IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
Pull x86 core updates from Borislav Petkov:
- Get rid of all the .fixup sections because this generates
misleading/wrong stacktraces and confuse RELIABLE_STACKTRACE and
LIVEPATCH as the backtrace misses the function which is being fixed
up.
- Add Straight Line Speculation mitigation support which uses a new
compiler switch -mharden-sls= which sticks an INT3 after a RET or an
indirect branch in order to block speculation after them. Reportedly,
CPUs do speculate behind such insns.
- The usual set of cleanups and improvements
* tag 'x86_core_for_v5.17_rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: (32 commits)
x86/entry_32: Fix segment exceptions
objtool: Remove .fixup handling
x86: Remove .fixup section
x86/word-at-a-time: Remove .fixup usage
x86/usercopy: Remove .fixup usage
x86/usercopy_32: Simplify __copy_user_intel_nocache()
x86/sgx: Remove .fixup usage
x86/checksum_32: Remove .fixup usage
x86/vmx: Remove .fixup usage
x86/kvm: Remove .fixup usage
x86/segment: Remove .fixup usage
x86/fpu: Remove .fixup usage
x86/xen: Remove .fixup usage
x86/uaccess: Remove .fixup usage
x86/futex: Remove .fixup usage
x86/msr: Remove .fixup usage
x86/extable: Extend extable functionality
x86/entry_32: Remove .fixup usage
x86/entry_64: Remove .fixup usage
x86/copy_mc_64: Remove .fixup usage
...
There's another compilation fail (first here [1]) reported by kernel
test robot for W=1 clang build:
>> samples/ftrace/ftrace-direct-multi-modify.c:7:6: warning: no previous
prototype for function 'my_direct_func1' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
void my_direct_func1(unsigned long ip)
Direct functions in ftrace direct sample modules need to have prototypes
defined. They are already global in order to be visible for the inline
assembly, so there's no problem.
The kernel test robot reported just error for ftrace-direct-multi-modify,
but I got same errors also for the rest of the modules touched by this patch.
[1] 67d4f6e3bf ftrace/samples: Add missing prototype for my_direct_func
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211219135317.212430-1-jolsa@kernel.org
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Fixes: e1067a07cf ("ftrace/samples: Add module to test multi direct modify interface")
Fixes: ae0cc3b7e7 ("ftrace/samples: Add a sample module that implements modify_ftrace_direct()")
Fixes: 156473a0ff ("ftrace: Add another example of register_ftrace_direct() use case")
Fixes: b06457c83a ("ftrace: Add sample module that uses register_ftrace_direct()")
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Add a sample module that tests modify_ftrace_direct(), and this can be used
by the selftests as well.
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>