iv/linux
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
1,039,358 Commits 104 Branches 1,843 Tags 5.7 GiB
4a3bb4200a
Commit Graph

4 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Geert Uytterhoeven
80454a9908 ARM: asm9260: Drop unneeded select of GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS 
Support for the Alphascale ASM9260 platform depends on ARCH_MULTI_V5,
and thus on ARCH_MULTIPLATFORM.
As the latter selects GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS, there is no need for
MACH_ASM9260 to select GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200505150722.1575-5-geert+renesas@glider.be
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Cc: Oleksij Rempel <linux@rempel-privat.de>
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
 2020-05-15 23:27:37 +02:00
Thomas Gleixner
ec8f24b7fa treewide: Add SPDX license identifier - Makefile/Kconfig 
Add SPDX license identifiers to all Make/Kconfig files which:

 - Have no license information of any form

These files fall under the project license, GPL v2 only. The resulting SPDX
license identifier is:

  GPL-2.0-only

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
 2019-05-21 10:50:46 +02:00
Daniel Lezcano
a8b1b9fc92 clockevents: asm9260: Fix compilation error with sparc/sparc64 allyesconfig 
The Kconfig options for the asm9260 timer is wrong as it can be selected by
another platform with allyes config and thus leading to a compilation failure
as some non arch related code is pulled by the compilation.

Fix this by having the platform Kconfig to select the timer as it is done for
the others drivers.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Acked-by: Oleksij Rempel <linux@rempel-privat.de>

Conflicts:
	drivers/clocksource/Kconfig
 2015-02-25 10:28:22 +01:00
Oleksij Rempel
d9bfc86dc6 ARM: add mach-asm9260 
it is low cost (?) SoC targeted for market in China and India which
trying to compete with AT91SAM9G25.

Here is some info:
http://www.alphascale.com/index.asp?ics/615.html

One of products:
http://www.aliexpress.com/store/product/2014-hot-sales-FREE-SHIPPING-new-Purple-core-ARM9-development-board-ASM9260T-SDRAM-power-line/433637_1931495721.html

In some cases this SoC looks similar to iMX23/iMX28. But currently it makes no
sense to merge mach code of this devices. Especially because most differences
are already collected mach-mxs folder.

Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel <linux@rempel-privat.de>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
 2014-11-28 15:06:38 +01:00