IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
If we create a new node, it is possible for the slab allocator to return
us a recently freed node. If that node was just retired, it will retain
the current jiffy as its node->age. There is then a miniscule window,
where as that node is retired, it will appear on the free list with an
incorrect age and be eligible for reuse by one thread, and then by a
second thread as the correct node->age is written.
Fixes: 06b73c2d0b65 ("drm/i915/gt: Delay taking the spinlock for grabbing from the buffer pool")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200915091417.4086-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
(cherry picked from commit 9bb34ff25c458a2a48fb61409df42f465ede37f8)
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
We need to ensure that the list is valid prior to marking the node as
retrievable, otherwise we may see two threads compete over the same node
in intel_gt_get_buffer_pool(). If the first thread acquires and releases
the node in the same jiffie, the second thread may then acquire it (as
the jiffie now again matches the expected value) and claim the node
before it is put back into the list.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200730134049.8822-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
A last minute change, that unfortunately broke CI so badly it declared
SUCCESS, was to refactor the debug free all buffer pool code to reuse
the normal worker, inverted the termination condition so that it instead
of discarding the nodes, they were all declared young enough and
eligible for reuse.
Fixes: 06b73c2d0b65 ("drm/i915/gt: Delay taking the spinlock for grabbing from the buffer pool")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200729110756.2344-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
[Joonas: Updating Fixes: link after rebasing and reordering into drm-intel-gt-next]
Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Some very low hanging fruit, but contention on the pool->lock is
noticeable between intel_gt_get_buffer_pool() and pool_retire(), with
the majority of the hold time due to the locked list iteration. If we
make the node itself RCU protected, we can perform the search for an
suitable node just under RCU, reserving taking the lock itself for
claiming the node and manipulating the list.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200729080245.8070-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Since the worker may rearm, we currently are only guaranteed to flush
the work if we cancel the timer. If the work was running at the time we
try and cancel it, we will wait for it to complete, but it may leave
items in the pool and requeue the work. If we rearrange the immediate
discard of the pool then cancel the work, we know that the work cannot
rearm and so our flush will be final.
<0> [314.146044] i915_mod-1321 2.... 299799443us : intel_gt_fini_buffer_pool: intel_gt_fini_buffer_pool:227 GEM_BUG_ON(!list_empty(&pool->cache_list[n]))
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/1920
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200525141957.3061-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Since the introduction of 'soft-rc6', we aim to park the device quickly
and that results in frequent idling of the whole device. Currently upon
idling we free the batch buffer pool, and so this renders the cache
ineffective for many workloads. If we want to have an effective cache of
recently allocated buffers available for reuse, we need to decouple that
cache from the engine powermanagement and make it timer based. As there
is no reason then to keep it within the engine (where it once made
retirement order easier to track), we can move it up the hierarchy to the
owner of the memory allocations.
v2: Hook up to debugfs/drop_caches to clear the cache on demand.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200430111819.10262-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
