IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
Implement the debug hook for the buddy resource manager. For this we
want to print out the status of the memory manager, including how much
memory is still allocatable, what page sizes we have etc. This will be
triggered when TTM is unable to fulfil an allocation request for device
local-memory.
v2(Thomas):
- s/MB/MiB
- s/KB/KiB
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210819093419.295636-1-matthew.auld@intel.com
With the global kmem_cache shrink infrastructure gone there's nothing
special and we can convert them over.
I'm doing this split up into each patch because there's quite a bit of
noise with removing the static global.slab_blocks to just a
slab_blocks.
v2: Make slab static (Jason, 0day)
Reviewed-by: Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>
Cc: Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210727121037.2041102-3-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch
There's no reason that I can tell why this should be per-i915_buddy_mm
and doing so causes KMEM_CACHE to throw dmesg warnings because it tries
to create a debugfs entry with the name i915_buddy_block multiple times.
We could handle this by carefully giving each slab its own name but that
brings its own pain because then we have to store that string somewhere
and manage the lifetimes of the different slabs. The most likely
outcome would be a global atomic which we increment to get a new name or
something like that.
The much easier solution is to use the i915_globals system like we do
for every other slab in i915. This ensures that we have exactly one of
them for each i915 driver load and it gets neatly created on module load
and destroyed on module unload. Using the globals system also means
that its now tied into the shrink handler so we can properly respond to
low-memory situations.
Signed-off-by: Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>
Fixes: 88be9a0a06b7 ("drm/i915/ttm: add ttm_buddy_man")
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
[danvet: Rebase against removal of global shrink code]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210721152358.2893314-7-jason@jlekstrand.net
Add back our standalone i915_buddy allocator and integrate it into a
ttm_resource_manager. This will plug into our ttm backend for managing
device local-memory in the next couple of patches.
v2(Thomas):
- Return -ENOSPC from the buddy; ttm expects this in order to
trigger eviction
- Drop the unnecessary inline
- bo->page_alignment is in page units
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210616152501.394518-1-matthew.auld@intel.com
Temporarily remove the buddy allocator and related selftests
and hook up the TTM range manager for i915 regions.
Also modify the mock region selftests somewhat to account for a
fragmenting manager.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210602083818.241793-2-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com
The largest possible order is (63-PAGE_SHIFT), given that our min chunk
size is PAGE_SIZE. With that we should only need at most 6 bits to
represent all possible orders, giving us back 4 bits for other potential
uses. Include a simple selftest to verify this.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210126103019.177622-1-matthew.auld@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
In the selftests, we may feed very long lists of blocks to be freed on
culmination of the tests. This coupled with kasan and other
malloc-tracing can make the kmem_cache_free() operation time consuming,
and doing many of those trigger soft lockup warnings. Break the list up
with a cond_resched().
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191221144917.1040662-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
We are meant to register the kmem cache at init, such the supplied exit
and shrink hooks can be called.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190905072921.7979-1-matthew.auld@intel.com
Since nodes are cached in a free-list, and potentially marked as free
without actually being destroyed, thus allowing them to be
opportunistically re-allocated, we should apply kmemleak_update_trace
every time a node is given a new owner and marked as allocated, to aid
in debugging.
Suggested-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190816105357.14340-2-matthew.auld@intel.com
If we are leaking nodes don't hide it. Also stop trying to be
"defensive" and instead embrace Kasan et al.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190816105357.14340-1-matthew.auld@intel.com
Simple buddy allocator. We want to allocate properly aligned
power-of-two blocks to promote usage of huge-pages for the GTT, so 64K,
2M and possibly even 1G. While we do support allocating stuff at a
specific offset, it is more intended for preallocating portions of the
address space, say for an initial framebuffer, for other uses drm_mm is
probably a much better fit. Anyway, hopefully this can all be thrown
away if we eventually move to having the core MM manage device memory.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190809202926.14545-2-matthew.auld@intel.com
