IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
The readpages bug is a regression that was introduced in 6993f74a5.
This also fixes a couple of similar bugs in the uncached read and write
codepaths.
Also, prevent this sort of thing in the future by having cifsFileInfo_get
take the spinlock itself, and adding a _locked variant for use in places
that are already holding the lock. The _put code has always done that
so this makes for a less confusing interface.
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.5.x
Reviewed-by: Pavel Shilovsky <pshilovsky@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
Since both CIFS and SMB2 use ses->capabilities (server->capabilities)
field but flags are different we should make such checks protocol
independent.
Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Pavel Shilovsky <pshilovsky@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
struct file_lock is pretty large, so we really don't want that on the
stack in a potentially long call chain. Reorganize the arguments to
CIFSSMBPosixLock to eliminate the need for that.
Eliminate the get_flag and simply use a non-NULL pLockInfo to indicate
that this is a "get" operation. In order to do that, need to add a new
loff_t argument for the start_offset.
Reported-by: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
Those macros add a newline on their own, so there's not any need to
embed one in the message itself.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
when cifs_reconnect sets maxBuf to 0 and we try to calculate a size
of memory we need to store locks.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Shilovsky <pshilovsky@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <sfrench@us.ibm.com>
While traversing the linked list of open file handles, if the identfied
file handle is invalid, a reopen is attempted and if it fails, we
resume traversing where we stopped and cifs can oops while accessing
invalid next element, for list might have changed.
So mark the invalid file handle and attempt reopen if no
valid file handle is found in rest of the list.
If reopen fails, move the invalid file handle to the end of the list
and start traversing the list again from the begining.
Repeat this four times before giving up and returning an error if
file reopen keeps failing.
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Shirish Pargaonkar <shirishpargaonkar@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <sfrench@us.ibm.com>
CIFS brlock cache can be used by several file handles if we have a
write-caching lease on the file that is supported by SMB2 protocol.
Prepate the code to handle this situation correctly by sorting brlocks
by a fid to easily push them in portions when lease break comes.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Shilovsky <piastry@etersoft.ru>
Convert cifs_iovec_read to use async I/O. This also raises the limit on
the rsize for uncached reads. We first allocate a set of pages to hold
the replies, then issue the reads in parallel and then collect the
replies and copy the results into the iovec.
A possible future optimization would be to kmap and inline the iovec
buffers and read the data directly from the socket into that. That would
require some rather complex conversion of the iovec into a kvec however.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
This isn't strictly necessary for the async readpages code, but the
uncached version will need to be able to collect the replies after
issuing the calls. Add a kref to cifs_readdata and use change the
code to take and put references appropriately.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Cached and uncached reads will need to do different things here to
handle the difference when the pages are in pagecache and not. Abstract
out the function that marshals the page list into a kvec array.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
We'll need different completion routines for an uncached read. Allow
the caller to set the one he needs at allocation time. Also, move
most of these functions to file.c so we can make more of them static.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
In the recent update of the cifs_iovec_write code to use async writes,
the handling of the file position was broken. That patch added a local
"offset" variable to handle the offset, and then only updated the
original "*poffset" before exiting.
Unfortunately, it copied off the original offset from the beginning,
instead of doing so after generic_write_checks had been called. Fix
this by moving the initialization of "offset" after that in the
function.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <sfrench@us.ibm.com>
We can deadlock if we have a write oplock and two processes
use the same file handle. In this case the first process can't
unlock its lock if the second process blocked on the lock in the
same time.
Fix it by using posix_lock_file rather than posix_lock_file_wait
under cinode->lock_mutex. If we request a blocking lock and
posix_lock_file indicates that there is another lock that prevents
us, wait untill that lock is released and restart our call.
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Acked-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Pavel Shilovsky <piastry@etersoft.ru>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <sfrench@us.ibm.com>
We can deadlock if we have a write oplock and two processes
use the same file handle. In this case the first process can't
unlock its lock if another process blocked on the lock in the
same time.
Fix this by removing lock_mutex protection from waiting on a
blocked lock and protect only posix_lock_file call.
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Pavel Shilovsky <piastry@etersoft.ru>
Acked-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <sfrench@us.ibm.com>
cifs_update_eof has the potential to be racy if multiple threads are
trying to modify it at the same time. Protect modifications of the
server_eof value with the inode->i_lock.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
We'll need to do something a bit different depending on the caller.
Abstract the code that marshals the page array into an iovec.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Pavel Shilovsky <piastry@etersoft.ru>
Use DIV_ROUND_UP. Also, PAGE_SIZE is more appropriate here since these
aren't pagecache pages.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Pavel Shilovsky <piastry@etersoft.ru>
The gfp flags are currently set to __GPF_HIGHMEM, which doesn't allow
for any reclaim. Make this more resilient by or'ing that with
GFP_KERNEL. Also, get rid of the goto and unify the exit codepath.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Pavel Shilovsky <piastry@etersoft.ru>
We'll need a different set of write completion ops when not writing out
of the pagecache.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Pavel Shilovsky <piastry@etersoft.ru>
We'll need this to handle rwpidforward option correctly when we use
async writes in the aio_write op.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Pavel Shilovsky <piastry@etersoft.ru>
Some servers sets this value less than 50 that was hardcoded and
we lost the connection if when we exceed this limit. Fix this by
respecting this value - not sending more than the server allows.
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Pavel Shilovsky <piastry@etersoft.ru>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <stevef@smf-gateway.(none)>
Signed-off-by: Pavel Shilovsky <piastry@etersoft.ru>
Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Reported-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <stevef@smf-gateway.(none)>
Reorganize the code to make the memory already allocated before
spinlock'ed loop.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Pavel Shilovsky <piastry@etersoft.ru>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <sfrench@us.ibm.com>
Reorder parms of cifs_lock_init, trivially simplify getlk code and
remove extra {} in cifs_lock_add_if.
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Acked-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Pavel Shilovsky <piastry@etersoft.ru>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <sfrench@us.ibm.com>
Now we allocate a lock structure at first, then we request to the server
and save the lock if server returned OK though void function - it prevents
the situation when we locked a file on the server and then return -ENOMEM
from setlk.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Shilovsky <piastry@etersoft.ru>
Acked-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <sfrench@us.ibm.com>
to prevent the mutex being unlocked twice if we interrupt a blocked lock.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Shilovsky <piastry@etersoft.ru>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
that reduces a traffic and increases a performance.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Shilovsky <piastry@etersoft.ru>
Acked-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
that reduces a traffic and increases a performance.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Shilovsky <piastry@etersoft.ru>
Acked-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
to handle all lock requests on the client in an exclusive oplock case.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Shilovsky <piastry@etersoft.ru>
Acked-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
If we have an oplock and negotiate mandatory locking style we handle
all brlock requests on the client.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Shilovsky <piastry@etersoft.ru>
Acked-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
Currently we cap the rsize at a value that fits in CIFSMaxBufSize. That's
not needed any longer for readpages. Allow the use of larger values for
readpages. cifs_iovec_read and cifs_read however are still limited to the
CIFSMaxBufSize. Make sure they don't exceed that.
The patch also changes the rsize defaults. The default when unix
extensions are enabled is set to 1M for parity with the wsize, and there
is a hard cap of ~16M.
When unix extensions are not enabled, the default is set to 60k. According
to MS-CIFS, Windows servers can only send a max of 60k at a time, so
this is more efficient than requesting a larger size. If the user wishes
however, the max can be extended up to 128k - the length of the READ_RSP
header.
Really old servers however require a special hack to ensure that we don't
request too large a read.
Reviewed-and-Tested-by: Pavel Shilovsky <piastry@etersoft.ru>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Now that we have code in place to do asynchronous reads, convert
cifs_readpages to use it. The new cifs_readpages walks the page_list
that gets passed in, locks and adds the pages to the pagecache and
sets up cifs_readdata to handle the reads.
The rest is handled by the cifs_async_readv infrastructure.
Reviewed-and-Tested-by: Pavel Shilovsky <piastry@etersoft.ru>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Smatch complains that the cast to "int" in min_t() changes very large
values of current_read_size into negative values and so min_t()
could return the wrong value. I removed the const as well, as that
doesn't do anything here.
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
that let us do local lock checks before requesting to the server.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Shilovsky <piastry@etersoft.ru>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
Split cifs_lock into several functions and let CIFSSMBLock get pid
as an argument.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Shilovsky <piastry@etersoft.ru>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
Add mount options backupuid and backugid.
It allows an authenticated user to access files with the intent to back them
up including their ACLs, who may not have access permission but has
"Backup files and directories user right" on them (by virtue of being part
of the built-in group Backup Operators.
When mount options backupuid is specified, cifs client restricts the
use of backup intents to the user whose effective user id is specified
along with the mount option.
When mount options backupgid is specified, cifs client restricts the
use of backup intents to the users whose effective user id belongs to the
group id specified along with the mount option.
If an authenticated user is not part of the built-in group Backup Operators
at the server, access to such files is denied, even if allowed by the client.
Signed-off-by: Shirish Pargaonkar <shirishpargaonkar@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
Thus spake Jeff Layton:
"Making that a module parm would allow you to set that parameter at boot
time without needing to add special startup scripts. IMO, all of the
procfile "switches" under /proc/fs/cifs should be module parms
instead."
This patch doesn't alter the default behavior (Oplocks are enabled by
default).
To disable oplocks when loading the module, use
modprobe cifs enable_oplocks=0
(any of '0' or 'n' or 'N' conventions can be used).
To disable oplocks at runtime using the new interface, use
echo 0 > /sys/module/cifs/parameters/enable_oplocks
The older /proc/fs/cifs/OplockEnabled interface will be deprecated
after two releases. A subsequent patch will add an warning message
about this deprecation.
Changes since v2:
- make enable_oplocks a 'bool'
Changes since v1:
- eliminate the use of extra variable by renaming the old one to
enable_oplocks and make it an 'int' type.
Reported-by: Alexander Swen <alex@swen.nu>
Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Suresh Jayaraman <sjayaraman@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
server->maxBuf is the maximum SMB size (including header) that the
server can handle. CIFSMaxBufSize is the maximum amount of data (sans
header) that the client can handle. Currently maxBuf is being capped at
CIFSMaxBufSize + the max headers size, and the two values are used
somewhat interchangeably in the code.
This makes little sense as these two values are not related at all.
Separate them and make sure the code uses the right values in the right
places.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
