2 Commits

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Will Deacon	4d6b7a779b	ARM: 6512/1: perf: fix warnings generated by sparse ... Russell reported a number of warnings coming from sparse when checking the ARM perf_event.c files: | perf_event.c seems to also have problems too: | | CHECK arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c | arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c:37:1: warning: symbol 'pmu_lock' was not declared. Should it be static? | arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c:70:1: warning: symbol 'cpu_hw_events' was not declared. Should it be static? | arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c:1006:1: warning: symbol 'armv6pmu_enable_event' was not declared. Should it be static? | arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c:1113:1: warning: symbol 'armv6pmu_stop' was not declared. Should it be static? | arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c:1956:6: warning: symbol 'armv7pmu_enable_event' was not declared. Should it be static? | arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c:3072:14: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) | arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c:3072:14: expected void const volatile [noderef] <asn:1>*<noident> | arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c:3072:14: got struct frame_tail *tail | arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c:3074:49: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different address spaces) | arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c:3074:49: expected void const [noderef] <asn:1>*from | arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c:3074:49: got struct frame_tail *tail This patch resolves these issues so we can live in silence again. Reported-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>	2010-12-04 11:17:44 +00:00
Will Deacon	43eab87828	ARM: perf: separate PMU backends into multiple files ... The ARM perf_event.c file contains all PMU backends and, as new PMUs are introduced, will continue to grow. This patch follows the example of x86 and splits the PMU implementations into separate files which are then #included back into the main file. Compile-time guards are added to each PMU file to avoid compiling in code that is not relevant for the version of the architecture which we are targetting. Acked-by: Jean Pihet <j-pihet@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>	2010-11-25 16:52:08 +00:00