IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
This function does not use intel_context_create_request, so it has
to use the same locking order as normal code. This is required to
shut up lockdep in selftests.
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200819140904.1708856-20-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
As a preparation step for full object locking and wait/wound handling
during pin and object mapping, ensure that we always pass the ww context
in i915_gem_execbuffer.c to i915_vma_pin, use lockdep to ensure this
happens.
This also requires changing the order of eb_parse slightly, to ensure
we pass ww at a point where we could still handle -EDEADLK safely.
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200819140904.1708856-15-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
I915_GEM_THROTTLE dates back to the time before contexts where there was
just a single engine, and therefore a single timeline and request list
globally. That request list was in execution/retirement order, and so
walking it to find a particular aged request made sense and could be
split per file.
That is no more. We now have many timelines with a file, as many as the
user wants to construct (essentially per-engine, per-context). Each of
those run independently and so make the single list futile. Remove the
disordered list, and iterate over all the timelines to find a request to
wait on in each to satisfy the criteria that the CPU is no more than 20ms
ahead of its oldest request.
It should go without saying that the I915_GEM_THROTTLE ioctl is no
longer used as the primary means of throttling, so it makes sense to push
the complication into the ioctl where it only impacts upon its few
irregular users, rather than the execbuf/retire where everybody has to
pay the cost. Fortunately, the few users do not create vast amount of
contexts, so the loops over contexts/engines should be concise.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200728152010.30701-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Since the engines belong to the GT, move the runtime-updated list of
available engines to the intel_gt struct. The original mask has been
renamed to indicate it contains the maximum engine list that can be
found on a matching device.
In preparation for other info being moved to the gt in follow up patches
(sseu), introduce an intel_gt_info structure to group all gt-related
runtime info.
v2: s/max_engine_mask/platform_engine_mask (tvrtko), fix selftest
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Cc: Venkata Sandeep Dhanalakota <venkata.s.dhanalakota@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> #v1
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200708003952.21831-5-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
A couple of very simple tests to ensure that the basic properties of
per-engine busyness accounting [0% and 100% busy] are faithful.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200617130916.15261-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Like live_unlite_ring, but instead of simply looking at the impact of
intel_ring_direction(), check that preemption more generally works with
different depths of queued requests in the ring.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200616233733.18050-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Not too long ago, we realised we had issues with a rolling back a
context so far for a preemption request we considered the resubmit not
to be a rollback but a forward roll. This means we would issue a lite
restore instead of forcing a full restore, continuing execution of the
old requests rather than causing a preemption. Add a selftest to
exercise such a far rollback, such that if we were to skip the full
restore, we would execute invalid instructions in the ring and hang.
Note that while I was able to confirm that this causes us to do a
lite-restore preemption rollback (with commit e36ba817fa96 ("drm/i915/gt:
Incrementally check for rewinding") disabled), it did not trick the HW
into rolling past the old RING_TAIL. Myybe on other HW.
References: e36ba817fa96 ("drm/i915/gt: Incrementally check for rewinding")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200616185518.11948-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Fix inconsistent IS_ERR and PTR_ERR in live_timeslice_nopreempt().
The proper pointer to be passed as argument to PTR_ERR() is ce.
This bug was detected with the help of Coccinelle.
Fixes: b72f02d78e4f ("drm/i915/gt: Prevent timeslicing into unpreemptable requests")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200616145452.GA25291@embeddedor
Reduce the smoke depth by trimming the number of contexts, repetitions
and wait times. This is in preparation for a less greedy scheduler that
tries to be fair across contexts, resulting in a great many more context
switches. A thousand context switches may be 50-100ms, causing us to
timeout as the HW is not fast enough to complete the deep smoketests.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200607222108.14401-5-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
With the removal of the internal wait-priority boosting, we can also
remove the selftest to ensure that those waits were being suppressed
from causing preemptions.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200607222108.14401-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Use the plain msec_to_jiffies() rather than the _timeout variant so we
round down and do not add an extra jiffy to our interval. For example,
with timeslicing we do not want to err on the longer side as any
fairness depends on catching hogging contexts on the GPU. Bring on
CFS.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200604135938.3975-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
We have a I915_REQUEST_NOPREEMPT flag that we set when we must prevent
the HW from preempting during the course of this request. We need to
honour this flag and protect the HW even if we have a heartbeat request,
or other maximum priority barrier, pending. As such, restrict the
timeslicing check to avoid preempting into the topmost priority band,
leaving the unpreemptable requests in blissful peace running
uninterrupted on the HW.
v2: Set the I915_PRIORITY_BARRIER to be less than
I915_PRIORITY_UNPREEMPTABLE so that we never submit a request
(heartbeat or barrier) that can legitimately preempt the current
non-premptable request.
Fixes: 2a98f4e65bba ("drm/i915: add infrastructure to hold off preemption on a request")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200527162418.24755-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Make sure that we can execute a virtual request on an already busy
engine, and conversely that we can execute a normal request if the
engines are already fully occupied by virtual requests.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200519132046.22443-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
When we look at i915_request_is_started() we must be careful in case we
are using a request that does not have the initial-breadcrumb and
instead the is-started is being compared against the end of the previous
request. This will make wait_for_submit() declare that a request has
been already submitted too early.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200519063123.20673-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Tvrtko spotted that some selftests were using 'break' not 'continue',
which will fail for discontiguous engine layouts such as on Icelake
(which may have vcs0 and vcs2).
Reported-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200518102911.3463-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
As we only restore the default context state upon banning a context, we
only need enough of the state to run the ring and nothing more. That is
we only need our bare protocontext.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200504180745.15645-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
The older arches did not convert MI_STORE_DATA_IMM to using the GTT, but
left them writing to a physical address. The notes suggest that the
primary reason would be so that the writes were cache coherent, as the
CPU cache uses physical tagging. As such we did not implement the
legacy variant of MI_STORE_DATA_IMM and so left all the relocations
synchronous -- but with a small function to convert from the vma address
into the physical address, we can implement asynchronous relocs on these
older arches, fixing up a few tests that require them.
In order to be able to test the legacy paths, refactor the gpu
relocations so that we can hook them up to a selftest.
v2: Use an array of offsets not enum labels for the selftest
v3: Refactor the common igt_hexdump()
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/757
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200504140629.28240-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
We need to keep the default context state around to instantiate new
contexts (aka golden rendercontext), and we also keep it pinned while
the engine is active so that we can quickly reset a hanging context.
However, the default contexts are large enough to merit keeping in
swappable memory as opposed to kernel memory, so we store them inside
shmemfs. Currently, we use the normal GEM objects to create the default
context image, but we can throw away all but the shmemfs file.
This greatly simplifies the tricky power management code which wants to
run underneath the normal GT locking, and we definitely do not want to
use any high level objects that may appear to recurse back into the GT.
Though perhaps the primary advantage of the complex GEM object is that
we aggressively cache the mapping, but here we are recreating the
vm_area everytime time we unpark. At the worst, we add a lightweight
cache, but first find a microbenchmark that is impacted.
Having started to create some utility functions to make working with
shmemfs objects easier, we can start putting them to wider use, where
GEM objects are overkill, such as storing persistent error state.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c@intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200429172429.6054-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
If intel_context_create() fails then it leads to an error pointer
dereference. I shuffled things around to make error handling easier.
Fixes: 1dd47b54baea ("drm/i915: Add live selftests for indirect ctx batchbuffers")
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200429132425.GE815283@mwanda
Use indirect ctx bb to load cmd buffer control value
from context image to avoid corruption.
v2: add to lrc layout (Chris)
v3: end to a cacheline (Chris)
v4: add to lrc fixed (Chris)
v5: value in offset+1
Testcase: igt/i915_selftest/gt_lrc
Signed-off-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200424230632.30333-1-mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com
Indirect ctx batchbuffers are a hw feature of which
batch can be run, by hardware, during context restoration stage.
Driver can setup a batchbuffer and also an offset into the
context image. When context image is marshalled from
memory to registers, and when the offset from the start of
context register state is equal of what driver pre-determined,
batch will run. So one can manipulate context restoration
process at cacheline granularity, given some limitations,
as you need to have rudimentaries in place before you can
run a batch.
Add selftest which will write the ring start register
to a canary spot. This will test that hardware will run a
batchbuffer for the context in question.
v2: request wait fix, naming (Chris)
v3: test order (Chris)
v4: rebase
Signed-off-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200424214841.28076-3-mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com
Since batch buffers dominant execution time, most preemption requests
should naturally occur during execution of a batch buffer. We wish to
verify that should a preemption occur within a batch buffer, when we
come to restart that batch buffer, it occurs at the interrupted
instruction and most importantly does not rollback to an earlier point.
v2: Do not clear the GPR at the start of the batch, but rely on them
being clear for new contexts.
Suggested-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200422100903.25216-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
With timeslice yielding on a semaphore, we may complete timeslices much
faster than we were expecting and already have yielded the stuck
request. Before complaining that timeslicing is not enabled, check that
we haven't already applied the switch.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200410081638.19893-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Since the semaphore interrupt may cause us to yield the timeslice
immediately, we may cancel the timer before we notice the submission is
complete. The assertion is no longer valid due to the race with the
interrupt.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200407222625.15542-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
If we find ourselves waiting on a MI_SEMAPHORE_WAIT, either within the
user batch or in our own preamble, the engine raises a
GT_WAIT_ON_SEMAPHORE interrupt. We can unmask that interrupt and so
respond to a semaphore wait by yielding the timeslice, if we have
another context to yield to!
The only real complication is that the interrupt is only generated for
the start of the semaphore wait, and is asynchronous to our
process_csb() -- that is, we may not have registered the timeslice before
we see the interrupt. To ensure we don't miss a potential semaphore
blocking forward progress (e.g. selftests/live_timeslice_preempt) we mark
the interrupt and apply it to the next timeslice regardless of whether it
was active at the time.
v2: We use semaphores in preempt-to-busy, within the timeslicing
implementation itself! Ergo, when we do insert a preemption due to an
expired timeslice, the new context may start with the missed semaphore
flagged by the retired context and be yielded, ad infinitum. To avoid
this, read the context id at the time of the semaphore interrupt and
only yield if that context is still active.
Fixes: 8ee36e048c98 ("drm/i915/execlists: Minimalistic timeslicing")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200407130811.17321-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
If we submit, we do not start timeslicing until we process the CS event
that marks the start of the context running on HW. So in the selftest,
be sure to wait until we have processed the pending events before
asserting that timeslicing has begun.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Acked-by: Michael J. Ruhl <michael.j.ruhl@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200403190209.21818-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
In order to kill off a hostile context, we need to be able to reset the
GPU. So check that is supported prior to beginning the test.
Reported-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200402205839.25065-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
For CI it is enough to point out a single failure
in isolation. However it is beneficial to gather
info in logs for transients further down
the line.
Do not stop into first comparison failure but
continue probing forward.
v2: for all engines and poisons (Chris)
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200331135403.16906-1-mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com
Allow a bit of leniency for the CPU scheduler to be distracted while we
flush the tasklet and so ensure that we always check the status of the
request once more before timing out.
v2: Wait until the HW acked the submit, and we do any secondary actions
for the submit (e.g. timeslices)
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200330121644.25277-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Static code analysis tool identified struct lrc_timestamp data as being
uninitialized and then data.ce[] is being checked for NULL/negative
value in the error path. Initializing data variable fixes the issue.
Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Aditya Swarup <aditya.swarup@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200303142347.15696-1-aditya.swarup@intel.com
Check that we can recover if the LRC is totally corrupted. Based on a
very simple theory that anything that can be adjusted via the context
(i.e. on behalf of the user), should be under the purview of the
per-engine-reset.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200227085723.1961649-13-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
use intel_uc_uses_guc_submission() directly instead, to be consistent in
the way we check what we want to do with the GuC.
v2: do not go through ctx->vm->gt, use i915->gt instead
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> #v1
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200218223327.11058-3-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
Currently, we check that a new context has a clear set of general
purpose registers. Add a little bit of hostility by preempting our new
context and re-poisoning the GPR to ensure that there is no context
leakage from preemption.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200219123418.1447428-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Always flush the tasklet if we have pending submissions in
wait_for_submit(), so that even if we see the HW has started before we
process its ack, when we return the execlists state is well defined.
Fixes: 06289949b8dd ("drm/i915/selftests: Check for any sign of request starting in wait_for_submit()")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Acked-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200218211215.1336341-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
