IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
If we encounter some monster sized local-memory page that exceeds the
maximum sg length (UINT32_MAX), ensure that don't end up with some
misaligned address in the entry that follows, leading to fireworks
later. Also ensure we have some coverage of this in the selftests.
v2(Chris):
- Use round_down consistently to avoid udiv errors
v3(Nirmoy):
- Also update the max_segment in the selftest
Fixes: f701b16d4cc5 ("drm/i915/ttm: add i915_sg_from_buddy_resource")
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/6379
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220711085859.24198-1-matthew.auld@intel.com
For the ttm backend we can use existing placements fpfn and lpfn to
force the allocator to place the object at the requested offset,
potentially evicting stuff if the spot is currently occupied.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220315181425.576828-5-matthew.auld@intel.com
Add a generic interface for allocating an object at some specific
offset, and convert stolen over. Later we will want to hook this up to
different backends.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220315181425.576828-4-matthew.auld@intel.com
If the user doesn't require CPU access for the buffer, then
ALLOC_GPU_ONLY should be used, in order to prioritise allocating in the
non-mappable portion of LMEM, on devices with small BAR.
v2(Thomas):
- The BO_ALLOC_TOPDOWN naming here is poor, since this is pure lies on
systems that don't even have small BAR. A better name is GPU_ONLY,
which is accurate regardless of the configuration.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220225145502.331818-3-matthew.auld@intel.com
With small LMEM-BAR we need to be able to differentiate between the
total size of LMEM, and how much of it is CPU mappable. The end goal is
to be able to utilize the entire range, even if part of is it not CPU
accessible.
v2: also update intelfb_create
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220225145502.331818-1-matthew.auld@intel.com
There is an interesting refcounting loop:
struct intel_memory_region has a struct ttm_resource_manager,
ttm_resource_manager->move may hold a reference to i915_request,
i915_request may hold a reference to intel_context,
intel_context may hold a reference to drm_i915_gem_object,
drm_i915_gem_object may hold a reference to intel_memory_region.
Break this loop by dropping region reference counting.
In addition, Have regions with a manager moving fence make sure
that all region objects are released before freeing the region.
v6:
- Fix a code comment.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211122214554.371864-4-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com
As we start to introduce asynchronous failsafe object migration,
where we update the object state and then submit asynchronous
commands we need to record what memory resources are actually used
by various part of the command stream. Initially for three purposes:
1) Error capture.
2) Asynchronous migration error recovery.
3) Asynchronous vma bind.
At the time where these happens, the object state may have been updated
to be several migrations ahead and object sg-tables discarded.
In order to make it possible to keep sg-tables with memory resource
information for these operations, introduce refcounted sg-tables that
aren't freed until the last user is done with them.
The alternative would be to reference information sitting on the
corresponding ttm_resources which typically have the same lifetime as
these refcountes sg_tables, but that leads to other awkward constructs:
Due to the design direction chosen for ttm resource managers that would
lead to diamond-style inheritance, the LMEM resources may sometimes be
prematurely freed, and finally the subclassed struct ttm_resource would
have to bleed into the asynchronous vma bind code.
v3:
- Address a number of style issues (Matthew Auld)
v4:
- Dont check for st->sgl being NULL in i915_ttm_tt__shmem_unpopulate(),
that should never happen. (Matthew Auld)
v5:
- Fix a Potential double-free (Matthew Auld)
Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211101122444.114607-1-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com
'drm/ttm/ttm_placement.h' included in
'drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/mock_region.c' is duplicated.
It is also included on the 9 line.
Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@zte.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Ran Jianping <ran.jianping@zte.com.cn>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211019090205.1003458-1-ran.jianping@zte.com.cn
For some specialised objects we might need something larger than the
regions min_page_size due to some hw restriction, and slightly more
hairy is needing something smaller with the guarantee that such objects
will never be inserted into any GTT, which is the case for the paging
structures.
This also fixes how we setup the BO page_alignment, if we later migrate
the object somewhere else. For example if the placements are {SMEM,
LMEM}, then we might get this wrong. Pushing the min_page_size behaviour
into the manager should fix this.
v2(Thomas): push the default page size behaviour into buddy_man, and let
the user override it with the page-alignment, which looks cleaner
v3: rebase on ttm sys changes
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210625103824.558481-1-matthew.auld@intel.com
We now have bo->page_alignment which perfectly describes what we need if
we have min page size restrictions for lmem. We can also drop the flag
here, since this is the default behaviour for all objects.
v2(Thomas):
- bo->page_alignment is in page units
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210616152501.394518-7-matthew.auld@intel.com
Move back to the buddy allocator for managing device local memory, and
restore the lost mock selftests. Keep around the range manager related
bits, since we likely need this for managing stolen at some point. For
stolen we also don't need to reserve anything so no need to support a
generic reserve interface.
v2(Thomas):
- bo->page_alignment is in page units, not bytes
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210616152501.394518-6-matthew.auld@intel.com
Now that ttm_resource_manager just returns a generic ttm_resource we
don't need to reference the mm_node stuff anymore which mostly only
makes sense for drm_mm_node. In the next few patches we want switch over
to the ttm_buddy_man which is just another type of ttm_resource so
reflect that in the naming.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210616152501.394518-5-matthew.auld@intel.com
Temporarily remove the buddy allocator and related selftests
and hook up the TTM range manager for i915 regions.
Also modify the mock region selftests somewhat to account for a
fragmenting manager.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210602083818.241793-2-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com
We want to remove the changing of ops structure for attaching
phys pages, so we need to kill off HAS_STRUCT_PAGE from ops->flags,
and put it in the bo.
This will remove a potential race of dereferencing the wrong obj->ops
without ww mutex held.
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
[danvet: apply with wiggle]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210323155059.628690-8-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com
Give more flexibility to the caller, if they already have an allocated
object, in case they wish to apply some transformation to the object
prior to handing it over to the region specific initialisation step,
like in gem_create_ext where we would like to first apply the extensions
to the object.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210114182402.840247-3-matthew.auld@intel.com
We are incorrectly limiting the max allocation size as per the mm
max_order, which is effectively the largest power-of-two that we can fit
in the region size. However, it's normal to setup the region or
allocator with a non-power-of-two size(for example 3G), which we should
already handle correctly, except it seems for the early too-big-check.
v2: make sure we also exercise the I915_BO_ALLOC_CONTIGUOUS path, which
is quite different, since for that we are actually limited by the
largest power-of-two that we can fit within the region size. (Chris)
Fixes: b908be543e44 ("drm/i915: support creating LMEM objects")
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: CQ Tang <cq.tang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201021103606.241395-1-matthew.auld@intel.com
(cherry picked from commit 83ebef47f8ebe320d5c5673db82f9903a4f40a69)
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Some kernel internal objects may need to be allocated as a contiguous
block, also thinking ahead the various kernel io_mapping interfaces seem
to expect it, although this is purely a limitation in the kernel
API...so perhaps something to be improved.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Abdiel Janulgue <abdiel.janulgue@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Michael J Ruhl <michael.j.ruhl@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191008160116.18379-3-matthew.auld@intel.com
Support memory regions, as defined by a given (start, end), and allow
creating GEM objects which are backed by said region. The immediate goal
here is to have something to represent our device memory, but later on
we also want to represent every memory domain with a region, so stolen,
shmem, and of course device. At some point we are probably going to want
use a common struct here, such that we are better aligned with say TTM.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Abdiel Janulgue <abdiel.janulgue@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Niranjana Vishwanathapura <niranjana.vishwanathapura@intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191008160116.18379-2-matthew.auld@intel.com
