IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
Now that ttm_resource_manager just returns a generic ttm_resource we
don't need to reference the mm_node stuff anymore which mostly only
makes sense for drm_mm_node. In the next few patches we want switch over
to the ttm_buddy_man which is just another type of ttm_resource so
reflect that in the naming.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210616152501.394518-5-matthew.auld@intel.com
Currently we just ignore the I915_BO_ALLOC_CONTIGUOUS flag, which is
fine since everything is already contiguous with the ttm range manager.
However in the next patch we want to switch over to the ttm buddy
manager, where allocations are by default not contiguous.
v2(Thomas):
- Forward ALLOC_CONTIG for all regions
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210616152501.394518-4-matthew.auld@intel.com
Instead of relying on a static placement, calculate at get_pages() time.
This should work for LMEM regions and system for now. For stolen we need
to take preallocated range into account. That will if needed be added
later.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210616152501.394518-3-matthew.auld@intel.com
Use the ttm handlers for servicing page faults, and vm_access.
We do our own validation of read-only access, otherwise use the
ttm handlers as much as possible.
Because the ttm handlers expect the vma_node at vma->base, we slightly
need to massage the mmap handlers to look at vma_node->driver_private
to fetch the bo, if it's NULL, we assume i915's normal mmap_offset uapi
is used.
This is the easiest way to achieve compatibility without changing ttm's
semantics.
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210610070152.572423-5-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com
Most logical place to introduce TTM buffer objects is as an i915
gem object backend. We need to add some ops to account for added
functionality like delayed delete and LRU list manipulation.
Initially we support only LMEM and SYSTEM memory, but SYSTEM
(which in this case means evicted LMEM objects) is not
visible to i915 GEM yet. The plan is to move the i915 gem system region
over to the TTM system memory type in upcoming patches.
We set up GPU bindings directly both from LMEM and from the system region,
as there is no need to use the legacy TTM_TT memory type. We reserve
that for future porting of GGTT bindings to TTM.
Remove the old lmem backend.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210610070152.572423-2-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com
