IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
As part of converting RISC-V SOC_FOO symbols to ARCH_FOO to match the
use of such symbols on other architectures, convert the Microchip FPGA
RTC driver to use the new symbol.
Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230309204452.969574-5-conor@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230304133028.2135435-42-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230304133028.2135435-41-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Acked-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230304133028.2135435-40-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230304133028.2135435-39-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230304133028.2135435-38-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230304133028.2135435-37-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230304133028.2135435-36-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230304133028.2135435-35-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230304133028.2135435-34-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230304133028.2135435-33-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230304133028.2135435-32-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230304133028.2135435-31-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230304133028.2135435-30-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230304133028.2135435-29-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230304133028.2135435-28-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230304133028.2135435-27-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230304133028.2135435-26-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230304133028.2135435-25-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230304133028.2135435-24-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230304133028.2135435-23-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230304133028.2135435-22-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230304133028.2135435-21-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230304133028.2135435-20-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230304133028.2135435-19-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230304133028.2135435-18-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230304133028.2135435-17-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230304133028.2135435-16-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230304133028.2135435-15-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230304133028.2135435-14-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230304133028.2135435-13-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Acked-By: Joshua Kinard <kumba@gentoo.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230304133028.2135435-12-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230304133028.2135435-11-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230304133028.2135435-10-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230304133028.2135435-9-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230304133028.2135435-8-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@microchip.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230304133028.2135435-7-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230304133028.2135435-6-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230304133028.2135435-5-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230304133028.2135435-4-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230304133028.2135435-3-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230304133028.2135435-2-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
The module pointer in class_create() never actually did anything, and it
shouldn't have been requred to be set as a parameter even if it did
something. So just remove it and fix up all callers of the function in
the kernel tree at the same time.
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230313181843.1207845-4-gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Subsystem:
- allow rtc_read_alarm without read_alarm callback
New driver:
- NXP BBNSM module RTC
Drivers:
- use IRQ flags from fwnode when available
- abx80x: nvmem support
- brcmstb-waketimer: add non-wake alarm support
- ingenic: provide CLK32K clock
- isl12022: cleanups
- moxart: switch to using gpiod API
- pcf85363: allow setting quartz load
- pm8xxx: cleanups and support for setting time
- rv3028, rv3032: add ACPI support
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=aZkd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Merge tag 'rtc-6.3' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/abelloni/linux
Pull RTC updates from Alexandre Belloni:
"A few drivers got some nice cleanups and a new driver are making the
bulk of the changes.
Subsystem:
- allow rtc_read_alarm without read_alarm callback
New driver:
- NXP BBNSM module RTC
Drivers:
- use IRQ flags from fwnode when available
- abx80x: nvmem support
- brcmstb-waketimer: add non-wake alarm support
- ingenic: provide CLK32K clock
- isl12022: cleanups
- moxart: switch to using gpiod API
- pcf85363: allow setting quartz load
- pm8xxx: cleanups and support for setting time
- rv3028, rv3032: add ACPI support"
* tag 'rtc-6.3' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/abelloni/linux: (64 commits)
rtc: pm8xxx: add support for nvmem offset
dt-bindings: rtc: qcom-pm8xxx: add nvmem-cell offset
rtc: abx80x: Add nvmem support
rtc: rx6110: Remove unused of_gpio,h
rtc: efi: Avoid spamming the log on RTC read failure
rtc: isl12022: sort header inclusion alphabetically
rtc: isl12022: Join string literals back
rtc: isl12022: Drop unneeded OF guards and of_match_ptr()
rtc: isl12022: Explicitly use __le16 type for ISL12022_REG_TEMP_L
rtc: isl12022: Get rid of unneeded private struct isl12022
rtc: pcf85363: add support for the quartz-load-femtofarads property
dt-bindings: rtc: nxp,pcf8563: move pcf85263/pcf85363 to a dedicated binding
rtc: allow rtc_read_alarm without read_alarm callback
rtc: rv3032: add ACPI support
rtc: rv3028: add ACPI support
rtc: bbnsm: Add the bbnsm rtc support
rtc: jz4740: Register clock provider for the CLK32K pin
rtc: jz4740: Use dev_err_probe()
rtc: jz4740: Use readl_poll_timeout
dt-bindings: rtc: Add #clock-cells property
...
On many Qualcomm platforms the PMIC RTC control and time registers are
read-only so that the RTC time can not be updated. Instead an offset
needs be stored in some machine-specific non-volatile memory, which the
driver can take into account.
Add support for storing a 32-bit offset from the Epoch in an nvmem cell
so that the RTC time can be set on such platforms.
Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230202155448.6715-18-johan+linaro@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
This adds support for the 256-byte internal RAM. There are two windows
which can be used to access this RAM: 64 bytes at 0x40 (the "standard"
address space) and 128 bytes at 0x80 (the "alternate" address space). We
use the standard address space because it is also accessible over SPI
(if such a port is ever done). We are limited to 32-byte reads for SMBus
compatibility, so there's no advantage to using the alternate address
space.
There are some reserved bits in the EXTRAM register, and the datasheet
doesn't say what to do with them. I've opted to skip a read/modify/write
and just write the whole thing. If this driver is ever converted to
regmap, this would be a good place to use regmap_update_bits.
Signed-off-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221222214532.1873718-1-sean.anderson@seco.com
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
There are cases where the EFI runtime services may end up in a funny
state, e.g., due to a crash in the variable services, and this affects
other EFI runtime services as well.
That means that, even though GetTime() should not return an error, there
are cases where it might, and there is no point in logging such an
occurrence multiple times.
This works around an issue where user space -apparently- keeps hitting
on /dev/rtc if it fails to read the h/w clock, resulting in a tsunami of
log spam and a non-responsive system as a result.
Cc: Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@arm.com>
Cc: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/Y2o1hdZK9GGDVJsS@monolith.localdoman/
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230217142338.1444509-1-ardb@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
