Commit Graph

2348 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
George Cherian
3d41386d55 cpufreq: CPPC: Use transition_delay_us depending transition_latency
With commit e948bc8fbe (cpufreq: Cap the default transition delay
value to 10 ms)  the cpufreq was not honouring the delay passed via
ACPI (PCCT). Due to which on ARM based platforms using CPPC the
cpufreq governor tries to change the frequency of CPUs faster than
expected.

This leads to continuous error messages like the following.
" ACPI CPPC: PCC check channel failed. Status=0 "

Earlier (without above commit) the default transition delay was
taken form the value passed from PCCT. Use the same value provided
by PCCT to set the transition_delay_us.

Fixes: e948bc8fbe (cpufreq: Cap the default transition delay value to 10 ms)
Signed-off-by: George Cherian <george.cherian@cavium.com>
Cc: 4.14+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.14+
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-03-30 12:15:58 +02:00
Viresh Kumar
a8b6966034 cpufreq: tegra186: Don't validate the frequency table twice
The cpufreq core is already validating the CPU frequency table after
calling the ->init() callback of the cpufreq drivers and the drivers
don't need to do the same anymore. Though they need to set the
policy->freq_table field directly from the ->init() callback now.

Stop validating the frequency table from tegra186 driver.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-03-20 12:07:53 +01:00
Viresh Kumar
2d28b03686 cpufreq: speedstep: Don't validate the frequency table twice
The cpufreq core is already validating the CPU frequency table after
calling the ->init() callback of the cpufreq drivers and the drivers
don't need to do the same anymore. Though they need to set the
policy->freq_table field directly from the ->init() callback now.

Stop validating the frequency table from speedstep driver.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-03-20 12:07:52 +01:00
Viresh Kumar
31f4b7a86b cpufreq: sparc: Don't validate the frequency table twice
The cpufreq core is already validating the CPU frequency table after
calling the ->init() callback of the cpufreq drivers and the drivers
don't need to do the same anymore. Though they need to set the
policy->freq_table field directly from the ->init() callback now.

Stop validating the frequency table from sparc driver.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-03-20 12:07:52 +01:00
Viresh Kumar
ec8d2cc62c cpufreq: sh: Don't validate the frequency table twice
The cpufreq core is already validating the CPU frequency table after
calling the ->init() callback of the cpufreq drivers and the drivers
don't need to do the same anymore. Though they need to set the
policy->freq_table field directly from the ->init() callback now.

Stop validating the frequency table from sh-cpufreq driver.

The driver though prints the min/max frequency values and the same is
done from the ->ready() callback now to keep the behavior unchanged.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-03-20 12:07:52 +01:00
Viresh Kumar
54a277ebf2 cpufreq: sfi: Don't validate the frequency table twice
The cpufreq core is already validating the CPU frequency table after
calling the ->init() callback of the cpufreq drivers and the drivers
don't need to do the same anymore. Though they need to set the
policy->freq_table field directly from the ->init() callback now.

Stop validating the frequency table from sfi driver.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-03-20 12:07:52 +01:00
Viresh Kumar
472ada6021 cpufreq: scpi: Don't validate the frequency table twice
The cpufreq core is already validating the CPU frequency table after
calling the ->init() callback of the cpufreq drivers and the drivers
don't need to do the same anymore. Though they need to set the
policy->freq_table field directly from the ->init() callback now.

Stop validating the frequency table from scpi driver.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Tested-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-03-20 12:07:52 +01:00
Viresh Kumar
f35750c885 cpufreq: sc520: Don't validate the frequency table twice
The cpufreq core is already validating the CPU frequency table after
calling the ->init() callback of the cpufreq drivers and the drivers
don't need to do the same anymore. Though they need to set the
policy->freq_table field directly from the ->init() callback now.

Stop validating the frequency table from sc520 driver.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-03-20 12:07:52 +01:00
Viresh Kumar
09e390f30f cpufreq: s3c24xx: Don't validate the frequency table twice
The cpufreq core is already validating the CPU frequency table after
calling the ->init() callback of the cpufreq drivers and the drivers
don't need to do the same anymore. Though they need to set the
policy->freq_table field directly from the ->init() callback now.

Stop validating the frequency table from s3c24xx driver.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-03-20 12:07:52 +01:00
Viresh Kumar
5ab508bebf cpufreq: qoirq: Don't validate the frequency table twice
The cpufreq core is already validating the CPU frequency table after
calling the ->init() callback of the cpufreq drivers and the drivers
don't need to do the same anymore. Though they need to set the
policy->freq_table field directly from the ->init() callback now.

Stop validating the frequency table from qoirq driver.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-03-20 12:07:52 +01:00
Viresh Kumar
8ed5a219d0 cpufreq: pxa: Don't validate the frequency table twice
The cpufreq core is already validating the CPU frequency table after
calling the ->init() callback of the cpufreq drivers and the drivers
don't need to do the same anymore. Though they need to set the
policy->freq_table field directly from the ->init() callback now.

Stop validating the frequency table from pxa driver.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-03-20 12:07:52 +01:00
Viresh Kumar
20dfdb9c80 cpufreq: ppc_cbe: Don't validate the frequency table twice
The cpufreq core is already validating the CPU frequency table after
calling the ->init() callback of the cpufreq drivers and the drivers
don't need to do the same anymore. Though they need to set the
policy->freq_table field directly from the ->init() callback now.

Stop validating the frequency table from ppc_cbe driver.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-03-20 12:07:52 +01:00
Viresh Kumar
e2376d1fa0 cpufreq: powernow: Don't validate the frequency table twice
The cpufreq core is already validating the CPU frequency table after
calling the ->init() callback of the cpufreq drivers and the drivers
don't need to do the same anymore. Though they need to set the
policy->freq_table field directly from the ->init() callback now.

Stop validating the frequency table from powernow driver.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-03-20 12:07:52 +01:00
Viresh Kumar
b01b531f67 cpufreq: p4-clockmod: Don't validate the frequency table twice
The cpufreq core is already validating the CPU frequency table after
calling the ->init() callback of the cpufreq drivers and the drivers
don't need to do the same anymore. Though they need to set the
policy->freq_table field directly from the ->init() callback now.

Stop validating the frequency table from p4-clockmod driver.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-03-20 12:07:52 +01:00
Viresh Kumar
b563afbaa8 cpufreq: mediatek: Don't validate the frequency table twice
The cpufreq core is already validating the CPU frequency table after
calling the ->init() callback of the cpufreq drivers and the drivers
don't need to do the same anymore. Though they need to set the
policy->freq_table field directly from the ->init() callback now.

Stop validating the frequency table from mediatek driver.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-03-20 12:07:52 +01:00
Viresh Kumar
2c65616b98 cpufreq: longhaul: Don't validate the frequency table twice
The cpufreq core is already validating the CPU frequency table after
calling the ->init() callback of the cpufreq drivers and the drivers
don't need to do the same anymore. Though they need to set the
policy->freq_table field directly from the ->init() callback now.

Stop validating the frequency table from longhaul driver.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-03-20 12:07:52 +01:00
Viresh Kumar
b6663622a3 cpufreq: ia64-acpi: Don't validate the frequency table twice
The cpufreq core is already validating the CPU frequency table after
calling the ->init() callback of the cpufreq drivers and the drivers
don't need to do the same anymore. Though they need to set the
policy->freq_table field directly from the ->init() callback now.

Stop validating the frequency table from ia64-acpi driver.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-03-20 12:07:52 +01:00
Viresh Kumar
c3e3cc8aa3 cpufreq: elanfreq: Don't validate the frequency table twice
The cpufreq core is already validating the CPU frequency table after
calling the ->init() callback of the cpufreq drivers and the drivers
don't need to do the same anymore. Though they need to set the
policy->freq_table field directly from the ->init() callback now.

Stop validating the frequency table from elanfreq driver.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-03-20 12:07:52 +01:00
Viresh Kumar
0d10539445 cpufreq: e_powersaver: Don't validate the frequency table twice
The cpufreq core is already validating the CPU frequency table after
calling the ->init() callback of the cpufreq drivers and the drivers
don't need to do the same anymore. Though they need to set the
policy->freq_table field directly from the ->init() callback now.

Stop validating the frequency table from e_powersaver driver.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-03-20 12:07:52 +01:00
Viresh Kumar
29aa18a762 cpufreq: cpufreq-dt: Don't validate the frequency table twice
The cpufreq core is already validating the CPU frequency table after
calling the ->init() callback of the cpufreq drivers and the drivers
don't need to do the same anymore. Though they need to set the
policy->freq_table field directly from the ->init() callback now.

Stop validating the frequency table from cpufreq-dt driver.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-03-20 12:07:52 +01:00
Viresh Kumar
5d8d4f9215 cpufreq: brcmstb: Don't validate the frequency table twice
The cpufreq core is already validating the CPU frequency table after
calling the ->init() callback of the cpufreq drivers and the drivers
don't need to do the same anymore. Though they need to set the
policy->freq_table field directly from the ->init() callback now.

Stop validating the frequency table from brcmstb driver.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-03-20 12:07:52 +01:00
Viresh Kumar
3c1f5a462e cpufreq: arm_big_little: Don't validate the frequency table twice
The cpufreq core is already validating the CPU frequency table after
calling the ->init() callback of the cpufreq drivers and the drivers
don't need to do the same anymore. Though they need to set the
policy->freq_table field directly from the ->init() callback now.

Stop validating the frequency table from arm_big_little driver.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-03-20 12:07:51 +01:00
Viresh Kumar
1a186d9e11 cpufreq: ACPI: Don't validate the frequency table twice
The cpufreq core is already validating the CPU frequency table after
calling the ->init() callback of the cpufreq drivers and the drivers
don't need to do the same anymore. Though they need to set the
policy->freq_table field directly from the ->init() callback now.

Stop validating the frequency table in the acpi-cpufreq driver.

The driver needs to crosscheck if the max frequency corresponds to the
P-state 0 or not and the same is done from the ->ready() callback now.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-03-20 12:07:51 +01:00
Viresh Kumar
92c99d159c cpufreq: Don't validate cpufreq table from cpufreq_generic_init()
The cpufreq table is already validated by the cpufreq core and none of
the users of cpufreq_generic_init() have any dependency on it to
validate the table as well.

Don't validate the cpufreq table anymore from cpufreq_generic_init().

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-03-20 12:07:51 +01:00
Viresh Kumar
8d768cdcf0 cpufreq: imx6q: Find max freq from frequency table itself
This is a preparatory commit to make policy->suspend_freq independent of
validation of the cpufreq table, as a later commit would update
cpufreq_generic_init() to not validate the cpufreq table any longer.

The driver already assumes the order in which the frequency table is
sorted and we can get the max frequency easily.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-03-20 12:07:51 +01:00
Arnd Bergmann
3478b24c5e cpufreq: scpi: Add thermal dependency
A built-in scpi cpufreq driver cannot link against a modular
thermal framework:

drivers/cpufreq/scpi-cpufreq.o: In function `scpi_cpufreq_ready':
scpi-cpufreq.c:(.text+0x4c): undefined reference to `of_cpufreq_cooling_register'
drivers/cpufreq/scpi-cpufreq.o: In function `scpi_cpufreq_exit':
scpi-cpufreq.c:(.text+0x9c): undefined reference to `cpufreq_cooling_unregister'

This adds a Kconfig dependency that makes sure this configuration
is not possible, while allowing all configurations that can work.
Note that disabling CPU_THERMAL means we don't care about the
THERMAL dependency.

Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-03-20 11:02:42 +01:00
Chunyu Hu
55b55abc17 cpufreq: cppc_cpufreq: Fix cppc_cpufreq_init() failure path
Kmemleak reported the below leak. When cppc_cpufreq_init went into
failure path, the cpu mask is not freed. After fix, this report is
gone. And to avaoid potential NULL pointer reference, check the cpu
value first.

unreferenced object 0xffff800fd5ea4880 (size 128):
  comm "swapper/0", pid 1, jiffies 4294939510 (age 668.680s)
  hex dump (first 32 bytes):
    00 00 00 00 20 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  .... ...........
    00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  ................
  backtrace:
    [<ffff0000082c4ae4>] __kmalloc_node+0x278/0x634
    [<ffff0000088f4a74>] alloc_cpumask_var_node+0x28/0x60
    [<ffff0000088f4af0>] zalloc_cpumask_var+0x14/0x1c
    [<ffff000008d20254>] cppc_cpufreq_init+0xd0/0x19c
    [<ffff000008083828>] do_one_initcall+0xec/0x15c
    [<ffff000008cd1018>] kernel_init_freeable+0x1f4/0x2a4
    [<ffff0000089099b0>] kernel_init+0x18/0x10c
    [<ffff000008084d50>] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18
    [<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff

Signed-off-by: Chunyu Hu <chuhu@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-03-20 10:52:31 +01:00
Viresh Kumar
bf14721c97 cpufreq: powernv: Don't validate the frequency table twice
The cpufreq core is already validating the CPU frequency table after
calling the ->init() callback of the cpufreq drivers and the drivers
don't need to do the same anymore. Though they need to set the
policy->freq_table field directly from the ->init() callback now.

Stop validating the frequency table from powernv driver.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-03-19 00:04:56 +01:00
Rafael J. Wysocki
1179c2aeb4 Merge cpufreq fixes from v4.16-rc4. 2018-03-05 12:37:06 +01:00
Markus Elfring
0f555518ea cpufreq: powernow-k8: Drop unnecessary return statements from two functions
The script "checkpatch.pl" pointed information out like the following.

WARNING: void function return statements are not generally useful

Thus remove such a statement in the affected functions.

Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-02-27 18:29:01 +01:00
Markus Elfring
7f3a1d66df cpufreq: powernow-k8: Drop memory allocation error messages from three functions
Omit an extra message for a memory allocation failure in these functions.

This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.

Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-02-27 18:29:01 +01:00
Markus Elfring
d6b96e4706 cpufreq: qoriq: Drop memory allocation error messages from qoriq_cpufreq_cpu_init()
Omit extra messages for a memory allocation failure in this function.

This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.

Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-02-27 18:29:01 +01:00
Markus Elfring
d430fb9984 cpufreq: s3c24xx: Drop memory allocation error messages from two functions
Omit an extra message for a memory allocation failure in these functions.

This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.

Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-02-27 18:29:01 +01:00
Viresh Kumar
3e3b507ef6 cpufreq: tegra186: Break after initialization is done for policy->cpu
There are two clusters (2 + 4 CPUs) on this platform and a separate
cpufreq policy is available for each of the CPUs. The loop in
tegra186_cpufreq_init() tries to find the structure for the right CPU
and finish initialization. But it is missing a `break` statement at the
end, which forces it to restart the loop even when the CPU already
matched and initialization is done.

Fix that by adding the missing `break` statement.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-02-27 18:22:12 +01:00
Viresh Kumar
d417e0691a cpufreq: Validate frequency table in the core
By design, cpufreq drivers are responsible for calling
cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo() from their ->init()
callbacks to validate the frequency table.

However, if a cpufreq driver is buggy and fails to do so properly, it
lead to unexpected behavior of the driver or the cpufreq core at a
later point in time.  It would be better if the core could
validate the frequency table during driver initialization.

To that end, introduce cpufreq_table_validate_and_sort() and make
the cpufreq core call it right after invoking the ->init() callback
of the driver and destroy the cpufreq policy if the table is invalid.

For the time being the validation of the table happens twice, once
from the driver and then from the core.  The individual drivers will
be updated separately to drop table validation if they don't need it
for other reasons.

The frequency table is marked "sorted" or "unsorted" by the new helper
now instead of in cpufreq_table_validate_and_show(), as it should only
be done after validating the table (which the drivers won't do going
forward).

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
[ rjw: Subject/changelog ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-02-27 18:22:12 +01:00
Viresh Kumar
b24b6478e6 cpufreq: Reorder cpufreq_online() error code path
Ideally the de-allocation of resources should happen in the exact
opposite order in which they were allocated. It helps maintain the code
in long term, even if nothing really breaks with incorrect ordering.

That wasn't followed in cpufreq_online() and it has some
inconsistencies.  For example, the symlinks were created from within
the locked region while they are removed only after putting the locks.
Also ->exit() should have been called only after the symlinks are
removed and the lock is dropped, as that was the case when ->init()
was first called.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
[ rjw: Subject ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-02-27 18:22:12 +01:00
Viresh Kumar
cb8bd2ff15 cpufreq: mediatek: Convert pr_warn() to pr_debug()
With multi-platform build images, this shows a message on non mediatek
platforms, which is unnecessary. Convert pr_warn() to pr_debug() here.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Sean Wang <sean.wang@mediatek.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-02-27 18:22:12 +01:00
Viresh Kumar
0373ca7483 cpufreq: s3c24xx: Fix broken s3c_cpufreq_init()
commit a307a1e6bc "cpufreq: s3c: use cpufreq_generic_init()"
accidentally broke cpufreq on s3c2410 and s3c2412.

These two platforms don't have a CPU frequency table and used to skip
calling cpufreq_table_validate_and_show() for them.  But with the
above commit, we started calling it unconditionally and that will
eventually fail as the frequency table pointer is NULL.

Fix this by calling cpufreq_table_validate_and_show() conditionally
again.

Fixes: a307a1e6bc "cpufreq: s3c: use cpufreq_generic_init()"
Cc: 3.13+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.13+
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-02-27 17:23:51 +01:00
Sudeep Holla
5c8b2623f6 cpufreq: scpi: Fix incorrect arm_big_little config dependency
Commit 343a8d17fa (cpufreq: scpi: remove arm_big_little dependency)
removed the SCPI cpufreq dependency on arm_big_little cpufreq driver.
However the Kconfig entry still depends on ARM_BIG_LITTLE_CPUFREQ
which is clearly wrong.

This patch removes that unnecessary Kconfig dependency.

Fixes: 343a8d17fa (cpufreq: scpi: remove arm_big_little dependency)
Reported-by: Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-02-26 23:29:19 +01:00
Dietmar Eggemann
9326fdf3fb cpufreq: scpi: invoke frequency-invariance setter function
Commit 343a8d17fa (cpufreq: scpi: remove arm_big_little dependency)
changed the cpufreq driver on juno from arm_big_little to scpi.

The scpi set_target function does not call the frequency-invariance
setter function arch_set_freq_scale() like the arm_big_little set_target
function does. As a result the task scheduler load and utilization
signals are not frequency-invariant on this platform anymore.

Fix this by adding a call to arch_set_freq_scale() into
scpi_cpufreq_set_target().

Fixes: 343a8d17fa (cpufreq: scpi: remove arm_big_little dependency)
Signed-off-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-02-26 23:27:56 +01:00
Linus Torvalds
d4667ca142 Merge branch 'x86-pti-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip
Pull x86 PTI and Spectre related fixes and updates from Ingo Molnar:
 "Here's the latest set of Spectre and PTI related fixes and updates:

  Spectre:
   - Add entry code register clearing to reduce the Spectre attack
     surface
   - Update the Spectre microcode blacklist
   - Inline the KVM Spectre helpers to get close to v4.14 performance
     again.
   - Fix indirect_branch_prediction_barrier()
   - Fix/improve Spectre related kernel messages
   - Fix array_index_nospec_mask() asm constraint
   - KVM: fix two MSR handling bugs

  PTI:
   - Fix a paranoid entry PTI CR3 handling bug
   - Fix comments

  objtool:
   - Fix paranoid_entry() frame pointer warning
   - Annotate WARN()-related UD2 as reachable
   - Various fixes
   - Add Add Peter Zijlstra as objtool co-maintainer

  Misc:
   - Various x86 entry code self-test fixes
   - Improve/simplify entry code stack frame generation and handling
     after recent heavy-handed PTI and Spectre changes. (There's two
     more WIP improvements expected here.)
   - Type fix for cache entries

  There's also some low risk non-fix changes I've included in this
  branch to reduce backporting conflicts:

   - rename a confusing x86_cpu field name
   - de-obfuscate the naming of single-TLB flushing primitives"

* 'x86-pti-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: (41 commits)
  x86/entry/64: Fix CR3 restore in paranoid_exit()
  x86/cpu: Change type of x86_cache_size variable to unsigned int
  x86/spectre: Fix an error message
  x86/cpu: Rename cpu_data.x86_mask to cpu_data.x86_stepping
  selftests/x86/mpx: Fix incorrect bounds with old _sigfault
  x86/mm: Rename flush_tlb_single() and flush_tlb_one() to __flush_tlb_one_[user|kernel]()
  x86/speculation: Add <asm/msr-index.h> dependency
  nospec: Move array_index_nospec() parameter checking into separate macro
  x86/speculation: Fix up array_index_nospec_mask() asm constraint
  x86/debug: Use UD2 for WARN()
  x86/debug, objtool: Annotate WARN()-related UD2 as reachable
  objtool: Fix segfault in ignore_unreachable_insn()
  selftests/x86: Disable tests requiring 32-bit support on pure 64-bit systems
  selftests/x86: Do not rely on "int $0x80" in single_step_syscall.c
  selftests/x86: Do not rely on "int $0x80" in test_mremap_vdso.c
  selftests/x86: Fix build bug caused by the 5lvl test which has been moved to the VM directory
  selftests/x86/pkeys: Remove unused functions
  selftests/x86: Clean up and document sscanf() usage
  selftests/x86: Fix vDSO selftest segfault for vsyscall=none
  x86/entry/64: Remove the unused 'icebp' macro
  ...
2018-02-14 17:02:15 -08:00
Jia Zhang
b399151cb4 x86/cpu: Rename cpu_data.x86_mask to cpu_data.x86_stepping
x86_mask is a confusing name which is hard to associate with the
processor's stepping.

Additionally, correct an indent issue in lib/cpu.c.

Signed-off-by: Jia Zhang <qianyue.zj@alibaba-inc.com>
[ Updated it to more recent kernels. ]
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: bp@alien8.de
Cc: tony.luck@intel.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1514771530-70829-1-git-send-email-qianyue.zj@alibaba-inc.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2018-02-15 01:15:52 +01:00
Nicolas Chauvet
d0404738c6 arm: imx: Add MODULE_ALIAS for cpufreq
Without this, the imx6q-cpufreq driver isn't loaded
automatically when built as a module

Tested on wandboard quad with a fedora 27 kernel rpm

Signed-off-by: Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-02-08 10:21:39 +01:00
Dominik Brodowski
ffd81dcfef cpufreq: Add and use cpufreq_for_each_{valid_,}entry_idx()
Pointer subtraction is slow and tedious. Therefore, replace all instances
where cpufreq_for_each_{valid_,}entry loops contained such substractions
with an iteration macro providing an index to the frequency_table entry.

Suggested-by: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180120020237.GM13338@ZenIV.linux.org.uk
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-02-08 10:21:39 +01:00
Chen Yu
70f6bf2a3b cpufreq: intel_pstate: Enable HWP during system resume on CPU0
When maxcpus=1 is in the kernel command line, the BP is responsible
for re-enabling the HWP - because currently only the APs invoke
intel_pstate_hwp_enable() during their online process - which might
put the system into unstable state after resume.

Fix this by enabling the HWP explicitly on BP during resume.

Reported-by: Doug Smythies <dsmythies@telus.net>
Suggested-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Yu Chen <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
[ rjw: Subject/changelog, minor modifications ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-02-08 10:21:38 +01:00
Wei Yongjun
0725390da9 cpufreq: scpi: fix error return code in scpi_cpufreq_init()
Fix to return a negative error code from the clk_get() error handling
case instead of 0, as done elsewhere in this function.

Fixes: 343a8d17fa (cpufreq: scpi: remove arm_big_little dependency)
Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-02-08 10:21:15 +01:00
Sudeep Holla
eb85c50c24 cpufreq: scpi: fix static checker warning cdev isn't an ERR_PTR
Commit 343a8d17fa (cpufreq: scpi: remove arm_big_little dependency)
leads to the following static checker warning:

	drivers/cpufreq/scpi-cpufreq.c:203 scpi_cpufreq_ready()
	warn: 'cdev' isn't an ERR_PTR

of_cpufreq_cooling_register() returns NULL on error. This patch removes
the incorrect IS_ERR check on the returned pointer.

Fixes: 343a8d17fa (cpufreq: scpi: remove arm_big_little dependency)
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-02-07 11:51:41 +01:00
Corentin LABBE
3d70671667 cpufreq: remove at32ap-cpufreq
Since AVR32 arch was removed, at32ap-cpufreq is useless.
Remove this driver.

Signed-off-by: Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-02-07 11:44:23 +01:00
Akshu Agrawal
59a3b3a8db cpufreq: AMD: Ignore the check for ProcFeedback in ST/CZ
In ST/CZ CPUID 8000_0007_EDX[11, ProcFeedbackInterface] is 0,
but the mechanism is still available and can be used.

Signed-off-by: Akshu Agrawal <akshu.agrawal@amd.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-02-07 11:26:37 +01:00
Bo Yan
703cbaa601 cpufreq: Skip cpufreq resume if it's not suspended
cpufreq_resume can be called even without preceding cpufreq_suspend.
This can happen in following scenario:

    suspend_devices_and_enter
       --> dpm_suspend_start
          --> dpm_prepare
              --> device_prepare : this function errors out
          --> dpm_suspend: this is skipped due to dpm_prepare failure
                           this means cpufreq_suspend is skipped over
       --> goto Recover_platform, due to previous error
       --> goto Resume_devices
       --> dpm_resume_end
           --> dpm_resume
               --> cpufreq_resume

In case schedutil is used as frequency governor, cpufreq_resume will
eventually call sugov_start, which does following:

    memset(sg_cpu, 0, sizeof(*sg_cpu));
    ....

This effectively erases function pointer for frequency update, causing
crash later on. The function pointer would have been set correctly if
subsequent cpufreq_add_update_util_hook runs successfully, but that
function returns earlier because cpufreq_suspend was not called:

    if (WARN_ON(per_cpu(cpufreq_update_util_data, cpu)))
		return;

The fix is to check cpufreq_suspended first, if it's false, that means
cpufreq_suspend was not called in the first place, so do not resume
cpufreq.

Signed-off-by: Bo Yan <byan@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
[ rjw: Dropped printing a message ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-02-05 11:03:33 +01:00