2410 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Paul E. McKenney
343640cb5b rcu: Mark __rcu_irq_enter_check_tick() ->rcu_urgent_qs load
The rcu_request_urgent_qs_task() function does a cross-CPU store
to ->rcu_urgent_qs, so this commit therefore marks the load in
__rcu_irq_enter_check_tick() with READ_ONCE().

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
2023-08-16 14:27:41 -07:00
Paul E. McKenney
bc19e86e28 rcutorture: Stop right-shifting torture_random() return values
Now that torture_random() uses swahw32(), its callers no longer see
not-so-random low-order bits, as these are now swapped up into the upper
16 bits of the torture_random() function's return value.  This commit
therefore removes the right-shifting of torture_random() return values.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2023-08-14 15:01:08 -07:00
Paul E. McKenney
9d0cce2bc3 rcu-tasks: Fix boot-time RCU tasks debug-only deadlock
In kernels built with CONFIG_PROVE_RCU=y (for example, lockdep kernels),
the following sequence of events can occur:

o	rcu_init_tasks_generic() is invoked just before init is spawned.
	It invokes rcu_spawn_tasks_kthread() and friends.

o	rcu_spawn_tasks_kthread() invokes rcu_spawn_tasks_kthread_generic(),
	which uses kthread_run() to create the needed kthread.

o	Control returns to rcu_init_tasks_generic(), which, because this
	is a CONFIG_PROVE_RCU=y kernel, invokes the version of the
	rcu_tasks_initiate_self_tests() function that actually does
	something, including invoking synchronize_rcu_tasks(), which
	in turn invokes synchronize_rcu_tasks_generic().

o	synchronize_rcu_tasks_generic() sees that the ->kthread_ptr is
	still NULL, because the newly spawned kthread has not yet
	started.

o	The new kthread starts, preempting synchronize_rcu_tasks_generic()
	just after its check.  This kthread invokes rcu_tasks_one_gp(),
	which acquires ->tasks_gp_mutex, and, seeing no work, blocks
	in rcuwait_wait_event().  Note that this step requires either
	a preemptible kernel or a fault-injection-style sleep at the
	beginning of mutex_lock().

o	synchronize_rcu_tasks_generic() resumes and invokes rcu_tasks_one_gp().

o	rcu_tasks_one_gp() attempts to acquire ->tasks_gp_mutex, which
	is still held by the newly spawned kthread's rcu_tasks_one_gp()
	function.  Deadlock.

Because the only reason for ->tasks_gp_mutex is to handle pre-kthread
synchronous grace periods, this commit avoids this deadlock by having
rcu_tasks_one_gp() momentarily release ->tasks_gp_mutex while invoking
rcuwait_wait_event().  This allows the call to rcu_tasks_one_gp() from
synchronize_rcu_tasks_generic() proceed.

Note that it is not necessary to release the mutex anywhere else in
rcu_tasks_one_gp() because rcuwait_wait_event() is the only function
that can block indefinitely.

Reported-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Reported-by: Roy Hopkins <rhopkins@suse.de>
Reported-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Roy Hopkins <rhopkins@suse.de>
2023-08-14 14:58:25 -07:00
Paul E. McKenney
cb88f7f51b rcu-tasks: Permit use of debug-objects with RCU Tasks flavors
Currently, cblist_init_generic() holds a raw spinlock when invoking
INIT_WORK().  This fails in kernels built with CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS=y
due to memory allocation being forbidden while holding a raw spinlock.
But the only reason for holding the raw spinlock is to synchronize
with early boot calls to call_rcu_tasks(), call_rcu_tasks_rude, and,
last but not least, call_rcu_tasks_trace().  These calls also invoke
cblist_init_generic() in order to support early boot queueing of
callbacks.

Except that there are no early boot calls to either of these three
functions, and the BPF guys confirm that they have no plans to add any
such calls.

This commit therefore removes the synchronization and adds a
WARN_ON_ONCE() to catch the case of now-prohibited early boot RCU Tasks
callback queueing.

If early boot queueing is needed, an "initialized" flag may be added to
the rcu_tasks structure.  Then queueing a callback before this flag is set
would initialize the callback list (if needed) and queue the callback.
The decision as to where to queue the callback given the possibility of
non-zero boot CPUs is left as an exercise for the reader.

Reported-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2023-07-31 16:06:57 -07:00
Jiri Slaby
bcb48185ed tty: sysrq: switch sysrq handlers from int to u8
The passed parameter to sysrq handlers is a key (a character). So change
the type from 'int' to 'u8'. Let it specifically be 'u8' for two
reasons:
* unsigned: unsigned values come from the upper layers (devices) and the
  tty layer assumes unsigned on most places, and
* 8-bit: as that what's supposed to be one day in all the layers built
  on the top of tty. (Currently, we use mostly 'unsigned char' and
  somewhere still only 'char'. (But that also translates to the former
  thanks to -funsigned-char.))

Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby (SUSE) <jirislaby@kernel.org>
Cc: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Cc: Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru>
Cc: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>
Cc: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>
Cc: WANG Xuerui <kernel@xen0n.name>
Cc: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@windriver.com>
Cc: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
Cc: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Cc: Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@quicinc.com>
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Cc: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>
Cc: Zqiang <qiang.zhang1211@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de> # DRM
Acked-by: WANG Xuerui <git@xen0n.name> # loongarch
Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230712081811.29004-3-jirislaby@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-07-25 19:21:03 +02:00
Paul E. McKenney
c924bf5a43 rcu: Clarify rcu_is_watching() kernel-doc comment
Make it clear that this function always returns either true or false
without other planned failure modes.

Reported-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
2023-07-19 13:21:28 -07:00
Paul E. McKenney
9cafe974cf rcutorture: Dump grace-period state upon rtort_pipe_count incidents
The rtort_pipe_count WARN() indicates that grace periods were unable
to invoke all callbacks during a stutter_wait() interval.  But it is
sometimes helpful to have a bit more information as to why.  This commit
therefore invokes show_rcu_gp_kthreads() immediately before that WARN()
in order to dump out some relevant information.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2023-07-14 15:04:09 -07:00
Zqiang
e60c122a16 rcuscale: Move rcu_scale_writer() schedule_timeout_uninterruptible() to _idle()
The rcuscale.holdoff module parameter can be used to delay the start
of rcu_scale_writer() kthread.  However, the hung-task timeout will
trigger when the timeout specified by rcuscale.holdoff is greater than
hung_task_timeout_secs:

runqemu kvm nographic slirp qemuparams="-smp 4 -m 2048M"
bootparams="rcuscale.shutdown=0 rcuscale.holdoff=300"

[  247.071753] INFO: task rcu_scale_write:59 blocked for more than 122 seconds.
[  247.072529]       Not tainted 6.4.0-rc1-00134-gb9ed6de8d4ff #7
[  247.073400] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
[  247.074331] task:rcu_scale_write state:D stack:30144 pid:59    ppid:2      flags:0x00004000
[  247.075346] Call Trace:
[  247.075660]  <TASK>
[  247.075965]  __schedule+0x635/0x1280
[  247.076448]  ? __pfx___schedule+0x10/0x10
[  247.076967]  ? schedule_timeout+0x2dc/0x4d0
[  247.077471]  ? __pfx_lock_release+0x10/0x10
[  247.078018]  ? enqueue_timer+0xe2/0x220
[  247.078522]  schedule+0x84/0x120
[  247.078957]  schedule_timeout+0x2e1/0x4d0
[  247.079447]  ? __pfx_schedule_timeout+0x10/0x10
[  247.080032]  ? __pfx_rcu_scale_writer+0x10/0x10
[  247.080591]  ? __pfx_process_timeout+0x10/0x10
[  247.081163]  ? __pfx_sched_set_fifo_low+0x10/0x10
[  247.081760]  ? __pfx_rcu_scale_writer+0x10/0x10
[  247.082287]  rcu_scale_writer+0x6b1/0x7f0
[  247.082773]  ? mark_held_locks+0x29/0xa0
[  247.083252]  ? __pfx_rcu_scale_writer+0x10/0x10
[  247.083865]  ? __pfx_rcu_scale_writer+0x10/0x10
[  247.084412]  kthread+0x179/0x1c0
[  247.084759]  ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
[  247.085098]  ret_from_fork+0x2c/0x50
[  247.085433]  </TASK>

This commit therefore replaces schedule_timeout_uninterruptible() with
schedule_timeout_idle().

Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang.zhang1211@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2023-07-14 15:01:49 -07:00
Arnd Bergmann
e0a34641eb rcuscale: fix building with RCU_TINY
Both the CONFIG_TASKS_RCU and CONFIG_TASKS_RUDE_RCU options
are broken when RCU_TINY is enabled as well, as some functions
are missing a declaration.

In file included from kernel/rcu/update.c:649:
kernel/rcu/tasks.h:1271:21: error: no previous prototype for 'get_rcu_tasks_rude_gp_kthread' [-Werror=missing-prototypes]
 1271 | struct task_struct *get_rcu_tasks_rude_gp_kthread(void)
      |                     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
kernel/rcu/rcuscale.c:330:27: error: 'get_rcu_tasks_rude_gp_kthread' undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean 'get_rcu_tasks_trace_gp_kthread'?
  330 |         .rso_gp_kthread = get_rcu_tasks_rude_gp_kthread,
      |                           ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      |                           get_rcu_tasks_trace_gp_kthread

In file included from /home/arnd/arm-soc/kernel/rcu/update.c:649:
kernel/rcu/tasks.h:1113:21: error: no previous prototype for 'get_rcu_tasks_gp_kthread' [-Werror=missing-prototypes]
 1113 | struct task_struct *get_rcu_tasks_gp_kthread(void)
      |                     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Also, building with CONFIG_TASKS_RUDE_RCU but not CONFIG_TASKS_RCU is
broken because of some missing stub functions:

kernel/rcu/rcuscale.c:322:27: error: 'tasks_scale_read_lock' undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean 'srcu_scale_read_lock'?
  322 |         .readlock       = tasks_scale_read_lock,
      |                           ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      |                           srcu_scale_read_lock
kernel/rcu/rcuscale.c:323:27: error: 'tasks_scale_read_unlock' undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean 'srcu_scale_read_unlock'?
  323 |         .readunlock     = tasks_scale_read_unlock,
      |                           ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      |                           srcu_scale_read_unlock

Move the declarations outside of the RCU_TINY #ifdef and duplicate the
shared stub functions to address all of the above.

Fixes: 88d7ff818f0ce ("rcuscale: Add RCU Tasks Rude testing")
Fixes: 755f1c5eb416b ("rcuscale: Measure RCU Tasks Trace grace-period kthread CPU time")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2023-07-14 15:01:49 -07:00
Paul E. McKenney
a15ec57cfc rcuscale: Add RCU Tasks Rude testing
Add a "tasks-rude" option to the rcuscale.scale_type module parameter.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2023-07-14 15:01:49 -07:00
Paul E. McKenney
271a8467a5 rcuscale: Measure RCU Tasks Trace grace-period kthread CPU time
This commit causes RCU Tasks Trace to output the CPU time consumed by
its grace-period kthread.  The CPU time is whatever is in the designated
task's current->stime field, and thus is controlled by whatever CPU-time
accounting scheme is in effect.

This output appears in microseconds as follows on the console:

rcu_scale: Grace-period kthread CPU time: 42367.037

[ paulmck: Apply Willy Tarreau feedback. ]

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2023-07-14 15:01:49 -07:00
Paul E. McKenney
5f8e320269 rcuscale: Measure grace-period kthread CPU time
This commit adds the ability to output the CPU time consumed by the
grace-period kthread for the RCU variant under test.  The CPU time is
whatever is in the designated task's current->stime field, and thus is
controlled by whatever CPU-time accounting scheme is in effect.

This output appears in microseconds as follows on the console:

rcu_scale: Grace-period kthread CPU time: 42367.037

[ paulmck: Apply feedback from Stephen Rothwell and kernel test robot. ]

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Yujie Liu <yujie.liu@intel.com>
2023-07-14 15:01:49 -07:00
Paul E. McKenney
bb7bad3dae rcuscale: Print out full set of kfree_rcu parameters
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com>
2023-07-14 15:01:49 -07:00
Paul E. McKenney
c68465dfaa rcuscale: Print out full set of module parameters
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2023-07-14 15:01:49 -07:00
Paul E. McKenney
7221f493c5 rcuscale: Add minruntime module parameter
By default, rcuscale collects only 100 points of data per writer, but
arranging for all kthreads to be actively collecting (if not recording)
data during the time that any kthread might be recording.  This works
well, but does not allow much time to bring external performance tools
to bear.  This commit therefore adds a minruntime module parameter
that specifies a minimum data-collection interval in seconds.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2023-07-14 15:01:49 -07:00
Paul E. McKenney
ee7516a163 rcuscale: Fix gp_async_max typo: s/reader/writer/
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2023-07-14 15:01:49 -07:00
Paul E. McKenney
2226f3dc05 rcuscale: Permit blocking delays between writers
Some workloads do isolated RCU work, and this can affect operation
latencies.  This commit therefore adds a writer_holdoff_jiffies module
parameter that causes writers to block for the specified number of
jiffies between each pair of consecutive write-side operations.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2023-07-14 15:01:48 -07:00
Paul E. McKenney
b5a2801fc0 refscale: Add a "jiffies" test
This commit adds a "jiffies" test to refscale, allowing use of jiffies
to be compared to ktime_get_real_fast_ns().  On my x86 laptop, jiffies
is more than 20x faster.  (Though for many uses, the tens-of-nanoseconds
overhead of ktime_get_real_fast_ns() will be just fine.)

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2023-07-14 15:01:04 -07:00
Waiman Long
f5063e8948 refscale: Fix uninitalized use of wait_queue_head_t
Running the refscale test occasionally crashes the kernel with the
following error:

[ 8569.952896] BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffffffffffffffe8
[ 8569.952900] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
[ 8569.952902] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
[ 8569.952904] PGD c4b048067 P4D c4b049067 PUD c4b04b067 PMD 0
[ 8569.952910] Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT_RT SMP NOPTI
[ 8569.952916] Hardware name: Dell Inc. PowerEdge R750/0WMWCR, BIOS 1.2.4 05/28/2021
[ 8569.952917] RIP: 0010:prepare_to_wait_event+0x101/0x190
  :
[ 8569.952940] Call Trace:
[ 8569.952941]  <TASK>
[ 8569.952944]  ref_scale_reader+0x380/0x4a0 [refscale]
[ 8569.952959]  kthread+0x10e/0x130
[ 8569.952966]  ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
[ 8569.952973]  </TASK>

The likely cause is that init_waitqueue_head() is called after the call to
the torture_create_kthread() function that creates the ref_scale_reader
kthread.  Although this init_waitqueue_head() call will very likely
complete before this kthread is created and starts running, it is
possible that the calling kthread will be delayed between the calls to
torture_create_kthread() and init_waitqueue_head().  In this case, the
new kthread will use the waitqueue head before it is properly initialized,
which is not good for the kernel's health and well-being.

The above crash happened here:

	static inline void __add_wait_queue(...)
	{
		:
		if (!(wq->flags & WQ_FLAG_PRIORITY)) <=== Crash here

The offset of flags from list_head entry in wait_queue_entry is
-0x18. If reader_tasks[i].wq.head.next is NULL as allocated reader_task
structure is zero initialized, the instruction will try to access address
0xffffffffffffffe8, which is exactly the fault address listed above.

This commit therefore invokes init_waitqueue_head() before creating
the kthread.

Fixes: 653ed64b01dc ("refperf: Add a test to measure performance of read-side synchronization")
Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Qiuxu Zhuo <qiuxu.zhuo@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Acked-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2023-07-14 15:01:04 -07:00
Paul E. McKenney
db13710a03 rcu-tasks: Cancel callback laziness if too many callbacks
The various RCU Tasks flavors now do lazy grace periods when there are
only asynchronous grace period requests.  By default, the system will let
250 milliseconds elapse after the first call_rcu_tasks*() callbacki is
queued before starting a grace period.  In contrast, synchronous grace
period requests such as synchronize_rcu_tasks*() will start a grace
period immediately.

However, invoking one of the call_rcu_tasks*() functions in a too-tight
loop can result in a callback flood, which in turn can exhaust memory
if grace periods are delayed for too long.

This commit therefore sets a limit so that the grace-period kthread
will be awakened when any CPU's callback list expands to contain
rcupdate.rcu_task_lazy_lim callbacks elements (defaulting to 32, set to -1
to disable), the grace-period kthread will be awakened, thus cancelling
any ongoing laziness and getting out in front of the potential callback
flood.

Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Cc: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2023-07-14 15:00:12 -07:00
Paul E. McKenney
450d461aa6 rcu-tasks: Add kernel boot parameters for callback laziness
This commit adds kernel boot parameters for callback laziness, allowing
the RCU Tasks flavors to be individually adjusted.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2023-07-14 15:00:12 -07:00
Paul E. McKenney
5ae769c611 rcu-tasks: Remove redundant #ifdef CONFIG_TASKS_RCU
The kernel/rcu/tasks.h file has a #endif immediately followed by an

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2023-07-14 15:00:12 -07:00
Paul E. McKenney
d119357d07 rcu-tasks: Treat only synchronous grace periods urgently
The performance requirements on RCU Tasks, and in particular on RCU
Tasks Trace, have evolved over time as the workloads have evolved.
The current implementation is designed to provide low grace-period
latencies, and also to accommodate short-duration floods of callbacks.

However, current workloads can also provide a constant background
callback-queuing rate of a few hundred call_rcu_tasks_trace() invocations
per second.  This results in continuous back-to-back RCU Tasks Trace
grace periods, which in turn can consume the better part of 10% of a CPU.
One could take the attitude that there are several tens of other CPUs on
the systems running such workloads, but energy efficiency is a thing.
On these systems, although asynchronous grace-period requests happen
every few milliseconds, synchronous grace-period requests are quite rare.

This commit therefore arrranges for grace periods to be initiated
immediately in response to calls to synchronize_rcu_tasks*() and
also to calls to synchronize_rcu_mult() that are passed one of the
call_rcu_tasks*() functions.  These are recognized by the tell-tale
wakeme_after_rcu callback function.

In other cases, callbacks are gathered up for up to about 250 milliseconds
before a grace period is initiated.  This results in more than an order of
magnitude reduction in RCU Tasks Trace grace periods, with corresponding
reduction in consumption of CPU time.

Reported-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Reported-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2023-07-14 15:00:11 -07:00
Paul E. McKenney
43a89baecf rcu: Export rcu_request_urgent_qs_task()
If a CPU is executing a long series of non-sleeping system calls,
RCU grace periods can be delayed for on the order of a couple hundred
milliseconds.  This is normally not a problem, but if each system call
does a call_rcu(), those callbacks can stack up.  RCU will eventually
notice this callback storm, but use of rcu_request_urgent_qs_task()
allows the code invoking call_rcu() to give RCU a heads up.

This function is not for general use, not yet, anyway.

Reported-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230706033447.54696-11-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
2023-07-12 23:45:23 +02:00
Paul E. McKenney
2e31da752c Merge branches 'doc.2023.05.10a', 'fixes.2023.05.11a', 'kvfree.2023.05.10a', 'nocb.2023.05.11a', 'rcu-tasks.2023.05.10a', 'torture.2023.05.15a' and 'rcu-urgent.2023.06.06a' into HEAD
doc.2023.05.10a: Documentation updates
fixes.2023.05.11a: Miscellaneous fixes
kvfree.2023.05.10a: kvfree_rcu updates
nocb.2023.05.11a: Callback-offloading updates
rcu-tasks.2023.05.10a: Tasks RCU updates
torture.2023.05.15a: Torture-test updates
rcu-urgent.2023.06.06a: Urgent SRCU fix
2023-06-07 13:44:06 -07:00
Qiuxu Zhuo
23fc8df26d rcu/rcuscale: Stop kfree_scale_thread thread(s) after unloading rcuscale
Running the 'kfree_rcu_test' test case [1] results in a splat [2].
The root cause is the kfree_scale_thread thread(s) continue running
after unloading the rcuscale module.  This commit fixes that isue by
invoking kfree_scale_cleanup() from rcu_scale_cleanup() when removing
the rcuscale module.

[1] modprobe rcuscale kfree_rcu_test=1
    // After some time
    rmmod rcuscale
    rmmod torture

[2] BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffffffffc0601a87
    #PF: supervisor instruction fetch in kernel mode
    #PF: error_code(0x0010) - not-present page
    PGD 11de4f067 P4D 11de4f067 PUD 11de51067 PMD 112f4d067 PTE 0
    Oops: 0010 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI
    CPU: 1 PID: 1798 Comm: kfree_scale_thr Not tainted 6.3.0-rc1-rcu+ #1
    Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015
    RIP: 0010:0xffffffffc0601a87
    Code: Unable to access opcode bytes at 0xffffffffc0601a5d.
    RSP: 0018:ffffb25bc2e57e18 EFLAGS: 00010297
    RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffffffc061f0b6 RCX: 0000000000000000
    RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffffffff962fd0de RDI: ffffffff962fd0de
    RBP: ffffb25bc2e57ea8 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
    R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: 0000000000000000
    R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 000000000000000a R15: 00000000001c1dbe
    FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff921fa2200000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
    CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
    CR2: ffffffffc0601a5d CR3: 000000011de4c006 CR4: 0000000000370ee0
    DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
    DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
    Call Trace:
     <TASK>
     ? kvfree_call_rcu+0xf0/0x3a0
     ? kthread+0xf3/0x120
     ? kthread_complete_and_exit+0x20/0x20
     ? ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
     </TASK>
    Modules linked in: rfkill sunrpc ... [last unloaded: torture]
    CR2: ffffffffc0601a87
    ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---

Fixes: e6e78b004fa7 ("rcuperf: Add kfree_rcu() performance Tests")
Reviewed-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Signed-off-by: Qiuxu Zhuo <qiuxu.zhuo@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2023-05-11 13:48:50 -07:00
Qiuxu Zhuo
bf5ddd7365 rcu/rcuscale: Move rcu_scale_*() after kfree_scale_cleanup()
This code-movement-only commit moves the rcu_scale_cleanup() and
rcu_scale_shutdown() functions to follow kfree_scale_cleanup().
This is code movement is in preparation for a bug-fix patch that invokes
kfree_scale_cleanup() from rcu_scale_cleanup().

Signed-off-by: Qiuxu Zhuo <qiuxu.zhuo@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
2023-05-11 13:48:41 -07:00
Frederic Weisbecker
fbde57d2d2 rcu/nocb: Make shrinker iterate only over NOCB CPUs
Callbacks can only be queued as lazy on NOCB CPUs, therefore iterating
over the NOCB mask is enough for both counting and scanning. Just lock
the mostly uncontended barrier mutex on counting as well in order to
keep rcu_nocb_mask stable.

Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2023-05-11 13:44:50 -07:00
Paul E. McKenney
401b0de3ae rcu-tasks: Stop rcu_tasks_invoke_cbs() from using never-onlined CPUs
The rcu_tasks_invoke_cbs() function relies on queue_work_on() to silently
fall back to WORK_CPU_UNBOUND when the specified CPU is offline.  However,
the queue_work_on() function's silent fallback mechanism relies on that
CPU having been online at some time in the past.  When queue_work_on()
is passed a CPU that has never been online, workqueue lockups ensue,
which can be bad for your kernel's general health and well-being.

This commit therefore checks whether a given CPU has ever been online,
and, if not substitutes WORK_CPU_UNBOUND in the subsequent call to
queue_work_on().  Why not simply omit the queue_work_on() call entirely?
Because this function is flooding callback-invocation notifications
to all CPUs, and must deal with possibilities that include a sparse
cpu_possible_mask.

This commit also moves the setting of the rcu_data structure's
->beenonline field to rcu_cpu_starting(), which executes on the
incoming CPU before that CPU has ever enabled interrupts.  This ensures
that the required workqueues are present.  In addition, because the
incoming CPU has not yet enabled its interrupts, there cannot yet have
been any softirq handlers running on this CPU, which means that the
WARN_ON_ONCE(!rdp->beenonline) within the RCU_SOFTIRQ handler cannot
have triggered yet.

Fixes: d363f833c6d88 ("rcu-tasks: Use workqueues for multiple rcu_tasks_invoke_cbs() invocations")
Reported-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2023-05-11 13:42:39 -07:00
Paul E. McKenney
15d44dfa40 rcu: Make rcu_cpu_starting() rely on interrupts being disabled
Currently, rcu_cpu_starting() is written so that it might be invoked
with interrupts enabled.  However, it is always called when interrupts
are disabled, either by rcu_init(), notify_cpu_starting(), or from a
call point prior to the call to notify_cpu_starting().

But why bother requiring that interrupts be disabled?  The purpose is
to allow the rcu_data structure's ->beenonline flag to be set after all
early processing has completed for the incoming CPU, thus allowing this
flag to be used to determine when workqueues have been set up for the
incoming CPU, while still allowing this flag to be used as a diagnostic
within rcu_core().

This commit therefore makes rcu_cpu_starting() rely on interrupts being
disabled.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2023-05-11 13:42:39 -07:00
Paul E. McKenney
a24c1aab65 rcu: Mark rcu_cpu_kthread() accesses to ->rcu_cpu_has_work
The rcu_data structure's ->rcu_cpu_has_work field can be modified by
any CPU attempting to wake up the rcuc kthread.  Therefore, this commit
marks accesses to this field from the rcu_cpu_kthread() function.

This data race was reported by KCSAN.  Not appropriate for backporting
due to failure being unlikely.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2023-05-11 13:42:39 -07:00
Paul E. McKenney
9146eb2549 rcu: Mark additional concurrent load from ->cpu_no_qs.b.exp
The per-CPU rcu_data structure's ->cpu_no_qs.b.exp field is updated
only on the instance corresponding to the current CPU, but can be read
more widely.  Unmarked accesses are OK from the corresponding CPU, but
only if interrupts are disabled, given that interrupt handlers can and
do modify this field.

Unfortunately, although the load from rcu_preempt_deferred_qs() is always
carried out from the corresponding CPU, interrupts are not necessarily
disabled.  This commit therefore upgrades this load to READ_ONCE.

Similarly, the diagnostic access from synchronize_rcu_expedited_wait()
might run with interrupts disabled and from some other CPU.  This commit
therefore marks this load with data_race().

Finally, the C-language access in rcu_preempt_ctxt_queue() is OK as
is because interrupts are disabled and this load is always from the
corresponding CPU.  This commit adds a comment giving the rationale for
this access being safe.

This data race was reported by KCSAN.  Not appropriate for backporting
due to failure being unlikely.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2023-05-11 13:42:39 -07:00
Paul E. McKenney
f51164a808 rcu: Employ jiffies-based backstop to callback time limit
Currently, if there are more than 100 ready-to-invoke RCU callbacks queued
on a given CPU, the rcu_do_batch() function sets a timeout for invocation
of the series.  This timeout defaulting to three milliseconds, and may
be adjusted using the rcutree.rcu_resched_ns kernel boot parameter.
This timeout is checked using local_clock(), but the overhead of this
function combined with the common-case very small callback-invocation
overhead means that local_clock() is checked every 32nd invocation.

This works well except for longer-than average callbacks.  For example,
a series of 500-microsecond-duration callbacks means that local_clock()
is checked only once every 16 milliseconds, which makes it difficult to
enforce a three-millisecond timeout.

This commit therefore adds a Kconfig option RCU_DOUBLE_CHECK_CB_TIME
that enables backup timeout checking using the coarser grained but
lighter weight jiffies.  If the jiffies counter detects a timeout,
then local_clock() is consulted even if this is not the 32nd callback.
This prevents the aforementioned 16-millisecond latency blow.

Reported-by: Domas Mituzas <dmituzas@meta.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2023-05-11 13:42:39 -07:00
Paul E. McKenney
fea1c1f010 rcu: Check callback-invocation time limit for rcuc kthreads
Currently, a callback-invocation time limit is enforced only for
callbacks invoked from the softirq environment, the rationale being
that when callbacks are instead invoked from rcuc and rcuoc kthreads,
these callbacks cannot be holding up other softirq vectors.

Which is in fact true.  However, if an rcuc kthread spends too much time
invoking callbacks, it can delay quiescent-state reports from its CPU,
which can also be a problem.

This commit therefore applies the callback-invocation time limit to
callback invocation from the rcuc kthreads as well as from softirq.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2023-05-11 13:42:39 -07:00
Zqiang
edff5e9a99 rcu-tasks: Clarify the cblist_init_generic() function's pr_info() output
This commit uses rtp->name instead of __func__ and outputs the value
of rcu_task_cb_adjust, thus reducing console-log output.

Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang1.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2023-05-09 17:27:43 -07:00
Shigeru Yoshida
5fc8cbe4cf rcu-tasks: Avoid pr_info() with spin lock in cblist_init_generic()
pr_info() is called with rtp->cbs_gbl_lock spin lock locked.  Because
pr_info() calls printk() that might sleep, this will result in BUG
like below:

[    0.206455] cblist_init_generic: Setting adjustable number of callback queues.
[    0.206463]
[    0.206464] =============================
[    0.206464] [ BUG: Invalid wait context ]
[    0.206465] 5.19.0-00428-g9de1f9c8ca51 #5 Not tainted
[    0.206466] -----------------------------
[    0.206466] swapper/0/1 is trying to lock:
[    0.206467] ffffffffa0167a58 (&port_lock_key){....}-{3:3}, at: serial8250_console_write+0x327/0x4a0
[    0.206473] other info that might help us debug this:
[    0.206473] context-{5:5}
[    0.206474] 3 locks held by swapper/0/1:
[    0.206474]  #0: ffffffff9eb597e0 (rcu_tasks.cbs_gbl_lock){....}-{2:2}, at: cblist_init_generic.constprop.0+0x14/0x1f0
[    0.206478]  #1: ffffffff9eb579c0 (console_lock){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: _printk+0x63/0x7e
[    0.206482]  #2: ffffffff9ea77780 (console_owner){....}-{0:0}, at: console_emit_next_record.constprop.0+0x111/0x330
[    0.206485] stack backtrace:
[    0.206486] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.19.0-00428-g9de1f9c8ca51 #5
[    0.206488] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.0-1.fc36 04/01/2014
[    0.206489] Call Trace:
[    0.206490]  <TASK>
[    0.206491]  dump_stack_lvl+0x6a/0x9f
[    0.206493]  __lock_acquire.cold+0x2d7/0x2fe
[    0.206496]  ? stack_trace_save+0x46/0x70
[    0.206497]  lock_acquire+0xd1/0x2f0
[    0.206499]  ? serial8250_console_write+0x327/0x4a0
[    0.206500]  ? __lock_acquire+0x5c7/0x2720
[    0.206502]  _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x3d/0x90
[    0.206504]  ? serial8250_console_write+0x327/0x4a0
[    0.206506]  serial8250_console_write+0x327/0x4a0
[    0.206508]  console_emit_next_record.constprop.0+0x180/0x330
[    0.206511]  console_unlock+0xf7/0x1f0
[    0.206512]  vprintk_emit+0xf7/0x330
[    0.206514]  _printk+0x63/0x7e
[    0.206516]  cblist_init_generic.constprop.0.cold+0x24/0x32
[    0.206518]  rcu_init_tasks_generic+0x5/0xd9
[    0.206522]  kernel_init_freeable+0x15b/0x2a2
[    0.206523]  ? rest_init+0x160/0x160
[    0.206526]  kernel_init+0x11/0x120
[    0.206527]  ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
[    0.206530]  </TASK>
[    0.207018] cblist_init_generic: Setting shift to 1 and lim to 1.

This patch moves pr_info() so that it is called without
rtp->cbs_gbl_lock locked.

Signed-off-by: Shigeru Yoshida <syoshida@redhat.com>
Tested-by: "Zhang, Qiang1" <qiang1.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2023-05-09 17:27:42 -07:00
Frederic Weisbecker
b96a8b0b5b rcu/nocb: Recheck lazy callbacks under the ->nocb_lock from shrinker
The ->lazy_len is only checked locklessly. Recheck again under the
->nocb_lock to avoid spending more time on flushing/waking if not
necessary. The ->lazy_len can still increment concurrently (from 1 to
infinity) but under the ->nocb_lock we at least know for sure if there
are lazy callbacks at all (->lazy_len > 0).

Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2023-05-09 17:26:59 -07:00
Frederic Weisbecker
7625926086 rcu/nocb: Fix shrinker race against callback enqueuer
The shrinker resets the lazy callbacks counter in order to trigger the
pending lazy queue flush though the rcuog kthread. The counter reset is
protected by the ->nocb_lock against concurrent accesses...except
for one of them. Here is a list of existing synchronized readers/writer:

1) The first lazy enqueuer (incrementing ->lazy_len to 1) does so under
   ->nocb_lock and ->nocb_bypass_lock.

2) The further lazy enqueuers (incrementing ->lazy_len above 1) do so
   under ->nocb_bypass_lock _only_.

3) The lazy flush checks and resets to 0 under ->nocb_lock and
	->nocb_bypass_lock.

The shrinker protects its ->lazy_len reset against cases 1) and 3) but
not against 2). As such, setting ->lazy_len to 0 under the ->nocb_lock
may be cancelled right away by an overwrite from an enqueuer, leading
rcuog to ignore the flush.

To avoid that, use the proper bypass flush API which takes care of all
those details.

Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2023-05-09 17:26:58 -07:00
Frederic Weisbecker
5c83cedbaa rcu/nocb: Protect lazy shrinker against concurrent (de-)offloading
The shrinker may run concurrently with callbacks (de-)offloading. As
such, calling rcu_nocb_lock() is very dangerous because it does a
conditional locking. The worst outcome is that rcu_nocb_lock() doesn't
lock but rcu_nocb_unlock() eventually unlocks, or the reverse, creating
an imbalance.

Fix this with protecting against (de-)offloading using the barrier mutex.
Although if the barrier mutex is contended, which should be rare, then
step aside so as not to trigger a mutex VS allocation
dependency chain.

Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2023-05-09 17:26:58 -07:00
Zqiang
6b706e5603 rcu/kvfree: Make drain_page_cache() take early return if cache is disabled
If the rcutree.rcu_min_cached_objs kernel boot parameter is set to zero,
then krcp->page_cache_work will never be triggered to fill page cache.
In addition, the put_cached_bnode() will not fill page cache.  As a
result krcp->bkvcache will always be empty, so there is no need to acquire
krcp->lock to get page from krcp->bkvcache.  This commit therefore makes
drain_page_cache() return immediately if the rcu_min_cached_objs is zero.

Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang1.zhang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2023-05-09 17:26:21 -07:00
Zqiang
60888b77a0 rcu/kvfree: Make fill page cache start from krcp->nr_bkv_objs
When the fill_page_cache_func() function is invoked, it assumes that
the cache of pages is completely empty.  However, there can be some time
between triggering execution of this function and its actual invocation.
During this time, kfree_rcu_work() might run, and might fill in part or
all of this cache of pages, thus invalidating the fill_page_cache_func()
function's assumption.

This will not overfill the cache because put_cached_bnode() will reject
the extra page.  However, it will result in a needless allocation and
freeing of one extra page, which might not be helpful under lowish-memory
conditions.

This commit therefore causes the fill_page_cache_func() to explicitly
account for pages that have been placed into the cache shortly before
it starts running.

Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang1.zhang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2023-05-09 17:26:21 -07:00
Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
021a5ff847 rcu/kvfree: Do not run a page work if a cache is disabled
By default the cache size is 5 pages per CPU, but it can be disabled at
boot time by setting the rcu_min_cached_objs to zero.  When that happens,
the current code will uselessly set an hrtimer to schedule refilling this
cache with zero pages.  This commit therefore streamlines this process
by simply refusing the set the hrtimer when rcu_min_cached_objs is zero.

Signed-off-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2023-05-09 17:26:21 -07:00
Zqiang
309a431650 rcu/kvfree: Use consistent krcp when growing kfree_rcu() page cache
The add_ptr_to_bulk_krc_lock() function is invoked to allocate a new
kfree_rcu() page, also known as a kvfree_rcu_bulk_data structure.
The kfree_rcu_cpu structure's lock is used to protect this operation,
except that this lock must be momentarily dropped when allocating memory.
It is clearly important that the lock that is reacquired be the same
lock that was acquired initially via krc_this_cpu_lock().

Unfortunately, this same krc_this_cpu_lock() function is used to
re-acquire this lock, and if the task migrated to some other CPU during
the memory allocation, this will result in the kvfree_rcu_bulk_data
structure being added to the wrong CPU's kfree_rcu_cpu structure.

This commit therefore replaces that second call to krc_this_cpu_lock()
with raw_spin_lock_irqsave() in order to explicitly acquire the lock on
the correct kfree_rcu_cpu structure, thus keeping things straight even
when the task migrates.

Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang1.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2023-05-09 17:26:21 -07:00
Zqiang
1e237994d9 rcu/kvfree: Invoke debug_rcu_bhead_unqueue() after checking bnode->gp_snap
If kvfree_rcu_bulk() sees that the required grace period has failed to
elapse, it leaks the memory because readers might still be using it.
But in that case, the debug-objects subsystem still marks the relevant
structures as having been freed, even though they are instead being
leaked.

This commit fixes this mismatch by invoking debug_rcu_bhead_unqueue()
only when we are actually going to free the objects.

Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang1.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2023-05-09 17:26:21 -07:00
Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
f32276a376 rcu/kvfree: Add debug check for GP complete for kfree_rcu_cpu list
Under low-memory conditions, kvfree_rcu() will use each object's
rcu_head structure to queue objects in a singly linked list headed by
the kfree_rcu_cpu structure's ->head field.  This list is passed to
call_rcu() as a unit, but there is no indication of which grace period
this list needs to wait for.  This in turn prevents adding debug checks
in the kfree_rcu_work() as was done for the two page-of-pointers channels
in the kfree_rcu_cpu structure.

This commit therefore adds a ->head_free_gp_snap field to the
kfree_rcu_cpu_work structure to record this grace-period number.  It also
adds a WARN_ON_ONCE() to kfree_rcu_monitor() that checks to make sure
that the required grace period has in fact elapsed.

[ paulmck: Fix kerneldoc issue raised by Stephen Rothwell. ]

Signed-off-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2023-05-09 17:26:21 -07:00
Paul E. McKenney
cdfa0f6fa6 rcu/kvfree: Add debug to check grace periods
This commit adds debugging checks to verify that the required RCU
grace period has elapsed for each kvfree_rcu_bulk_data structure that
arrives at the kvfree_rcu_bulk() function.  These checks make use
of that structure's ->gp_snap field, which has been upgraded from an
unsigned long to an rcu_gp_oldstate structure.  This upgrade reduces
the chances of false positives to nearly zero, even on 32-bit systems,
for which this structure carries 64 bits of state.

Cc: Ziwei Dai <ziwei.dai@unisoc.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2023-05-09 17:26:21 -07:00
Linus Torvalds
5dfb75e842 RCU Changes for 6.4:
o  MAINTAINERS files additions and changes.
  o  Fix hotplug warning in nohz code.
  o  Tick dependency changes by Zqiang.
  o  Lazy-RCU shrinker fixes by Zqiang.
  o  rcu-tasks stall reporting improvements by Neeraj.
  o  Initial changes for renaming of k[v]free_rcu() to its new k[v]free_rcu_mightsleep()
     name for robustness.
  o  Documentation Updates:
  o  Significant changes to srcu_struct size.
  o  Deadlock detection for srcu_read_lock() vs synchronize_srcu() from Boqun.
  o  rcutorture and rcu-related tool, which are targeted for v6.4 from Boqun's tree.
  o  Other misc changes.
 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
 
 iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEcoCIrlGe4gjE06JJqA4nf2o45hAFAmQuBnIACgkQqA4nf2o4
 5hACVRAAoXu7/gfh5Pjw9O4E4pCdPJKsZZVYrcrVGrq6NAxRn6M1SgurAdC5grj2
 96x0waoGaiO82V0H5iJMcKdAVu67x9R8WaQ1JoxN75Efn8h9W4TguB87TV1gk0xS
 eZ18b/CyEaM5mNb80DFFF4FLohy5737p/kNTMqXQdUyR1BsDl16iRMgjiBiFhNUx
 yPo8Y2kC2U2OTbldZgaE7s9bQO3xxEcifx93sGWsAex/gx54FYNisiwSlCOSgOE+
 XkYo/OKk8Xvr82tLVX8XQVEPCMJ+rxea8T5zSs8/alvsPq7gA8wW3y6fsoa3vUU/
 +Gd+W+Q/OsONIDtp8rQAY1qsD0ScDpaR8052RSH0zTa7pj8HsQgE5PjZ+cJW0SEi
 cKN+Oe8+ETqKald+xZ6PDf58O212VLrru3RpQWrOQcJ7fmKmfT4REK0RcbLgg4qT
 CBgOo6eg+ub4pxq2y11LZJBNTv1/S7xAEzFE0kArew64KB2gyVud0VJRZVAJnEfe
 93QQVDFrwK2bhgWQZ6J6IbTvGeQW0L93IibuaU6jhZPR283VtUIIvM7vrOylN7Fq
 4jsae0T7YGYfKUhgTpm7rCnm8A/D3Ni8MY0sKYYgDSyKmZUsnpI5wpx1xke4lwwV
 ErrY46RCFa+k8wscc6iWfB4cGXyyFHyu+wtyg0KpFn5JAzcfz4A=
 =Rgbj
 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Merge tag 'rcu.6.4.april5.2023.3' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jfern/linux

Pull RCU updates from Joel Fernandes:

 - Updates and additions to MAINTAINERS files, with Boqun being added to
   the RCU entry and Zqiang being added as an RCU reviewer.

   I have also transitioned from reviewer to maintainer; however, Paul
   will be taking over sending RCU pull-requests for the next merge
   window.

 - Resolution of hotplug warning in nohz code, achieved by fixing
   cpu_is_hotpluggable() through interaction with the nohz subsystem.

   Tick dependency modifications by Zqiang, focusing on fixing usage of
   the TICK_DEP_BIT_RCU_EXP bitmask.

 - Avoid needless calls to the rcu-lazy shrinker for CONFIG_RCU_LAZY=n
   kernels, fixed by Zqiang.

 - Improvements to rcu-tasks stall reporting by Neeraj.

 - Initial renaming of k[v]free_rcu() to k[v]free_rcu_mightsleep() for
   increased robustness, affecting several components like mac802154,
   drbd, vmw_vmci, tracing, and more.

   A report by Eric Dumazet showed that the API could be unknowingly
   used in an atomic context, so we'd rather make sure they know what
   they're asking for by being explicit:

      https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221202052847.2623997-1-edumazet@google.com/

 - Documentation updates, including corrections to spelling,
   clarifications in comments, and improvements to the srcu_size_state
   comments.

 - Better srcu_struct cache locality for readers, by adjusting the size
   of srcu_struct in support of SRCU usage by Christoph Hellwig.

 - Teach lockdep to detect deadlocks between srcu_read_lock() vs
   synchronize_srcu() contributed by Boqun.

   Previously lockdep could not detect such deadlocks, now it can.

 - Integration of rcutorture and rcu-related tools, targeted for v6.4
   from Boqun's tree, featuring new SRCU deadlock scenarios, test_nmis
   module parameter, and more

 - Miscellaneous changes, various code cleanups and comment improvements

* tag 'rcu.6.4.april5.2023.3' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jfern/linux: (71 commits)
  checkpatch: Error out if deprecated RCU API used
  mac802154: Rename kfree_rcu() to kvfree_rcu_mightsleep()
  rcuscale: Rename kfree_rcu() to kfree_rcu_mightsleep()
  ext4/super: Rename kfree_rcu() to kfree_rcu_mightsleep()
  net/mlx5: Rename kfree_rcu() to kfree_rcu_mightsleep()
  net/sysctl: Rename kvfree_rcu() to kvfree_rcu_mightsleep()
  lib/test_vmalloc.c: Rename kvfree_rcu() to kvfree_rcu_mightsleep()
  tracing: Rename kvfree_rcu() to kvfree_rcu_mightsleep()
  misc: vmw_vmci: Rename kvfree_rcu() to kvfree_rcu_mightsleep()
  drbd: Rename kvfree_rcu() to kvfree_rcu_mightsleep()
  rcu: Protect rcu_print_task_exp_stall() ->exp_tasks access
  rcu: Avoid stack overflow due to __rcu_irq_enter_check_tick() being kprobe-ed
  rcu-tasks: Report stalls during synchronize_srcu() in rcu_tasks_postscan()
  rcu: Permit start_poll_synchronize_rcu_expedited() to be invoked early
  rcu: Remove never-set needwake assignment from rcu_report_qs_rdp()
  rcu: Register rcu-lazy shrinker only for CONFIG_RCU_LAZY=y kernels
  rcu: Fix missing TICK_DEP_MASK_RCU_EXP dependency check
  rcu: Fix set/clear TICK_DEP_BIT_RCU_EXP bitmask race
  rcu/trace: use strscpy() to instead of strncpy()
  tick/nohz: Fix cpu_is_hotpluggable() by checking with nohz subsystem
  ...
2023-04-24 12:16:14 -07:00
Ziwei Dai
5da7cb193d rcu/kvfree: Avoid freeing new kfree_rcu() memory after old grace period
Memory passed to kvfree_rcu() that is to be freed is tracked by a
per-CPU kfree_rcu_cpu structure, which in turn contains pointers
to kvfree_rcu_bulk_data structures that contain pointers to memory
that has not yet been handed to RCU, along with an kfree_rcu_cpu_work
structure that tracks the memory that has already been handed to RCU.
These structures track three categories of memory: (1) Memory for
kfree(), (2) Memory for kvfree(), and (3) Memory for both that arrived
during an OOM episode.  The first two categories are tracked in a
cache-friendly manner involving a dynamically allocated page of pointers
(the aforementioned kvfree_rcu_bulk_data structures), while the third
uses a simple (but decidedly cache-unfriendly) linked list through the
rcu_head structures in each block of memory.

On a given CPU, these three categories are handled as a unit, with that
CPU's kfree_rcu_cpu_work structure having one pointer for each of the
three categories.  Clearly, new memory for a given category cannot be
placed in the corresponding kfree_rcu_cpu_work structure until any old
memory has had its grace period elapse and thus has been removed.  And
the kfree_rcu_monitor() function does in fact check for this.

Except that the kfree_rcu_monitor() function checks these pointers one
at a time.  This means that if the previous kfree_rcu() memory passed
to RCU had only category 1 and the current one has only category 2, the
kfree_rcu_monitor() function will send that current category-2 memory
along immediately.  This can result in memory being freed too soon,
that is, out from under unsuspecting RCU readers.

To see this, consider the following sequence of events, in which:

o	Task A on CPU 0 calls rcu_read_lock(), then uses "from_cset",
	then is preempted.

o	CPU 1 calls kfree_rcu(cset, rcu_head) in order to free "from_cset"
	after a later grace period.  Except that "from_cset" is freed
	right after the previous grace period ended, so that "from_cset"
	is immediately freed.  Task A resumes and references "from_cset"'s
	member, after which nothing good happens.

In full detail:

CPU 0					CPU 1
----------------------			----------------------
count_memcg_event_mm()
|rcu_read_lock()  <---
|mem_cgroup_from_task()
 |// css_set_ptr is the "from_cset" mentioned on CPU 1
 |css_set_ptr = rcu_dereference((task)->cgroups)
 |// Hard irq comes, current task is scheduled out.

					cgroup_attach_task()
					|cgroup_migrate()
					|cgroup_migrate_execute()
					|css_set_move_task(task, from_cset, to_cset, true)
					|cgroup_move_task(task, to_cset)
					|rcu_assign_pointer(.., to_cset)
					|...
					|cgroup_migrate_finish()
					|put_css_set_locked(from_cset)
					|from_cset->refcount return 0
					|kfree_rcu(cset, rcu_head) // free from_cset after new gp
					|add_ptr_to_bulk_krc_lock()
					|schedule_delayed_work(&krcp->monitor_work, ..)

					kfree_rcu_monitor()
					|krcp->bulk_head[0]'s work attached to krwp->bulk_head_free[]
					|queue_rcu_work(system_wq, &krwp->rcu_work)
					|if rwork->rcu.work is not in WORK_STRUCT_PENDING_BIT state,
					|call_rcu(&rwork->rcu, rcu_work_rcufn) <--- request new gp

					// There is a perious call_rcu(.., rcu_work_rcufn)
					// gp end, rcu_work_rcufn() is called.
					rcu_work_rcufn()
					|__queue_work(.., rwork->wq, &rwork->work);

					|kfree_rcu_work()
					|krwp->bulk_head_free[0] bulk is freed before new gp end!!!
					|The "from_cset" is freed before new gp end.

// the task resumes some time later.
 |css_set_ptr->subsys[(subsys_id) <--- Caused kernel crash, because css_set_ptr is freed.

This commit therefore causes kfree_rcu_monitor() to refrain from moving
kfree_rcu() memory to the kfree_rcu_cpu_work structure until the RCU
grace period has completed for all three categories.

v2: Use helper function instead of inserted code block at kfree_rcu_monitor().

Fixes: 34c881745549 ("rcu: Support kfree_bulk() interface in kfree_rcu()")
Fixes: 5f3c8d620447 ("rcu/tree: Maintain separate array for vmalloc ptrs")
Reported-by: Mukesh Ojha <quic_mojha@quicinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Ziwei Dai <ziwei.dai@unisoc.com>
Reviewed-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2023-04-06 10:04:23 -07:00
Joel Fernandes (Google)
8ae9985774 Merge branches 'rcu/staging-core', 'rcu/staging-docs' and 'rcu/staging-kfree', remote-tracking branches 'paul/srcu-cf.2023.04.04a', 'fbq/rcu/lockdep.2023.03.27a' and 'fbq/rcu/rcutorture.2023.03.20a' into rcu/staging 2023-04-05 13:50:37 +00:00
Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
936c7e19c6 rcuscale: Rename kfree_rcu() to kfree_rcu_mightsleep()
The kfree_rcu() and kvfree_rcu() macros' single-argument forms are
deprecated.  Therefore switch to the new kfree_rcu_mightsleep() and
kvfree_rcu_mightsleep() variants. The goal is to avoid accidental use
of the single-argument forms, which can introduce functionality bugs in
atomic contexts and latency bugs in non-atomic contexts.

Acked-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Signed-off-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
2023-04-05 13:48:04 +00:00