that. We could make this RCU safe, but there's little point in doing that.
With this, we always print the last valid information we had, rather than
have spurious outputs with missing information.
Fixes: 7644b1a1c9 ("io_uring/fdinfo: lock SQ thread while retrieving thread cpu/pid")
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
If we setup the ring with SQPOLL, then that polling thread has its
own io-wq setup. This means that if the application uses
IORING_REGISTER_IOWQ_AFF to set the io-wq affinity, we should not be
setting it for the invoking task, but rather the sqpoll task.
Add an sqpoll helper that parks the thread and updates the affinity,
and use that one if we're using SQPOLL.
Fixes: fe76421d1d ("io_uring: allow user configurable IO thread CPU affinity")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.10+
Link: https://github.com/axboe/liburing/discussions/884
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
The sq thread actively releases CPU resources by calling the
cond_resched() and schedule() interfaces when it is idle. Therefore,
more resources are available for other threads to run.
There exists a problem in sq thread: it does not unlock sqd->lock before
releasing CPU resources every time. This makes other threads pending on
sqd->lock for a long time. For example, the following interfaces all
require sqd->lock: io_sq_offload_create(), io_register_iowq_max_workers()
and io_ring_exit_work().
Before the sq thread releases CPU resources, unlocking sqd->lock will
provide the user a better experience because it can respond quickly to
user requests.
Signed-off-by: Kanchan Joshi<joshi.k@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenwen Chen<wenwen.chen@samsung.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230525082626.577862-1-wenwen.chen@samsung.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Users may specify a CPU where the sqpoll thread would run. This may
conflict with cpuset operations because of strict PF_NO_SETAFFINITY
requirement. That flag is unnecessary for polling "kernel" threads, see
the reasoning in commit 01e68ce08a ("io_uring/io-wq: stop setting
PF_NO_SETAFFINITY on io-wq workers"). Drop the flag on poll threads too.
Fixes: 01e68ce08a ("io_uring/io-wq: stop setting PF_NO_SETAFFINITY on io-wq workers")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230314162559.pnyxdllzgw7jozgx@blackpad/
Signed-off-by: Michal Koutný <mkoutny@suse.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230314183332.25834-1-mkoutny@suse.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Change the return type to void since it always return 0, and no need
to do the checking in syscall io_uring_enter.
Signed-off-by: Quanfa Fu <quanfafu@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230115071519.554282-1-quanfafu@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
