IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
Instead of hand-rolling the same three calls in each function, pull them
into an i915_gem_object_create_user helper. Apart from re-ordering of
the placements array ENOMEM check, there should be no functional change.
v2 (Matthew Auld):
- Add the call to i915_gem_flush_free_objects() from
i915_gem_dumb_create() in a separate patch
- Move i915_gem_object_alloc() below the simple error checks
v3 (Matthew Auld):
- Add __ to i915_gem_object_create_user and kerneldoc which warns the
caller that it's not validating anything.
Signed-off-by: Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210723172142.3273510-5-jason@jlekstrand.net
Since we don't allow changing the set of regions after creation, we can
make ext_set_placements() build up the region set directly in the
create_ext and assign it to the object later. This is similar to what
we did for contexts with the proto-context only simpler because there's
no funny object shuffling. This will be used in the next patch to allow
us to de-duplicate a bunch of code. Also, since we know the maximum
number of regions up-front, we can use a fixed-size temporary array for
the regions. This simplifies memory management a bit for this new
delayed approach.
v2 (Matthew Auld):
- Get rid of MAX_N_PLACEMENTS
- Drop kfree(placements) from set_placements()
v3 (Matthew Auld):
- Properly set ext_data->n_placements
Signed-off-by: Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210723172142.3273510-3-jason@jlekstrand.net
For some specialised objects we might need something larger than the
regions min_page_size due to some hw restriction, and slightly more
hairy is needing something smaller with the guarantee that such objects
will never be inserted into any GTT, which is the case for the paging
structures.
This also fixes how we setup the BO page_alignment, if we later migrate
the object somewhere else. For example if the placements are {SMEM,
LMEM}, then we might get this wrong. Pushing the min_page_size behaviour
into the manager should fix this.
v2(Thomas): push the default page size behaviour into buddy_man, and let
the user override it with the page-alignment, which looks cleaner
v3: rebase on ttm sys changes
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210625103824.558481-1-matthew.auld@intel.com
Most logical place to introduce TTM buffer objects is as an i915
gem object backend. We need to add some ops to account for added
functionality like delayed delete and LRU list manipulation.
Initially we support only LMEM and SYSTEM memory, but SYSTEM
(which in this case means evicted LMEM objects) is not
visible to i915 GEM yet. The plan is to move the i915 gem system region
over to the TTM system memory type in upcoming patches.
We set up GPU bindings directly both from LMEM and from the system region,
as there is no need to use the legacy TTM_TT memory type. We reserve
that for future porting of GGTT bindings to TTM.
Remove the old lmem backend.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210610070152.572423-2-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com
