IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
When we check the length, we only check that the advertised
data length fits into the data we have, but currently not
that it actually matches correctly.
This should be harmless, but if the first two bytes are zero,
then the iwl_rx_packet_payload_len() ends up negative, and
that might later cause issues if unsigned variables are used,
as this is not something that's normally expected.
Change the validation here to precisely validate the lengths
match, to avoid such issues.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210117164916.5184dfc2a445.I0631d2e4f6ffb93cf06618edb035c45bd6d1d7b9@changeid
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Handling host commands in a sync way is not directly related to PCIe
transport, and can serve as common logic for any transport, so move
it to trans layer.
Signed-off-by: Mordechay Goodstein <mordechay.goodstein@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210117164916.fde99af4e0f7.I4cab95919eb35cc5bfb26d32dcf5e15419d0e0ef@changeid
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
In roaming flows and during reassociation, its possible that data frames
such as EAPOLs for 4 way handshake/ 802.1x authentication are initially set
to higher MCS rate. Though these are pruned down to a lower legacy rate
before sending to the FW, driver also emits a kernel warning - intended for
non-data frames. Add checks to avoid such warnings for data frames, while
also enhancing the debug data printed.
Signed-off-by: Krishnanand Prabhu <krishnanand.prabhu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210117164916.d9ded010c4ce.Ie1d5a33d7175c0bcb35c10b5729748646671da31@changeid
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
While disconnecting from the AP due to bad channel switch
params (e.g. too long Tx block), do not send the firmware
'CSA abort' before disconnecting. That causes canceling the
immediate quiet and can cause transmitting data before the
disconnection happens.
Signed-off-by: Shaul Triebitz <shaul.triebitz@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210117164916.b9af359a675f.I996fc7eb3d94e9539f8b117017c428448c42c7ad@changeid
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
D3_CONFIG_CMD and D0I3_END_CMD should be the last\first
command upon suspend\resume correspondingly, otherwise,
FW will raise an assert (0x342).
There are firmware notifications that cause the driver to
send a command back to the firmware. If such a notification
is sent to the driver while the the driver prepares the
firmware for D3, operation, what is likely to happen is that
the handling of the notification will try to get the mutex
and will wait unil the driver finished configuring the
firmware for D3. Then the handling notification will get
the mutex and handle the notification which will lead to
the aforementioned ASSERT 342.
To avoid this, we need to prevent any command to be sent to
the firmware between the D3_CONFIG_CMD and the D0I3_END_CMD.
Check this in the utility layer that sends the host commands
and in the transport layer as well.
Flag the D3_CONFIG_CMD and the D0I3_END_CMD commands as
commands that must be sent even if the firmware has already
been configured for D3 operation.
Signed-off-by: Haim Dreyfuss <haim.dreyfuss@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210117164916.1935a993b471.I3192c93c030576ca16773c01b009c4d93610d6ea@changeid
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
When we want to stop TX'ing because we are suspending, we
have two options: either we check system_pm_mode or we
check the mvm's status that has a bit for the suspend
flow.
The latter is better because test_bit is atomic. Also
add a call to synchronize_net after we set the bit to
make sure that all the new Tx see the bit before we
actually complete the suspend flow.
Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210117130510.243c88781302.I5c0379c5a7e5d49410569e7fcd2fff7a419c6dea@changeid
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Instead of pretending to have NAPI and then relying entirely on
interrupts anyway, properly implement NAPI and schedule the poll
when we get an interrupt, re-enabling the interrupt only after
the poll completed.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210117130510.a5951ac4fc06.I9c84a147288fcfb1b019572c6758f2d92949f5d7@changeid
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
In the new api all the flush in the FW is done before we
get the response and in the response we only get the updated
read pointer and all queued packets don't get anymore rx_tx
per packet to free the queued packet, so driver needs to free
all queued packets on flushed queue at once after flush response.
Signed-off-by: Mordechay Goodstein <mordechay.goodstein@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210117130510.4bd0eca8c0ef.I1601aad2eb2cc83f6f73b8ca52be57bb9fd626ab@changeid
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
If there are frequent CCA delays due to the extension channel
as detected by the firmware, and we're on 2.4 GHz, then handle
this by disconnecting (with a reconnect hint).
When we disconnect, we'll also update our capabilities to use
only 20 MHz on the next connection (if it's on 2.4 GHz) as to
avoid the use of the extension channel that has too much noise.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210117130510.4de9c363b0b5.I709b7e6f73a7537c53f22d7418927691259de8a8@changeid
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
When restarting firmware with an ongoing scheduled scan, we
don't (and shouldn't) mark it as aborted as mac80211 will be
restarting it, and so no event should go out to userspace.
The appropriate comment regarding this wasn't moved to this
place, so add it.
However, we _do_ need to clean up our internal state, since
mac80211 will restart the scan, and we'll otherwise get to
the WARN_ON() a few lines below for no reason whatsoever.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210117130510.4ddc9b017268.Ie869b628ae56a5d776eba0e7b7f05f42fc566f2e@changeid
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
For testing features where the firmware may send some
notifications it can often be a lot easier to do that
from a test script. Remove most injection limitations
from debugfs to be able to do this.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210117130510.9aff3c6b4607.I03b0ae7df094734451445ffcb7f9f0274969f1c0@changeid
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
We shouldn't trust the firmware with the sizes (or contents)
of notifications, accessing too much data could cause page
faults if the data doesn't fit into the allocated space. This
applies more on older NICs where multiple notifications can
be in a single RX buffer.
Add a general framework for checking a minimum size of any
notification in the RX handlers and use it for most. Some RX
handlers were already checking and I've moved the checks,
some more complex checks I left and made them _NO_SIZE for
the RX handlers.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210117130510.3e155d5e5f90.I2121fa4ac7cd7eb98970d84b793796646afa3eed@changeid
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
We have already WARN_ON(!qc) for non-QOS frame on txq->sched_retry path,
but we continue to process, what makes no sense since tid is not
initialized. Non QOS frame should never happen when aggregation
is enabled on queue, so do not process that.
Patch should fix smatch warning:
drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlegacy/4965-mac.c:2822 il4965_hdl_tx() error: uninitialized symbol 'tid'.
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Stanislaw Gruszka <stf_xl@wp.pl>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210119100621.439134-1-stf_xl@wp.pl
Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/fw/acpi.c:123: warning: Function parameter or member 'dev' not described in 'iwl_acpi_get_dsm_object'
drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/fw/acpi.c:123: warning: Function parameter or member 'rev' not described in 'iwl_acpi_get_dsm_object'
drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/fw/acpi.c:123: warning: Function parameter or member 'func' not described in 'iwl_acpi_get_dsm_object'
drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/fw/acpi.c:123: warning: Function parameter or member 'args' not described in 'iwl_acpi_get_dsm_object'
drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/fw/acpi.c:142: warning: Function parameter or member 'dev' not described in 'iwl_acpi_get_dsm_u8'
drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/fw/acpi.c:142: warning: Function parameter or member 'rev' not described in 'iwl_acpi_get_dsm_u8'
drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/fw/acpi.c:142: warning: Function parameter or member 'func' not described in 'iwl_acpi_get_dsm_u8'
Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Cc: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Cc: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Cc: Intel Linux Wireless <linuxwifi@intel.com>
Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201126133152.3211309-17-lee.jones@linaro.org
Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/fw/dbg.c:1932: warning: Function parameter or member 'reg_data' not described in 'iwl_dump_ini_mem'
drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/fw/dbg.c:1932: warning: Excess function parameter 'reg' description in 'iwl_dump_ini_mem'
Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Cc: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Cc: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Cc: Intel Linux Wireless <linuxwifi@intel.com>
Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: Shahar S Matityahu <shahar.s.matityahu@intel.com>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201126133152.3211309-15-lee.jones@linaro.org
Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/iwl-phy-db.c:97: warning: Function parameter or member 'trans' not described in 'iwl_phy_db'
Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Cc: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Cc: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Cc: Intel Linux Wireless <linuxwifi@intel.com>
Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201126133152.3211309-14-lee.jones@linaro.org
Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/iwl-eeprom-parse.c:340: warning: cannot understand function prototype: 'struct iwl_eeprom_enhanced_txpwr '
Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Cc: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Cc: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Cc: Intel Linux Wireless <linuxwifi@intel.com>
Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201126133152.3211309-9-lee.jones@linaro.org
Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/iwl-eeprom-read.c:347: warning: Function parameter or member 'trans' not described in 'iwl_read_eeprom'
drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/iwl-eeprom-read.c:347: warning: Function parameter or member 'eeprom' not described in 'iwl_read_eeprom'
drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/iwl-eeprom-read.c:347: warning: Function parameter or member 'eeprom_size' not described in 'iwl_read_eeprom'
Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Cc: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Cc: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Cc: Intel Linux Wireless <linuxwifi@intel.com>
Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201126133152.3211309-8-lee.jones@linaro.org
Also add documentation for 'mvm'.
Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c:400: warning: cannot understand function prototype: 'const u16 expected_tpt_legacy[IWL_RATE_COUNT] = '
drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c:684: warning: Function parameter or member 'mvm' not described in '_rs_collect_tx_data'
drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c:684: warning: Function parameter or member 'tbl' not described in '_rs_collect_tx_data'
drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c:684: warning: Function parameter or member 'scale_index' not described in '_rs_collect_tx_data'
drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c:684: warning: Function parameter or member 'attempts' not described in '_rs_collect_tx_data'
drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c:684: warning: Function parameter or member 'successes' not described in '_rs_collect_tx_data'
drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c:684: warning: Function parameter or member 'window' not described in '_rs_collect_tx_data'
drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c:2677: warning: duplicate section name 'NOTE'
drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c:2682: warning: Function parameter or member 'mvm' not described in 'rs_initialize_lq'
drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c:2682: warning: Function parameter or member 'sta' not described in 'rs_initialize_lq'
drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c:2682: warning: Function parameter or member 'lq_sta' not described in 'rs_initialize_lq'
drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c:2682: warning: Function parameter or member 'band' not described in 'rs_initialize_lq'
drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c:3761: warning: Function parameter or member 'mvm' not described in 'rs_program_fix_rate'
drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c:3761: warning: Function parameter or member 'lq_sta' not described in 'rs_program_fix_rate'
drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c:4213: warning: Function parameter or member 'mvm' not described in 'iwl_mvm_tx_protection'
Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Cc: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Cc: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Cc: Intel Linux Wireless <linuxwifi@intel.com>
Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201126133152.3211309-3-lee.jones@linaro.org
In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix a
warning by replacing a /* fall through */ comment with the new
pseudo-keyword macro fallthrough; instead of letting the code fall
through to the next case.
Notice that Clang doesn't recognize /* fall through */ comments as
implicit fall-through markings.
Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/115
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/edd98d194bfc98b4be93a9bdc303630b719c0e66.1605896060.git.gustavoars@kernel.org
In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix multiple
warnings by explicitly using the fallthrough pseudo-keyword as a
replacement for a number of "fall through" markings.
Notice that Clang doesn't recognize "fall through" comments as
implicit fall-through.
Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/115
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201117155904.GA14551@embeddedor
In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix multiple
warnings by explicitly using the fallthrough pseudo-keyword as a
replacement for a number of "fall through" markings.
Notice that Clang doesn't recognize "fall through" comments as
implicit fall-through.
Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/115
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201117135053.GA13248@embeddedor
When waiting for a notification and then processing it,
we also need to check the size of the data before we use
it. Most places do that already, but fix the remaining
ones to do it as well.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20201209231352.b29573bcba39.I4b7e72824d06dc0719a40021d933e29edfc14713@changeid
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
The range response notification has several versions. Check the
notification size according to the expected notification version.
Notifications with incorrect size will be ignored.
Signed-off-by: Avraham Stern <avraham.stern@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20201209231352.ee57c3214d05.I810d7de33fb08001ef1a2e24714d5b68932e088e@changeid
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
The RX handlers for probe response data and channel switch weren't
hooked up properly, fix that.
Fixes: 86e177d80ff7 ("iwlwifi: mvm: add NOA and CSA to a probe response")
Fixes: d3a108a48dc6 ("iwlwifi: mvm: Support CSA countdown offloading")
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20201209231352.2d07dcee0d35.I07a61b5d734478db57d9434ff303e4c90bf6c32b@changeid
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Previously, we added checks that the contained MPDU size is long
enough, but really we should also check that the notification
itself fits into the data. Add some checks for that.
Also add unlikely() annotations on the previously added checks.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20201209231352.51cc04cf1e3e.I7bfd6809f8f5feb75f79397646e6656e95688a0e@changeid
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
If the channel switch delay that we would incur after the channel
switch actually happens is longer than the quiet time we're willing
to tolerate, disconnect as well.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20201209231352.3bc3449922da.Ib0255deb67b2fc21317e274adcacb545bb1dc669@changeid
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
There are some races in the hardware that can possibly lead to
a bus lockup later during a restart when we manage to kill the
firmware at a bad time (while it's accessing the bus).
To work around this, add support for a new handshake between
firmware and driver to ensure that the firmware is in a well-
known state before we kill it.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20201209231352.7756fcc9865c.I13de65e0ffcb4186dd4c1a465f66df2e98c9a947@changeid
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
When we get a channel switch with a very long quiet period, we schedule
a work to disconnect after a while. This work runs in background. In the
meanwhile, we keep getting beacons and sending FW modify command for each.
This has a potential race, where we modify the CSA after we aborted it.
Protect the flow by setting csa_failed to true in case we abort, and check
it before sending the modify command.
This required a modification to the way we treat csa_failed in
iwl_mvm_post_channel_switch:
1. The variable isn't being reset anymore, so we can still look at it in
iwl_mvm_channel_switch_rx_beacon. This is fine, since we reset it when
starting a new CSA.
2. There is no more early return in case of csa_failed. This is fine,
since before this patch csa_failed was set only for GO, and for GO the
function is only resetting the power settings, which we want to restore
even in case of failure.
Signed-off-by: Sara Sharon <sara.sharon@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20201209231352.b023856bdf39.I4ed0149e0018fe5e1ae3c2a1cbc614954016063f@changeid
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
We send some data to the firmware and expect to get it back,
but we shouldn't really trust the firmware on this. Check the
size of all the data we send down to avoid using bad or just
uninitialized data when the firmware doesn't respond right.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20201209231352.a5a8173f16c7.I4fa68bb2b1c7dcc52ddd381c4042722d27c4a34d@changeid
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
We don't need the sequence/index/cmd_index unless we're doing
reclaim, they're not even valid in the other cases. Move the
variables and their assignments into the right if statement
and combine the two if statements into a single one as well.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20201209231352.6207fdcc91a9.Ia71e766ead7560262f4bc6ad3da6f1117c498cd6@changeid
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
There's a bug in the lengths - the 'old length' needs to be calculated
using the 'old' pointer, of course, likely a copy/paste mistake. Fix
this.
Reported-by: Daniel Gabay <daniel.gabay@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Fixes: cf29c5b66b9f ("iwlwifi: dbg_ini: implement time point handling")
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20201209231352.c0105ddffa74.I1ddb243053ff763c91b663748b6a593ecc3b5634@changeid
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
We set this here, but don't really use it until we've
enabled interrupts. But when enabling interrupts we
always overwrite this value anyway, so remove setting
it here, mostly in order not to have some additional
code duplicated later.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20201209231352.135d96297aca.Id2d26fff60b6c31202bb0a36e46948bda6a39d33@changeid
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
This is actually wrong, the bit used here by the image loader
is BIT(1), not BIT(2). The latter will be reused by the new
reset flow soon.
However, as we never had any complaints about not printing
the IML status or not handling the IML error interrupt (and
I suspect the code handling it was incorrectly anyway) just
remove the code for it.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20201209231352.9a323f4a3493.Ic7aee4dbbf4be42287c338c2fa1b111473724116@changeid
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
We keep the scan status per UID in scan_uid_status field when the
iwl_mvm_build_scan_cmd() function is called. If we error out after
this, e.g. due to FW restart being in progress, we're not cleaning
up properly, and can run into warnings later.
Clean up internal variables when starting fails after calling the
iwl_mvm_build_scan_cmd() function.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20201209231352.970421a2f753.Id62b2da8a0ccccbb114407db82ca485d07749d39@changeid
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
We're currently doing accounting on the queue sync with an
atomic variable that counts down the number of remaining
notifications that we still need.
As we've been hitting issues in this area, modify this to
track a bitmap of queues, not just the number of queues,
and print out the remaining bitmap in the warning.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20201209231352.0a3fa177cd6b.I7c69ff999419368266279ec27dd618eb450908b3@changeid
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
