iv/linux
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
992,729 Commits 104 Branches 1,843 Tags
4dc0484e90a3cde1cb1514f1db1de3145d99cb18
Commit Graph

1126 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Anand Jain
ab90a3930d btrfs: add a helper to read the superblock metadata_uuid 
[ Upstream commit 4844c3664a ]

In some cases, we need to read the FSID from the superblock when the
metadata_uuid is not set, and otherwise, read the metadata_uuid. So,
add a helper.

Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Tested-by: Guilherme G. Piccoli <gpiccoli@igalia.com>
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Stable-dep-of: 6bfe3959b0 ("btrfs: compare the correct fsid/metadata_uuid in btrfs_validate_super")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
 2023-09-23 11:01:09 +02:00
xiaoshoukui
bd7bef82ce btrfs: fix BUG_ON condition in btrfs_cancel_balance 
commit 29eefa6d0d upstream.

Pausing and canceling balance can race to interrupt balance lead to BUG_ON
panic in btrfs_cancel_balance. The BUG_ON condition in btrfs_cancel_balance
does not take this race scenario into account.

However, the race condition has no other side effects. We can fix that.

Reproducing it with panic trace like this:

  kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4618!
  RIP: 0010:btrfs_cancel_balance+0x5cf/0x6a0
  Call Trace:
   <TASK>
   ? do_nanosleep+0x60/0x120
   ? hrtimer_nanosleep+0xb7/0x1a0
   ? sched_core_clone_cookie+0x70/0x70
   btrfs_ioctl_balance_ctl+0x55/0x70
   btrfs_ioctl+0xa46/0xd20
   __x64_sys_ioctl+0x7d/0xa0
   do_syscall_64+0x38/0x80
   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

  Race scenario as follows:
  > mutex_unlock(&fs_info->balance_mutex);
  > --------------------
  > .......issue pause and cancel req in another thread
  > --------------------
  > ret = __btrfs_balance(fs_info);
  >
  > mutex_lock(&fs_info->balance_mutex);
  > if (ret == -ECANCELED && atomic_read(&fs_info->balance_pause_req)) {
  >         btrfs_info(fs_info, "balance: paused");
  >         btrfs_exclop_balance(fs_info, BTRFS_EXCLOP_BALANCE_PAUSED);
  > }

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+
Signed-off-by: xiaoshoukui <xiaoshoukui@ruijie.com.cn>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
 2023-08-26 15:26:51 +02:00
Anand Jain
b51e442295 btrfs: scan device in non-exclusive mode 
commit 50d281fc43 upstream.

This fixes mkfs/mount/check failures due to race with systemd-udevd
scan.

During the device scan initiated by systemd-udevd, other user space
EXCL operations such as mkfs, mount, or check may get blocked and result
in a "Device or resource busy" error. This is because the device
scan process opens the device with the EXCL flag in the kernel.

Two reports were received:

 - btrfs/179 test case, where the fsck command failed with the -EBUSY
   error

 - LTP pwritev03 test case, where mkfs.vfs failed with
   the -EBUSY error, when mkfs.vfs tried to overwrite old btrfs filesystem
   on the device.

In both cases, fsck and mkfs (respectively) were racing with a
systemd-udevd device scan, and systemd-udevd won, resulting in the
-EBUSY error for fsck and mkfs.

Reproducing the problem has been difficult because there is a very
small window during which these userspace threads can race to
acquire the exclusive device open. Even on the system where the problem
was observed, the problem occurrences were anywhere between 10 to 400
iterations and chances of reproducing decreases with debug printk()s.

However, an exclusive device open is unnecessary for the scan process,
as there are no write operations on the device during scan. Furthermore,
during the mount process, the superblock is re-read in the below
function call chain:

  btrfs_mount_root
   btrfs_open_devices
    open_fs_devices
     btrfs_open_one_device
       btrfs_get_bdev_and_sb

So, to fix this issue, removes the FMODE_EXCL flag from the scan
operation, and add a comment.

The case where mkfs may still write to the device and a scan is running,
the btrfs signature is not written at that time so scan will not
recognize such device.

Reported-by: Sherry Yang <sherry.yang@oracle.com>
Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202303170839.fdf23068-oliver.sang@intel.com
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
 2023-04-05 11:23:51 +02:00
Anand Jain
dd965ad39d btrfs: free device in btrfs_close_devices for a single device filesystem 
commit 5f58d783fd upstream.

We have this check to make sure we don't accidentally add older devices
that may have disappeared and re-appeared with an older generation from
being added to an fs_devices (such as a replace source device). This
makes sense, we don't want stale disks in our file system. However for
single disks this doesn't really make sense.

I've seen this in testing, but I was provided a reproducer from a
project that builds btrfs images on loopback devices. The loopback
device gets cached with the new generation, and then if it is re-used to
generate a new file system we'll fail to mount it because the new fs is
"older" than what we have in cache.

Fix this by freeing the cache when closing the device for a single device
filesystem. This will ensure that the mount command passed device path is
scanned successfully during the next mount.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.10+
Reported-by: Daan De Meyer <daandemeyer@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
 2023-02-15 17:22:26 +01:00
Josef Bacik
a1406d5aa3 btrfs: limit device extents to the device size 
commit 3c538de0f2 upstream.

There was a recent regression in btrfs/177 that started happening with
the size class patches ("btrfs: introduce size class to block group
allocator").  This however isn't a regression introduced by those
patches, but rather the bug was uncovered by a change in behavior in
these patches.  The patches triggered more chunk allocations in the
^free-space-tree case, which uncovered a race with device shrink.

The problem is we will set the device total size to the new size, and
use this to find a hole for a device extent.  However during shrink we
may have device extents allocated past this range, so we could
potentially find a hole in a range past our new shrink size.  We don't
actually limit our found extent to the device size anywhere, we assume
that we will not find a hole past our device size.  This isn't true with
shrink as we're relocating block groups and thus creating holes past the
device size.

Fix this by making sure we do not search past the new device size, and
if we wander into any device extents that start after our device size
simply break from the loop and use whatever hole we've already found.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
 2023-02-15 17:22:22 +01:00
Anand Jain
7f73a9dea0 btrfs: harden identification of a stale device 
commit 770c79fb65 upstream.

Identifying and removing the stale device from the fs_uuids list is done
by btrfs_free_stale_devices().  btrfs_free_stale_devices() in turn
depends on device_path_matched() to check if the device appears in more
than one btrfs_device structure.

The matching of the device happens by its path, the device path. However,
when device mapper is in use, the dm device paths are nothing but a link
to the actual block device, which leads to the device_path_matched()
failing to match.

Fix this by matching the dev_t as provided by lookup_bdev() instead of
plain string compare of the device paths.

Reported-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
 2022-09-08 11:11:40 +02:00
Qu Wenruo
509e9710b8 btrfs: repair super block num_devices automatically 
commit d201238ccd upstream.

[BUG]
There is a report that a btrfs has a bad super block num devices.

This makes btrfs to reject the fs completely.

  BTRFS error (device sdd3): super_num_devices 3 mismatch with num_devices 2 found here
  BTRFS error (device sdd3): failed to read chunk tree: -22
  BTRFS error (device sdd3): open_ctree failed

[CAUSE]
During btrfs device removal, chunk tree and super block num devs are
updated in two different transactions:

  btrfs_rm_device()
  |- btrfs_rm_dev_item(device)
  |  |- trans = btrfs_start_transaction()
  |  |  Now we got transaction X
  |  |
  |  |- btrfs_del_item()
  |  |  Now device item is removed from chunk tree
  |  |
  |  |- btrfs_commit_transaction()
  |     Transaction X got committed, super num devs untouched,
  |     but device item removed from chunk tree.
  |     (AKA, super num devs is already incorrect)
  |
  |- cur_devices->num_devices--;
  |- cur_devices->total_devices--;
  |- btrfs_set_super_num_devices()
     All those operations are not in transaction X, thus it will
     only be written back to disk in next transaction.

So after the transaction X in btrfs_rm_dev_item() committed, but before
transaction X+1 (which can be minutes away), a power loss happen, then
we got the super num mismatch.

This has been fixed by commit bbac58698a ("btrfs: remove device item
and update super block in the same transaction").

[FIX]
Make the super_num_devices check less strict, converting it from a hard
error to a warning, and reset the value to a correct one for the current
or next transaction commit.

As the number of device items is the critical information where the
super block num_devices is only a cached value (and also useful for
cross checking), it's safe to automatically update it. Other device
related problems like missing device are handled after that and may
require other means to resolve, like degraded mount. With this fix,
potentially affected filesystems won't fail mount and require the manual
repair by btrfs check.

Reported-by: Luca Béla Palkovics <luca.bela.palkovics@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CA+8xDSpvdm_U0QLBAnrH=zqDq_cWCOH5TiV46CKmp3igr44okQ@mail.gmail.com/
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
 2022-06-09 10:20:49 +02:00
Naohiro Aota
5e4dd17998 btrfs: mark resumed async balance as writing 
commit a690e5f2db upstream.

When btrfs balance is interrupted with umount, the background balance
resumes on the next mount. There is a potential deadlock with FS freezing
here like as described in commit 26559780b953 ("btrfs: zoned: mark
relocation as writing"). Mark the process as sb_writing to avoid it.

Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.9+
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
 2022-04-20 09:23:27 +02:00
Josef Bacik
2ec78af152 btrfs: update device path inode time instead of bd_inode 
commit 54fde91f52 upstream.

Christoph pointed out that I'm updating bdev->bd_inode for the device
time when we remove block devices from a btrfs file system, however this
isn't actually exposed to anything.  The inode we want to update is the
one that's associated with the path to the device, usually on devtmpfs,
so that blkid notices the difference.

We still don't want to do the blkdev_open, so use kern_path() to get the
path to the given device and do the update time on that inode.

Fixes: 8f96a5bfa1 ("btrfs: update the bdev time directly when closing")
Reported-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
 2021-11-26 10:39:22 +01:00
Josef Bacik
b917f9b946 btrfs: do not take the uuid_mutex in btrfs_rm_device 
[ Upstream commit 8ef9dc0f14 ]

We got the following lockdep splat while running fstests (specifically
btrfs/003 and btrfs/020 in a row) with the new rc.  This was uncovered
by 87579e9b7d ("loop: use worker per cgroup instead of kworker") which
converted loop to using workqueues, which comes with lockdep
annotations that don't exist with kworkers.  The lockdep splat is as
follows:

  WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
  5.14.0-rc2-custom+ #34 Not tainted
  ------------------------------------------------------
  losetup/156417 is trying to acquire lock:
  ffff9c7645b02d38 ((wq_completion)loop0){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: flush_workqueue+0x84/0x600

  but task is already holding lock:
  ffff9c7647395468 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __loop_clr_fd+0x41/0x650 [loop]

  which lock already depends on the new lock.

  the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

  -> #5 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
	 __mutex_lock+0xba/0x7c0
	 lo_open+0x28/0x60 [loop]
	 blkdev_get_whole+0x28/0xf0
	 blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0x168/0x3c0
	 blkdev_open+0xd2/0xe0
	 do_dentry_open+0x163/0x3a0
	 path_openat+0x74d/0xa40
	 do_filp_open+0x9c/0x140
	 do_sys_openat2+0xb1/0x170
	 __x64_sys_openat+0x54/0x90
	 do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90
	 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae

  -> #4 (&disk->open_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
	 __mutex_lock+0xba/0x7c0
	 blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0xd1/0x3c0
	 blkdev_get_by_path+0xc0/0xd0
	 btrfs_scan_one_device+0x52/0x1f0 [btrfs]
	 btrfs_control_ioctl+0xac/0x170 [btrfs]
	 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0
	 do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90
	 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae

  -> #3 (uuid_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
	 __mutex_lock+0xba/0x7c0
	 btrfs_rm_device+0x48/0x6a0 [btrfs]
	 btrfs_ioctl+0x2d1c/0x3110 [btrfs]
	 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0
	 do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90
	 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae

  -> #2 (sb_writers#11){.+.+}-{0:0}:
	 lo_write_bvec+0x112/0x290 [loop]
	 loop_process_work+0x25f/0xcb0 [loop]
	 process_one_work+0x28f/0x5d0
	 worker_thread+0x55/0x3c0
	 kthread+0x140/0x170
	 ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30

  -> #1 ((work_completion)(&lo->rootcg_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}:
	 process_one_work+0x266/0x5d0
	 worker_thread+0x55/0x3c0
	 kthread+0x140/0x170
	 ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30

  -> #0 ((wq_completion)loop0){+.+.}-{0:0}:
	 __lock_acquire+0x1130/0x1dc0
	 lock_acquire+0xf5/0x320
	 flush_workqueue+0xae/0x600
	 drain_workqueue+0xa0/0x110
	 destroy_workqueue+0x36/0x250
	 __loop_clr_fd+0x9a/0x650 [loop]
	 lo_ioctl+0x29d/0x780 [loop]
	 block_ioctl+0x3f/0x50
	 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0
	 do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90
	 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae

  other info that might help us debug this:
  Chain exists of:
    (wq_completion)loop0 --> &disk->open_mutex --> &lo->lo_mutex
   Possible unsafe locking scenario:
	 CPU0                    CPU1
	 ----                    ----
    lock(&lo->lo_mutex);
				 lock(&disk->open_mutex);
				 lock(&lo->lo_mutex);
    lock((wq_completion)loop0);

   *** DEADLOCK ***
  1 lock held by losetup/156417:
   #0: ffff9c7647395468 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __loop_clr_fd+0x41/0x650 [loop]

  stack backtrace:
  CPU: 8 PID: 156417 Comm: losetup Not tainted 5.14.0-rc2-custom+ #34
  Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015
  Call Trace:
   dump_stack_lvl+0x57/0x72
   check_noncircular+0x10a/0x120
   __lock_acquire+0x1130/0x1dc0
   lock_acquire+0xf5/0x320
   ? flush_workqueue+0x84/0x600
   flush_workqueue+0xae/0x600
   ? flush_workqueue+0x84/0x600
   drain_workqueue+0xa0/0x110
   destroy_workqueue+0x36/0x250
   __loop_clr_fd+0x9a/0x650 [loop]
   lo_ioctl+0x29d/0x780 [loop]
   ? __lock_acquire+0x3a0/0x1dc0
   ? update_dl_rq_load_avg+0x152/0x360
   ? lock_is_held_type+0xa5/0x120
   ? find_held_lock.constprop.0+0x2b/0x80
   block_ioctl+0x3f/0x50
   __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0
   do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90
   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
  RIP: 0033:0x7f645884de6b

Usually the uuid_mutex exists to protect the fs_devices that map
together all of the devices that match a specific uuid.  In rm_device
we're messing with the uuid of a device, so it makes sense to protect
that here.

However in doing that it pulls in a whole host of lockdep dependencies,
as we call mnt_may_write() on the sb before we grab the uuid_mutex, thus
we end up with the dependency chain under the uuid_mutex being added
under the normal sb write dependency chain, which causes problems with
loop devices.

We don't need the uuid mutex here however.  If we call
btrfs_scan_one_device() before we scratch the super block we will find
the fs_devices and not find the device itself and return EBUSY because
the fs_devices is open.  If we call it after the scratch happens it will
not appear to be a valid btrfs file system.

We do not need to worry about other fs_devices modifying operations here
because we're protected by the exclusive operations locking.

So drop the uuid_mutex here in order to fix the lockdep splat.

A more detailed explanation from the discussion:

We are worried about rm and scan racing with each other, before this
change we'll zero the device out under the UUID mutex so when scan does
run it'll make sure that it can go through the whole device scan thing
without rm messing with us.

We aren't worried if the scratch happens first, because the result is we
don't think this is a btrfs device and we bail out.

The only case we are concerned with is we scratch _after_ scan is able
to read the superblock and gets a seemingly valid super block, so lets
consider this case.

Scan will call device_list_add() with the device we're removing.  We'll
call find_fsid_with_metadata_uuid() and get our fs_devices for this
UUID.  At this point we lock the fs_devices->device_list_mutex.  This is
what protects us in this case, but we have two cases here.

1. We aren't to the device removal part of the RM.  We found our device,
   and device name matches our path, we go down and we set total_devices
   to our super number of devices, which doesn't affect anything because
   we haven't done the remove yet.

2. We are past the device removal part, which is protected by the
   device_list_mutex.  Scan doesn't find the device, it goes down and
   does the

   if (fs_devices->opened)
	   return -EBUSY;

   check and we bail out.

Nothing about this situation is ideal, but the lockdep splat is real,
and the fix is safe, tho admittedly a bit scary looking.

Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[ copy more from the discussion ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
 2021-11-18 14:04:00 +01:00
Li Zhang
8992aab294 btrfs: clear MISSING device status bit in btrfs_close_one_device 
commit 5d03dbebba upstream.

Reported bug: https://github.com/kdave/btrfs-progs/issues/389

There's a problem with scrub reporting aborted status but returning
error code 0, on a filesystem with missing and readded device.

Roughly these steps:

- mkfs -d raid1 dev1 dev2
- fill with data
- unmount
- make dev1 disappear
- mount -o degraded
- copy more data
- make dev1 appear again

Running scrub afterwards reports that the command was aborted, but the
system log message says the exit code was 0.

It seems that the cause of the error is decrementing
fs_devices->missing_devices but not clearing device->dev_state.  Every
time we umount filesystem, it would call close_ctree, And it would
eventually involve btrfs_close_one_device to close the device, but it
only decrements fs_devices->missing_devices but does not clear the
device BTRFS_DEV_STATE_MISSING bit. Worse, this bug will cause Integer
Overflow, because every time umount, fs_devices->missing_devices will
decrease. If fs_devices->missing_devices value hit 0, it would overflow.

With added debugging:

   loop1: detected capacity change from 0 to 20971520
   BTRFS: device fsid 56ad51f1-5523-463b-8547-c19486c51ebb devid 1 transid 21 /dev/loop1 scanned by systemd-udevd (2311)
   loop2: detected capacity change from 0 to 20971520
   BTRFS: device fsid 56ad51f1-5523-463b-8547-c19486c51ebb devid 2 transid 17 /dev/loop2 scanned by systemd-udevd (2313)
   BTRFS info (device loop1): flagging fs with big metadata feature
   BTRFS info (device loop1): allowing degraded mounts
   BTRFS info (device loop1): using free space tree
   BTRFS info (device loop1): has skinny extents
   BTRFS info (device loop1):  before clear_missing.00000000f706684d /dev/loop1 0
   BTRFS warning (device loop1): devid 2 uuid 6635ac31-56dd-4852-873b-c60f5e2d53d2 is missing
   BTRFS info (device loop1):  before clear_missing.0000000000000000 /dev/loop2 1
   BTRFS info (device loop1): flagging fs with big metadata feature
   BTRFS info (device loop1): allowing degraded mounts
   BTRFS info (device loop1): using free space tree
   BTRFS info (device loop1): has skinny extents
   BTRFS info (device loop1):  before clear_missing.00000000f706684d /dev/loop1 0
   BTRFS warning (device loop1): devid 2 uuid 6635ac31-56dd-4852-873b-c60f5e2d53d2 is missing
   BTRFS info (device loop1):  before clear_missing.0000000000000000 /dev/loop2 0
   BTRFS info (device loop1): flagging fs with big metadata feature
   BTRFS info (device loop1): allowing degraded mounts
   BTRFS info (device loop1): using free space tree
   BTRFS info (device loop1): has skinny extents
   BTRFS info (device loop1):  before clear_missing.00000000f706684d /dev/loop1 18446744073709551615
   BTRFS warning (device loop1): devid 2 uuid 6635ac31-56dd-4852-873b-c60f5e2d53d2 is missing
   BTRFS info (device loop1):  before clear_missing.0000000000000000 /dev/loop2 18446744073709551615

If fs_devices->missing_devices is 0, next time it would be 18446744073709551615

After apply this patch, the fs_devices->missing_devices seems to be
right:

  $ truncate -s 10g test1
  $ truncate -s 10g test2
  $ losetup /dev/loop1 test1
  $ losetup /dev/loop2 test2
  $ mkfs.btrfs -draid1 -mraid1 /dev/loop1 /dev/loop2 -f
  $ losetup -d /dev/loop2
  $ mount -o degraded /dev/loop1 /mnt/1
  $ umount /mnt/1
  $ mount -o degraded /dev/loop1 /mnt/1
  $ umount /mnt/1
  $ mount -o degraded /dev/loop1 /mnt/1
  $ umount /mnt/1
  $ dmesg

   loop1: detected capacity change from 0 to 20971520
   loop2: detected capacity change from 0 to 20971520
   BTRFS: device fsid 15aa1203-98d3-4a66-bcae-ca82f629c2cd devid 1 transid 5 /dev/loop1 scanned by mkfs.btrfs (1863)
   BTRFS: device fsid 15aa1203-98d3-4a66-bcae-ca82f629c2cd devid 2 transid 5 /dev/loop2 scanned by mkfs.btrfs (1863)
   BTRFS info (device loop1): flagging fs with big metadata feature
   BTRFS info (device loop1): allowing degraded mounts
   BTRFS info (device loop1): disk space caching is enabled
   BTRFS info (device loop1): has skinny extents
   BTRFS info (device loop1):  before clear_missing.00000000975bd577 /dev/loop1 0
   BTRFS warning (device loop1): devid 2 uuid 8b333791-0b3f-4f57-b449-1c1ab6b51f38 is missing
   BTRFS info (device loop1):  before clear_missing.0000000000000000 /dev/loop2 1
   BTRFS info (device loop1): checking UUID tree
   BTRFS info (device loop1): flagging fs with big metadata feature
   BTRFS info (device loop1): allowing degraded mounts
   BTRFS info (device loop1): disk space caching is enabled
   BTRFS info (device loop1): has skinny extents
   BTRFS info (device loop1):  before clear_missing.00000000975bd577 /dev/loop1 0
   BTRFS warning (device loop1): devid 2 uuid 8b333791-0b3f-4f57-b449-1c1ab6b51f38 is missing
   BTRFS info (device loop1):  before clear_missing.0000000000000000 /dev/loop2 1
   BTRFS info (device loop1): flagging fs with big metadata feature
   BTRFS info (device loop1): allowing degraded mounts
   BTRFS info (device loop1): disk space caching is enabled
   BTRFS info (device loop1): has skinny extents
   BTRFS info (device loop1):  before clear_missing.00000000975bd577 /dev/loop1 0
   BTRFS warning (device loop1): devid 2 uuid 8b333791-0b3f-4f57-b449-1c1ab6b51f38 is missing
   BTRFS info (device loop1):  before clear_missing.0000000000000000 /dev/loop2 1

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+
Signed-off-by: Li Zhang <zhanglikernel@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
 2021-11-18 14:03:44 +01:00
Filipe Manana
63c89930d4 btrfs: fix mount failure due to past and transient device flush error 
[ Upstream commit 6b225baaba ]

When we get an error flushing one device, during a super block commit, we
record the error in the device structure, in the field 'last_flush_error'.
This is used to later check if we should error out the super block commit,
depending on whether the number of flush errors is greater than or equals
to the maximum tolerated device failures for a raid profile.

However if we get a transient device flush error, unmount the filesystem
and later try to mount it, we can fail the mount because we treat that
past error as critical and consider the device is missing. Even if it's
very likely that the error will happen again, as it's probably due to a
hardware related problem, there may be cases where the error might not
happen again. One example is during testing, and a test case like the
new generic/648 from fstests always triggers this. The test cases
generic/019 and generic/475 also trigger this scenario, but very
sporadically.

When this happens we get an error like this:

  $ mount /dev/sdc /mnt
  mount: /mnt wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/sdc, missing codepage or helper program, or other error.

  $ dmesg
  (...)
  [12918.886926] BTRFS warning (device sdc): chunk 13631488 missing 1 devices, max tolerance is 0 for writable mount
  [12918.888293] BTRFS warning (device sdc): writable mount is not allowed due to too many missing devices
  [12918.890853] BTRFS error (device sdc): open_ctree failed

The failure happens because when btrfs_check_rw_degradable() is called at
mount time, or at remount from RO to RW time, is sees a non zero value in
a device's ->last_flush_error attribute, and therefore considers that the
device is 'missing'.

Fix this by setting a device's ->last_flush_error to zero when we close a
device, making sure the error is not seen on the next mount attempt. We
only need to track flush errors during the current mount, so that we never
commit a super block if such errors happened.

Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
 2021-10-09 14:40:56 +02:00
Sami Tolvanen
55e6f8b3c0 treewide: Change list_sort to use const pointers 
[ Upstream commit 4f0f586bf0 ]

list_sort() internally casts the comparison function passed to it
to a different type with constant struct list_head pointers, and
uses this pointer to call the functions, which trips indirect call
Control-Flow Integrity (CFI) checking.

Instead of removing the consts, this change defines the
list_cmp_func_t type and changes the comparison function types of
all list_sort() callers to use const pointers, thus avoiding type
mismatches.

Suggested-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Tested-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210408182843.1754385-10-samitolvanen@google.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
 2021-09-30 10:11:04 +02:00
Anand Jain
aa1af89a66 btrfs: fix lockdep warning while mounting sprout fs 
[ Upstream commit c124706900 ]

Following test case reproduces lockdep warning.

  Test case:

  $ mkfs.btrfs -f <dev1>
  $ btrfstune -S 1 <dev1>
  $ mount <dev1> <mnt>
  $ btrfs device add <dev2> <mnt> -f
  $ umount <mnt>
  $ mount <dev2> <mnt>
  $ umount <mnt>

The warning claims a possible ABBA deadlock between the threads
initiated by [#1] btrfs device add and [#0] the mount.

  [ 540.743122] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
  [ 540.743129] 5.11.0-rc7+ #5 Not tainted
  [ 540.743135] ------------------------------------------------------
  [ 540.743142] mount/2515 is trying to acquire lock:
  [ 540.743149] ffffa0c5544c2ce0 (&fs_devs->device_list_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: clone_fs_devices+0x6d/0x210 [btrfs]
  [ 540.743458] but task is already holding lock:
  [ 540.743461] ffffa0c54a7932b8 (btrfs-chunk-00){++++}-{4:4}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x200 [btrfs]
  [ 540.743541] which lock already depends on the new lock.
  [ 540.743543] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

  [ 540.743546] -> #1 (btrfs-chunk-00){++++}-{4:4}:
  [ 540.743566] down_read_nested+0x48/0x2b0
  [ 540.743585] __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x200 [btrfs]
  [ 540.743650] btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x70/0x200 [btrfs]
  [ 540.743733] btrfs_search_slot+0x6c6/0xe00 [btrfs]
  [ 540.743785] btrfs_update_device+0x83/0x260 [btrfs]
  [ 540.743849] btrfs_finish_chunk_alloc+0x13f/0x660 [btrfs] <--- device_list_mutex
  [ 540.743911] btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x18d/0x3f0 [btrfs]
  [ 540.743982] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x86/0x1260 [btrfs]
  [ 540.744037] btrfs_init_new_device+0x1600/0x1dd0 [btrfs]
  [ 540.744101] btrfs_ioctl+0x1c77/0x24c0 [btrfs]
  [ 540.744166] __x64_sys_ioctl+0xe4/0x140
  [ 540.744170] do_syscall_64+0x4b/0x80
  [ 540.744174] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

  [ 540.744180] -> #0 (&fs_devs->device_list_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}:
  [ 540.744184] __lock_acquire+0x155f/0x2360
  [ 540.744188] lock_acquire+0x10b/0x5c0
  [ 540.744190] __mutex_lock+0xb1/0xf80
  [ 540.744193] mutex_lock_nested+0x27/0x30
  [ 540.744196] clone_fs_devices+0x6d/0x210 [btrfs]
  [ 540.744270] btrfs_read_chunk_tree+0x3c7/0xbb0 [btrfs]
  [ 540.744336] open_ctree+0xf6e/0x2074 [btrfs]
  [ 540.744406] btrfs_mount_root.cold.72+0x16/0x127 [btrfs]
  [ 540.744472] legacy_get_tree+0x38/0x90
  [ 540.744475] vfs_get_tree+0x30/0x140
  [ 540.744478] fc_mount+0x16/0x60
  [ 540.744482] vfs_kern_mount+0x91/0x100
  [ 540.744484] btrfs_mount+0x1e6/0x670 [btrfs]
  [ 540.744536] legacy_get_tree+0x38/0x90
  [ 540.744537] vfs_get_tree+0x30/0x140
  [ 540.744539] path_mount+0x8d8/0x1070
  [ 540.744541] do_mount+0x8d/0xc0
  [ 540.744543] __x64_sys_mount+0x125/0x160
  [ 540.744545] do_syscall_64+0x4b/0x80
  [ 540.744547] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

  [ 540.744551] other info that might help us debug this:
  [ 540.744552] Possible unsafe locking scenario:

  [ 540.744553] CPU0 				CPU1
  [ 540.744554] ---- 				----
  [ 540.744555] lock(btrfs-chunk-00);
  [ 540.744557] 					lock(&fs_devs->device_list_mutex);
  [ 540.744560] 					lock(btrfs-chunk-00);
  [ 540.744562] lock(&fs_devs->device_list_mutex);
  [ 540.744564]
   *** DEADLOCK ***

  [ 540.744565] 3 locks held by mount/2515:
  [ 540.744567] #0: ffffa0c56bf7a0e0 (&type->s_umount_key#42/1){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: alloc_super.isra.16+0xdf/0x450
  [ 540.744574] #1: ffffffffc05a9628 (uuid_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: btrfs_read_chunk_tree+0x63/0xbb0 [btrfs]
  [ 540.744640] #2: ffffa0c54a7932b8 (btrfs-chunk-00){++++}-{4:4}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x200 [btrfs]
  [ 540.744708]
   stack backtrace:
  [ 540.744712] CPU: 2 PID: 2515 Comm: mount Not tainted 5.11.0-rc7+ #5

But the device_list_mutex in clone_fs_devices() is redundant, as
explained below.  Two threads [1]  and [2] (below) could lead to
clone_fs_device().

  [1]
  open_ctree <== mount sprout fs
   btrfs_read_chunk_tree()
    mutex_lock(&uuid_mutex) <== global lock
    read_one_dev()
     open_seed_devices()
      clone_fs_devices() <== seed fs_devices
       mutex_lock(&orig->device_list_mutex) <== seed fs_devices

  [2]
  btrfs_init_new_device() <== sprouting
   mutex_lock(&uuid_mutex); <== global lock
   btrfs_prepare_sprout()
     lockdep_assert_held(&uuid_mutex)
     clone_fs_devices(seed_fs_device) <== seed fs_devices

Both of these threads hold uuid_mutex which is sufficient to protect
getting the seed device(s) freed while we are trying to clone it for
sprouting [2] or mounting a sprout [1] (as above). A mounted seed device
can not free/write/replace because it is read-only. An unmounted seed
device can be freed by btrfs_free_stale_devices(), but it needs
uuid_mutex.  So this patch removes the unnecessary device_list_mutex in
clone_fs_devices().  And adds a lockdep_assert_held(&uuid_mutex) in
clone_fs_devices().

Reported-by: Su Yue <l@damenly.su>
Tested-by: Su Yue <l@damenly.su>
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
 2021-09-26 14:09:00 +02:00
Josef Bacik
c43803c1aa btrfs: update the bdev time directly when closing 
[ Upstream commit 8f96a5bfa1 ]

We update the ctime/mtime of a block device when we remove it so that
blkid knows the device changed.  However we do this by re-opening the
block device and calling filp_update_time.  This is more correct because
it'll call the inode->i_op->update_time if it exists, but the block dev
inodes do not do this.  Instead call generic_update_time() on the
bd_inode in order to avoid the blkdev_open path and get rid of the
following lockdep splat:

======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
5.14.0-rc2+ #406 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
losetup/11596 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff939640d2f538 ((wq_completion)loop0){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: flush_workqueue+0x67/0x5e0

but task is already holding lock:
ffff939655510c68 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __loop_clr_fd+0x41/0x660 [loop]

which lock already depends on the new lock.

the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #4 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
       __mutex_lock+0x7d/0x750
       lo_open+0x28/0x60 [loop]
       blkdev_get_whole+0x25/0xf0
       blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0x168/0x3c0
       blkdev_open+0xd2/0xe0
       do_dentry_open+0x161/0x390
       path_openat+0x3cc/0xa20
       do_filp_open+0x96/0x120
       do_sys_openat2+0x7b/0x130
       __x64_sys_openat+0x46/0x70
       do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae

-> #3 (&disk->open_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
       __mutex_lock+0x7d/0x750
       blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0x56/0x3c0
       blkdev_open+0xd2/0xe0
       do_dentry_open+0x161/0x390
       path_openat+0x3cc/0xa20
       do_filp_open+0x96/0x120
       file_open_name+0xc7/0x170
       filp_open+0x2c/0x50
       btrfs_scratch_superblocks.part.0+0x10f/0x170
       btrfs_rm_device.cold+0xe8/0xed
       btrfs_ioctl+0x2a31/0x2e70
       __x64_sys_ioctl+0x80/0xb0
       do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae

-> #2 (sb_writers#12){.+.+}-{0:0}:
       lo_write_bvec+0xc2/0x240 [loop]
       loop_process_work+0x238/0xd00 [loop]
       process_one_work+0x26b/0x560
       worker_thread+0x55/0x3c0
       kthread+0x140/0x160
       ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30

-> #1 ((work_completion)(&lo->rootcg_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}:
       process_one_work+0x245/0x560
       worker_thread+0x55/0x3c0
       kthread+0x140/0x160
       ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30

-> #0 ((wq_completion)loop0){+.+.}-{0:0}:
       __lock_acquire+0x10ea/0x1d90
       lock_acquire+0xb5/0x2b0
       flush_workqueue+0x91/0x5e0
       drain_workqueue+0xa0/0x110
       destroy_workqueue+0x36/0x250
       __loop_clr_fd+0x9a/0x660 [loop]
       block_ioctl+0x3f/0x50
       __x64_sys_ioctl+0x80/0xb0
       do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae

other info that might help us debug this:

Chain exists of:
  (wq_completion)loop0 --> &disk->open_mutex --> &lo->lo_mutex

 Possible unsafe locking scenario:

       CPU0                    CPU1
       ----                    ----
  lock(&lo->lo_mutex);
                               lock(&disk->open_mutex);
                               lock(&lo->lo_mutex);
  lock((wq_completion)loop0);

 *** DEADLOCK ***

1 lock held by losetup/11596:
 #0: ffff939655510c68 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __loop_clr_fd+0x41/0x660 [loop]

stack backtrace:
CPU: 1 PID: 11596 Comm: losetup Not tainted 5.14.0-rc2+ #406
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-2.fc32 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
 dump_stack_lvl+0x57/0x72
 check_noncircular+0xcf/0xf0
 ? stack_trace_save+0x3b/0x50
 __lock_acquire+0x10ea/0x1d90
 lock_acquire+0xb5/0x2b0
 ? flush_workqueue+0x67/0x5e0
 ? lockdep_init_map_type+0x47/0x220
 flush_workqueue+0x91/0x5e0
 ? flush_workqueue+0x67/0x5e0
 ? verify_cpu+0xf0/0x100
 drain_workqueue+0xa0/0x110
 destroy_workqueue+0x36/0x250
 __loop_clr_fd+0x9a/0x660 [loop]
 ? blkdev_ioctl+0x8d/0x2a0
 block_ioctl+0x3f/0x50
 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x80/0xb0
 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae

Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
 2021-09-26 14:09:00 +02:00
Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi
c1b249e02a btrfs: reset replace target device to allocation state on close 
commit 0d977e0eba upstream.

This crash was observed with a failed assertion on device close:

  BTRFS: Transaction aborted (error -28)
  WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 3902 at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:2150 btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x1d2/0x1e0 [btrfs]
  Modules linked in: btrfs blake2b_generic libcrc32c crc32c_intel xor zstd_decompress zstd_compress xxhash lzo_compress lzo_decompress raid6_pq loop
  CPU: 1 PID: 3902 Comm: kworker/u8:4 Not tainted 5.14.0-rc5-default+ #1532
  Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.12.0-59-gc9ba527-rebuilt.opensuse.org 04/01/2014
  Workqueue: events_unbound btrfs_async_reclaim_metadata_space [btrfs]
  RIP: 0010:btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x1d2/0x1e0 [btrfs]
  RSP: 0018:ffffb7a5452d7d80 EFLAGS: 00010282
  RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000003 RCX: 0000000000000000
  RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: ffffffffabee13c4 RDI: 00000000ffffffff
  RBP: ffff97834176a378 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000001
  R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff97835195d388
  R13: 0000000005b08000 R14: ffff978385484000 R15: 000000000000016c
  FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff9783bd800000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
  CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
  CR2: 000056190d003fe8 CR3: 000000002a81e005 CR4: 0000000000170ea0
  Call Trace:
   flush_space+0x197/0x2f0 [btrfs]
   btrfs_async_reclaim_metadata_space+0x139/0x300 [btrfs]
   process_one_work+0x262/0x5e0
   worker_thread+0x4c/0x320
   ? process_one_work+0x5e0/0x5e0
   kthread+0x144/0x170
   ? set_kthread_struct+0x40/0x40
   ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
  irq event stamp: 19334989
  hardirqs last  enabled at (19334997): [<ffffffffab0e0c87>] console_unlock+0x2b7/0x400
  hardirqs last disabled at (19335006): [<ffffffffab0e0d0d>] console_unlock+0x33d/0x400
  softirqs last  enabled at (19334900): [<ffffffffaba0030d>] __do_softirq+0x30d/0x574
  softirqs last disabled at (19334893): [<ffffffffab0721ec>] irq_exit_rcu+0x12c/0x140
  ---[ end trace 45939e308e0dd3c7 ]---
  BTRFS: error (device vdd) in btrfs_run_delayed_refs:2150: errno=-28 No space left
  BTRFS info (device vdd): forced readonly
  BTRFS warning (device vdd): failed setting block group ro: -30
  BTRFS info (device vdd): suspending dev_replace for unmount
  assertion failed: !test_bit(BTRFS_DEV_STATE_REPLACE_TGT, &device->dev_state), in fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1150
  ------------[ cut here ]------------
  kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/ctree.h:3431!
  invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
  CPU: 1 PID: 3982 Comm: umount Tainted: G        W         5.14.0-rc5-default+ #1532
  Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.12.0-59-gc9ba527-rebuilt.opensuse.org 04/01/2014
  RIP: 0010:assertfail.constprop.0+0x18/0x1a [btrfs]
  RSP: 0018:ffffb7a5454c7db8 EFLAGS: 00010246
  RAX: 0000000000000068 RBX: ffff978364b91c00 RCX: 0000000000000000
  RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffffffffabee13c4 RDI: 00000000ffffffff
  RBP: ffff9783523a4c00 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000001
  R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff9783523a4d18
  R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000004 R15: 0000000000000003
  FS:  00007f61c8f42800(0000) GS:ffff9783bd800000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
  CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
  CR2: 000056190cffa810 CR3: 0000000030b96002 CR4: 0000000000170ea0
  Call Trace:
   btrfs_close_one_device.cold+0x11/0x55 [btrfs]
   close_fs_devices+0x44/0xb0 [btrfs]
   btrfs_close_devices+0x48/0x160 [btrfs]
   generic_shutdown_super+0x69/0x100
   kill_anon_super+0x14/0x30
   btrfs_kill_super+0x12/0x20 [btrfs]
   deactivate_locked_super+0x2c/0xa0
   cleanup_mnt+0x144/0x1b0
   task_work_run+0x59/0xa0
   exit_to_user_mode_loop+0xe7/0xf0
   exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0xaf/0xf0
   syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x19/0x50
   do_syscall_64+0x4a/0x90
   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae

This happens when close_ctree is called while a dev_replace hasn't
completed. In close_ctree, we suspend the dev_replace, but keep the
replace target around so that we can resume the dev_replace procedure
when we mount the root again. This is the call trace:

  close_ctree():
    btrfs_dev_replace_suspend_for_unmount();
    btrfs_close_devices():
      btrfs_close_fs_devices():
        btrfs_close_one_device():
          ASSERT(!test_bit(BTRFS_DEV_STATE_REPLACE_TGT,
                 &device->dev_state));

However, since the replace target sticks around, there is a device
with BTRFS_DEV_STATE_REPLACE_TGT set on close, and we fail the
assertion in btrfs_close_one_device.

To fix this, if we come across the replace target device when
closing, we should properly reset it back to allocation state. This
fix also ensures that if a non-target device has a corrupted state and
has the BTRFS_DEV_STATE_REPLACE_TGT bit set, the assertion will still
catch the error.

Reported-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Fixes: b2a6166768 ("btrfs: fix rw device counting in __btrfs_free_extra_devids")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi <desmondcheongzx@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
 2021-09-18 13:40:06 +02:00
Qu Wenruo
c43add24df btrfs: fix NULL pointer dereference when deleting device by invalid id 
commit e4571b8c5e upstream.

[BUG]
It's easy to trigger NULL pointer dereference, just by removing a
non-existing device id:

 # mkfs.btrfs -f -m single -d single /dev/test/scratch1 \
				     /dev/test/scratch2
 # mount /dev/test/scratch1 /mnt/btrfs
 # btrfs device remove 3 /mnt/btrfs

Then we have the following kernel NULL pointer dereference:

 BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000000
 #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
 #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
 PGD 0 P4D 0
 Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI
 CPU: 9 PID: 649 Comm: btrfs Not tainted 5.14.0-rc3-custom+ #35
 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015
 RIP: 0010:btrfs_rm_device+0x4de/0x6b0 [btrfs]
  btrfs_ioctl+0x18bb/0x3190 [btrfs]
  ? lock_is_held_type+0xa5/0x120
  ? find_held_lock.constprop.0+0x2b/0x80
  ? do_user_addr_fault+0x201/0x6a0
  ? lock_release+0xd2/0x2d0
  ? __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0
  __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0
  do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90
  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae

[CAUSE]
Commit a27a94c2b0 ("btrfs: Make btrfs_find_device_by_devspec return
btrfs_device directly") moves the "missing" device path check into
btrfs_rm_device().

But btrfs_rm_device() itself can have case where it only receives
@devid, with NULL as @device_path.

In that case, calling strcmp() on NULL will trigger the NULL pointer
dereference.

Before that commit, we handle the "missing" case inside
btrfs_find_device_by_devspec(), which will not check @device_path at all
if @devid is provided, thus no way to trigger the bug.

[FIX]
Before calling strcmp(), also make sure @device_path is not NULL.

Fixes: a27a94c2b0 ("btrfs: Make btrfs_find_device_by_devspec return btrfs_device directly")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+
Reported-by: butt3rflyh4ck <butterflyhuangxx@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
 2021-09-03 10:09:30 +02:00
Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi
4e1a57d752 btrfs: fix rw device counting in __btrfs_free_extra_devids 
commit b2a6166768 upstream.

When removing a writeable device in __btrfs_free_extra_devids, the rw
device count should be decremented.

This error was caught by Syzbot which reported a warning in
close_fs_devices:

  WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 9355 at fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1168 close_fs_devices+0x763/0x880 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1168
  Modules linked in:
  CPU: 0 PID: 9355 Comm: syz-executor552 Not tainted 5.13.0-rc1-syzkaller #0
  Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011
  RIP: 0010:close_fs_devices+0x763/0x880 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1168
  RSP: 0018:ffffc9000333f2f0 EFLAGS: 00010293
  RAX: ffffffff8365f5c3 RBX: 0000000000000001 RCX: ffff888029afd4c0
  RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: 0000000000000000
  RBP: ffff88802846f508 R08: ffffffff8365f525 R09: ffffed100337d128
  R10: ffffed100337d128 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: dffffc0000000000
  R13: ffff888019be8868 R14: 1ffff1100337d10d R15: 1ffff1100337d10a
  FS:  00007f6f53828700(0000) GS:ffff8880b9a00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
  CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
  CR2: 000000000047c410 CR3: 00000000302a6000 CR4: 00000000001506f0
  DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
  DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
  Call Trace:
   btrfs_close_devices+0xc9/0x450 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1180
   open_ctree+0x8e1/0x3968 fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:3693
   btrfs_fill_super fs/btrfs/super.c:1382 [inline]
   btrfs_mount_root+0xac5/0xc60 fs/btrfs/super.c:1749
   legacy_get_tree+0xea/0x180 fs/fs_context.c:592
   vfs_get_tree+0x86/0x270 fs/super.c:1498
   fc_mount fs/namespace.c:993 [inline]
   vfs_kern_mount+0xc9/0x160 fs/namespace.c:1023
   btrfs_mount+0x3d3/0xb50 fs/btrfs/super.c:1809
   legacy_get_tree+0xea/0x180 fs/fs_context.c:592
   vfs_get_tree+0x86/0x270 fs/super.c:1498
   do_new_mount fs/namespace.c:2905 [inline]
   path_mount+0x196f/0x2be0 fs/namespace.c:3235
   do_mount fs/namespace.c:3248 [inline]
   __do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3456 [inline]
   __se_sys_mount+0x2f9/0x3b0 fs/namespace.c:3433
   do_syscall_64+0x3f/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:47
   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae

Because fs_devices->rw_devices was not 0 after
closing all devices. Here is the call trace that was observed:

  btrfs_mount_root():
    btrfs_scan_one_device():
      device_list_add();   <---------------- device added
    btrfs_open_devices():
      open_fs_devices():
        btrfs_open_one_device();   <-------- writable device opened,
	                                     rw device count ++
    btrfs_fill_super():
      open_ctree():
        btrfs_free_extra_devids():
	  __btrfs_free_extra_devids();  <--- writable device removed,
	                              rw device count not decremented
	  fail_tree_roots:
	    btrfs_close_devices():
	      close_fs_devices();   <------- rw device count off by 1

As a note, prior to commit cf89af146b ("btrfs: dev-replace: fail
mount if we don't have replace item with target device"), rw_devices
was decremented on removing a writable device in
__btrfs_free_extra_devids only if the BTRFS_DEV_STATE_REPLACE_TGT bit
was not set for the device. However, this check does not need to be
reinstated as it is now redundant and incorrect.

In __btrfs_free_extra_devids, we skip removing the device if it is the
target for replacement. This is done by checking whether device->devid
== BTRFS_DEV_REPLACE_DEVID. Since BTRFS_DEV_STATE_REPLACE_TGT is set
only on the device with devid BTRFS_DEV_REPLACE_DEVID, no devices
should have the BTRFS_DEV_STATE_REPLACE_TGT bit set after the check,
and so it's redundant to test for that bit.

Additionally, following commit 82372bc816 ("Btrfs: make
the logic of source device removing more clear"), rw_devices is
incremented whenever a writeable device is added to the alloc
list (including the target device in btrfs_dev_replace_finishing), so
all removals of writable devices from the alloc list should also be
accompanied by a decrement to rw_devices.

Reported-by: syzbot+a70e2ad0879f160b9217@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: cf89af146b ("btrfs: dev-replace: fail mount if we don't have replace item with target device")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.10+
Tested-by: syzbot+a70e2ad0879f160b9217@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi <desmondcheongzx@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
 2021-08-04 12:46:39 +02:00
Su Yue
f343bf1aaf btrfs: fix lockdep warning due to seqcount_mutex on 32bit arch 
commit c41ec4529d upstream.

This effectively reverts commit d5c8238849 ("btrfs: convert
data_seqcount to seqcount_mutex_t").

While running fstests on 32 bits test box, many tests failed because of
warnings in dmesg. One of those warnings (btrfs/003):

  [66.441317] WARNING: CPU: 6 PID: 9251 at include/linux/seqlock.h:279 btrfs_remove_chunk+0x58b/0x7b0 [btrfs]
  [66.441446] CPU: 6 PID: 9251 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G           O      5.11.0-rc4-custom+ #5
  [66.441449] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS ArchLinux 1.14.0-1 04/01/2014
  [66.441451] EIP: btrfs_remove_chunk+0x58b/0x7b0 [btrfs]
  [66.441472] EAX: 00000000 EBX: 00000001 ECX: c576070c EDX: c6b15803
  [66.441475] ESI: 10000000 EDI: 00000000 EBP: c56fbcfc ESP: c56fbc70
  [66.441477] DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 00e0 SS: 0068 EFLAGS: 00010246
  [66.441481] CR0: 80050033 CR2: 05c8da20 CR3: 04b20000 CR4: 00350ed0
  [66.441485] Call Trace:
  [66.441510]  btrfs_relocate_chunk+0xb1/0x100 [btrfs]
  [66.441529]  ? btrfs_lookup_block_group+0x17/0x20 [btrfs]
  [66.441562]  btrfs_balance+0x8ed/0x13b0 [btrfs]
  [66.441586]  ? btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x333/0x3c0 [btrfs]
  [66.441619]  ? __this_cpu_preempt_check+0xf/0x11
  [66.441643]  btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x333/0x3c0 [btrfs]
  [66.441664]  ? btrfs_ioctl_get_supported_features+0x30/0x30 [btrfs]
  [66.441683]  btrfs_ioctl+0x414/0x2ae0 [btrfs]
  [66.441700]  ? __lock_acquire+0x35f/0x2650
  [66.441717]  ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x87/0x120
  [66.441720]  ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0xd0/0x1e0
  [66.441724]  ? call_rcu+0x2d3/0x530
  [66.441731]  ? __might_fault+0x41/0x90
  [66.441736]  ? kvm_sched_clock_read+0x15/0x50
  [66.441740]  ? sched_clock+0x8/0x10
  [66.441745]  ? sched_clock_cpu+0x13/0x180
  [66.441750]  ? btrfs_ioctl_get_supported_features+0x30/0x30 [btrfs]
  [66.441750]  ? btrfs_ioctl_get_supported_features+0x30/0x30 [btrfs]
  [66.441768]  __ia32_sys_ioctl+0x165/0x8a0
  [66.441773]  ? __this_cpu_preempt_check+0xf/0x11
  [66.441785]  ? __might_fault+0x89/0x90
  [66.441791]  __do_fast_syscall_32+0x54/0x80
  [66.441796]  do_fast_syscall_32+0x32/0x70
  [66.441801]  do_SYSENTER_32+0x15/0x20
  [66.441805]  entry_SYSENTER_32+0x9f/0xf2
  [66.441808] EIP: 0xab7b5549
  [66.441814] EAX: ffffffda EBX: 00000003 ECX: c4009420 EDX: bfa91f5c
  [66.441816] ESI: 00000003 EDI: 00000001 EBP: 00000000 ESP: bfa91e98
  [66.441818] DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 0000 GS: 0033 SS: 007b EFLAGS: 00000292
  [66.441833] irq event stamp: 42579
  [66.441835] hardirqs last  enabled at (42585): [<c60eb065>] console_unlock+0x495/0x590
  [66.441838] hardirqs last disabled at (42590): [<c60eafd5>] console_unlock+0x405/0x590
  [66.441840] softirqs last  enabled at (41698): [<c601b76c>] call_on_stack+0x1c/0x60
  [66.441843] softirqs last disabled at (41681): [<c601b76c>] call_on_stack+0x1c/0x60

  ========================================================================
  btrfs_remove_chunk+0x58b/0x7b0:
  __seqprop_mutex_assert at linux/./include/linux/seqlock.h:279
  (inlined by) btrfs_device_set_bytes_used at linux/fs/btrfs/volumes.h:212
  (inlined by) btrfs_remove_chunk at linux/fs/btrfs/volumes.c:2994
  ========================================================================

The warning is produced by lockdep_assert_held() in
__seqprop_mutex_assert() if CONFIG_LOCKDEP is enabled.
And "olumes.c:2994 is btrfs_device_set_bytes_used() with mutex lock
fs_info->chunk_mutex held already.

After adding some debug prints, the cause was found that many
__alloc_device() are called with NULL @fs_info (during scanning ioctl).
Inside the function, btrfs_device_data_ordered_init() is expanded to
seqcount_mutex_init().  In this scenario, its second
parameter info->chunk_mutex  is &NULL->chunk_mutex which equals
to offsetof(struct btrfs_fs_info, chunk_mutex) unexpectedly. Thus,
seqcount_mutex_init() is called in wrong way. And later
btrfs_device_get/set helpers trigger lockdep warnings.

The device and filesystem object lifetimes are different and we'd have
to synchronize initialization of the btrfs_device::data_seqcount with
the fs_info, possibly using some additional synchronization. It would
still not prevent concurrent access to the seqcount lock when it's used
for read and initialization.

Commit d5c8238849 ("btrfs: convert data_seqcount to seqcount_mutex_t")
does not mention a particular problem being fixed so revert should not
cause any harm and we'll get the lockdep warning fixed.

Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=210139
Reported-by: Erhard F <erhard_f@mailbox.org>
Fixes: d5c8238849 ("btrfs: convert data_seqcount to seqcount_mutex_t")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.10
CC: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Su Yue <l@damenly.su>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
 2021-02-03 23:28:40 +01:00
Josef Bacik
14e17e90bf btrfs: fix lockdep splat in btrfs_recover_relocation 
commit fb28610097 upstream.

While testing the error paths of relocation I hit the following lockdep
splat:

  ======================================================
  WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
  5.10.0-rc6+ #217 Not tainted
  ------------------------------------------------------
  mount/779 is trying to acquire lock:
  ffffa0e676945418 (&fs_info->balance_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_recover_balance+0x2f0/0x340

  but task is already holding lock:
  ffffa0e60ee31da8 (btrfs-root-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x27/0x100

  which lock already depends on the new lock.

  the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

  -> #2 (btrfs-root-00){++++}-{3:3}:
	 down_read_nested+0x43/0x130
	 __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x27/0x100
	 btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x31/0x40
	 btrfs_search_slot+0x462/0x8f0
	 btrfs_update_root+0x55/0x2b0
	 btrfs_drop_snapshot+0x398/0x750
	 clean_dirty_subvols+0xdf/0x120
	 btrfs_recover_relocation+0x534/0x5a0
	 btrfs_start_pre_rw_mount+0xcb/0x170
	 open_ctree+0x151f/0x1726
	 btrfs_mount_root.cold+0x12/0xea
	 legacy_get_tree+0x30/0x50
	 vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0
	 vfs_kern_mount.part.0+0x71/0xb0
	 btrfs_mount+0x10d/0x380
	 legacy_get_tree+0x30/0x50
	 vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0
	 path_mount+0x433/0xc10
	 __x64_sys_mount+0xe3/0x120
	 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40
	 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

  -> #1 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}:
	 start_transaction+0x444/0x700
	 insert_balance_item.isra.0+0x37/0x320
	 btrfs_balance+0x354/0xf40
	 btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x2cf/0x380
	 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0
	 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40
	 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

  -> #0 (&fs_info->balance_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
	 __lock_acquire+0x1120/0x1e10
	 lock_acquire+0x116/0x370
	 __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7b0
	 btrfs_recover_balance+0x2f0/0x340
	 open_ctree+0x1095/0x1726
	 btrfs_mount_root.cold+0x12/0xea
	 legacy_get_tree+0x30/0x50
	 vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0
	 vfs_kern_mount.part.0+0x71/0xb0
	 btrfs_mount+0x10d/0x380
	 legacy_get_tree+0x30/0x50
	 vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0
	 path_mount+0x433/0xc10
	 __x64_sys_mount+0xe3/0x120
	 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40
	 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

  other info that might help us debug this:

  Chain exists of:
    &fs_info->balance_mutex --> sb_internal#2 --> btrfs-root-00

   Possible unsafe locking scenario:

	 CPU0                    CPU1
	 ----                    ----
    lock(btrfs-root-00);
				 lock(sb_internal#2);
				 lock(btrfs-root-00);
    lock(&fs_info->balance_mutex);

   *** DEADLOCK ***

  2 locks held by mount/779:
   #0: ffffa0e60dc040e0 (&type->s_umount_key#47/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: alloc_super+0xb5/0x380
   #1: ffffa0e60ee31da8 (btrfs-root-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x27/0x100

  stack backtrace:
  CPU: 0 PID: 779 Comm: mount Not tainted 5.10.0-rc6+ #217
  Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-2.fc32 04/01/2014
  Call Trace:
   dump_stack+0x8b/0xb0
   check_noncircular+0xcf/0xf0
   ? trace_call_bpf+0x139/0x260
   __lock_acquire+0x1120/0x1e10
   lock_acquire+0x116/0x370
   ? btrfs_recover_balance+0x2f0/0x340
   __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7b0
   ? btrfs_recover_balance+0x2f0/0x340
   ? btrfs_recover_balance+0x2f0/0x340
   ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x3f/0x80
   ? kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x2c4/0x2f0
   ? btrfs_get_64+0x5e/0x100
   btrfs_recover_balance+0x2f0/0x340
   open_ctree+0x1095/0x1726
   btrfs_mount_root.cold+0x12/0xea
   ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x3f/0x80
   legacy_get_tree+0x30/0x50
   vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0
   vfs_kern_mount.part.0+0x71/0xb0
   btrfs_mount+0x10d/0x380
   ? __kmalloc_track_caller+0x2f2/0x320
   legacy_get_tree+0x30/0x50
   vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0
   ? capable+0x3a/0x60
   path_mount+0x433/0xc10
   __x64_sys_mount+0xe3/0x120
   do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40
   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

This is straightforward to fix, simply release the path before we setup
the balance_ctl.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
 2021-01-27 11:54:53 +01:00
Johannes Thumshirn
0697d9a610 btrfs: don't access possibly stale fs_info data for printing duplicate device 
Syzbot reported a possible use-after-free when printing a duplicate device
warning device_list_add().

At this point it can happen that a btrfs_device::fs_info is not correctly
setup yet, so we're accessing stale data, when printing the warning
message using the btrfs_printk() wrappers.

  ==================================================================
  BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in btrfs_printk+0x3eb/0x435 fs/btrfs/super.c:245
  Read of size 8 at addr ffff8880878e06a8 by task syz-executor225/7068

  CPU: 1 PID: 7068 Comm: syz-executor225 Not tainted 5.9.0-rc5-syzkaller #0
  Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011
  Call Trace:
   __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline]
   dump_stack+0x1d6/0x29e lib/dump_stack.c:118
   print_address_description+0x66/0x620 mm/kasan/report.c:383
   __kasan_report mm/kasan/report.c:513 [inline]
   kasan_report+0x132/0x1d0 mm/kasan/report.c:530
   btrfs_printk+0x3eb/0x435 fs/btrfs/super.c:245
   device_list_add+0x1a88/0x1d60 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:943
   btrfs_scan_one_device+0x196/0x490 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1359
   btrfs_mount_root+0x48f/0xb60 fs/btrfs/super.c:1634
   legacy_get_tree+0xea/0x180 fs/fs_context.c:592
   vfs_get_tree+0x88/0x270 fs/super.c:1547
   fc_mount fs/namespace.c:978 [inline]
   vfs_kern_mount+0xc9/0x160 fs/namespace.c:1008
   btrfs_mount+0x33c/0xae0 fs/btrfs/super.c:1732
   legacy_get_tree+0xea/0x180 fs/fs_context.c:592
   vfs_get_tree+0x88/0x270 fs/super.c:1547
   do_new_mount fs/namespace.c:2875 [inline]
   path_mount+0x179d/0x29e0 fs/namespace.c:3192
   do_mount fs/namespace.c:3205 [inline]
   __do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3413 [inline]
   __se_sys_mount+0x126/0x180 fs/namespace.c:3390
   do_syscall_64+0x31/0x70 arch/x86/entry/common.c:46
   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
  RIP: 0033:0x44840a
  RSP: 002b:00007ffedfffd608 EFLAGS: 00000293 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000a5
  RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007ffedfffd670 RCX: 000000000044840a
  RDX: 0000000020000000 RSI: 0000000020000100 RDI: 00007ffedfffd630
  RBP: 00007ffedfffd630 R08: 00007ffedfffd670 R09: 0000000000000000
  R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000293 R12: 000000000000001a
  R13: 0000000000000004 R14: 0000000000000003 R15: 0000000000000003

  Allocated by task 6945:
   kasan_save_stack mm/kasan/common.c:48 [inline]
   kasan_set_track mm/kasan/common.c:56 [inline]
   __kasan_kmalloc+0x100/0x130 mm/kasan/common.c:461
   kmalloc_node include/linux/slab.h:577 [inline]
   kvmalloc_node+0x81/0x110 mm/util.c:574
   kvmalloc include/linux/mm.h:757 [inline]
   kvzalloc include/linux/mm.h:765 [inline]
   btrfs_mount_root+0xd0/0xb60 fs/btrfs/super.c:1613
   legacy_get_tree+0xea/0x180 fs/fs_context.c:592
   vfs_get_tree+0x88/0x270 fs/super.c:1547
   fc_mount fs/namespace.c:978 [inline]
   vfs_kern_mount+0xc9/0x160 fs/namespace.c:1008
   btrfs_mount+0x33c/0xae0 fs/btrfs/super.c:1732
   legacy_get_tree+0xea/0x180 fs/fs_context.c:592
   vfs_get_tree+0x88/0x270 fs/super.c:1547
   do_new_mount fs/namespace.c:2875 [inline]
   path_mount+0x179d/0x29e0 fs/namespace.c:3192
   do_mount fs/namespace.c:3205 [inline]
   __do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3413 [inline]
   __se_sys_mount+0x126/0x180 fs/namespace.c:3390
   do_syscall_64+0x31/0x70 arch/x86/entry/common.c:46
   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

  Freed by task 6945:
   kasan_save_stack mm/kasan/common.c:48 [inline]
   kasan_set_track+0x3d/0x70 mm/kasan/common.c:56
   kasan_set_free_info+0x17/0x30 mm/kasan/generic.c:355
   __kasan_slab_free+0xdd/0x110 mm/kasan/common.c:422
   __cache_free mm/slab.c:3418 [inline]
   kfree+0x113/0x200 mm/slab.c:3756
   deactivate_locked_super+0xa7/0xf0 fs/super.c:335
   btrfs_mount_root+0x72b/0xb60 fs/btrfs/super.c:1678
   legacy_get_tree+0xea/0x180 fs/fs_context.c:592
   vfs_get_tree+0x88/0x270 fs/super.c:1547
   fc_mount fs/namespace.c:978 [inline]
   vfs_kern_mount+0xc9/0x160 fs/namespace.c:1008
   btrfs_mount+0x33c/0xae0 fs/btrfs/super.c:1732
   legacy_get_tree+0xea/0x180 fs/fs_context.c:592
   vfs_get_tree+0x88/0x270 fs/super.c:1547
   do_new_mount fs/namespace.c:2875 [inline]
   path_mount+0x179d/0x29e0 fs/namespace.c:3192
   do_mount fs/namespace.c:3205 [inline]
   __do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3413 [inline]
   __se_sys_mount+0x126/0x180 fs/namespace.c:3390
   do_syscall_64+0x31/0x70 arch/x86/entry/common.c:46
   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

  The buggy address belongs to the object at ffff8880878e0000
   which belongs to the cache kmalloc-16k of size 16384
  The buggy address is located 1704 bytes inside of
   16384-byte region [ffff8880878e0000, ffff8880878e4000)
  The buggy address belongs to the page:
  page:0000000060704f30 refcount:1 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x0 pfn:0x878e0
  head:0000000060704f30 order:3 compound_mapcount:0 compound_pincount:0
  flags: 0xfffe0000010200(slab|head)
  raw: 00fffe0000010200 ffffea00028e9a08 ffffea00021e3608 ffff8880aa440b00
  raw: 0000000000000000 ffff8880878e0000 0000000100000001 0000000000000000
  page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected

  Memory state around the buggy address:
   ffff8880878e0580: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb
   ffff8880878e0600: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb
  >ffff8880878e0680: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb
				    ^
   ffff8880878e0700: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb
   ffff8880878e0780: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb
  ==================================================================

The syzkaller reproducer for this use-after-free crafts a filesystem image
and loop mounts it twice in a loop. The mount will fail as the crafted
image has an invalid chunk tree. When this happens btrfs_mount_root() will
call deactivate_locked_super(), which then cleans up fs_info and
fs_info::sb. If a second thread now adds the same block-device to the
filesystem, it will get detected as a duplicate device and
device_list_add() will reject the duplicate and print a warning. But as
the fs_info pointer passed in is non-NULL this will result in a
use-after-free.

Instead of printing possibly uninitialized or already freed memory in
btrfs_printk(), explicitly pass in a NULL fs_info so the printing of the
device name will be skipped altogether.

There was a slightly different approach discussed in
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/20200114060920.4527-1-anand.jain@oracle.com/t/#u

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/000000000000c9e14b05afcc41ba@google.com
Reported-by: syzbot+582e66e5edf36a22c7b0@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
 2020-11-23 21:16:12 +01:00
Anand Jain
cf89af146b btrfs: dev-replace: fail mount if we don't have replace item with target device 
If there is a device BTRFS_DEV_REPLACE_DEVID without the device replace
item, then it means the filesystem is inconsistent state. This is either
corruption or a crafted image.  Fail the mount as this needs a closer
look what is actually wrong.

As of now if BTRFS_DEV_REPLACE_DEVID is present without the replace
item, in __btrfs_free_extra_devids() we determine that there is an
extra device, and free those extra devices but continue to mount the
device.
However, we were wrong in keeping tack of the rw_devices so the syzbot
testcase failed:

  WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 3612 at fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1166 close_fs_devices.part.0+0x607/0x800 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1166
  Kernel panic - not syncing: panic_on_warn set ...
  CPU: 1 PID: 3612 Comm: syz-executor.2 Not tainted 5.9.0-rc4-syzkaller #0
  Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011
  Call Trace:
   __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline]
   dump_stack+0x198/0x1fd lib/dump_stack.c:118
   panic+0x347/0x7c0 kernel/panic.c:231
   __warn.cold+0x20/0x46 kernel/panic.c:600
   report_bug+0x1bd/0x210 lib/bug.c:198
   handle_bug+0x38/0x90 arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:234
   exc_invalid_op+0x14/0x40 arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:254
   asm_exc_invalid_op+0x12/0x20 arch/x86/include/asm/idtentry.h:536
  RIP: 0010:close_fs_devices.part.0+0x607/0x800 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1166
  RSP: 0018:ffffc900091777e0 EFLAGS: 00010246
  RAX: 0000000000040000 RBX: ffffffffffffffff RCX: ffffc9000c8b7000
  RDX: 0000000000040000 RSI: ffffffff83097f47 RDI: 0000000000000007
  RBP: dffffc0000000000 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffff8880988a187f
  R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff88809593a130
  R13: ffff88809593a1ec R14: ffff8880988a1908 R15: ffff88809593a050
   close_fs_devices fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1193 [inline]
   btrfs_close_devices+0x95/0x1f0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1179
   open_ctree+0x4984/0x4a2d fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:3434
   btrfs_fill_super fs/btrfs/super.c:1316 [inline]
   btrfs_mount_root.cold+0x14/0x165 fs/btrfs/super.c:1672

The fix here is, when we determine that there isn't a replace item
then fail the mount if there is a replace target device (devid 0).

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+
Reported-by: syzbot+4cfe71a4da060be47502@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
 2020-11-05 13:03:31 +01:00
Davidlohr Bueso
d5c8238849 btrfs: convert data_seqcount to seqcount_mutex_t 
By doing so we can associate the sequence counter to the chunk_mutex
for lockdep purposes (compiled-out otherwise), the mutex is otherwise
used on the write side.
Also avoid explicitly disabling preemption around the write region as it
will now be done automatically by the seqcount machinery based on the
lock type.

Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
 2020-10-27 15:11:51 +01:00
Filipe Manana
66d204a16c btrfs: fix readahead hang and use-after-free after removing a device 
Very sporadically I had test case btrfs/069 from fstests hanging (for
years, it is not a recent regression), with the following traces in
dmesg/syslog:

  [162301.160628] BTRFS info (device sdc): dev_replace from /dev/sdd (devid 2) to /dev/sdg started
  [162301.181196] BTRFS info (device sdc): scrub: finished on devid 4 with status: 0
  [162301.287162] BTRFS info (device sdc): dev_replace from /dev/sdd (devid 2) to /dev/sdg finished
  [162513.513792] INFO: task btrfs-transacti:1356167 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
  [162513.514318]       Not tainted 5.9.0-rc6-btrfs-next-69 #1
  [162513.514522] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
  [162513.514747] task:btrfs-transacti state:D stack:    0 pid:1356167 ppid:     2 flags:0x00004000
  [162513.514751] Call Trace:
  [162513.514761]  __schedule+0x5ce/0xd00
  [162513.514765]  ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3c/0x60
  [162513.514771]  schedule+0x46/0xf0
  [162513.514844]  wait_current_trans+0xde/0x140 [btrfs]
  [162513.514850]  ? finish_wait+0x90/0x90
  [162513.514864]  start_transaction+0x37c/0x5f0 [btrfs]
  [162513.514879]  transaction_kthread+0xa4/0x170 [btrfs]
  [162513.514891]  ? btrfs_cleanup_transaction+0x660/0x660 [btrfs]
  [162513.514894]  kthread+0x153/0x170
  [162513.514897]  ? kthread_stop+0x2c0/0x2c0
  [162513.514902]  ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
  [162513.514916] INFO: task fsstress:1356184 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
  [162513.515192]       Not tainted 5.9.0-rc6-btrfs-next-69 #1
  [162513.515431] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
  [162513.515680] task:fsstress        state:D stack:    0 pid:1356184 ppid:1356177 flags:0x00004000
  [162513.515682] Call Trace:
  [162513.515688]  __schedule+0x5ce/0xd00
  [162513.515691]  ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3c/0x60
  [162513.515697]  schedule+0x46/0xf0
  [162513.515712]  wait_current_trans+0xde/0x140 [btrfs]
  [162513.515716]  ? finish_wait+0x90/0x90
  [162513.515729]  start_transaction+0x37c/0x5f0 [btrfs]
  [162513.515743]  btrfs_attach_transaction_barrier+0x1f/0x50 [btrfs]
  [162513.515753]  btrfs_sync_fs+0x61/0x1c0 [btrfs]
  [162513.515758]  ? __ia32_sys_fdatasync+0x20/0x20
  [162513.515761]  iterate_supers+0x87/0xf0
  [162513.515765]  ksys_sync+0x60/0xb0
  [162513.515768]  __do_sys_sync+0xa/0x10
  [162513.515771]  do_syscall_64+0x33/0x80
  [162513.515774]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
  [162513.515781] RIP: 0033:0x7f5238f50bd7
  [162513.515782] Code: Bad RIP value.
  [162513.515784] RSP: 002b:00007fff67b978e8 EFLAGS: 00000206 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000a2
  [162513.515786] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000055b1fad2c560 RCX: 00007f5238f50bd7
  [162513.515788] RDX: 00000000ffffffff RSI: 000000000daf0e74 RDI: 000000000000003a
  [162513.515789] RBP: 0000000000000032 R08: 000000000000000a R09: 00007f5239019be0
  [162513.515791] R10: fffffffffffff24f R11: 0000000000000206 R12: 000000000000003a
  [162513.515792] R13: 00007fff67b97950 R14: 00007fff67b97906 R15: 000055b1fad1a340
  [162513.515804] INFO: task fsstress:1356185 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
  [162513.516064]       Not tainted 5.9.0-rc6-btrfs-next-69 #1
  [162513.516329] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
  [162513.516617] task:fsstress        state:D stack:    0 pid:1356185 ppid:1356177 flags:0x00000000
  [162513.516620] Call Trace:
  [162513.516625]  __schedule+0x5ce/0xd00
  [162513.516628]  ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3c/0x60
  [162513.516634]  schedule+0x46/0xf0
  [162513.516647]  wait_current_trans+0xde/0x140 [btrfs]
  [162513.516650]  ? finish_wait+0x90/0x90
  [162513.516662]  start_transaction+0x4d7/0x5f0 [btrfs]
  [162513.516679]  btrfs_setxattr_trans+0x3c/0x100 [btrfs]
  [162513.516686]  __vfs_setxattr+0x66/0x80
  [162513.516691]  __vfs_setxattr_noperm+0x70/0x200
  [162513.516697]  vfs_setxattr+0x6b/0x120
  [162513.516703]  setxattr+0x125/0x240
  [162513.516709]  ? lock_acquire+0xb1/0x480
  [162513.516712]  ? mnt_want_write+0x20/0x50
  [162513.516721]  ? rcu_read_lock_any_held+0x8e/0xb0
  [162513.516723]  ? preempt_count_add+0x49/0xa0
  [162513.516725]  ? __sb_start_write+0x19b/0x290
  [162513.516727]  ? preempt_count_add+0x49/0xa0
  [162513.516732]  path_setxattr+0xba/0xd0
  [162513.516739]  __x64_sys_setxattr+0x27/0x30
  [162513.516741]  do_syscall_64+0x33/0x80
  [162513.516743]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
  [162513.516745] RIP: 0033:0x7f5238f56d5a
  [162513.516746] Code: Bad RIP value.
  [162513.516748] RSP: 002b:00007fff67b97868 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000bc
  [162513.516750] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000001 RCX: 00007f5238f56d5a
  [162513.516751] RDX: 000055b1fbb0d5a0 RSI: 00007fff67b978a0 RDI: 000055b1fbb0d470
  [162513.516753] RBP: 000055b1fbb0d5a0 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 00007fff67b97700
  [162513.516754] R10: 0000000000000004 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 0000000000000004
  [162513.516756] R13: 0000000000000024 R14: 0000000000000001 R15: 00007fff67b978a0
  [162513.516767] INFO: task fsstress:1356196 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
  [162513.517064]       Not tainted 5.9.0-rc6-btrfs-next-69 #1
  [162513.517365] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
  [162513.517763] task:fsstress        state:D stack:    0 pid:1356196 ppid:1356177 flags:0x00004000
  [162513.517780] Call Trace:
  [162513.517786]  __schedule+0x5ce/0xd00
  [162513.517789]  ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3c/0x60
  [162513.517796]  schedule+0x46/0xf0
  [162513.517810]  wait_current_trans+0xde/0x140 [btrfs]
  [162513.517814]  ? finish_wait+0x90/0x90
  [162513.517829]  start_transaction+0x37c/0x5f0 [btrfs]
  [162513.517845]  btrfs_attach_transaction_barrier+0x1f/0x50 [btrfs]
  [162513.517857]  btrfs_sync_fs+0x61/0x1c0 [btrfs]
  [162513.517862]  ? __ia32_sys_fdatasync+0x20/0x20
  [162513.517865]  iterate_supers+0x87/0xf0
  [162513.517869]  ksys_sync+0x60/0xb0
  [162513.517872]  __do_sys_sync+0xa/0x10
  [162513.517875]  do_syscall_64+0x33/0x80
  [162513.517878]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
  [162513.517881] RIP: 0033:0x7f5238f50bd7
  [162513.517883] Code: Bad RIP value.
  [162513.517885] RSP: 002b:00007fff67b978e8 EFLAGS: 00000206 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000a2
  [162513.517887] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000055b1fad2c560 RCX: 00007f5238f50bd7
  [162513.517889] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 000000007660add2 RDI: 0000000000000053
  [162513.517891] RBP: 0000000000000032 R08: 0000000000000067 R09: 00007f5239019be0
  [162513.517893] R10: fffffffffffff24f R11: 0000000000000206 R12: 0000000000000053
  [162513.517895] R13: 00007fff67b97950 R14: 00007fff67b97906 R15: 000055b1fad1a340
  [162513.517908] INFO: task fsstress:1356197 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
  [162513.518298]       Not tainted 5.9.0-rc6-btrfs-next-69 #1
  [162513.518672] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
  [162513.519157] task:fsstress        state:D stack:    0 pid:1356197 ppid:1356177 flags:0x00000000
  [162513.519160] Call Trace:
  [162513.519165]  __schedule+0x5ce/0xd00
  [162513.519168]  ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3c/0x60
  [162513.519174]  schedule+0x46/0xf0
  [162513.519190]  wait_current_trans+0xde/0x140 [btrfs]
  [162513.519193]  ? finish_wait+0x90/0x90
  [162513.519206]  start_transaction+0x4d7/0x5f0 [btrfs]
  [162513.519222]  btrfs_create+0x57/0x200 [btrfs]
  [162513.519230]  lookup_open+0x522/0x650
  [162513.519246]  path_openat+0x2b8/0xa50
  [162513.519270]  do_filp_open+0x91/0x100
  [162513.519275]  ? find_held_lock+0x32/0x90
  [162513.519280]  ? lock_acquired+0x33b/0x470
  [162513.519285]  ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x4b/0xc0
  [162513.519287]  ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x29/0x40
  [162513.519295]  do_sys_openat2+0x20d/0x2d0
  [162513.519300]  do_sys_open+0x44/0x80
  [162513.519304]  do_syscall_64+0x33/0x80
  [162513.519307]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
  [162513.519309] RIP: 0033:0x7f5238f4a903
  [162513.519310] Code: Bad RIP value.
  [162513.519312] RSP: 002b:00007fff67b97758 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000055
  [162513.519314] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00000000ffffffff RCX: 00007f5238f4a903
  [162513.519316] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 00000000000001b6 RDI: 000055b1fbb0d470
  [162513.519317] RBP: 00007fff67b978c0 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000002
  [162513.519319] R10: 00007fff67b974f7 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000013
  [162513.519320] R13: 00000000000001b6 R14: 00007fff67b97906 R15: 000055b1fad1c620
  [162513.519332] INFO: task btrfs:1356211 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
  [162513.519727]       Not tainted 5.9.0-rc6-btrfs-next-69 #1
  [162513.520115] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
  [162513.520508] task:btrfs           state:D stack:    0 pid:1356211 ppid:1356178 flags:0x00004002
  [162513.520511] Call Trace:
  [162513.520516]  __schedule+0x5ce/0xd00
  [162513.520519]  ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3c/0x60
  [162513.520525]  schedule+0x46/0xf0
  [162513.520544]  btrfs_scrub_pause+0x11f/0x180 [btrfs]
  [162513.520548]  ? finish_wait+0x90/0x90
  [162513.520562]  btrfs_commit_transaction+0x45a/0xc30 [btrfs]
  [162513.520574]  ? start_transaction+0xe0/0x5f0 [btrfs]
  [162513.520596]  btrfs_dev_replace_finishing+0x6d8/0x711 [btrfs]
  [162513.520619]  btrfs_dev_replace_by_ioctl.cold+0x1cc/0x1fd [btrfs]
  [162513.520639]  btrfs_ioctl+0x2a25/0x36f0 [btrfs]
  [162513.520643]  ? do_sigaction+0xf3/0x240
  [162513.520645]  ? find_held_lock+0x32/0x90
  [162513.520648]  ? do_sigaction+0xf3/0x240
  [162513.520651]  ? lock_acquired+0x33b/0x470
  [162513.520655]  ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x24/0x50
  [162513.520657]  ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x7d/0x100
  [162513.520660]  ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x35/0x50
  [162513.520662]  ? do_sigaction+0xf3/0x240
  [162513.520671]  ? __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0
  [162513.520672]  __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0
  [162513.520677]  do_syscall_64+0x33/0x80
  [162513.520679]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
  [162513.520681] RIP: 0033:0x7fc3cd307d87
  [162513.520682] Code: Bad RIP value.
  [162513.520684] RSP: 002b:00007ffe30a56bb8 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010
  [162513.520686] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000004 RCX: 00007fc3cd307d87
  [162513.520687] RDX: 00007ffe30a57a30 RSI: 00000000ca289435 RDI: 0000000000000003
  [162513.520689] RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
  [162513.520690] R10: 0000000000000008 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 0000000000000003
  [162513.520692] R13: 0000557323a212e0 R14: 00007ffe30a5a520 R15: 0000000000000001
  [162513.520703]
		  Showing all locks held in the system:
  [162513.520712] 1 lock held by khungtaskd/54:
  [162513.520713]  #0: ffffffffb40a91a0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: debug_show_all_locks+0x15/0x197
  [162513.520728] 1 lock held by in:imklog/596:
  [162513.520729]  #0: ffff8f3f0d781400 (&f->f_pos_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __fdget_pos+0x4d/0x60
  [162513.520782] 1 lock held by btrfs-transacti/1356167:
  [162513.520784]  #0: ffff8f3d810cc848 (&fs_info->transaction_kthread_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: transaction_kthread+0x4a/0x170 [btrfs]
  [162513.520798] 1 lock held by btrfs/1356190:
  [162513.520800]  #0: ffff8f3d57644470 (sb_writers#15){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: mnt_want_write_file+0x22/0x60
  [162513.520805] 1 lock held by fsstress/1356184:
  [162513.520806]  #0: ffff8f3d576440e8 (&type->s_umount_key#62){++++}-{3:3}, at: iterate_supers+0x6f/0xf0
  [162513.520811] 3 locks held by fsstress/1356185:
  [162513.520812]  #0: ffff8f3d57644470 (sb_writers#15){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: mnt_want_write+0x20/0x50
  [162513.520815]  #1: ffff8f3d80a650b8 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#10){++++}-{3:3}, at: vfs_setxattr+0x50/0x120
  [162513.520820]  #2: ffff8f3d57644690 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: start_transaction+0x40e/0x5f0 [btrfs]
  [162513.520833] 1 lock held by fsstress/1356196:
  [162513.520834]  #0: ffff8f3d576440e8 (&type->s_umount_key#62){++++}-{3:3}, at: iterate_supers+0x6f/0xf0
  [162513.520838] 3 locks held by fsstress/1356197:
  [162513.520839]  #0: ffff8f3d57644470 (sb_writers#15){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: mnt_want_write+0x20/0x50
  [162513.520843]  #1: ffff8f3d506465e8 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#10){++++}-{3:3}, at: path_openat+0x2a7/0xa50
  [162513.520846]  #2: ffff8f3d57644690 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: start_transaction+0x40e/0x5f0 [btrfs]
  [162513.520858] 2 locks held by btrfs/1356211:
  [162513.520859]  #0: ffff8f3d810cde30 (&fs_info->dev_replace.lock_finishing_cancel_unmount){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_dev_replace_finishing+0x52/0x711 [btrfs]
  [162513.520877]  #1: ffff8f3d57644690 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: start_transaction+0x40e/0x5f0 [btrfs]

This was weird because the stack traces show that a transaction commit,
triggered by a device replace operation, is blocking trying to pause any
running scrubs but there are no stack traces of blocked tasks doing a
scrub.

After poking around with drgn, I noticed there was a scrub task that was
constantly running and blocking for shorts periods of time:

  >>> t = find_task(prog, 1356190)
  >>> prog.stack_trace(t)
  #0  __schedule+0x5ce/0xcfc
  #1  schedule+0x46/0xe4
  #2  schedule_timeout+0x1df/0x475
  #3  btrfs_reada_wait+0xda/0x132
  #4  scrub_stripe+0x2a8/0x112f
  #5  scrub_chunk+0xcd/0x134
  #6  scrub_enumerate_chunks+0x29e/0x5ee
  #7  btrfs_scrub_dev+0x2d5/0x91b
  #8  btrfs_ioctl+0x7f5/0x36e7
  #9  __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0
  #10 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x77
  #11 entry_SYSCALL_64+0x7c/0x156

Which corresponds to:

int btrfs_reada_wait(void *handle)
{
    struct reada_control *rc = handle;
    struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = rc->fs_info;

    while (atomic_read(&rc->elems)) {
        if (!atomic_read(&fs_info->reada_works_cnt))
            reada_start_machine(fs_info);
        wait_event_timeout(rc->wait, atomic_read(&rc->elems) == 0,
                          (HZ + 9) / 10);
    }
(...)

So the counter "rc->elems" was set to 1 and never decreased to 0, causing
the scrub task to loop forever in that function. Then I used the following
script for drgn to check the readahead requests:

  $ cat dump_reada.py
  import sys
  import drgn
  from drgn import NULL, Object, cast, container_of, execscript, \
      reinterpret, sizeof
  from drgn.helpers.linux import *

  mnt_path = b"/home/fdmanana/btrfs-tests/scratch_1"

  mnt = None
  for mnt in for_each_mount(prog, dst = mnt_path):
      pass

  if mnt is None:
      sys.stderr.write(f'Error: mount point {mnt_path} not found\n')
      sys.exit(1)

  fs_info = cast('struct btrfs_fs_info *', mnt.mnt.mnt_sb.s_fs_info)

  def dump_re(re):
      nzones = re.nzones.value_()
      print(f're at {hex(re.value_())}')
      print(f'\t logical {re.logical.value_()}')
      print(f'\t refcnt {re.refcnt.value_()}')
      print(f'\t nzones {nzones}')
      for i in range(nzones):
          dev = re.zones[i].device
          name = dev.name.str.string_()
          print(f'\t\t dev id {dev.devid.value_()} name {name}')
      print()

  for _, e in radix_tree_for_each(fs_info.reada_tree):
      re = cast('struct reada_extent *', e)
      dump_re(re)

  $ drgn dump_reada.py
  re at 0xffff8f3da9d25ad8
          logical 38928384
          refcnt 1
          nzones 1
                 dev id 0 name b'/dev/sdd'
  $

So there was one readahead extent with a single zone corresponding to the
source device of that last device replace operation logged in dmesg/syslog.
Also the ID of that zone's device was 0 which is a special value set in
the source device of a device replace operation when the operation finishes
(constant BTRFS_DEV_REPLACE_DEVID set at btrfs_dev_replace_finishing()),
confirming again that device /dev/sdd was the source of a device replace
operation.

Normally there should be as many zones in the readahead extent as there are
devices, and I wasn't expecting the extent to be in a block group with a
'single' profile, so I went and confirmed with the following drgn script
that there weren't any single profile block groups:

  $ cat dump_block_groups.py
  import sys
  import drgn
  from drgn import NULL, Object, cast, container_of, execscript, \
      reinterpret, sizeof
  from drgn.helpers.linux import *

  mnt_path = b"/home/fdmanana/btrfs-tests/scratch_1"

  mnt = None
  for mnt in for_each_mount(prog, dst = mnt_path):
      pass

  if mnt is None:
      sys.stderr.write(f'Error: mount point {mnt_path} not found\n')
      sys.exit(1)

  fs_info = cast('struct btrfs_fs_info *', mnt.mnt.mnt_sb.s_fs_info)

  BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DATA = (1 << 0)
  BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_SYSTEM = (1 << 1)
  BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_METADATA = (1 << 2)
  BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID0 = (1 << 3)
  BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1 = (1 << 4)
  BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DUP = (1 << 5)
  BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID10 = (1 << 6)
  BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID5 = (1 << 7)
  BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID6 = (1 << 8)
  BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1C3 = (1 << 9)
  BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1C4 = (1 << 10)

  def bg_flags_string(bg):
      flags = bg.flags.value_()
      ret = ''
      if flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DATA:
          ret = 'data'
      if flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_METADATA:
          if len(ret) > 0:
              ret += '|'
          ret += 'meta'
      if flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_SYSTEM:
          if len(ret) > 0:
              ret += '|'
          ret += 'system'
      if flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID0:
          ret += ' raid0'
      elif flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1:
          ret += ' raid1'
      elif flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DUP:
          ret += ' dup'
      elif flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID10:
          ret += ' raid10'
      elif flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID5:
          ret += ' raid5'
      elif flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID6:
          ret += ' raid6'
      elif flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1C3:
          ret += ' raid1c3'
      elif flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1C4:
          ret += ' raid1c4'
      else:
          ret += ' single'

      return ret

  def dump_bg(bg):
      print()
      print(f'block group at {hex(bg.value_())}')
      print(f'\t start {bg.start.value_()} length {bg.length.value_()}')
      print(f'\t flags {bg.flags.value_()} - {bg_flags_string(bg)}')

  bg_root = fs_info.block_group_cache_tree.address_of_()
  for bg in rbtree_inorder_for_each_entry('struct btrfs_block_group', bg_root, 'cache_node'):
      dump_bg(bg)

  $ drgn dump_block_groups.py

  block group at 0xffff8f3d673b0400
         start 22020096 length 16777216
         flags 258 - system raid6

  block group at 0xffff8f3d53ddb400
         start 38797312 length 536870912
         flags 260 - meta raid6

  block group at 0xffff8f3d5f4d9c00
         start 575668224 length 2147483648
         flags 257 - data raid6

  block group at 0xffff8f3d08189000
         start 2723151872 length 67108864
         flags 258 - system raid6

  block group at 0xffff8f3db70ff000
         start 2790260736 length 1073741824
         flags 260 - meta raid6

  block group at 0xffff8f3d5f4dd800
         start 3864002560 length 67108864
         flags 258 - system raid6

  block group at 0xffff8f3d67037000
         start 3931111424 length 2147483648
         flags 257 - data raid6
  $

So there were only 2 reasons left for having a readahead extent with a
single zone: reada_find_zone(), called when creating a readahead extent,
returned NULL either because we failed to find the corresponding block
group or because a memory allocation failed. With some additional and
custom tracing I figured out that on every further ocurrence of the
problem the block group had just been deleted when we were looping to
create the zones for the readahead extent (at reada_find_extent()), so we
ended up with only one zone in the readahead extent, corresponding to a
device that ends up getting replaced.

So after figuring that out it became obvious why the hang happens:

1) Task A starts a scrub on any device of the filesystem, except for
   device /dev/sdd;

2) Task B starts a device replace with /dev/sdd as the source device;

3) Task A calls btrfs_reada_add() from scrub_stripe() and it is currently
   starting to scrub a stripe from block group X. This call to
   btrfs_reada_add() is the one for the extent tree. When btrfs_reada_add()
   calls reada_add_block(), it passes the logical address of the extent
   tree's root node as its 'logical' argument - a value of 38928384;

4) Task A then enters reada_find_extent(), called from reada_add_block().
   It finds there isn't any existing readahead extent for the logical
   address 38928384, so it proceeds to the path of creating a new one.

   It calls btrfs_map_block() to find out which stripes exist for the block
   group X. On the first iteration of the for loop that iterates over the
   stripes, it finds the stripe for device /dev/sdd, so it creates one
   zone for that device and adds it to the readahead extent. Before getting
   into the second iteration of the loop, the cleanup kthread deletes block
   group X because it was empty. So in the iterations for the remaining
   stripes it does not add more zones to the readahead extent, because the
   calls to reada_find_zone() returned NULL because they couldn't find
   block group X anymore.

   As a result the new readahead extent has a single zone, corresponding to
   the device /dev/sdd;

4) Before task A returns to btrfs_reada_add() and queues the readahead job
   for the readahead work queue, task B finishes the device replace and at
   btrfs_dev_replace_finishing() swaps the device /dev/sdd with the new
   device /dev/sdg;

5) Task A returns to reada_add_block(), which increments the counter
   "->elems" of the reada_control structure allocated at btrfs_reada_add().

   Then it returns back to btrfs_reada_add() and calls
   reada_start_machine(). This queues a job in the readahead work queue to
   run the function reada_start_machine_worker(), which calls
   __reada_start_machine().

   At __reada_start_machine() we take the device list mutex and for each
   device found in the current device list, we call
   reada_start_machine_dev() to start the readahead work. However at this
   point the device /dev/sdd was already freed and is not in the device
   list anymore.

   This means the corresponding readahead for the extent at 38928384 is
   never started, and therefore the "->elems" counter of the reada_control
   structure allocated at btrfs_reada_add() never goes down to 0, causing
   the call to btrfs_reada_wait(), done by the scrub task, to wait forever.

Note that the readahead request can be made either after the device replace
started or before it started, however in pratice it is very unlikely that a
device replace is able to start after a readahead request is made and is
able to complete before the readahead request completes - maybe only on a
very small and nearly empty filesystem.

This hang however is not the only problem we can have with readahead and
device removals. When the readahead extent has other zones other than the
one corresponding to the device that is being removed (either by a device
replace or a device remove operation), we risk having a use-after-free on
the device when dropping the last reference of the readahead extent.

For example if we create a readahead extent with two zones, one for the
device /dev/sdd and one for the device /dev/sde:

1) Before the readahead worker starts, the device /dev/sdd is removed,
   and the corresponding btrfs_device structure is freed. However the
   readahead extent still has the zone pointing to the device structure;

2) When the readahead worker starts, it only finds device /dev/sde in the
   current device list of the filesystem;

3) It starts the readahead work, at reada_start_machine_dev(), using the
   device /dev/sde;

4) Then when it finishes reading the extent from device /dev/sde, it calls
   __readahead_hook() which ends up dropping the last reference on the
   readahead extent through the last call to reada_extent_put();

5) At reada_extent_put() it iterates over each zone of the readahead extent
   and attempts to delete an element from the device's 'reada_extents'
   radix tree, resulting in a use-after-free, as the device pointer of the
   zone for /dev/sdd is now stale. We can also access the device after
   dropping the last reference of a zone, through reada_zone_release(),
   also called by reada_extent_put().

And a device remove suffers the same problem, however since it shrinks the
device size down to zero before removing the device, it is very unlikely to
still have readahead requests not completed by the time we free the device,
the only possibility is if the device has a very little space allocated.

While the hang problem is exclusive to scrub, since it is currently the
only user of btrfs_reada_add() and btrfs_reada_wait(), the use-after-free
problem affects any path that triggers readhead, which includes
btree_readahead_hook() and __readahead_hook() (a readahead worker can
trigger readahed for the children of a node) for example - any path that
ends up calling reada_add_block() can trigger the use-after-free after a
device is removed.

So fix this by waiting for any readahead requests for a device to complete
before removing a device, ensuring that while waiting for existing ones no
new ones can be made.

This problem has been around for a very long time - the readahead code was
added in 2011, device remove exists since 2008 and device replace was
introduced in 2013, hard to pick a specific commit for a git Fixes tag.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
 2020-10-26 15:03:59 +01:00
Anand Jain
96c2e067ed btrfs: skip devices without magic signature when mounting 
Many things can happen after the device is scanned and before the device
is mounted.  One such thing is losing the BTRFS_MAGIC on the device.
If it happens we still won't free that device from the memory and cause
the userland confusion.

For example: As the BTRFS_IOC_DEV_INFO still carries the device path
which does not have the BTRFS_MAGIC, 'btrfs fi show' still lists
device which does not belong to the filesystem anymore:

  $ mkfs.btrfs -fq -draid1 -mraid1 /dev/sda /dev/sdb
  $ wipefs -a /dev/sdb
  # /dev/sdb does not contain magic signature
  $ mount -o degraded /dev/sda /btrfs
  $ btrfs fi show -m
  Label: none  uuid: 470ec6fb-646b-4464-b3cb-df1b26c527bd
	  Total devices 2 FS bytes used 128.00KiB
	  devid    1 size 3.00GiB used 571.19MiB path /dev/sda
	  devid    2 size 3.00GiB used 571.19MiB path /dev/sdb

We need to distinguish the missing signature and invalid superblock, so
add a specific error code ENODATA for that. This also fixes failure of
fstest btrfs/198.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
 2020-10-07 12:17:59 +02:00
Josef Bacik
92e26df43b btrfs: return error if we're unable to read device stats 
I noticed when fixing device stats for seed devices that we simply threw
away the return value from btrfs_search_slot().  This is because we may
not have stat items, but we could very well get an error, and thus miss
reporting the error up the chain.

Fix this by returning ret if it's an actual error, and then stop trying
to init the rest of the devices stats and return the error up the chain.

Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
 2020-10-07 12:17:58 +02:00
Josef Bacik
124604eb50 btrfs: init device stats for seed devices 
We recently started recording device stats across the fleet, and noticed
a large increase in messages such as this

  BTRFS warning (device dm-0): get dev_stats failed, not yet valid

on our tiers that use seed devices for their root devices.  This is
because we do not initialize the device stats for any seed devices if we
have a sprout device and mount using that sprout device.  The basic
steps for reproducing are:

  $ mkfs seed device
  $ mount seed device
  # fill seed device
  $ umount seed device
  $ btrfstune -S 1 seed device
  $ mount seed device
  $ btrfs device add -f sprout device /mnt/wherever
  $ umount /mnt/wherever
  $ mount sprout device /mnt/wherever
  $ btrfs device stats /mnt/wherever

This will fail with the above message in dmesg.

Fix this by iterating over the fs_devices->seed if they exist in
btrfs_init_dev_stats.  This fixed the problem and properly reports the
stats for both devices.

Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[ rename to btrfs_device_init_dev_stats ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
 2020-10-07 12:17:58 +02:00
Anand Jain
c83b60c0e4 btrfs: simplify gotos in open_seed_device 
The function does not have a common exit block and returns immediatelly
so there's no point having the goto. Remove the two cases.

Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
 2020-10-07 12:12:22 +02:00
Anand Jain
e493e8f9bc btrfs: remove unnecessary tmp variable in btrfs_assign_next_active_device() 
We can check the argument value directly, no need for the temporary
variable.

Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
 2020-10-07 12:12:22 +02:00
Anand Jain
e17125b52b btrfs: use sprout device_list_mutex in btrfs_init_devices_late 
On a mounted sprout filesystem, all threads now are using the
sprout::device_list_mutex, and this is the only code using the
seed::device_list_mutex. This patch converts to use the sprouts
fs_info->fs_devices->device_list_mutex.

The same reasoning holds true here, that device delete is holding
the sprout::device_list_mutex.

Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
 2020-10-07 12:12:22 +02:00
Anand Jain
53f8a74cbe btrfs: split and refactor btrfs_sysfs_remove_devices_dir 
Similar to btrfs_sysfs_add_devices_dir()'s refactoring, split
btrfs_sysfs_remove_devices_dir() so that we don't have to use the device
argument to indicate whether to free all devices or just one device.

Export btrfs_sysfs_remove_device() as device operations outside of
sysfs.c now calls this instead of btrfs_sysfs_remove_devices_dir().

btrfs_sysfs_remove_devices_dir() is renamed to
btrfs_sysfs_remove_fs_devices() to suite its new role.

Now, no one outside of sysfs.c calls btrfs_sysfs_remove_fs_devices()
so it is redeclared s static. And the same function had to be moved
before its first caller.

Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
 2020-10-07 12:12:21 +02:00
Anand Jain
cd36da2e7e btrfs: simplify parameters of btrfs_sysfs_add_devices_dir 
When we add a device we need to add it to sysfs, so instead of using the
btrfs_sysfs_add_devices_dir() fs_devices argument to specify whether to
add a device or all of fs_devices, call the helper function directly
btrfs_sysfs_add_device() and thus make it non-static.

Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
 2020-10-07 12:12:21 +02:00
Anand Jain
79dae17d8d btrfs: improve device scanning messages 
Systems booting without the initramfs seems to scan an unusual kind
of device path (/dev/root). And at a later time, the device is updated
to the correct path. We generally print the process name and PID of the
process scanning the device but we don't capture the same information if
the device path is rescanned with a different pathname.

The current message is too long, so drop the unnecessary UUID and add
process name and PID.

While at this also update the duplicate device warning to include the
process name and PID so the messages are consistent

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89721
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
 2020-10-07 12:12:20 +02:00
Goldwyn Rodrigues
c3e1f96c37 btrfs: enumerate the type of exclusive operation in progress 
Instead of using a flag bit for exclusive operation, use a variable to
store which exclusive operation is being performed.  Introduce an API
to start and finish an exclusive operation.

This would enable another way for tools to check which operation is
running on why starting an exclusive operation failed. The followup
patch adds a sysfs_notify() to alert userspace when the state changes, so
userspace can perform select() on it to get notified of the change.

This would enable us to enqueue a command which will wait for current
exclusive operation to complete before issuing the next exclusive
operation. This has been done synchronously as opposed to a background
process, or else error collection (if any) will become difficult.

Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[ update comments ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
 2020-10-07 12:12:20 +02:00
Josef Bacik
ca10845a56 btrfs: sysfs: init devices outside of the chunk_mutex 
While running btrfs/061, btrfs/073, btrfs/078, or btrfs/178 we hit the
following lockdep splat:

  ======================================================
  WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
  5.9.0-rc3+ #4 Not tainted
  ------------------------------------------------------
  kswapd0/100 is trying to acquire lock:
  ffff96ecc22ef4a0 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330

  but task is already holding lock:
  ffffffff8dd74700 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x5/0x30

  which lock already depends on the new lock.

  the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

  -> #3 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}:
	 fs_reclaim_acquire+0x65/0x80
	 slab_pre_alloc_hook.constprop.0+0x20/0x200
	 kmem_cache_alloc+0x37/0x270
	 alloc_inode+0x82/0xb0
	 iget_locked+0x10d/0x2c0
	 kernfs_get_inode+0x1b/0x130
	 kernfs_get_tree+0x136/0x240
	 sysfs_get_tree+0x16/0x40
	 vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0
	 path_mount+0x434/0xc00
	 __x64_sys_mount+0xe3/0x120
	 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40
	 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

  -> #2 (kernfs_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
	 __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7e0
	 kernfs_add_one+0x23/0x150
	 kernfs_create_link+0x63/0xa0
	 sysfs_do_create_link_sd+0x5e/0xd0
	 btrfs_sysfs_add_devices_dir+0x81/0x130
	 btrfs_init_new_device+0x67f/0x1250
	 btrfs_ioctl+0x1ef/0x2e20
	 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0
	 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40
	 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

  -> #1 (&fs_info->chunk_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
	 __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7e0
	 btrfs_chunk_alloc+0x125/0x3a0
	 find_free_extent+0xdf6/0x1210
	 btrfs_reserve_extent+0xb3/0x1b0
	 btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0xb0/0x310
	 alloc_tree_block_no_bg_flush+0x4a/0x60
	 __btrfs_cow_block+0x11a/0x530
	 btrfs_cow_block+0x104/0x220
	 btrfs_search_slot+0x52e/0x9d0
	 btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x64/0xb0
	 btrfs_insert_delayed_items+0x90/0x4f0
	 btrfs_commit_inode_delayed_items+0x93/0x140
	 btrfs_log_inode+0x5de/0x2020
	 btrfs_log_inode_parent+0x429/0xc90
	 btrfs_log_new_name+0x95/0x9b
	 btrfs_rename2+0xbb9/0x1800
	 vfs_rename+0x64f/0x9f0
	 do_renameat2+0x320/0x4e0
	 __x64_sys_rename+0x1f/0x30
	 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40
	 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

  -> #0 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
	 __lock_acquire+0x119c/0x1fc0
	 lock_acquire+0xa7/0x3d0
	 __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7e0
	 __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330
	 btrfs_evict_inode+0x24c/0x500
	 evict+0xcf/0x1f0
	 dispose_list+0x48/0x70
	 prune_icache_sb+0x44/0x50
	 super_cache_scan+0x161/0x1e0
	 do_shrink_slab+0x178/0x3c0
	 shrink_slab+0x17c/0x290
	 shrink_node+0x2b2/0x6d0
	 balance_pgdat+0x30a/0x670
	 kswapd+0x213/0x4c0
	 kthread+0x138/0x160
	 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30

  other info that might help us debug this:

  Chain exists of:
    &delayed_node->mutex --> kernfs_mutex --> fs_reclaim

   Possible unsafe locking scenario:

	 CPU0                    CPU1
	 ----                    ----
    lock(fs_reclaim);
				 lock(kernfs_mutex);
				 lock(fs_reclaim);
    lock(&delayed_node->mutex);

   *** DEADLOCK ***

  3 locks held by kswapd0/100:
   #0: ffffffff8dd74700 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x5/0x30
   #1: ffffffff8dd65c50 (shrinker_rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: shrink_slab+0x115/0x290
   #2: ffff96ed2ade30e0 (&type->s_umount_key#36){++++}-{3:3}, at: super_cache_scan+0x38/0x1e0

  stack backtrace:
  CPU: 0 PID: 100 Comm: kswapd0 Not tainted 5.9.0-rc3+ #4
  Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-2.fc32 04/01/2014
  Call Trace:
   dump_stack+0x8b/0xb8
   check_noncircular+0x12d/0x150
   __lock_acquire+0x119c/0x1fc0
   lock_acquire+0xa7/0x3d0
   ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330
   __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7e0
   ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330
   ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330
   ? lock_acquire+0xa7/0x3d0
   ? find_held_lock+0x2b/0x80
   __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330
   btrfs_evict_inode+0x24c/0x500
   evict+0xcf/0x1f0
   dispose_list+0x48/0x70
   prune_icache_sb+0x44/0x50
   super_cache_scan+0x161/0x1e0
   do_shrink_slab+0x178/0x3c0
   shrink_slab+0x17c/0x290
   shrink_node+0x2b2/0x6d0
   balance_pgdat+0x30a/0x670
   kswapd+0x213/0x4c0
   ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x41/0x50
   ? add_wait_queue_exclusive+0x70/0x70
   ? balance_pgdat+0x670/0x670
   kthread+0x138/0x160
   ? kthread_create_worker_on_cpu+0x40/0x40
   ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30

This happens because we are holding the chunk_mutex at the time of
adding in a new device.  However we only need to hold the
device_list_mutex, as we're going to iterate over the fs_devices
devices.  Move the sysfs init stuff outside of the chunk_mutex to get
rid of this lockdep splat.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4.x: f3cd2c5811: btrfs: sysfs, rename device_link add/remove functions
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4.x
Reported-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
 2020-10-07 12:12:19 +02:00
Nikolay Borisov
b9ba017fb0 btrfs: don't opencode sync_blockdev in btrfs_init_new_device 
Instead of opencoding filemap_write_and_wait simply call syncblockdev as
it makes it abundantly clear what's going on and why this is used. No
semantics changes.

Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
 2020-10-07 12:12:15 +02:00
Nikolay Borisov
4ae312e972 btrfs: remove redundant code from btrfs_free_stale_devices 
Following the refactor of btrfs_free_stale_devices in
7bcb8164ad ("btrfs: use device_list_mutex when removing stale devices")
fs_devices are freed after they have been iterated by the inner
list_for_each so the use-after-free fixed by introducing the break in
fd649f10c3 ("btrfs: Fix use-after-free when cleaning up fs_devs with
a single stale device") is no longer necessary. Just remove it
altogether. No functional changes.

Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
 2020-10-07 12:12:15 +02:00
Nikolay Borisov
44cab9ba37 btrfs: refactor locked condition in btrfs_init_new_device 
Invert unlocked to locked and exploit the fact it can only ever be
modified if we are adding a new device to a seed filesystem. This allows
to simplify the check in error: label. No semantics changes.

Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
 2020-10-07 12:12:15 +02:00
Nikolay Borisov
f4cfa9bdd4 btrfs: use RCU for quick device check in btrfs_init_new_device 
When adding a new device there's a mandatory check to see if a device is
being duplicated to the filesystem it's added to. Since this is a
read-only operations not necessary to take device_list_mutex and can simply
make do with an rcu-readlock.

Using just RCU is safe because there won't be another device add delete
running in parallel as btrfs_init_new_device is called only from
btrfs_ioctl_add_dev.

Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
 2020-10-07 12:12:15 +02:00
Josef Bacik
425c6ed648 btrfs: do not hold device_list_mutex when closing devices 
The following lockdep splat

======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
5.8.0-rc7-00169-g87212851a027-dirty #929 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
fsstress/8739 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff88bfd0eb0c90 (&fs_info->reloc_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_record_root_in_trans+0x43/0x70

but task is already holding lock:
ffff88bfbd16e538 (sb_pagefaults){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: btrfs_page_mkwrite+0x6a/0x4a0

which lock already depends on the new lock.

the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #10 (sb_pagefaults){.+.+}-{0:0}:
       __sb_start_write+0x129/0x210
       btrfs_page_mkwrite+0x6a/0x4a0
       do_page_mkwrite+0x4d/0xc0
       handle_mm_fault+0x103c/0x1730
       exc_page_fault+0x340/0x660
       asm_exc_page_fault+0x1e/0x30

-> #9 (&mm->mmap_lock#2){++++}-{3:3}:
       __might_fault+0x68/0x90
       _copy_to_user+0x1e/0x80
       perf_read+0x141/0x2c0
       vfs_read+0xad/0x1b0
       ksys_read+0x5f/0xe0
       do_syscall_64+0x50/0x90
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

-> #8 (&cpuctx_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
       __mutex_lock+0x9f/0x930
       perf_event_init_cpu+0x88/0x150
       perf_event_init+0x1db/0x20b
       start_kernel+0x3ae/0x53c
       secondary_startup_64+0xa4/0xb0

-> #7 (pmus_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:
       __mutex_lock+0x9f/0x930
       perf_event_init_cpu+0x4f/0x150
       cpuhp_invoke_callback+0xb1/0x900
       _cpu_up.constprop.26+0x9f/0x130
       cpu_up+0x7b/0xc0
       bringup_nonboot_cpus+0x4f/0x60
       smp_init+0x26/0x71
       kernel_init_freeable+0x110/0x258
       kernel_init+0xa/0x103
       ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30

-> #6 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}:
       cpus_read_lock+0x39/0xb0
       kmem_cache_create_usercopy+0x28/0x230
       kmem_cache_create+0x12/0x20
       bioset_init+0x15e/0x2b0
       init_bio+0xa3/0xaa
       do_one_initcall+0x5a/0x2e0
       kernel_init_freeable+0x1f4/0x258
       kernel_init+0xa/0x103
       ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30

-> #5 (bio_slab_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:
       __mutex_lock+0x9f/0x930
       bioset_init+0xbc/0x2b0
       __blk_alloc_queue+0x6f/0x2d0
       blk_mq_init_queue_data+0x1b/0x70
       loop_add+0x110/0x290 [loop]
       fq_codel_tcf_block+0x12/0x20 [sch_fq_codel]
       do_one_initcall+0x5a/0x2e0
       do_init_module+0x5a/0x220
       load_module+0x2459/0x26e0
       __do_sys_finit_module+0xba/0xe0
       do_syscall_64+0x50/0x90
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

-> #4 (loop_ctl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
       __mutex_lock+0x9f/0x930
       lo_open+0x18/0x50 [loop]
       __blkdev_get+0xec/0x570
       blkdev_get+0xe8/0x150
       do_dentry_open+0x167/0x410
       path_openat+0x7c9/0xa80
       do_filp_open+0x93/0x100
       do_sys_openat2+0x22a/0x2e0
       do_sys_open+0x4b/0x80
       do_syscall_64+0x50/0x90
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

-> #3 (&bdev->bd_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
       __mutex_lock+0x9f/0x930
       blkdev_put+0x1d/0x120
       close_fs_devices.part.31+0x84/0x130
       btrfs_close_devices+0x44/0xb0
       close_ctree+0x296/0x2b2
       generic_shutdown_super+0x69/0x100
       kill_anon_super+0xe/0x30
       btrfs_kill_super+0x12/0x20
       deactivate_locked_super+0x29/0x60
       cleanup_mnt+0xb8/0x140
       task_work_run+0x6d/0xb0
       __prepare_exit_to_usermode+0x1cc/0x1e0
       do_syscall_64+0x5c/0x90
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

-> #2 (&fs_devs->device_list_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
       __mutex_lock+0x9f/0x930
       btrfs_run_dev_stats+0x49/0x480
       commit_cowonly_roots+0xb5/0x2a0
       btrfs_commit_transaction+0x516/0xa60
       sync_filesystem+0x6b/0x90
       generic_shutdown_super+0x22/0x100
       kill_anon_super+0xe/0x30
       btrfs_kill_super+0x12/0x20
       deactivate_locked_super+0x29/0x60
       cleanup_mnt+0xb8/0x140
       task_work_run+0x6d/0xb0
       __prepare_exit_to_usermode+0x1cc/0x1e0
       do_syscall_64+0x5c/0x90
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

-> #1 (&fs_info->tree_log_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
       __mutex_lock+0x9f/0x930
       btrfs_commit_transaction+0x4bb/0xa60
       sync_filesystem+0x6b/0x90
       generic_shutdown_super+0x22/0x100
       kill_anon_super+0xe/0x30
       btrfs_kill_super+0x12/0x20
       deactivate_locked_super+0x29/0x60
       cleanup_mnt+0xb8/0x140
       task_work_run+0x6d/0xb0
       __prepare_exit_to_usermode+0x1cc/0x1e0
       do_syscall_64+0x5c/0x90
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

-> #0 (&fs_info->reloc_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
       __lock_acquire+0x1272/0x2310
       lock_acquire+0x9e/0x360
       __mutex_lock+0x9f/0x930
       btrfs_record_root_in_trans+0x43/0x70
       start_transaction+0xd1/0x5d0
       btrfs_dirty_inode+0x42/0xd0
       file_update_time+0xc8/0x110
       btrfs_page_mkwrite+0x10c/0x4a0
       do_page_mkwrite+0x4d/0xc0
       handle_mm_fault+0x103c/0x1730
       exc_page_fault+0x340/0x660
       asm_exc_page_fault+0x1e/0x30

other info that might help us debug this:

Chain exists of:
  &fs_info->reloc_mutex --> &mm->mmap_lock#2 --> sb_pagefaults

 Possible unsafe locking scenario:

       CPU0                    CPU1
       ----                    ----
  lock(sb_pagefaults);
                               lock(&mm->mmap_lock#2);
                               lock(sb_pagefaults);
  lock(&fs_info->reloc_mutex);

 *** DEADLOCK ***

3 locks held by fsstress/8739:
 #0: ffff88bee66eeb68 (&mm->mmap_lock#2){++++}-{3:3}, at: exc_page_fault+0x173/0x660
 #1: ffff88bfbd16e538 (sb_pagefaults){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: btrfs_page_mkwrite+0x6a/0x4a0
 #2: ffff88bfbd16e630 (sb_internal){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: start_transaction+0x3da/0x5d0

stack backtrace:
CPU: 17 PID: 8739 Comm: fsstress Kdump: loaded Not tainted 5.8.0-rc7-00169-g87212851a027-dirty #929
Hardware name: Quanta Tioga Pass Single Side 01-0030993006/Tioga Pass Single Side, BIOS F08_3A18 12/20/2018
Call Trace:
 dump_stack+0x78/0xa0
 check_noncircular+0x165/0x180
 __lock_acquire+0x1272/0x2310
 ? btrfs_get_alloc_profile+0x150/0x210
 lock_acquire+0x9e/0x360
 ? btrfs_record_root_in_trans+0x43/0x70
 __mutex_lock+0x9f/0x930
 ? btrfs_record_root_in_trans+0x43/0x70
 ? lock_acquire+0x9e/0x360
 ? join_transaction+0x5d/0x450
 ? find_held_lock+0x2d/0x90
 ? btrfs_record_root_in_trans+0x43/0x70
 ? join_transaction+0x3d5/0x450
 ? btrfs_record_root_in_trans+0x43/0x70
 btrfs_record_root_in_trans+0x43/0x70
 start_transaction+0xd1/0x5d0
 btrfs_dirty_inode+0x42/0xd0
 file_update_time+0xc8/0x110
 btrfs_page_mkwrite+0x10c/0x4a0
 ? handle_mm_fault+0x5e/0x1730
 do_page_mkwrite+0x4d/0xc0
 ? __do_fault+0x32/0x150
 handle_mm_fault+0x103c/0x1730
 exc_page_fault+0x340/0x660
 ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x8/0x30
 asm_exc_page_fault+0x1e/0x30
RIP: 0033:0x7faa6c9969c4

Was seen in testing.  The fix is similar to that of

  btrfs: open device without device_list_mutex

where we're holding the device_list_mutex and then grab the bd_mutex,
which pulls in a bunch of dependencies under the bd_mutex.  We only ever
call btrfs_close_devices() on mount failure or unmount, so we're save to
not have the device_list_mutex here.  We're already holding the
uuid_mutex which keeps us safe from any external modification of the
fs_devices.

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
 2020-10-07 12:12:13 +02:00
Josef Bacik
62cf539120 btrfs: move btrfs_rm_dev_replace_free_srcdev outside of all locks 
When closing and freeing the source device we could end up doing our
final blkdev_put() on the bdev, which will grab the bd_mutex.  As such
we want to be holding as few locks as possible, so move this call
outside of the dev_replace->lock_finishing_cancel_unmount lock.  Since
we're modifying the fs_devices we need to make sure we're holding the
uuid_mutex here, so take that as well.

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
 2020-10-07 12:12:13 +02:00
Nikolay Borisov
68abf36016 btrfs: remove alloc_list splice in btrfs_prepare_sprout 
btrfs_prepare_sprout is called when the first rw device is added to a
seed filesystem. This means the filesystem can't have its alloc_list
be non-empty, since seed filesystems are read only. Simply remove the
code altogether.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
 2020-10-07 12:06:59 +02:00
Nikolay Borisov
427c8fddb1 btrfs: document some invariants of seed code 
Without good understanding of how seed devices works it's hard to grok
some of what the code in open_seed_devices or btrfs_prepare_sprout does.

Add comments hopefully reducing some of the cognitive load.

Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
 2020-10-07 12:06:58 +02:00
Nikolay Borisov
944d3f9fac btrfs: switch seed device to list api 
While this patch touches a bunch of files the conversion is
straighforward. Instead of using the implicit linked list anchored at
btrfs_fs_devices::seed the code is switched to using
list_for_each_entry.

Previous patches in the series already factored out code that processed
both main and seed devices so in those cases the factored out functions
are called on the main fs_devices and then on every seed dev inside
list_for_each_entry.

Using list api also allows to simplify deletion from the seed dev list
performed in btrfs_rm_device and btrfs_rm_dev_replace_free_srcdev by
substituting a while() loop with a simple list_del_init.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
 2020-10-07 12:06:58 +02:00
Nikolay Borisov
c4989c2fd0 btrfs: simplify setting/clearing fs_info to btrfs_fs_devices 
It makes no sense to have sysfs-related routines be responsible for
properly initialising the fs_info pointer of struct btrfs_fs_device.
Instead this can be streamlined by making it the responsibility of
btrfs_init_devices_late to initialize it. That function already
initializes fs_info of every individual device in btrfs_fs_devices.

As far as clearing it is concerned it makes sense to move it to
close_fs_devices. That function is only called when struct
btrfs_fs_devices is no longer in use - either for holding seeds or
main devices for a mounted filesystem.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
 2020-10-07 12:06:58 +02:00
Nikolay Borisov
54eed6ae8d btrfs: make close_fs_devices return void 
The return value of this function conveys absolutely no information.
All callers already check the state of fs_devices->opened to decide how
to proceed. So convert the function to returning void. While at it make
btrfs_close_devices also return void.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
 2020-10-07 12:06:57 +02:00
Nikolay Borisov
3712ccb7f1 btrfs: factor out loop logic from btrfs_free_extra_devids 
This prepares the code to switching seeds devices to a proper list.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
 2020-10-07 12:06:57 +02:00
Qu Wenruo
154f7cb868 btrfs: add owner and fs_info to alloc_state io_tree 
Commit 1c11b63eff ("btrfs: replace pending/pinned chunks lists with io
tree") introduced btrfs_device::alloc_state extent io tree, but it
doesn't initialize the fs_info and owner member.

This means the following features are not properly supported:

- Fs owner report for insert_state() error
  Without fs_info initialized, although btrfs_err() won't panic, it
  won't output which fs is causing the error.

- Wrong owner for trace events
  alloc_state will get the owner as pinned extents.

Fix this by assiging proper fs_info and owner for
btrfs_device::alloc_state.

Fixes: 1c11b63eff ("btrfs: replace pending/pinned chunks lists with io tree")
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
 2020-10-07 12:06:56 +02:00
Nikolay Borisov
8e56008180 btrfs: remove fsid argument from btrfs_sysfs_update_sprout_fsid 
It can be accessed from 'fs_devices' as it's identical to
fs_info->fs_devices. Also add a comment about why we are calling the
function. No semantic changes.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
 2020-10-07 12:06:50 +02:00
Josef Bacik
a466c85edc btrfs: move btrfs_rm_dev_replace_free_srcdev outside of all locks 
When closing and freeing the source device we could end up doing our
final blkdev_put() on the bdev, which will grab the bd_mutex.  As such
we want to be holding as few locks as possible, so move this call
outside of the dev_replace->lock_finishing_cancel_unmount lock.  Since
we're modifying the fs_devices we need to make sure we're holding the
uuid_mutex here, so take that as well.

There's a report from syzbot probably hitting one of the cases where
the bd_mutex and device_list_mutex are taken in the wrong order, however
it's not with device replace, like this patch fixes. As there's no
reproducer available so far, we can't verify the fix.

https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/000000000000fc04d105afcf86d7@google.com/
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=84a0634dc5d21d488419

  WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
  5.9.0-rc5-syzkaller #0 Not tainted
  ------------------------------------------------------
  syz-executor.0/6878 is trying to acquire lock:
  ffff88804c17d780 (&bdev->bd_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: blkdev_put+0x30/0x520 fs/block_dev.c:1804

  but task is already holding lock:
  ffff8880908cfce0 (&fs_devs->device_list_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: close_fs_devices.part.0+0x2e/0x800 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1159

  which lock already depends on the new lock.

  the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

  -> #4 (&fs_devs->device_list_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
	 __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:956 [inline]
	 __mutex_lock+0x134/0x10e0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:1103
	 btrfs_finish_chunk_alloc+0x281/0xf90 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:5255
	 btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x2f3/0x700 fs/btrfs/block-group.c:2109
	 __btrfs_end_transaction+0xf5/0x690 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:916
	 find_free_extent_update_loop fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:3807 [inline]
	 find_free_extent+0x23b7/0x2e60 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4127
	 btrfs_reserve_extent+0x166/0x460 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4206
	 cow_file_range+0x3de/0x9b0 fs/btrfs/inode.c:1063
	 btrfs_run_delalloc_range+0x2cf/0x1410 fs/btrfs/inode.c:1838
	 writepage_delalloc+0x150/0x460 fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:3439
	 __extent_writepage+0x441/0xd00 fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:3653
	 extent_write_cache_pages.constprop.0+0x69d/0x1040 fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:4249
	 extent_writepages+0xcd/0x2b0 fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:4370
	 do_writepages+0xec/0x290 mm/page-writeback.c:2352
	 __writeback_single_inode+0x125/0x1400 fs/fs-writeback.c:1461
	 writeback_sb_inodes+0x53d/0xf40 fs/fs-writeback.c:1721
	 wb_writeback+0x2ad/0xd40 fs/fs-writeback.c:1894
	 wb_do_writeback fs/fs-writeback.c:2039 [inline]
	 wb_workfn+0x2dc/0x13e0 fs/fs-writeback.c:2080
	 process_one_work+0x94c/0x1670 kernel/workqueue.c:2269
	 worker_thread+0x64c/0x1120 kernel/workqueue.c:2415
	 kthread+0x3b5/0x4a0 kernel/kthread.c:292
	 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:294

  -> #3 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}:
	 percpu_down_read include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:51 [inline]
	 __sb_start_write+0x234/0x470 fs/super.c:1672
	 sb_start_intwrite include/linux/fs.h:1690 [inline]
	 start_transaction+0xbe7/0x1170 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:624
	 find_free_extent_update_loop fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:3789 [inline]
	 find_free_extent+0x25e1/0x2e60 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4127
	 btrfs_reserve_extent+0x166/0x460 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4206
	 cow_file_range+0x3de/0x9b0 fs/btrfs/inode.c:1063
	 btrfs_run_delalloc_range+0x2cf/0x1410 fs/btrfs/inode.c:1838
	 writepage_delalloc+0x150/0x460 fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:3439
	 __extent_writepage+0x441/0xd00 fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:3653
	 extent_write_cache_pages.constprop.0+0x69d/0x1040 fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:4249
	 extent_writepages+0xcd/0x2b0 fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:4370
	 do_writepages+0xec/0x290 mm/page-writeback.c:2352
	 __writeback_single_inode+0x125/0x1400 fs/fs-writeback.c:1461
	 writeback_sb_inodes+0x53d/0xf40 fs/fs-writeback.c:1721
	 wb_writeback+0x2ad/0xd40 fs/fs-writeback.c:1894
	 wb_do_writeback fs/fs-writeback.c:2039 [inline]
	 wb_workfn+0x2dc/0x13e0 fs/fs-writeback.c:2080
	 process_one_work+0x94c/0x1670 kernel/workqueue.c:2269
	 worker_thread+0x64c/0x1120 kernel/workqueue.c:2415
	 kthread+0x3b5/0x4a0 kernel/kthread.c:292
	 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:294

  -> #2 ((work_completion)(&(&wb->dwork)->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}:
	 __flush_work+0x60e/0xac0 kernel/workqueue.c:3041
	 wb_shutdown+0x180/0x220 mm/backing-dev.c:355
	 bdi_unregister+0x174/0x590 mm/backing-dev.c:872
	 del_gendisk+0x820/0xa10 block/genhd.c:933
	 loop_remove drivers/block/loop.c:2192 [inline]
	 loop_control_ioctl drivers/block/loop.c:2291 [inline]
	 loop_control_ioctl+0x3b1/0x480 drivers/block/loop.c:2257
	 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:48 [inline]
	 __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:753 [inline]
	 __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:739 [inline]
	 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x193/0x200 fs/ioctl.c:739
	 do_syscall_64+0x2d/0x70 arch/x86/entry/common.c:46
	 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

  -> #1 (loop_ctl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
	 __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:956 [inline]
	 __mutex_lock+0x134/0x10e0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:1103
	 lo_open+0x19/0xd0 drivers/block/loop.c:1893
	 __blkdev_get+0x759/0x1aa0 fs/block_dev.c:1507
	 blkdev_get fs/block_dev.c:1639 [inline]
	 blkdev_open+0x227/0x300 fs/block_dev.c:1753
	 do_dentry_open+0x4b9/0x11b0 fs/open.c:817
	 do_open fs/namei.c:3251 [inline]
	 path_openat+0x1b9a/0x2730 fs/namei.c:3368
	 do_filp_open+0x17e/0x3c0 fs/namei.c:3395
	 do_sys_openat2+0x16d/0x420 fs/open.c:1168
	 do_sys_open fs/open.c:1184 [inline]
	 __do_sys_open fs/open.c:1192 [inline]
	 __se_sys_open fs/open.c:1188 [inline]
	 __x64_sys_open+0x119/0x1c0 fs/open.c:1188
	 do_syscall_64+0x2d/0x70 arch/x86/entry/common.c:46
	 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

  -> #0 (&bdev->bd_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
	 check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2496 [inline]
	 check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2601 [inline]
	 validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3218 [inline]
	 __lock_acquire+0x2a96/0x5780 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4426
	 lock_acquire+0x1f3/0xae0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5006
	 __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:956 [inline]
	 __mutex_lock+0x134/0x10e0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:1103
	 blkdev_put+0x30/0x520 fs/block_dev.c:1804
	 btrfs_close_bdev fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1117 [inline]
	 btrfs_close_bdev fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1107 [inline]
	 btrfs_close_one_device fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1133 [inline]
	 close_fs_devices.part.0+0x1a4/0x800 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1161
	 close_fs_devices fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1193 [inline]
	 btrfs_close_devices+0x95/0x1f0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1179
	 close_ctree+0x688/0x6cb fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:4149
	 generic_shutdown_super+0x144/0x370 fs/super.c:464
	 kill_anon_super+0x36/0x60 fs/super.c:1108
	 btrfs_kill_super+0x38/0x50 fs/btrfs/super.c:2265
	 deactivate_locked_super+0x94/0x160 fs/super.c:335
	 deactivate_super+0xad/0xd0 fs/super.c:366
	 cleanup_mnt+0x3a3/0x530 fs/namespace.c:1118
	 task_work_run+0xdd/0x190 kernel/task_work.c:141
	 tracehook_notify_resume include/linux/tracehook.h:188 [inline]
	 exit_to_user_mode_loop kernel/entry/common.c:163 [inline]
	 exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x1e1/0x200 kernel/entry/common.c:190
	 syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x7e/0x2e0 kernel/entry/common.c:265
	 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

  other info that might help us debug this:

  Chain exists of:
    &bdev->bd_mutex --> sb_internal#2 --> &fs_devs->device_list_mutex

   Possible unsafe locking scenario:

	 CPU0                    CPU1
	 ----                    ----
    lock(&fs_devs->device_list_mutex);
				 lock(sb_internal#2);
				 lock(&fs_devs->device_list_mutex);
    lock(&bdev->bd_mutex);

   *** DEADLOCK ***

  3 locks held by syz-executor.0/6878:
   #0: ffff88809070c0e0 (&type->s_umount_key#70){++++}-{3:3}, at: deactivate_super+0xa5/0xd0 fs/super.c:365
   #1: ffffffff8a5b37a8 (uuid_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_close_devices+0x23/0x1f0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1178
   #2: ffff8880908cfce0 (&fs_devs->device_list_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: close_fs_devices.part.0+0x2e/0x800 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1159

  stack backtrace:
  CPU: 0 PID: 6878 Comm: syz-executor.0 Not tainted 5.9.0-rc5-syzkaller #0
  Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011
  Call Trace:
   __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline]
   dump_stack+0x198/0x1fd lib/dump_stack.c:118
   check_noncircular+0x324/0x3e0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1827
   check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2496 [inline]
   check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2601 [inline]
   validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3218 [inline]
   __lock_acquire+0x2a96/0x5780 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4426
   lock_acquire+0x1f3/0xae0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5006
   __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:956 [inline]
   __mutex_lock+0x134/0x10e0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:1103
   blkdev_put+0x30/0x520 fs/block_dev.c:1804
   btrfs_close_bdev fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1117 [inline]
   btrfs_close_bdev fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1107 [inline]
   btrfs_close_one_device fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1133 [inline]
   close_fs_devices.part.0+0x1a4/0x800 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1161
   close_fs_devices fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1193 [inline]
   btrfs_close_devices+0x95/0x1f0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1179
   close_ctree+0x688/0x6cb fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:4149
   generic_shutdown_super+0x144/0x370 fs/super.c:464
   kill_anon_super+0x36/0x60 fs/super.c:1108
   btrfs_kill_super+0x38/0x50 fs/btrfs/super.c:2265
   deactivate_locked_super+0x94/0x160 fs/super.c:335
   deactivate_super+0xad/0xd0 fs/super.c:366
   cleanup_mnt+0x3a3/0x530 fs/namespace.c:1118
   task_work_run+0xdd/0x190 kernel/task_work.c:141
   tracehook_notify_resume include/linux/tracehook.h:188 [inline]
   exit_to_user_mode_loop kernel/entry/common.c:163 [inline]
   exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x1e1/0x200 kernel/entry/common.c:190
   syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x7e/0x2e0 kernel/entry/common.c:265
   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
  RIP: 0033:0x460027
  RSP: 002b:00007fff59216328 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000a6
  RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000076035 RCX: 0000000000460027
  RDX: 0000000000403188 RSI: 0000000000000002 RDI: 00007fff592163d0
  RBP: 0000000000000333 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 000000000000000b
  R10: 0000000000000005 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007fff59217460
  R13: 0000000002df2a60 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 00007fff59217460

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
[ add syzbot reference ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
 2020-09-30 19:34:24 +02:00