IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
The documentation for most of the non-static members and structs were
missing. Fix that.
v2: Fix typos (Durga)
v3: Rebase.
Fix make docs warnings.
Document more.
v4: capitilize CRTC; say that the prepare hook is a nop if the DPLL is
already enabled; link to struct intel_dpll_hw_state from @hw_state
field in struct intel_shared_dpll_state; reorganize DPLL flags; link
intel_shared_dpll_state to other structs and functions. (Daniel)
Signed-off-by: Ander Conselvan de Oliveira <ander.conselvan.de.oliveira@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1483024933-3726-6-git-send-email-ander.conselvan.de.oliveira@intel.com
The function intel_shared_dpll_commit() performs the equivalent of
drm_atomic_helper_swap_state() for the shared dpll state, which is not
handled by the helpers. So make it do a full swap of the state and
rename it for consistency.
v2: Fix typo in the commit message. (Durga)
v3: Rebase.
v4: Swap the states instead of just renaming the function. (Daniel)
Signed-off-by: Ander Conselvan de Oliveira <ander.conselvan.de.oliveira@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Durgadoss R <durgadoss.r@intel.com> (v2)
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> (v3)
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1483024933-3726-3-git-send-email-ander.conselvan.de.oliveira@intel.com
While the details of getting a shared dpll are wrapped by
intel_get_shared_dpll(), the release was still hand rolled into the
modeset code. Fix that by creating an entry point for releasing the
pll and move that code there.
v2: Take old_dpll from crtc->state instead of crtc_state. (CI)
Signed-off-by: Ander Conselvan de Oliveira <ander.conselvan.de.oliveira@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1483024933-3726-2-git-send-email-ander.conselvan.de.oliveira@intel.com
Drivers need to take care. Motivated by a discussion between Mark and
Rob on dri-devel.
Cc: Mark yao <mark.yao@rock-chips.com>
Cc: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
[danvet: s/alloc|freeing/modifications/ per Chris' suggestion.]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1482833457-29592-1-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch
Remove a superfluous helper as drm_mm_insert_node is equivalent to
insert_node_in_range with a range of [0, U64_MAX].
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161222083641.2691-37-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
mm->color_adjust() compares the hole with its neighbouring nodes. They
only abutt before we restrict the hole, so we have to apply color_adjust
before we apply the range restriction.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161222083641.2691-36-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Insulate users from changes to the internal hole tracking within
struct drm_mm_node by using an accessor for hole_follows.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
[danvet: resolve conflicts in i915_vma.c]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Using mm->color_adjust makes the eviction scanner much tricker since we
don't know the actual neighbours of the target hole until after it is
created (after scanning is complete). To work out whether we need to
evict the neighbours because they impact upon the hole, we have to then
check the hole afterwards - requiring an extra step in the user of the
eviction scanner when they apply color_adjust.
v2: Massage kerneldoc.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161222083641.2691-34-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Since we mandate a strict reverse-order of drm_mm_scan_remove_block()
after drm_mm_scan_add_block() we can further simplify the list
manipulations when generating the temporary scan-hole.
v2: Highlight the games being played with the lists to track the scan
holes without allocation.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161222083641.2691-33-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Add an assertion to the plain i915_ggtt_offset() to double check that
any offset we hand to the GuC is outside of its unmappable ranges.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161224193146.4402-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Reviewed-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
For power-of-two alignments, we can avoid the 64bit divide and do a
simple bitwise add instead.
v2: s/alignment_mask/remainder_mask/
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161222083641.2691-32-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Compute the minimal required hole during scan and only evict those nodes
that overlap. This enables us to reduce the number of nodes we need to
evict to the bare minimum.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161222083641.2691-31-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
The range restriction should be applied after the color adjustment, or
else we may inadvertently apply the color adjustment to the restricted
hole (and not against its neighbours).
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161222083641.2691-30-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Doing the check is trivial (low cost in comparison to overall eviction)
and helps simplify the code.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161222083641.2691-29-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Acknowledging that we were building up the hole was more useful to me
when reading the code, than knowing the relationship between this node
and the previous node.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161222083641.2691-28-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Kbuild really doesn't like non-recursive Makefiles, but they do work
as long as you build without O=
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Fixes: 50f0033d1a0f ("drm: Add some kselftests for the DRM range manager (struct drm_mm)")
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1482918077-30027-1-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch
The scan state occupies a large proportion of the struct drm_mm and is
rarely used and only contains temporary state. That makes it suitable to
moving to its struct and onto the stack of the callers.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
[danvet: Fix up etnaviv to compile, was missing a BUG_ON.]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
A simple assert to ensure that we don't overflow start + size when
initialising the drm_mm, or its scanner.
In future, we may want to switch to tracking the value of ranges (rather
than size) so that we can cover the full u64, for example like resource
tracking.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161222083641.2691-26-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Since commit ea7b1dd44867 ("drm: mm: track free areas implicitly"),
to test whether there are any nodes allocated within the range manager,
we merely have to ask whether the node_list is empty.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161222083641.2691-25-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Protect ourselves from a caller passing in node.start + node.size that
will overflow and trick us into reserving that node.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161222083641.2691-24-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
The nodes must be removed in the *reverse* order. This is correct in the
overview, but backwards in the function description. Whilst here add
Intel's copyright statement and tweak some formatting.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161222083641.2691-23-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
In places (e.g. i915.ko), the alignment is exported to userspace as u64
and there now exists hardware for which we can indeed utilize a u64
alignment. As such, we need to keep 64bit integers throughout when
handling alignment.
Testcase: igt/drm_mm/align64
Testcase: igt/gem_exec_alignment
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161222083641.2691-22-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Check that after applying the driver's color adjustment, restricted
eviction scanning finds a suitable hole.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161222083641.2691-20-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Check that after applying the driver's color adjustment, eviction
scanning finds a suitable hole.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161222083641.2691-19-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Check that after applying the driver's color adjustment, fitting of the
node and its alignment are still correct.
v2: s/no_color_touching/separate_adjacent_colors/
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161222083641.2691-18-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Check that if we request top-down allocation from drm_mm_insert_node()
we receive the next available hole from the top.
v2: Flip sign on conditional assert.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161222083641.2691-17-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Check that we add arbitrary blocks to a restrited eviction scanner in
order to find the first minimal hole that matches our request.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161222083641.2691-16-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Check that we add arbitrary blocks to the eviction scanner in order to
find the first minimal hole that matches our request.
v2: Refactor out some common eviction code for later
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161222083641.2691-15-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Check that we can request alignment to any power-of-two or prime using a
plain drm_mm_node_insert(), and also handle a reasonable selection of
primes.
v2: Exercise all allocation flags
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161222083641.2691-14-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Exercise drm_mm_insert_node_in_range(), check that we only allocate from
the specified range.
v2: Use all allocation flags
v3: Don't pass in invalid ranges - these will be asserted later.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161222083641.2691-13-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Reuse drm_mm_insert_node() with a temporary node to exercise
drm_mm_replace_node(). We use the previous test in order to exercise the
various lists following replacement.
v2: Check that we copy across the important (user) details of the node.
The internal details (such as lists and hole tracking) we hope to detect
errors by exercise.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161222083641.2691-12-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Exercise drm_mm_insert_node(), check that we can't overfill a range and
that the lists are correct after reserving/removing.
v2: Extract helpers for the repeated tests
v3: Iterate over all allocation flags
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161222083641.2691-11-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Exercise drm_mm_reserve_node(), check that we can't reserve an already
occupied range and that the lists are correct after reserving/removing.
v2: Check for invalid node reservation.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161222083641.2691-10-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
First we introduce a smattering of infrastructure for writing selftests.
The idea is that we have a test module that exercises a particular
portion of the exported API, and that module provides a set of tests
that can either be run as an ensemble via kselftest or individually via
an igt harness (in this case igt/drm_mm). To accommodate selecting
individual tests, we export a boolean parameter to control selection of
each test - that is hidden inside a bunch of reusable boilerplate macros
to keep writing the tests simple.
v2: Choose a random random_seed unless one is specified by the user.
v3: More parameters to control max_iterations and max_prime of the
tests.
Testcase: igt/drm_mm
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161222083641.2691-7-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
When testing, we want a random but yet reproducible order in which to
process elements. Here we create an array which is a random (using the
Tausworthe PRNG) permutation of the order in which to execute.
Note these are simple helpers intended to be merged upstream in lib/
v2: Tidier code by David Herrmann
v3: Add reminder that this code is intended to be temporary, with at
least the bulk of the prandom changes going to lib/
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161222083641.2691-6-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Fairly commonly we want to inspect the node list on the struct drm_mm,
which is buried within an embedded node. Bring it to the surface with a
bit of syntatic sugar.
Note this was intended to be split from commit ad579002c8ec ("drm: Add
drm_mm_for_each_node_safe()") before being applied, but my timing sucks.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161222083641.2691-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
i915 does not set DRIVER_ATOMIC by default yet but uses atomic_check and
atomic_commit. drm_object_property_get_value() does not read the correct
value of atomic properties if DRIVER_ATOMIC is not set. Checking whether
the driver uses atomic modeset is a better check instead as the property
values are tracked in the state structures.
v2: Included header
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1482396643-32456-2-git-send-email-dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com
This check is useful for drivers that do not have DRIVER_ATOMIC set but
have atomic modesetting internally implemented. Wrap the check into a
function since this is used in many places and as a bonus, the function
name helps to document what the check is for.
v2:
Change return type to bool (Ville)
Move the function drm_atomic.h (Daniel)
Fixed comment marker for documentation
Suggested-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
[danvet: Move back to drmP.h because include hell.]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1482396643-32456-1-git-send-email-dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com
PCI basic config space's size is 256 bytes. When check if access crosses
space range, should use "> 256".
Signed-off-by: Pei Zhang <pei.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>
There's an issue in current cfg space emulation for PCI_COMMAND (offset
0x4): when guest changes some bits other than PCI_COMMAND_MEMORY, this
write operation will not be written to virutal cfg space successfully.
This patch is to fix the wrong behavior above.
Signed-off-by: Min He <min.he@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>
The release action might be triggered from either user's closing
mdev or the detaching event of kvm and vfio_group, so this patch
introduces an atomic to prevent double-release.
Signed-off-by: Jike Song <jike.song@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>
gfn_to_memslot() may return NULL if the gfn is mmio
or invalid. A malicious user might input a bad gfn
to panic the host if we don't check it.
Signed-off-by: Jike Song <jike.song@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>
