IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
move increment of ->depth to the point where we'd discovered
that get_link() has not returned an error, adjust exits
accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
nd->stack[0] is unused until the handling of trailing symlinks and
we want to get rid of that. Having fucked that transformation up
several times, I went for bloody pedantic series of provably equivalent
transformations. Sorry.
Step 1: keep nd->depth higher by one in link_path_walk() - increment upon
entry, decrement on exits, adjust the arithmetics inside and surround the
calls of functions that care about nd->depth value (nd_alloc_stack(),
get_link(), put_link()) with decrement/increment pairs.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
The only restriction is that on the total amount of symlinks
crossed; how they are nested does not matter
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Array of MAX_NESTED_LINKS + 1 elements put into nameidata;
what used to be a local array in link_path_walk() occupies
entries 1 .. MAX_NESTED_LINKS in it, link and cookie from
the trailing symlink handling loops - entry 0.
This is _not_ the final arrangement; just an easily verified
incremental step.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Deal with skipping leading slashes before what used to be the
recursive call. That way we can get rid of that goto completely.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
absolutely straightforward now - the only variables we need to preserve
across the recursive call are name, link and cookie, and recursion depth
is limited (and can is equal to nd->depth). So arrange an array of
triples to hold instances of those and be done with that.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
reduce the number of returns in there - turn all places
where it returns zero into goto OK and places where it
returns non-zero into goto Err. The only non-trivial
detail is that all breaks in the loop are guaranteed
to be with non-zero err.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
What we do after the second walk_component() + put_link() + depth
decrement in there is exactly equivalent to what's done right
after the first walk_component(). Easy to verify and not at all
surprising, seeing that there we have just walked the last
component of nested symlink.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Pull the block after the if-else in the end of what used to be do-while
body into all branches there. We are almost done with the massage...
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
If we get ERR_PTR() from get_link(), we are guaranteed to get err != 0
when we break out of do-while, so we are going to hit if (err) return err;
shortly after it. Pull that into the if (IS_ERR(s)) body.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
... and strip __always_inline from follow_link() - remaining callers
don't need that.
Now link_path_walk() recursion is a direct one.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
shares space with nameidata->next, walk_component() et.al. store
the struct path of symlink instead of returning it into a variable
passed by caller.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Split a piece of fs/namei.c:follow_link() that does obtaining the link
body into a separate function. follow_link() itself is converted to
calling get_link() and then doing the body traversal (if any).
The next step will expand follow_link() call in link_path_walk()
and this helps to keep the size down...
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
a) instead of storing the symlink body (via nd_set_link()) and returning
an opaque pointer later passed to ->put_link(), ->follow_link() _stores_
that opaque pointer (into void * passed by address by caller) and returns
the symlink body. Returning ERR_PTR() on error, NULL on jump (procfs magic
symlinks) and pointer to symlink body for normal symlinks. Stored pointer
is ignored in all cases except the last one.
Storing NULL for opaque pointer (or not storing it at all) means no call
of ->put_link().
b) the body used to be passed to ->put_link() implicitly (via nameidata).
Now only the opaque pointer is. In the cases when we used the symlink body
to free stuff, ->follow_link() now should store it as opaque pointer in addition
to returning it.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
when we go for on-demand allocation of saved state in
link_path_walk(), we'll want nameidata to stay around
for all 3 calls of path_mountpoint().
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
that avoids having nameidata on stack during the calls of
->rmdir()/->unlink() and *two* of those during the calls
of ->rename().
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
it's a convenient helper, but we'll want to shift nameidata
down the call chain, so it won't be available there...
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
With LOOKUP_FOLLOW we unlazy and return 1; without it we either
fail with ELOOP or, for O_PATH opens, succeed. No need to mix
those cases...
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
When O_PATH is present, O_CREAT isn't, so symlink_ok is always equal to
(open_flags & O_PATH) && !(nd->flags & LOOKUP_FOLLOW).
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
No ->inode_follow_link() methods use the nameidata arg, and
it is about to become private to namei.c.
So remove from all inode_follow_link() functions.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
path_openat() jumps to the wrong place after do_tmpfile() - it has
already done path_cleanup() (as part of path_lookupat() called by
do_tmpfile()), so doing that again can lead to double fput().
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v3.11+
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Fetching ->d_inode, verifying ->d_seq and finding d_is_negative() to
be true does *not* mean that inode we'd fetched had been NULL - that
holds only while ->d_seq is still unchanged.
Shift d_is_negative() checks into lookup_fast() prior to ->d_seq
verification.
Reported-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Tested-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Calling unlazy_walk() in walk_component() and do_last() when we find
a symlink that needs to be followed doesn't acquire a reference to vfsmount.
That's fine when the symlink is on the same vfsmount as the parent directory
(which is almost always the case), but it's not always true - one _can_
manage to bind a symlink on top of something. And in such cases we end up
with excessive mntput().
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # since 2.6.39
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Make pathwalk use d_is_reg() rather than S_ISREG() to determine whether to
honour O_TRUNC. Since this occurs after complete_walk(), the dentry type
field cannot change and the inode pointer cannot change as we hold a ref on
the dentry, so this should be safe.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Where we have:
if (!dentry->d_inode || d_is_negative(dentry)) {
type constructions in pathwalk we should be able to eliminate the check of
d_inode and rely solely on the result of d_is_negative() or d_is_positive().
What we do have to take care to do is to read d_inode after calling a
d_is_xxx() typecheck function to get the barriering right.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
just make const char iname[] the last member and compare name->name with
name->iname instead of checking name->separate
We need to make sure that out-of-line name doesn't end up allocated adjacent
to struct filename refering to it; fortunately, it's easy to achieve - just
allocate that struct filename with one byte in ->iname[], so that ->iname[0]
will be inside the same object and thus have an address different from that
of out-of-line name [spotted by Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>]
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
