IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
To make the fastboot checks at least somewhat sensible let's mark
the expected DPLL as the active one right after we finished the
state computation. Otherwise intel_pipe_config_compare() will
always be comparing things against NULL/0.
TODO: This is still not really right. If the previous commit
had to fall back to the other PLL then the comparisong will
now fail. I guess intel_pipe_config_compare() should rather
be comparing port_dplls[] instead. But to do that we really
should just unify every platform to use the port_dplls[]
approach whether they have any need for PLL fallbacks or not.
Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220907091057.11572-12-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Toss a bunch if constants into .rodata drom the stack. Also
shrink the types of some of the arrays to reduce the size.
bloat-o-meter -c intel_dpll_mgr.o:
add/remove: 0/0 grow/shrink: 0/2 up/down: 0/-86 (-86)
Function old new delta
icl_get_dplls 3393 3372 -21
skl_get_dpll 2069 2004 -65
Total: Before=28029, After=27943, chg -0.31%
add/remove: 0/0 grow/shrink: 0/0 up/down: 0/0 (0)
Data old new delta
Total: Before=17, After=17, chg +0.00%
add/remove: 2/0 grow/shrink: 0/2 up/down: 28/-129 (-101)
RO Data old new delta
dco_central_freq - 24 +24
div1_vals - 4 +4
odd_dividers 28 7 -21
even_dividers 144 36 -108
Total: Before=3600, After=3499, chg -2.81%
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220301173128.6988-3-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
A new programming step was added to combo and TC PLL sequences.
If override_AFC_startup is set in VBT, driver should overwrite
AFC_startup value to 0x0 or 0x7 in PLL's div0 register.
The current understating is that only TGL needs this and all other
display 12 and newer platforms will have a older VBT or a newer VBT
with override_AFC_startup set to 0 but in any case there is a
drm_warn_on_once() to let us know if this is not true.
v2:
- specification updated, now AFC can be override to 0x0 or 0x7
- not using a union for div0 (Imre)
- following previous wrong vbt naming: bits instead of bytes (Imre)
BSpec: 49204
BSpec: 20122
BSpec: 49968
BSpec: 71360
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220216134059.25348-1-jose.souza@intel.com
CI test results/further experiments show that the workaround added in
commit 573d7ce4f6 ("drm/i915/adlp: Add workaround to disable CMTG clock gating")
can be applied only while DPLL0 is enabled. If it's disabled the
TRANS_CMTG_CHICKEN register is not accessible. Accordingly move the WA
to DPLL0 HW state sanitization and enabling.
This fixes an issue where the WA won't get applied (and a WARN is thrown
due to an unexpected value in TRANS_CMTG_CHICKEN) if the driver is
loaded without DPLL0 being enabled: booting without BIOS enabling an
output with this PLL, or reloading the driver.
While at it also add a debug print for the unexpected register value.
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210802190148.2099625-1-imre.deak@intel.com
The only real platform with DISPLAY_VER == 10 is GLK. We don't need to
handle CNL explicitly in intel_ddi.c.
A lot of special code for CNL can be removed. There were some
__cnl.*() functions that were created to share the implementation
between ICL and CNL. Those are now embedded in the only caller, in ICL.
Remove code and rename functions/macros accordingly to use ICL prefix
for those that are still needed.
Verified with:
make EXTRA_CFLAGS=-Wunused drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.o
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210729233934.2059489-1-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
The switch from old old IS_FOO_REVID() macros to the new table-based
IS_FOO_{GT,DISP}_STEP() macros is needed on both drm-intel-next (for
display-based DMC matching) and drm-intel-gt-next (for workaround
guards). To avoid conflicts, we'll apply the patches to a topic branch
and merge it to both intel branches to ensure the transition to the
new macros is clean.
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Hoist the intel_de.h include from intel_display_types.h one
level up. I need this in order to untangle the include order
so that I can add tracepoints into intel_de.h.
This little cocci script did most of the work for me:
@find@
@@
(
intel_de_read(...)
|
intel_de_read_fw(...)
|
intel_de_write(...)
|
intel_de_write_fw(...)
)
@has_include@
@@
(
#include "intel_de.h"
|
#include "display/intel_de.h"
)
@depends on find && !has_include@
@@
+ #include "intel_de.h"
#include "intel_display_types.h"
@depends on find && !has_include@
@@
+ #include "display/intel_de.h"
#include "display/intel_display_types.h"
Cc: Cooper Chiou <cooper.chiou@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210430143945.6776-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
While converting the rest of the driver to use GRAPHICS_VER() and
MEDIA_VER(), following what was done for display, some discussions went
back on what we did for display:
1) Why is the == comparison special that deserves a separate
macro instead of just getting the version and comparing directly
like is done for >, >=, <=?
2) IS_DISPLAY_RANGE() is weird in that it omits the "_VER" for
brevity. If we remove the current users of IS_DISPLAY_VER(), we
could actually repurpose it for a range check
With (1) there could be an advantage if we used gen_mask since multiple
conditionals be combined by the compiler in a single and instruction and
check the result. However a) INTEL_GEN() doesn't use the mask since it
would make the code bigger everywhere else and b) in the cases it made
sense, it also made sense to convert to the _RANGE() variant.
So here we repurpose IS_DISPLAY_VER() to work with a [ from, to ] range
like was the IS_DISPLAY_RANGE() and convert the current IS_DISPLAY_VER()
users to use == and != operators. Aside from the definition changes,
this was done by the following semantic patch:
@@ expression dev_priv, E1; @@
- !IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, E1)
+ DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) != E1
@@ expression dev_priv, E1; @@
- IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, E1)
+ DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) == E1
@@ expression dev_priv, from, until; @@
- IS_DISPLAY_RANGE(dev_priv, from, until)
+ IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, from, until)
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
[Jani: Minor conflict resolve while applying.]
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210413051002.92589-4-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
Use Coccinelle to convert most of the usage of INTEL_GEN() and IS_GEN()
in the display code to use DISPLAY_VER() comparisons instead. The
following semantic patch was used:
@@ expression dev_priv, E; @@
- INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) == E
+ IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, E)
@@ expression dev_priv; @@
- INTEL_GEN(dev_priv)
+ DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv)
@@ expression dev_priv; expression E; @@
- IS_GEN(dev_priv, E)
+ IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, E)
@@
expression dev_priv;
expression from, until;
@@
- IS_GEN_RANGE(dev_priv, from, until)
+ IS_DISPLAY_RANGE(dev_priv, from, until)
There are still some display-related uses of INTEL_GEN() in intel_pm.c
(watermark code) and i915_irq.c. Those will be updated separately.
v2:
- Use new IS_DISPLAY_RANGE and IS_DISPLAY_VER helpers. (Jani)
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210320044245.3920043-4-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
All the other places we have use pipes instead of crtc indices
when tracking resource usage. Life is easier when we do it
the same way always, so switch the dpll mgr to using pipes as
well. Looks like it was actually mixing these up in some cases
so it would not even have worked correctly except when the
device has a contiguous set of pipes starting from pipe A.
Granted, that is the typical case but supposedly it may not
always hold on modern hw.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210224144214.24803-4-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
