IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
The disable_dmar_iommu() is called when IOMMU initialization fails or
the IOMMU is hot-removed from the system. In both cases, there is no
need to clear the IOMMU translation data structures for devices.
On the initialization path, the device probing only happens after the
IOMMU is initialized successfully, hence there're no translation data
structures.
On the hot-remove path, there is no real use case where the IOMMU is
hot-removed, but the devices that it manages are still alive in the
system. The translation data structures were torn down during device
release, hence there's no need to repeat it in IOMMU hot-remove path
either. This removes the unnecessary code and only leaves a check.
Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220706025524.2904370-3-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
The IOMMU driver shares the pasid table for PCI alias devices. When the
RID2PASID entry of the shared pasid table has been filled by the first
device, the subsequent device will encounter the "DMAR: Setup RID2PASID
failed" failure as the pasid entry has already been marked as present.
As the result, the IOMMU probing process will be aborted.
On the contrary, when any alias device is hot-removed from the system,
for example, by writing to /sys/bus/pci/devices/.../remove, the shared
RID2PASID will be cleared without any notifications to other devices.
As the result, any DMAs from those rest devices are blocked.
Sharing pasid table among PCI alias devices could save two memory pages
for devices underneath the PCIe-to-PCI bridges. Anyway, considering that
those devices are rare on modern platforms that support VT-d in scalable
mode and the saved memory is negligible, it's reasonable to remove this
part of immature code to make the driver feasible and stable.
Fixes: ef848b7e5a6a0 ("iommu/vt-d: Setup pasid entry for RID2PASID support")
Reported-by: Chenyi Qiang <chenyi.qiang@intel.com>
Reported-by: Ethan Zhao <haifeng.zhao@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ethan Zhao <haifeng.zhao@linux.intel.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220623065720.727849-1-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220625133430.2200315-2-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
As domain->force_snooping only impacts the devices attached with the
domain, there's no need to check against all IOMMU units. On the other
hand, force_snooping could be set on a domain no matter whether it has
been attached or not, and once set it is an immutable flag. If no
device attached, the operation always succeeds. Then this empty domain
can be only attached to a device of which the IOMMU supports snoop
control.
Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220508123525.1973626-1-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220510023407.2759143-7-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
The guest pasid related callbacks are not called in the tree. Remove them
to avoid dead code.
Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220216025249.3459465-2-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
This fixes improper iotlb invalidation in intel_pasid_tear_down_entry().
When a PASID was used as nested mode, released and reused, the following
error message will appear:
[ 180.187556] Unexpected page request in Privilege Mode
[ 180.187565] Unexpected page request in Privilege Mode
[ 180.279933] Unexpected page request in Privilege Mode
[ 180.279937] Unexpected page request in Privilege Mode
Per chapter 6.5.3.3 of VT-d spec 3.3, when tear down a pasid entry, the
software should use Domain selective IOTLB flush if the PGTT of the pasid
entry is SL only or Nested, while for the pasid entries whose PGTT is FL
only or PT using PASID-based IOTLB flush is enough.
Fixes: 2cd1311a26673 ("iommu/vt-d: Add set domain DOMAIN_ATTR_NESTING attr")
Signed-off-by: Kumar Sanjay K <sanjay.k.kumar@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Liu Yi L <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
Tested-by: Yi Sun <yi.y.sun@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210817042425.1784279-1-yi.l.liu@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210817124321.1517985-3-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
The Intel VT-d driver checks wrong register to report snoop capablility
when using first level page table for GPA to HPA translation. This might
lead the IOMMU driver to say that it supports snooping control, but in
reality, it does not. Fix this by always setting PASID-table-entry.PGSNP
whenever a pasid entry is setting up for GPA to HPA translation so that
the IOMMU driver could report snoop capability as long as it runs in the
scalable mode.
Fixes: b802d070a52a1 ("iommu/vt-d: Use iova over first level")
Suggested-by: Rajesh Sankaran <rajesh.sankaran@intel.com>
Suggested-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
Suggested-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210330021145.13824-1-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
Some functions have been removed. Remove the remaining function
delarations.
Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210323010600.678627-5-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
As per Intel vt-d spec, Rev 3.0 (section 10.4.45 "Virtual Command Response
Register"), the status code of "No PASID available" error in response to
the Allocate PASID command is 2, not 1. The same for "Invalid PASID" error
in response to the Free PASID command.
We will otherwise see confusing kernel log under the command failure from
guest side. Fix it.
Fixes: 24f27d32ab6b ("iommu/vt-d: Enlightened PASID allocation")
Signed-off-by: Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210227073909.432-1-yuzenghui@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
PASID is defined as a few different types in iommu including "int",
"u32", and "unsigned int". To be consistent and to match with uapi
definitions, define PASID and its variations (e.g. max PASID) as "u32".
"u32" is also shorter and a little more explicit than "unsigned int".
No PASID type change in uapi although it defines PASID as __u64 in
some places.
Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com>
Acked-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1600187413-163670-2-git-send-email-fenghua.yu@intel.com
