IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=FX5W
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Merge "do not rely on ALLOW_ERROR_INJECTION for fmod_ret" into bpf-next
Merge commit 5b481acab4 ("bpf: do not rely on ALLOW_ERROR_INJECTION for fmod_ret")
from hid tree into bpf-next.
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
The current way of expressing that a non-bpf kernel component is willing
to accept that bpf programs can be attached to it and that they can change
the return value is to abuse ALLOW_ERROR_INJECTION.
This is debated in the link below, and the result is that it is not a
reasonable thing to do.
Reuse the kfunc declaration structure to also tag the kernel functions
we want to be fmodret. This way we can control from any subsystem which
functions are being modified by bpf without touching the verifier.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221121104403.1545f9b5@gandalf.local.home/
Suggested-by: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221206145936.922196-2-benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com
Martin mentioned that the verifier cannot assume arguments from
LSM hook sk_alloc_security being trusted since after the hook
is called, the sk ref_count is set to 1. This will overwrite
the ref_count changed by the bpf program and may cause ref_count
underflow later on.
I then further checked some other hooks. For example,
for bpf_lsm_file_alloc() hook in fs/file_table.c,
f->f_cred = get_cred(cred);
error = security_file_alloc(f);
if (unlikely(error)) {
file_free_rcu(&f->f_rcuhead);
return ERR_PTR(error);
}
atomic_long_set(&f->f_count, 1);
The input parameter 'f' to security_file_alloc() cannot be trusted
as well.
Specifically, I investiaged bpf_map/bpf_prog/file/sk/task alloc/free
lsm hooks. Except bpf_map_alloc and task_alloc, arguments for all other
hooks should not be considered as trusted. This may not be a complete
list, but it covers common usage for sk and task.
Fixes: 3f00c52393 ("bpf: Allow trusted pointers to be passed to KF_TRUSTED_ARGS kfuncs")
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221203204954.2043348-1-yhs@fb.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
The PTR_TRUSTED flag should only be applied to pointers where the verifier can
guarantee that such pointers are valid.
The fentry/fexit/fmod_ret programs are not in this category.
Only arguments of SEC("tp_btf") and SEC("iter") programs are trusted
(which have BPF_TRACE_RAW_TP and BPF_TRACE_ITER attach_type correspondingly)
This bug was masked because convert_ctx_accesses() was converting trusted
loads into BPF_PROBE_MEM loads. Fix it as well.
The loads from trusted pointers don't need exception handling.
Fixes: 3f00c52393 ("bpf: Allow trusted pointers to be passed to KF_TRUSTED_ARGS kfuncs")
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221124215314.55890-1-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
Add two kfunc's bpf_rcu_read_lock() and bpf_rcu_read_unlock(). These two kfunc's
can be used for all program types. The following is an example about how
rcu pointer are used w.r.t. bpf_rcu_read_lock()/bpf_rcu_read_unlock().
struct task_struct {
...
struct task_struct *last_wakee;
struct task_struct __rcu *real_parent;
...
};
Let us say prog does 'task = bpf_get_current_task_btf()' to get a
'task' pointer. The basic rules are:
- 'real_parent = task->real_parent' should be inside bpf_rcu_read_lock
region. This is to simulate rcu_dereference() operation. The
'real_parent' is marked as MEM_RCU only if (1). task->real_parent is
inside bpf_rcu_read_lock region, and (2). task is a trusted ptr. So
MEM_RCU marked ptr can be 'trusted' inside the bpf_rcu_read_lock region.
- 'last_wakee = real_parent->last_wakee' should be inside bpf_rcu_read_lock
region since it tries to access rcu protected memory.
- the ptr 'last_wakee' will be marked as PTR_UNTRUSTED since in general
it is not clear whether the object pointed by 'last_wakee' is valid or
not even inside bpf_rcu_read_lock region.
The verifier will reset all rcu pointer register states to untrusted
at bpf_rcu_read_unlock() kfunc call site, so any such rcu pointer
won't be trusted any more outside the bpf_rcu_read_lock() region.
The current implementation does not support nested rcu read lock
region in the prog.
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221124053217.2373910-1-yhs@fb.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Syzkaller managed to hit another decl_tag issue:
btf_func_proto_check kernel/bpf/btf.c:4506 [inline]
btf_check_all_types kernel/bpf/btf.c:4734 [inline]
btf_parse_type_sec+0x1175/0x1980 kernel/bpf/btf.c:4763
btf_parse kernel/bpf/btf.c:5042 [inline]
btf_new_fd+0x65a/0xb00 kernel/bpf/btf.c:6709
bpf_btf_load+0x6f/0x90 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:4342
__sys_bpf+0x50a/0x6c0 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5034
__do_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5093 [inline]
__se_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5091 [inline]
__x64_sys_bpf+0x7c/0x90 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5091
do_syscall_64+0x54/0x70 arch/x86/entry/common.c:48
This seems similar to commit ea68376c8b ("bpf: prevent decl_tag from being
referenced in func_proto") but for the argument.
Reported-by: syzbot+8dd0551dda6020944c5d@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221123035422.872531-2-sdf@google.com
Implement bpf_cast_to_kern_ctx() kfunc which does a type cast
of a uapi ctx object to the corresponding kernel ctx. Previously
if users want to access some data available in kctx but not
in uapi ctx, bpf_probe_read_kernel() helper is needed.
The introduction of bpf_cast_to_kern_ctx() allows direct
memory access which makes code simpler and easier to understand.
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221120195432.3113982-1-yhs@fb.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Later on, we will introduce kfuncs bpf_cast_to_kern_ctx() and
bpf_rdonly_cast() which apply to all program types. Currently kfunc set
only supports individual prog types. This patch added support for kfunc
applying to all program types.
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221120195426.3113828-1-yhs@fb.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Kfuncs currently support specifying the KF_TRUSTED_ARGS flag to signal
to the verifier that it should enforce that a BPF program passes it a
"safe", trusted pointer. Currently, "safe" means that the pointer is
either PTR_TO_CTX, or is refcounted. There may be cases, however, where
the kernel passes a BPF program a safe / trusted pointer to an object
that the BPF program wishes to use as a kptr, but because the object
does not yet have a ref_obj_id from the perspective of the verifier, the
program would be unable to pass it to a KF_ACQUIRE | KF_TRUSTED_ARGS
kfunc.
The solution is to expand the set of pointers that are considered
trusted according to KF_TRUSTED_ARGS, so that programs can invoke kfuncs
with these pointers without getting rejected by the verifier.
There is already a PTR_UNTRUSTED flag that is set in some scenarios,
such as when a BPF program reads a kptr directly from a map
without performing a bpf_kptr_xchg() call. These pointers of course can
and should be rejected by the verifier. Unfortunately, however,
PTR_UNTRUSTED does not cover all the cases for safety that need to
be addressed to adequately protect kfuncs. Specifically, pointers
obtained by a BPF program "walking" a struct are _not_ considered
PTR_UNTRUSTED according to BPF. For example, say that we were to add a
kfunc called bpf_task_acquire(), with KF_ACQUIRE | KF_TRUSTED_ARGS, to
acquire a struct task_struct *. If we only used PTR_UNTRUSTED to signal
that a task was unsafe to pass to a kfunc, the verifier would mistakenly
allow the following unsafe BPF program to be loaded:
SEC("tp_btf/task_newtask")
int BPF_PROG(unsafe_acquire_task,
struct task_struct *task,
u64 clone_flags)
{
struct task_struct *acquired, *nested;
nested = task->last_wakee;
/* Would not be rejected by the verifier. */
acquired = bpf_task_acquire(nested);
if (!acquired)
return 0;
bpf_task_release(acquired);
return 0;
}
To address this, this patch defines a new type flag called PTR_TRUSTED
which tracks whether a PTR_TO_BTF_ID pointer is safe to pass to a
KF_TRUSTED_ARGS kfunc or a BPF helper function. PTR_TRUSTED pointers are
passed directly from the kernel as a tracepoint or struct_ops callback
argument. Any nested pointer that is obtained from walking a PTR_TRUSTED
pointer is no longer PTR_TRUSTED. From the example above, the struct
task_struct *task argument is PTR_TRUSTED, but the 'nested' pointer
obtained from 'task->last_wakee' is not PTR_TRUSTED.
A subsequent patch will add kfuncs for storing a task kfunc as a kptr,
and then another patch will add selftests to validate.
Signed-off-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221120051004.3605026-3-void@manifault.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
The old behavior of bpf_map_meta_equal was that it compared timer_off
to be equal (but not spin_lock_off, because that was not allowed), and
did memcmp of kptr_off_tab.
Now, we memcmp the btf_record of two bpf_map structs, which has all
fields.
We preserve backwards compat as we kzalloc the array, so if only spin
lock and timer exist in map, we only compare offset while the rest of
unused members in the btf_field struct are zeroed out.
In case of kptr, btf and everything else is of vmlinux or module, so as
long type is same it will match, since kernel btf, module, dtor pointer
will be same across maps.
Now with list_head in the mix, things are a bit complicated. We
implicitly add a requirement that both BTFs are same, because struct
btf_field_list_head has btf and value_rec members.
We obviously shouldn't force BTFs to be equal by default, as that breaks
backwards compatibility.
Currently it is only implicitly required due to list_head matching
struct btf and value_rec member. value_rec points back into a btf_record
stashed in the map BTF (btf member of btf_field_list_head). So that
pointer and btf member has to match exactly.
Document all these subtle details so that things don't break in the
future when touching this code.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221118015614.2013203-19-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
As we continue to add more features, argument types, kfunc flags, and
different extensions to kfuncs, the code to verify the correctness of
the kfunc prototype wrt the passed in registers has become ad-hoc and
ugly to read. To make life easier, and make a very clear split between
different stages of argument processing, move all the code into
verifier.c and refactor into easier to read helpers and functions.
This also makes sharing code within the verifier easier with kfunc
argument processing. This will be more and more useful in later patches
as we are now moving to implement very core BPF helpers as kfuncs, to
keep them experimental before baking into UAPI.
Remove all kfunc related bits now from btf_check_func_arg_match, as
users have been converted away to refactored kfunc argument handling.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221118015614.2013203-12-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Ensure that there can be no ownership cycles among different types by
way of having owning objects that can hold some other type as their
element. For instance, a map value can only hold allocated objects, but
these are allowed to have another bpf_list_head. To prevent unbounded
recursion while freeing resources, elements of bpf_list_head in local
kptrs can never have a bpf_list_head which are part of list in a map
value. Later patches will verify this by having dedicated BTF selftests.
Also, to make runtime destruction easier, once btf_struct_metas is fully
populated, we can stash the metadata of the value type directly in the
metadata of the list_head fields, as that allows easier access to the
value type's layout to destruct it at runtime from the btf_field entry
of the list head itself.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221118015614.2013203-8-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Allow specifying bpf_spin_lock, bpf_list_head, bpf_list_node fields in a
allocated object.
Also update btf_struct_access to reject direct access to these special
fields.
A bpf_list_head allows implementing map-in-map style use cases, where an
allocated object with bpf_list_head is linked into a list in a map
value. This would require embedding a bpf_list_node, support for which
is also included. The bpf_spin_lock is used to protect the bpf_list_head
and other data.
While we strictly don't require to hold a bpf_spin_lock while touching
the bpf_list_head in such objects, as when have access to it, we have
complete ownership of the object, the locking constraint is still kept
and may be conditionally lifted in the future.
Note that the specification of such types can be done just like map
values, e.g.:
struct bar {
struct bpf_list_node node;
};
struct foo {
struct bpf_spin_lock lock;
struct bpf_list_head head __contains(bar, node);
struct bpf_list_node node;
};
struct map_value {
struct bpf_spin_lock lock;
struct bpf_list_head head __contains(foo, node);
};
To recognize such types in user BTF, we build a btf_struct_metas array
of metadata items corresponding to each BTF ID. This is done once during
the btf_parse stage to avoid having to do it each time during the
verification process's requirement to inspect the metadata.
Moreover, the computed metadata needs to be passed to some helpers in
future patches which requires allocating them and storing them in the
BTF that is pinned by the program itself, so that valid access can be
assumed to such data during program runtime.
A key thing to note is that once a btf_struct_meta is available for a
type, both the btf_record and btf_field_offs should be available. It is
critical that btf_field_offs is available in case special fields are
present, as we extensively rely on special fields being zeroed out in
map values and allocated objects in later patches. The code ensures that
by bailing out in case of errors and ensuring both are available
together. If the record is not available, the special fields won't be
recognized, so not having both is also fine (in terms of being a
verification error and not a runtime bug).
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221118015614.2013203-7-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Introduce support for representing pointers to objects allocated by the
BPF program, i.e. PTR_TO_BTF_ID that point to a type in program BTF.
This is indicated by the presence of MEM_ALLOC type flag in reg->type to
avoid having to check btf_is_kernel when trying to match argument types
in helpers.
Whenever walking such types, any pointers being walked will always yield
a SCALAR instead of pointer. In the future we might permit kptr inside
such allocated objects (either kernel or program allocated), and it will
then form a PTR_TO_BTF_ID of the respective type.
For now, such allocated objects will always be referenced in verifier
context, hence ref_obj_id == 0 for them is a bug. It is allowed to write
to such objects, as long fields that are special are not touched
(support for which will be added in subsequent patches). Note that once
such a pointer is marked PTR_UNTRUSTED, it is no longer allowed to write
to it.
No PROBE_MEM handling is therefore done for loads into this type unless
PTR_UNTRUSTED is part of the register type, since they can never be in
an undefined state, and their lifetime will always be valid.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221118015614.2013203-6-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Instead of having to pass multiple arguments that describe the register,
pass the bpf_reg_state into the btf_struct_access callback. Currently,
all call sites simply reuse the btf and btf_id of the reg they want to
check the access of. The only exception to this pattern is the callsite
in check_ptr_to_map_access, hence for that case create a dummy reg to
simulate PTR_TO_BTF_ID access.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221114191547.1694267-8-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Add the support on the map side to parse, recognize, verify, and build
metadata table for a new special field of the type struct bpf_list_head.
To parameterize the bpf_list_head for a certain value type and the
list_node member it will accept in that value type, we use BTF
declaration tags.
The definition of bpf_list_head in a map value will be done as follows:
struct foo {
struct bpf_list_node node;
int data;
};
struct map_value {
struct bpf_list_head head __contains(foo, node);
};
Then, the bpf_list_head only allows adding to the list 'head' using the
bpf_list_node 'node' for the type struct foo.
The 'contains' annotation is a BTF declaration tag composed of four
parts, "contains:name:node" where the name is then used to look up the
type in the map BTF, with its kind hardcoded to BTF_KIND_STRUCT during
the lookup. The node defines name of the member in this type that has
the type struct bpf_list_node, which is actually used for linking into
the linked list. For now, 'kind' part is hardcoded as struct.
This allows building intrusive linked lists in BPF, using container_of
to obtain pointer to entry, while being completely type safe from the
perspective of the verifier. The verifier knows exactly the type of the
nodes, and knows that list helpers return that type at some fixed offset
where the bpf_list_node member used for this list exists. The verifier
also uses this information to disallow adding types that are not
accepted by a certain list.
For now, no elements can be added to such lists. Support for that is
coming in future patches, hence draining and freeing items is done with
a TODO that will be resolved in a future patch.
Note that the bpf_list_head_free function moves the list out to a local
variable under the lock and releases it, doing the actual draining of
the list items outside the lock. While this helps with not holding the
lock for too long pessimizing other concurrent list operations, it is
also necessary for deadlock prevention: unless every function called in
the critical section would be notrace, a fentry/fexit program could
attach and call bpf_map_update_elem again on the map, leading to the
same lock being acquired if the key matches and lead to a deadlock.
While this requires some special effort on part of the BPF programmer to
trigger and is highly unlikely to occur in practice, it is always better
if we can avoid such a condition.
While notrace would prevent this, doing the draining outside the lock
has advantages of its own, hence it is used to also fix the deadlock
related problem.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221114191547.1694267-5-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
In f71b2f6417 ("bpf: Refactor map->off_arr handling"), map->off_arr
was refactored to be btf_field_offs. The number of field offsets is
equal to maximum possible fields limited by BTF_FIELDS_MAX. Hence, reuse
BTF_FIELDS_MAX as spin_lock and timer no longer are to be handled
specially for offset sorting, fix the comment, and remove incorrect
WARN_ON as its rec->cnt can never exceed this value. The reason to keep
separate constant was the it was always more 2 more than total kptrs.
This is no longer the case.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221114191547.1694267-3-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Refactor map->off_arr handling into generic functions that can work on
their own without hardcoding map specific code. The btf_fields_offs
structure is now returned from btf_parse_field_offs, which can be reused
later for types in program BTF.
All functions like copy_map_value, zero_map_value call generic
underlying functions so that they can also be reused later for copying
to values allocated in programs which encode specific fields.
Later, some helper functions will also require access to this
btf_field_offs structure to be able to skip over special fields at
runtime.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221103191013.1236066-9-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Now that kptr_off_tab has been refactored into btf_record, and can hold
more than one specific field type, accomodate bpf_spin_lock and
bpf_timer as well.
While they don't require any more metadata than offset, having all
special fields in one place allows us to share the same code for
allocated user defined types and handle both map values and these
allocated objects in a similar fashion.
As an optimization, we still keep spin_lock_off and timer_off offsets in
the btf_record structure, just to avoid having to find the btf_field
struct each time their offset is needed. This is mostly needed to
manipulate such objects in a map value at runtime. It's ok to hardcode
just one offset as more than one field is disallowed.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221103191013.1236066-8-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
To prepare the BPF verifier to handle special fields in both map values
and program allocated types coming from program BTF, we need to refactor
the kptr_off_tab handling code into something more generic and reusable
across both cases to avoid code duplication.
Later patches also require passing this data to helpers at runtime, so
that they can work on user defined types, initialize them, destruct
them, etc.
The main observation is that both map values and such allocated types
point to a type in program BTF, hence they can be handled similarly. We
can prepare a field metadata table for both cases and store them in
struct bpf_map or struct btf depending on the use case.
Hence, refactor the code into generic btf_record and btf_field member
structs. The btf_record represents the fields of a specific btf_type in
user BTF. The cnt indicates the number of special fields we successfully
recognized, and field_mask is a bitmask of fields that were found, to
enable quick determination of availability of a certain field.
Subsequently, refactor the rest of the code to work with these generic
types, remove assumptions about kptr and kptr_off_tab, rename variables
to more meaningful names, etc.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221103191013.1236066-7-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
This is useful in particular to mark the pointer as volatile, so that
compiler treats each load and store to the field as a volatile access.
The alternative is having to define and use READ_ONCE and WRITE_ONCE in
the BPF program.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Acked-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221103191013.1236066-3-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Instead of forcing all arguments to be referenced pointers with non-zero
reg->ref_obj_id, tweak the definition of KF_TRUSTED_ARGS to mean that
only PTR_TO_BTF_ID (and socket types translated to PTR_TO_BTF_ID) have
that constraint, and require their offset to be set to 0.
The rest of pointer types are also accomodated in this definition of
trusted pointers, but with more relaxed rules regarding offsets.
The inherent meaning of setting this flag is that all kfunc pointer
arguments have a guranteed lifetime, and kernel object pointers
(PTR_TO_BTF_ID, PTR_TO_CTX) are passed in their unmodified form (with
offset 0). In general, this is not true for PTR_TO_BTF_ID as it can be
obtained using pointer walks.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/cdede0043c47ed7a357f0a915d16f9ce06a1d589.1663778601.git.lorenzo@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Allow dynamic pointers (struct bpf_dynptr_kern *) to be specified as
parameters in kfuncs. Also, ensure that dynamic pointers passed as argument
are valid and initialized, are a pointer to the stack, and of the type
local. More dynamic pointer types can be supported in the future.
To properly detect whether a parameter is of the desired type, introduce
the stringify_struct() macro to compare the returned structure name with
the desired name. In addition, protect against structure renames, by
halting the build with BUILD_BUG_ON(), so that developers have to revisit
the code.
To check if a dynamic pointer passed to the kfunc is valid and initialized,
and if its type is local, export the existing functions
is_dynptr_reg_valid_init() and is_dynptr_type_expected().
Cc: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com>
Cc: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220920075951.929132-5-roberto.sassu@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
In preparation for the addition of new kfuncs, allow kfuncs defined in the
tracing subsystem to be used in LSM programs by mapping the LSM program
type to the TRACING hook.
Signed-off-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220920075951.929132-2-roberto.sassu@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
It could directly return 'btf_check_sec_info' to simplify code.
Signed-off-by: William Dean <williamsukatube@163.com>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220917084248.3649-1-williamsukatube@163.com
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
We have btf_type_str(). Use it whenever possible in btf.c, instead of
"btf_kind_str[BTF_INFO_KIND(t->info)]".
Signed-off-by: Peilin Ye <peilin.ye@bytedance.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220916202800.31421-1-yepeilin.cs@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
When trying to finish resolving a struct member, btf_struct_resolve
saves the member type id in a u16 temporary variable. This truncates
the 32 bit type id value if it exceeds UINT16_MAX.
As a result, structs that have members with type ids > UINT16_MAX and
which need resolution will fail with a message like this:
[67414] STRUCT ff_device size=120 vlen=12
effect_owners type_id=67434 bits_offset=960 Member exceeds struct_size
Fix this by changing the type of last_member_type_id to u32.
Fixes: a0791f0df7 ("bpf: fix BTF limits")
Reviewed-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Lorenz Bauer <oss@lmb.io>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220910110120.339242-1-oss@lmb.io
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
For drivers (outside of network), the incoming data is not statically
defined in a struct. Most of the time the data buffer is kzalloc-ed
and thus we can not rely on eBPF and BTF to explore the data.
This commit allows to return an arbitrary memory, previously allocated by
the driver.
An interesting extra point is that the kfunc can mark the exported
memory region as read only or read/write.
So, when a kfunc is not returning a pointer to a struct but to a plain
type, we can consider it is a valid allocated memory assuming that:
- one of the arguments is either called rdonly_buf_size or
rdwr_buf_size
- and this argument is a const from the caller point of view
We can then use this parameter as the size of the allocated memory.
The memory is either read-only or read-write based on the name
of the size parameter.
Acked-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220906151303.2780789-7-benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
net/bpf/test_run.c is already presenting 20 kfuncs.
net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_bpf.c is also presenting an extra 10 kfuncs.
Given that all the kfuncs are regrouped into one unique set, having
only 2 space left prevent us to add more selftests.
Bump it to 256.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220906151303.2780789-6-benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
btf_check_subprog_arg_match() was used twice in verifier.c:
- when checking for the type mismatches between a (sub)prog declaration
and BTF
- when checking the call of a subprog to see if the provided arguments
are correct and valid
This is problematic when we check if the first argument of a program
(pointer to ctx) is correctly accessed:
To be able to ensure we access a valid memory in the ctx, the verifier
assumes the pointer to context is not null.
This has the side effect of marking the program accessing the entire
context, even if the context is never dereferenced.
For example, by checking the context access with the current code, the
following eBPF program would fail with -EINVAL if the ctx is set to null
from the userspace:
```
SEC("syscall")
int prog(struct my_ctx *args) {
return 0;
}
```
In that particular case, we do not want to actually check that the memory
is correct while checking for the BTF validity, but we just want to
ensure that the (sub)prog definition matches the BTF we have.
So split btf_check_subprog_arg_match() in two so we can actually check
for the memory used when in a call, and ignore that part when not.
Note that a further patch is in preparation to disentangled
btf_check_func_arg_match() from these two purposes, and so right now we
just add a new hack around that by adding a boolean to this function.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220906151303.2780789-3-benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Allow struct argument in trampoline based programs where
the struct size should be <= 16 bytes. In such cases, the argument
will be put into up to 2 registers for bpf, x86_64 and arm64
architectures.
To support arch-specific trampoline manipulation,
add arg_flags for additional struct information about arguments
in btf_func_model. Such information will be used in arch specific
function arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline() to prepare argument access
properly in trampoline.
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220831152646.2078089-1-yhs@fb.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Currently in funciton __get_type_size(), the corresponding
btf_type is returned only in invalid cases. Let us always
return btf_type regardless of valid or invalid cases.
Such a new functionality will be used in subsequent patches.
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220807175116.4179242-1-yhs@fb.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
This allows to declare a kfunc as sleepable and prevents its use in
a non sleepable program.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>
Co-developed-by: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220805214821.1058337-2-haoluo@google.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
vsnprintf returns the number of characters which would have been written if
enough space had been available, excluding the terminating null byte. Thus,
the return value of 'len_left' means that the last character has been
dropped.
Signed-off-by: Fedor Tokarev <ftokarev@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220711211317.GA1143610@laptop
Teach the verifier to detect a new KF_TRUSTED_ARGS kfunc flag, which
means each pointer argument must be trusted, which we define as a
pointer that is referenced (has non-zero ref_obj_id) and also needs to
have its offset unchanged, similar to how release functions expect their
argument. This allows a kfunc to receive pointer arguments unchanged
from the result of the acquire kfunc.
This is required to ensure that kfunc that operate on some object only
work on acquired pointers and not normal PTR_TO_BTF_ID with same type
which can be obtained by pointer walking. The restrictions applied to
release arguments also apply to trusted arguments. This implies that
strict type matching (not deducing type by recursively following members
at offset) and OBJ_RELEASE offset checks (ensuring they are zero) are
used for trusted pointer arguments.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220721134245.2450-5-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Instead of populating multiple sets to indicate some attribute and then
researching the same BTF ID in them, prepare a single unified BTF set
which indicates whether a kfunc is allowed to be called, and also its
attributes if any at the same time. Now, only one call is needed to
perform the lookup for both kfunc availability and its attributes.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220721134245.2450-4-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
When checking with sparse, btf_show_type_value() is causing a
warning about checking integer vs NULL when the macro is passed
a pointer, due to the 'value != 0' check. Stop sparse complaining
about any type-casting by adding a cast to the typeof(value).
This fixes the following sparse warnings:
kernel/bpf/btf.c:2579:17: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
kernel/bpf/btf.c:2581:17: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
kernel/bpf/btf.c:3407:17: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
kernel/bpf/btf.c:3758:9: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@sifive.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220714100322.260467-1-ben.dooks@sifive.com
Daniel Borkmann says:
====================
pull-request: bpf-next 2022-07-09
We've added 94 non-merge commits during the last 19 day(s) which contain
a total of 125 files changed, 5141 insertions(+), 6701 deletions(-).
The main changes are:
1) Add new way for performing BTF type queries to BPF, from Daniel Müller.
2) Add inlining of calls to bpf_loop() helper when its function callback is
statically known, from Eduard Zingerman.
3) Implement BPF TCP CC framework usability improvements, from Jörn-Thorben Hinz.
4) Add LSM flavor for attaching per-cgroup BPF programs to existing LSM
hooks, from Stanislav Fomichev.
5) Remove all deprecated libbpf APIs in prep for 1.0 release, from Andrii Nakryiko.
6) Add benchmarks around local_storage to BPF selftests, from Dave Marchevsky.
7) AF_XDP sample removal (given move to libxdp) and various improvements around AF_XDP
selftests, from Magnus Karlsson & Maciej Fijalkowski.
8) Add bpftool improvements for memcg probing and bash completion, from Quentin Monnet.
9) Add arm64 JIT support for BPF-2-BPF coupled with tail calls, from Jakub Sitnicki.
10) Sockmap optimizations around throughput of UDP transmissions which have been
improved by 61%, from Cong Wang.
11) Rework perf's BPF prologue code to remove deprecated functions, from Jiri Olsa.
12) Fix sockmap teardown path to avoid sleepable sk_psock_stop, from John Fastabend.
13) Fix libbpf's cleanup around legacy kprobe/uprobe on error case, from Chuang Wang.
14) Fix libbpf's bpf_helpers.h to work with gcc for the case of its sec/pragma
macro, from James Hilliard.
15) Fix libbpf's pt_regs macros for riscv to use a0 for RC register, from Yixun Lan.
16) Fix bpftool to show the name of type BPF_OBJ_LINK, from Yafang Shao.
* https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next: (94 commits)
selftests/bpf: Fix xdp_synproxy build failure if CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK=m/n
bpf: Correctly propagate errors up from bpf_core_composites_match
libbpf: Disable SEC pragma macro on GCC
bpf: Check attach_func_proto more carefully in check_return_code
selftests/bpf: Add test involving restrict type qualifier
bpftool: Add support for KIND_RESTRICT to gen min_core_btf command
MAINTAINERS: Add entry for AF_XDP selftests files
selftests, xsk: Rename AF_XDP testing app
bpf, docs: Remove deprecated xsk libbpf APIs description
selftests/bpf: Add benchmark for local_storage RCU Tasks Trace usage
libbpf, riscv: Use a0 for RC register
libbpf: Remove unnecessary usdt_rel_ip assignments
selftests/bpf: Fix few more compiler warnings
selftests/bpf: Fix bogus uninitialized variable warning
bpftool: Remove zlib feature test from Makefile
libbpf: Cleanup the legacy uprobe_event on failed add/attach_event()
libbpf: Fix wrong variable used in perf_event_uprobe_open_legacy()
libbpf: Cleanup the legacy kprobe_event on failed add/attach_event()
selftests/bpf: Add type match test against kernel's task_struct
selftests/bpf: Add nested type to type based tests
...
====================
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220708233145.32365-1-daniel@iogearbox.net
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
This patch adds support for the proposed type match relation to
relo_core where it is shared between userspace and kernel. It plumbs
through both kernel-side and libbpf-side support.
The matching relation is defined as follows (copy from source):
- modifiers and typedefs are stripped (and, hence, effectively ignored)
- generally speaking types need to be of same kind (struct vs. struct, union
vs. union, etc.)
- exceptions are struct/union behind a pointer which could also match a
forward declaration of a struct or union, respectively, and enum vs.
enum64 (see below)
Then, depending on type:
- integers:
- match if size and signedness match
- arrays & pointers:
- target types are recursively matched
- structs & unions:
- local members need to exist in target with the same name
- for each member we recursively check match unless it is already behind a
pointer, in which case we only check matching names and compatible kind
- enums:
- local variants have to have a match in target by symbolic name (but not
numeric value)
- size has to match (but enum may match enum64 and vice versa)
- function pointers:
- number and position of arguments in local type has to match target
- for each argument and the return value we recursively check match
Signed-off-by: Daniel Müller <deso@posteo.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220628160127.607834-5-deso@posteo.net
Allow attaching to lsm hooks in the cgroup context.
Attaching to per-cgroup LSM works exactly like attaching
to other per-cgroup hooks. New BPF_LSM_CGROUP is added
to trigger new mode; the actual lsm hook we attach to is
signaled via existing attach_btf_id.
For the hooks that have 'struct socket' or 'struct sock' as its first
argument, we use the cgroup associated with that socket. For the rest,
we use 'current' cgroup (this is all on default hierarchy == v2 only).
Note that for some hooks that work on 'struct sock' we still
take the cgroup from 'current' because some of them work on the socket
that hasn't been properly initialized yet.
Behind the scenes, we allocate a shim program that is attached
to the trampoline and runs cgroup effective BPF programs array.
This shim has some rudimentary ref counting and can be shared
between several programs attaching to the same lsm hook from
different cgroups.
Note that this patch bloats cgroup size because we add 211
cgroup_bpf_attach_type(s) for simplicity sake. This will be
addressed in the subsequent patch.
Also note that we only add non-sleepable flavor for now. To enable
sleepable use-cases, bpf_prog_run_array_cg has to grab trace rcu,
shim programs have to be freed via trace rcu, cgroup_bpf.effective
should be also trace-rcu-managed + maybe some other changes that
I'm not aware of.
Reviewed-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220628174314.1216643-4-sdf@google.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
BPF type compatibility checks (bpf_core_types_are_compat()) are
currently duplicated between kernel and user space. That's a historical
artifact more than intentional doing and can lead to subtle bugs where
one implementation is adjusted but another is forgotten.
That happened with the enum64 work, for example, where the libbpf side
was changed (commit 23b2a3a8f6 ("libbpf: Add enum64 relocation
support")) to use the btf_kind_core_compat() helper function but the
kernel side was not (commit 6089fb325c ("bpf: Add btf enum64
support")).
This patch addresses both the duplication issue, by merging both
implementations and moving them into relo_core.c, and fixes the alluded
to kind check (by giving preference to libbpf's already adjusted logic).
For discussion of the topic, please refer to:
https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAADnVQKbWR7oarBdewgOBZUPzryhRYvEbkhyPJQHHuxq=0K1gw@mail.gmail.com/T/#mcc99f4a33ad9a322afaf1b9276fb1f0b7add9665
Changelog:
v1 -> v2:
- limited libbpf recursion limit to 32
- changed name to __bpf_core_types_are_compat
- included warning previously present in libbpf version
- merged kernel and user space changes into a single patch
Signed-off-by: Daniel Müller <deso@posteo.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220623182934.2582827-1-deso@posteo.net
Daniel Borkmann says:
====================
pull-request: bpf-next 2022-06-17
We've added 72 non-merge commits during the last 15 day(s) which contain
a total of 92 files changed, 4582 insertions(+), 834 deletions(-).
The main changes are:
1) Add 64 bit enum value support to BTF, from Yonghong Song.
2) Implement support for sleepable BPF uprobe programs, from Delyan Kratunov.
3) Add new BPF helpers to issue and check TCP SYN cookies without binding to a
socket especially useful in synproxy scenarios, from Maxim Mikityanskiy.
4) Fix libbpf's internal USDT address translation logic for shared libraries as
well as uprobe's symbol file offset calculation, from Andrii Nakryiko.
5) Extend libbpf to provide an API for textual representation of the various
map/prog/attach/link types and use it in bpftool, from Daniel Müller.
6) Provide BTF line info for RV64 and RV32 JITs, and fix a put_user bug in the
core seen in 32 bit when storing BPF function addresses, from Pu Lehui.
7) Fix libbpf's BTF pointer size guessing by adding a list of various aliases
for 'long' types, from Douglas Raillard.
8) Fix bpftool to readd setting rlimit since probing for memcg-based accounting
has been unreliable and caused a regression on COS, from Quentin Monnet.
9) Fix UAF in BPF cgroup's effective program computation triggered upon BPF link
detachment, from Tadeusz Struk.
10) Fix bpftool build bootstrapping during cross compilation which was pointing
to the wrong AR process, from Shahab Vahedi.
11) Fix logic bug in libbpf's is_pow_of_2 implementation, from Yuze Chi.
12) BPF hash map optimization to avoid grabbing spinlocks of all CPUs when there
is no free element. Also add a benchmark as reproducer, from Feng Zhou.
13) Fix bpftool's codegen to bail out when there's no BTF, from Michael Mullin.
14) Various minor cleanup and improvements all over the place.
* https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next: (72 commits)
bpf: Fix bpf_skc_lookup comment wrt. return type
bpf: Fix non-static bpf_func_proto struct definitions
selftests/bpf: Don't force lld on non-x86 architectures
selftests/bpf: Add selftests for raw syncookie helpers in TC mode
bpf: Allow the new syncookie helpers to work with SKBs
selftests/bpf: Add selftests for raw syncookie helpers
bpf: Add helpers to issue and check SYN cookies in XDP
bpf: Allow helpers to accept pointers with a fixed size
bpf: Fix documentation of th_len in bpf_tcp_{gen,check}_syncookie
selftests/bpf: add tests for sleepable (uk)probes
libbpf: add support for sleepable uprobe programs
bpf: allow sleepable uprobe programs to attach
bpf: implement sleepable uprobes by chaining gps
bpf: move bpf_prog to bpf.h
libbpf: Fix internal USDT address translation logic for shared libraries
samples/bpf: Check detach prog exist or not in xdp_fwd
selftests/bpf: Avoid skipping certain subtests
selftests/bpf: Fix test_varlen verification failure with latest llvm
bpftool: Do not check return value from libbpf_set_strict_mode()
Revert "bpftool: Use libbpf 1.0 API mode instead of RLIMIT_MEMLOCK"
...
====================
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220617220836.7373-1-daniel@iogearbox.net
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
On processing a module BTF of module built for an older kernel, we might
sometimes find that some type points to itself forming a loop. If such a
type is a modifier, btf_check_type_tags's while loop following modifier
chain will be caught in an infinite loop.
Fix this by defining a maximum chain length and bailing out if we spin
any longer than that.
Fixes: eb596b0905 ("bpf: Ensure type tags precede modifiers in BTF")
Reported-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220615042151.2266537-1-memxor@gmail.com
The verifier allows programs to call global functions as long as their
argument types match, using BTF to check the function arguments. One of the
allowed argument types to such global functions is PTR_TO_CTX; however the
check for this fails on BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT functions because the verifier
uses the wrong type to fetch the vmlinux BTF ID for the program context
type. This failure is seen when an XDP program is loaded using
libxdp (which loads it as BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT and attaches it to a global XDP
type program).
Fix the issue by passing in the target program type instead of the
BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT type to bpf_prog_get_ctx() when checking function
argument compatibility.
The first Fixes tag refers to the latest commit that touched the code in
question, while the second one points to the code that first introduced
the global function call verification.
v2:
- Use resolve_prog_type()
Fixes: 3363bd0cfb ("bpf: Extend kfunc with PTR_TO_CTX, PTR_TO_MEM argument support")
Fixes: 51c39bb1d5 ("bpf: Introduce function-by-function verification")
Reported-by: Simon Sundberg <simon.sundberg@kau.se>
Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220606075253.28422-1-toke@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
