IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
Xiaolong Ye reported the following failure on Broadwell D server:
EDAC sbridge: Some needed devices are missing
EDAC MC: Removed device 0 for sbridge_edac.c Broadwell SrcID#0_Ha#0: DEV 0000:ff:12.0
EDAC sbridge: Couldn't find mci handler
EDAC sbridge: Failed to register device with error -19.
Broadwell D (only IMC0 per socket) and Broadwell X (IMC0 and IMC1 per
socket) use the same PCI device IDs for IMC0 per socket, then they
share pci_dev_descr_broadwell_table (n_imcs_per_sock=2). In this case,
Broadwell D wrongly creates the nonexistent SOCK EDAC memory controller
and reports above error messages, since it has no IMC1 per socket.
Avoid creating the nonexistent SOCK memory controller.
Reported-and-tested-by: Xiaolong Ye <xiaolong.ye@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Qiuxu Zhuo <qiuxu.zhuo@intel.com>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: linux-edac <linux-edac@vger.kernel.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170608113351.25323-1-qiuxu.zhuo@intel.com
[ Massage. ]
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Tony pointed out: "currently the driver pretends there is one big
8-channel memory controller per socket instead of 2 4-channel
controllers. This is fine with all memory controller populated with
symmetrical DIMM configurations, but runs into difficulties on
asymmetrical setups".
Restructure the driver to assign an EDAC memory controller to each real
h/w memory controller to resolve the issue.
Signed-off-by: Qiuxu Zhuo <qiuxu.zhuo@intel.com>
Cc: linux-edac <linux-edac@vger.kernel.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170523000731.87793-1-qiuxu.zhuo@intel.com
[ Break some lines at convenient points. ]
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
EDAC assigns logical memory controller numbers in the order that we find
memory controllers, which depends on which PCI bus they are on. Some
systems end up with MC0 on socket0, others (e.g Haswell) have MC0 on
socket3.
All this is made more confusing for users because we use the string
"Socket" while generating names for memory controllers, but the number
that we attach there is the memory controller number. E.g.
EDAC MC0: Giving out device to module sbridge_edac.c controller
Haswell Socket#0: DEV 0000:ff:12.0 (INTERRUPT)
Change the names to say "SrcID#%d" (where the number we use is read from
the h/w associated with the memory controller instead of some logical
number internal to the EDAC driver). New message:
EDAC MC0: Giving out device to module sbridge_edac.c controller
Haswell SrcID#3: DEV 0000:ff:12.0 (INTERRUPT)
Reported-by: Andrey Korolyov <andrey@xdel.ru>
Reported-by: Patrick Geary <patrickg@supermicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: linux-edac <linux-edac@vger.kernel.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170523000603.87748-1-qiuxu.zhuo@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Each of the PCI device IDs belongs to a CPU socket, or to one of the
integrated memory controllers. Provide an enum to specify the domain of
each, and distinguish the resource number in each domain: the number
of the PCI device IDs per integrated memory controller/socket, and the
number of integrated memory controllers per socket.
Signed-off-by: Qiuxu Zhuo <qiuxu.zhuo@intel.com>
Cc: linux-edac <linux-edac@vger.kernel.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170523000533.87704-1-qiuxu.zhuo@intel.com
[ Realign pci_dev_descr_knl members. ]
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Leave it to the user to decide whether to enable this or not. Otherwise,
platform-specific drivers won't initialize (currently, EDAC supports
only a single platform driver loaded).
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Use mc_devices list instead to check whether we have EDAC driver
instances successfully registered with EDAC core.
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Apparently, some machines used to report DRAM errors through a PCI SERR
NMI. This is why we have a call into EDAC in the NMI handler. See
c0d1217202 ("drivers/edac: add new nmi rescan").
From looking at the patch above, that's two drivers: e752x_edac.c and
e7xxx_edac.c. Now, I wanna say those are old machines which are probably
decommissioned already.
Tony says that "[t]the newest CPU supported by either of those drivers
is the Xeon E7520 (a.k.a. "Nehalem") released in Q1'2010. Possibly some
folks are still using these ... but people that hold onto h/w for 7
years generally cling to old s/w too ... so I'd guess it unlikely that
we will get complaints for breaking these in upstream."
So even if there is a small number still in use, we did load EDAC with
edac_op_state == EDAC_OPSTATE_POLL by default (we still do, in fact)
which means a default EDAC setup without any parameters supplied on the
command line or otherwise would never even log the error in the NMI
handler because we're polling by default:
inline int edac_handler_set(void)
{
if (edac_op_state == EDAC_OPSTATE_POLL)
return 0;
return atomic_read(&edac_handlers);
}
So, long story short, I'd like to get rid of that nastiness called
edac_stub.c and confine all the EDAC drivers solely to drivers/edac/. If
we ever have to do stuff like that again, it should be notifiers we're
using and not some insanity like this one.
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
DIMM number passed to edac_mc_handle_error() was accidentally hardcoded
to zero. Pass in the correct daddr->dimm value.
Signed-off-by: Qiuxu Zhuo <qiuxu.zhuo@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Provide debugfs function stubs when EDAC_DEBUG is not enabled so that we
don't fail the build:
drivers/edac/pnd2_edac.c: In function ‘pnd2_init’:
drivers/edac/pnd2_edac.c:1521:2: error: implicit declaration of function ‘setup_pnd2_debug’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
setup_pnd2_debug();
^
drivers/edac/pnd2_edac.c: In function ‘pnd2_exit’:
drivers/edac/pnd2_edac.c:1529:2: error: implicit declaration of function ‘teardown_pnd2_debug’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
teardown_pnd2_debug();
^
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Initial target for this driver is the Intel Apollo Lake platform and
Denverton micro-server, they use the same internal memory controller IP
called Pondicherry2.
Memory controller registers are not in PCI config space like earlier
Intel memory controllers. For Apollo Lake platform they are accessed via
a "side-band" interface, for Denverton micro-server they are access via
PCI config space and memory map I/O. This driver is for Apollo Lake and
Denverton, but only the Denverton is fully enabled while we wait for the
sideband driver.
Apollo lake driver and initial cut at Denverton driver by Tony Luck.
Extensive cleanup, refactoring and basic verification by Qiuxu Zhuo.
Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Qiuxu Zhuo <qiuxu.zhuo@intel.com>
Cc: linux-edac <linux-edac@vger.kernel.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170308174539.14432-1-qiuxu.zhuo@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Pull RAS updates from Ingo Molnar:
"The main changes in this cycle were:
- Assign notifier chain priorities for all RAS related handlers to
make the ordering explicit (Borislav Petkov)
- Improve the AMD MCA banks sysfs output (Yazen Ghannam)
- Various cleanups and restructuring of the x86 RAS code (Borislav
Petkov)"
* 'ras-core-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip:
x86/ras, EDAC, acpi: Assign MCE notifier handlers a priority
x86/ras: Get rid of mce_process_work()
EDAC/mce/amd: Dump TSC value
EDAC/mce/amd: Unexport amd_decode_mce()
x86/ras/amd/inj: Change dependency
x86/ras: Flip the TSC-adding logic
x86/ras/amd: Make sysfs names of banks more user-friendly
x86/ras/therm_throt: Do not log a fake MCE for thermal events
x86/ras/inject: Make it depend on X86_LOCAL_APIC=y
Currently, the IPID and Syndrome are printed on the same line as the
Address. There are cases when we can have a valid Syndrome but not a
valid Address.
For example, the MCA_SYND register can be used to hold more detailed
error info that the hardware folks can use. It's not just DRAM ECC
syndromes. There are some error types that aren't related to memory that
may have valid syndromes, like some errors related to links in the Data
Fabric, etc.
In these cases, the IPID and Syndrome are not printed at the same log
level as the rest of the stanza, so users won't see them on the console.
Console:
[Hardware Error]: CPU:16 (17:1:0) MC22_STATUS[Over|CE|MiscV|-|-|-|-|SyndV|-]: 0xd82000000002080b
[Hardware Error]: Power, Interrupts, etc. Extended Error Code: 2
Dmesg:
[Hardware Error]: CPU:16 (17:1:0) MC22_STATUS[Over|CE|MiscV|-|-|-|-|SyndV|-]: 0xd82000000002080b
, Syndrome: 0x000000010b404000, IPID: 0x0001002e00000002
[Hardware Error]: Power, Interrupts, etc. Extended Error Code: 2
Print the IPID first and on a new line. The IPID should always be
printed on SMCA systems. The Syndrome will then be printed with the IPID
and at the same log level when valid:
[Hardware Error]: CPU:16 (17:1:0) MC22_STATUS[Over|CE|MiscV|-|-|-|-|SyndV|-]: 0xd82000000002080b
[Hardware Error]: IPID: 0x0001002e00000002, Syndrome: 0x000000010b404000
[Hardware Error]: Power, Interrupts, etc. Extended Error Code: 2
Signed-off-by: Yazen Ghannam <Yazen.Ghannam@amd.com>
Cc: linux-edac <linux-edac@vger.kernel.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1487192182-2474-1-git-send-email-Yazen.Ghannam@amd.com
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Last time we did that was when we enabled Bulldozer. Now, we enabled Zen
so it is only natural ... :-)
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: Yazen Ghannam <Yazen.Ghannam@amd.com>
Fix the following sparse warnings:
drivers/edac/fsl_ddr_edac.c:148:1: warning:
symbol 'dev_attr_inject_data_hi' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/edac/fsl_ddr_edac.c:150:1: warning:
symbol 'dev_attr_inject_data_lo' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/edac/fsl_ddr_edac.c:152:1: warning:
symbol 'dev_attr_inject_ctrl' was not declared. Should it be static?
Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@huawei.com>
Cc: linux-edac <linux-edac@vger.kernel.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170209150424.15124-1-weiyj.lk@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
