IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
We're seeing livelocks that appear to be due to
bch2_btree_key_cache_scan repeatedly scanning and blocking other tasks
from using the key cache lock - we probably shouldn't be reporting
objects that can't actually be freed yet.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
bch2_varint_decode() can read up to 7 bytes past the end of the buffer,
which means we need to allocate slightly larger key cache buffers.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Flushing the btree key cache needs to use allocation reserves - journal
reclaim depends on flushing the btree key cache for making forward
progress, and the allocator and copygc depend on journal reclaim making
forward progress.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
We need to flush the btree key cache when it's too dirty, because
otherwise the shrinker won't be able to reclaim memory - this is done by
journal reclaim. But journal reclaim also kicks btree node writes: this
meant that btree node writes were getting kicked much too often just
because we needed to flush btree key cache keys.
This patch splits journal pins into two different lists, and teaches
journal reclaim to not flush btree node writes when it only needs to
flush key cache keys.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
JOURNAL_RES_GET_RESERVED should only be used for updatse that need to be
done to free up space in the journal. In particular, when we're flushing
keys from the key cache, if we're flushing them out of order we
shouldn't be using it, since we're using up our remaining space in the
journal without dropping a pin that will let us make forward progress.
With this patch, BTREE_INSERT_JOURNAL_RECLAIM without
BTREE_INSERT_JOURNAL_RESERVED may return -EAGAIN - we can't wait on
journal reclaim if we're already in journal reclaim.
This means we need to propagate these errors up to journal reclaim,
indicating that flushing a journal pin should be retried in the future.
This is prep work for a patch to change the way journal reclaim works,
to split out flushing key cache keys because the btree key cache is too
dirty from journal reclaim because we need space in the journal.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
With snapshots, we're going to need to differentiate between comparisons
that should and shouldn't include the snapshot field. bpos_cmp is now
the comparison function that does include the snapshot field, used by
core btree code.
Upper level filesystem code generally does _not_ want to compare against
the snapshot field - that code wants keys to compare as equal even when
one of them is in an ancestor snapshot.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
The btree key cache mutex was becoming a significant bottleneck - it was
mainly used to protect the lists of dirty, clean and freed cached keys.
This patch eliminates the dirty and clean lists - instead, when we need
to scan for keys to drop from the cache we iterate over the rhashtable,
and thus we're able to remove most uses of that lock.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
This is a bit clearer than using bch2_btree_iter_free().
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
bch2_btree_iter_traverse() is supposed to ensure we have the correct
type of lock - it was downgrading if necessary, but if we entered with a
read lock it wasn't upgrading to an intent lock, oops.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Previously, we were using BTREE_INSERT_RESERVE in a lot of places where
it no longer makes sense.
- we now have more open_buckets than we used to, and the reserves work
better, so we shouldn't need to use BTREE_INSERT_RESERVE just because
we're holding open_buckets pinned anymore.
- We have the btree key cache for updates to the alloc btree, meaning
we no longer need the btree reserve to ensure the allocator can make
forward progress.
This means that we should only need a reserve for btree updates to
ensure that copygc can make forward progress.
Since it's now just for copygc, we can also fold RESERVE_BTREE into
RESERVE_MOVINGGC (the allocator's freelist reserve).
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Particularly on emergency shutdown we can end up having to clean up a
lot of dirty cached btree keys here.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
These only come up when building in userspace, for some reason.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Since we now always preallocate the maximum number of iterators when we
initialize a btree transaction, getting an iterator never fails - we can
delete a fair amount of error path code.
This patch also simplifies the iterator allocation code a bit.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
In the btree key cache code, failing to flush a dirty key is a serious
error, but it doesn't need to be a BUG_ON(), we can stop the filesystem
instead.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
The rhashtable code doesn't like when we destroy an rhashtable that was
never initialized
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Ensuring the key cache isn't too dirty is critical for ensuring that the
shrinker can reclaim memory.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
The shrinker should start scanning for entries that can be freed oldest
to newest - this way, we can avoid scanning a lot of entries that are
too new to be freed.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
We allocate a lot of these, and we're seeing sporading OOMs - this will
help with tracking those down.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
On emergency shutdown, we might still have dirty keys in the btree key
cache that need to be cleaned up properly.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
This lets us improve journal reclaim, so that it now tries to make sure
no more than 3/4s of the btree node cache and btree key cache are dirty
- ensuring the shrinkers can free memory.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
We have a bug where we can get stuck with a process spinning in
transaction restarts - need more information.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
This switches inode updates to use cached btree iterators - which should
be a nice performance boost, since lock contention on the inodes btree
can be a bottleneck on multithreaded workloads.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
The code that checks lock ordering was recently changed to go off of the
pos of the btree node, rather than the iterator, but the btree cache
code didn't update to handle iterators that point to cached bkeys. Oops
Also, update various debug code.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
This introduces a new kind of btree iterator, cached iterators, which
point to keys cached in a hash table. The cache also acts as a write
cache - in the update path, we journal the update but defer updating the
btree until the cached entry is flushed by journal reclaim.
Cache coherency is for now up to the users to handle, which isn't ideal
but should be good enough for now.
These new iterators will be used for updating inodes and alloc info (the
alloc and stripes btrees).
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
