IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
On a system configured with multiple transport channels, expose a few
additional debugfs per-channel entries to allow a user to explicitly select
which transport channel to use for the SCMI message injection.
Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230118121426.492864-18-cristian.marussi@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Add a couple of unique identifiers to channel and platform instance
descriptors in order to emit more descriptive message dump traces.
Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230118121426.492864-8-cristian.marussi@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Move SCMI error codes definitions and helper to the common.h header
together with the delayed response timeout define.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230118121426.492864-7-cristian.marussi@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Refactor polling helpers to receive scmi_desc directly as a parameter and
move all of them to common.h.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230118121426.492864-3-cristian.marussi@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Make the SCMI bus on its own as a distinct module initialized at
subsys_initcall level when builtin.
Keep the SCMI driver core stack, together with any configured transport,
in a different module initialized as module_init level.
SCMI drivers initialization remain unchanged at module_init level.
Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221222185049.737625-10-cristian.marussi@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Refactor SCMI device create/destroy helpers: it is now possible to ask
for the creation of all the currently requested devices for a whole
protocol, not only for the creation of a single well-defined device.
While at that, re-instate uniqueness checks on the creation of SCMI
SystemPower devices.
Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221222185049.737625-8-cristian.marussi@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Move protocol device request helpers from driver.c compilation unit to
bus.c, so reducing the cross interactions between driver.c and bus.c.
Get rid of old protocol device creation process as a whole from driver.c
and remove also stale SCMI system power unicity checks.
While at that make such helpers call into scmi_requested_devices_nh
notification chain.
Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221222185049.737625-6-cristian.marussi@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Add a pair of notifier chains and generic empty notifier callbacks.
Currently they are still unused but they will be used to act properly
on device request and creation events.
Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221222185049.737625-5-cristian.marussi@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Move protocol registration helpers and logic out of bus.c compilation
unit into driver.c.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221222185049.737625-4-cristian.marussi@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Refactor channels initialization to use dedicated transport devices
instead of using devices borrowed from the SCMI drivers.
Initialize all channels, as described in the device tree, upfront during
SCMI core stack probe phase and free all of them, including the underlying
devices, when the SCMI core is removed.
Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221222185049.737625-3-cristian.marussi@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
SCMI transport operation .chan_available determines in a transport
specific way if an SCMI channel is still available and to be configured.
Such information is derived by analyzing bits of device node in a
transport specific way, all it needs is a device node to operate up on,
not necessarily a full blown device.
Simplify the helper to receive in input a reference to a device_node
instead of a device carrying a pointer to such device_node.
Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221222185049.737625-2-cristian.marussi@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
SCMI transports based on shared memory, at start of transmissions, have
to wait for the shared Tx channel area to be eventually freed by the
SCMI platform before accessing the channel. In fact the channel is owned
by the SCMI platform until marked as free by the platform itself and,
as such, cannot be used by the agent until relinquished.
As a consequence a badly misbehaving SCMI platform firmware could lock
the channel indefinitely and make the kernel side SCMI stack loop
forever waiting for such channel to be freed, possibly hanging the
whole boot sequence.
Add a timeout to the existent Tx waiting spin-loop so that, when the
system ends up in this situation, the SCMI stack can at least bail-out,
nosily warn the user, and abort the transmission.
Reported-by: YaxiongTian <iambestgod@outlook.com>
Suggested-by: YaxiongTian <iambestgod@outlook.com>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: Etienne Carriere <etienne.carriere@linaro.org>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221028140833.280091-3-cristian.marussi@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Platform drivers .remove callbacks are not supposed to fail and report
errors. Such errors are indeed ignored by the core platform drivers
and the driver unbind process is anyway completed.
The SCMI core platform driver as it is now, instead, bails out reporting
an error in case of an explicit unbind request.
Fix the removal path by adding proper device links between the core SCMI
device and the SCMI protocol devices so that a full SCMI stack unbind is
triggered when the core driver is removed. The remove process does not
bail out anymore on the anomalous conditions triggered by an explicit
unbind but the user is still warned.
Reported-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221028140833.280091-1-cristian.marussi@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Move some SCMI protocol specific definitions from common.h into a the new
dedicated protocols.h header so that SCMI protocols core code can include
only what it needs; this is going to be useful to avoid the risk of growing
indefinitely the dimension of common.h, especially when introducing some
common protocols helper functions.
Header common.h will continue to be included by SCMI core and transport
layers.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220330150551.2573938-10-cristian.marussi@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Move away from a statically allocated array for holding the current set of
protocols implemented by the platform in favour of allocating it
dynamically based on the number of protocols effectively advertised by the
platform via BASE protocol exchanges.
While at that, rectify the BASE_DISCOVER_LIST_PROTOCOLS loop iterations to
terminate only when a number of protocols equal to the advertised ones has
been received, instead of looping till the platform returns no more
protocols descriptors. This new behaviour is better compliant with the
specification and it has been tested to work equally well against an SCMI
stack running on top of an official SCP firmware on a JUNO board.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220330150551.2573938-6-cristian.marussi@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Add a new xfer parameter to mark_txdone transport operation which enables
the SCMI core to optionally pass back into the transport layer a reference
to the xfer descriptor that is being handled.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211220195646.44498-9-cristian.marussi@arm.com
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
An SCMI transport can be configured as .atomic_enabled in order to signal
to the SCMI core that all its TX path is executed in atomic context and
that, when requested, polling mode should be used while waiting for command
responses.
When a specific platform configuration had properly configured such a
transport as .atomic_enabled, the SCMI core will also take care not to
sleep in the corresponding RX path while waiting for a response if that
specific command transaction was requested as atomic using polling mode.
Asynchronous commands should not be used in an atomic context and so a
warning is emitted if polling was requested for an asynchronous command.
Add also a method to check, from the SCMI drivers, if the underlying SCMI
transport is currently configured to support atomic transactions: this will
be used by upper layers to determine if atomic requests can be supported at
all on this SCMI instance.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211220195646.44498-7-cristian.marussi@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Add a flag to let the transport signal to the core if its handling of sync
command implies that, after .send_message has returned successfully, the
requested command can be assumed to be fully and completely executed on
SCMI platform side so that any possible response value is already
immediately available to be retrieved by a .fetch_response: in other words
the polling phase can be skipped in such a case and the response values
accessed straight away.
Note that all of the above applies only when polling mode of operation was
selected by the core: if instead a completion IRQ was found to be available
the normal response processing path based on completions will still be
followed.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211220195646.44498-4-cristian.marussi@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
SCMI communications along TX channels can optionally be provided of a
completion interrupt; when such interrupt is not available, command
transactions should rely on polling, where the SCMI core takes care to
repeatedly evaluate the transport-specific .poll_done() function, if
available, to determine if and when a request was fully completed or
timed out.
Such mechanism is already present and working on a single transfer base:
SCMI protocols can indeed enable hdr.poll_completion on specific commands
ahead of each transfer and cause that transaction to be handled with
polling.
Introduce a couple of flags to be able to enforce such polling behaviour
globally at will:
- scmi_desc.force_polling: to statically switch the whole transport to
polling mode.
- scmi_chan_info.no_completion_irq: to switch a single channel dynamically
to polling mode if, at runtime, is determined that no completion
interrupt was available for such channel.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211220195646.44498-2-cristian.marussi@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Add a new transport channel to the SCMI firmware interface driver for
SCMI message exchange based on optee transport channel. The optee
transport is realized by connecting and invoking OP-TEE SCMI service
interface PTA.
Optee transport support (CONFIG_ARM_SCMI_TRANSPORT_OPTEE) is default
enabled when optee driver (CONFIG_OPTEE) is enabled. Effective optee
transport is setup upon OP-TEE SCMI service discovery at optee
device initialization. For this SCMI UUID is registered to the optee
bus for probing. This is done from the link_supplier operator of the
SCMI optee transport.
The optee transport can use a statically defined shared memory in
which case SCMI device tree node defines it using an "arm,scmi-shmem"
compatible phandle through property shmem. Alternatively, optee transport
allocates the shared memory buffer from the optee driver when no shmem
property is defined.
The protocol used to exchange SCMI message over that shared memory is
negotiated between optee transport driver and the OP-TEE service through
capabilities exchange.
OP-TEE SCMI service is integrated in OP-TEE since its release tag 3.13.0.
The service interface is published in [1].
Link: [1] https://github.com/OP-TEE/optee_os/blob/3.13.0/lib/libutee/include/pta_scmi_client.h
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211028140009.23331-2-etienne.carriere@linaro.org
Cc: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Etienne Carriere <etienne.carriere@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
This transport enables communications with an SCMI platform through virtio;
the SCMI platform will be represented by a virtio device.
Implement an SCMI virtio driver according to the virtio SCMI device spec
[1]. Virtio device id 32 has been reserved for the SCMI device [2].
The virtio transport has one Tx channel (virtio cmdq, A2P channel) and
at most one Rx channel (virtio eventq, P2A channel).
The following feature bit defined in [1] is not implemented:
VIRTIO_SCMI_F_SHARED_MEMORY.
The number of messages which can be pending simultaneously is restricted
according to the virtqueue capacity negotiated at probing time.
As soon as Rx channel message buffers are allocated or have been read
out by the arm-scmi driver, feed them back to the virtio device.
Since some virtio devices may not have the short response time exhibited
by SCMI platforms using other transports, set a generous response
timeout.
SCMI polling mode is not supported by this virtio transport since deemed
meaningless: polling mode operation is offered by the SCMI core to those
transports that could not provide a completion interrupt on the TX path,
which is never the case for virtio whose core callbacks can easily call
into core scmi_rx_callback upon messages reception.
[1] https://github.com/oasis-tcs/virtio-spec/blob/master/virtio-scmi.tex
[2] https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/ballot.php?id=3496
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210803131024.40280-16-cristian.marussi@arm.com
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Co-developed-by: Peter Hilber <peter.hilber@opensynergy.com>
Co-developed-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Igor Skalkin <igor.skalkin@opensynergy.com>
[ Peter: Adapted patch for submission to upstream. ]
Signed-off-by: Peter Hilber <peter.hilber@opensynergy.com>
[ Cristian: simplified driver logic, changed link_supplier and channel
available/setup logic, removed dummy callbacks ]
Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Add a new opaque void *priv parameter to scmi_rx_callback which can be
optionally provided by the transport layer when invoking scmi_rx_callback
and that will be passed back to the transport layer in xfer->priv.
This can be used by transports that needs to keep track of their specific
data structures together with the valid xfers.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210803131024.40280-15-cristian.marussi@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Some transports are also effectively registered with other kernel subsystem
in order to be properly probed and initialized; as a consequence such kind
of transports, and their related devices, might still not have been probed
and initialized at the time the main SCMI core driver is probed.
Add an optional .link_supplier() transport operation which can be used by
the core SCMI stack to dynamically check if the transport is ready and
dynamically link its device to the SCMI platform instance device.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210803131024.40280-13-cristian.marussi@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Hilber <peter.hilber@opensynergy.com>
[ Cristian: reworded commit message ]
Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Add abstractions for future transports using message passing, such as
virtio. Derive the abstractions from the shared memory abstractions.
Abstract the transport SDU through the opaque struct scmi_msg_payld.
Also enable the transport to determine all other required information
about the transport SDU.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210803131024.40280-12-cristian.marussi@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Hilber <peter.hilber@opensynergy.com>
[ Cristian: Adapted to new SCMI Kconfig layout, updated Copyrights ]
Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
The maximum number of simultaneously pending messages is a transport
specific quantity that is usually described statically in struct scmi_desc.
Some transports, though, can calculate such number only at run-time after
some initial transport specific setup and probing is completed; moreover
the resulting max message numbers could also be different between rx and
tx channels.
Add an optional get_max_msg() operation so that a transport can report more
accurate max message numbers for each channel type.
The value in scmi_desc.max_msg is still used as default when transport does
not provide any get_max_msg() method.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210803131024.40280-11-cristian.marussi@arm.com
Co-developed-by: Peter Hilber <peter.hilber@opensynergy.com>
Co-developed-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Igor Skalkin <igor.skalkin@opensynergy.com>
[ Peter: Adapted patch for submission to upstream. ]
Signed-off-by: Peter Hilber <peter.hilber@opensynergy.com>
[ Cristian: refactored how get_max_msg() is used to minimize core changes ]
Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Add configuration options to be able to select which SCMI transports have
to be compiled into the SCMI stack.
Mailbox and SMC are by default enabled if their related dependencies are
satisfied.
While doing that move all SCMI related config options in their own
dedicated submenu.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210803131024.40280-9-cristian.marussi@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Even though in case of asynchronous commands an SCMI platform is
constrained to emit the delayed response message only after the related
message response has been sent, the configured underlying transport could
still deliver such messages together or in inverted order, causing races
due to the concurrent or out-of-order access to the underlying xfer.
Introduce a mechanism to grant exclusive access to an xfer in order to
properly serialize concurrent accesses to the same xfer originating from
multiple correlated messages.
Add additional state information to xfer descriptors so as to be able to
identify out-of-order message deliveries and act accordingly:
- when a delayed response is expected but delivered before the related
response, the synchronous response is considered as successfully
received and the delayed response processing is carried on as usual.
- when/if the missing synchronous response is subsequently received, it
is discarded as not congruent with the current state of the xfer, or
simply, because the xfer has been already released and so, now, the
monotonically increasing sequence number carried by the late response
is stale.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210803131024.40280-6-cristian.marussi@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Tokens are sequence numbers embedded in the each SCMI message header: they
are used to correlate commands with responses (and delayed responses), but
their usage and policy of selection is entirely up to the caller (usually
the OSPM agent), while they are completely opaque to the callee (i.e. SCMI
platform) which merely copies them back from the command into the response
message header.
This also means that the platform does not, can not and should not enforce
any kind of policy on received messages depending on the contained sequence
number: platform can perfectly handle concurrent requests carrying the same
identifiying token if that should happen.
Moreover the platform is not required to produce in-order responses to
agent requests, the only constraint in these regards is that in case of
an asynchronous message the delayed response must be sent after the
immediate response for the synchronous part of the command transaction.
Currenly the SCMI stack of the OSPM agent selects a token for the egressing
commands picking the lowest possible number which is not already in use by
an existing in-flight transaction, which means, in other words, that we
immediately reuse any token after its transaction has completed or it has
timed out: this policy indeed does simplify management and lookup of tokens
and associated xfers.
Under the above assumptions and constraints, since there is really no state
shared between the agent and the platform to let the platform know when a
token and its associated message has timed out, the current policy of early
reuse of tokens can easily lead to the situation in which a spurious or
late received response (or delayed_response), related to an old stale and
timed out transaction, can be wrongly associated to a newer valid in-flight
xfer that just happens to have reused the same token.
This misbehaviour on such late/spurious responses is more easily exposed on
those transports that naturally have an higher level of parallelism in
processing multiple concurrent in-flight messages.
This commit introduces a new policy of selection of tokens for the OSPM
agent: each new command transfer now gets the next available, monotonically
increasing token, until tokens are exhausted and the counter rolls over.
Such new policy mitigates the above issues with late/spurious responses
since the tokens are now reused as late as possible (when they roll back
ideally) and so it is much easier to identify such late/spurious responses
to stale timed out transactions: this also helps in simplifying the
specific transports implementation since stale transport messages can be
easily identified and discarded early on in the rx path without the need
to cross check their actual state with the core transport layer.
This mitigation is even more effective when, as is usually the case, the
maximum number of pending messages is capped by the platform to a much
lower number than the whole possible range of tokens values (2^10).
This internal policy change in the core SCMI transport layer is fully
transparent to the specific transports so it has not and should not have
any impact on the transports implementation.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210803131024.40280-5-cristian.marussi@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Some SCMI transport could need to perform some transport specific setup
before they can be used by the SCMI core transport layer: typically this
early setup consists in registering with some other kernel subsystem.
Add the optional capability for a transport to provide a couple of init
and exit functions that are assured to be called early during the SCMI
core initialization phase, well before the SCMI core probing step.
[ Peter: Adapted RFC patch by Cristian for submission to upstream. ]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210803131024.40280-4-cristian.marussi@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Hilber <peter.hilber@opensynergy.com>
[ Cristian: Fixed scmi_transports_exit point of invocation ]
Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
ARM_SCMI_PROTOCOL depends on either MAILBOX or HAVE_ARM_SMCCC_DISCOVERY,
not MAILBOX alone. Fix the depedency in Kconfig file and driver to
reflect the same.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210521134055.24271-1-etienne.carriere@linaro.org
Reviewed-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Etienne Carriere <etienne.carriere@linaro.org>
[sudeep.holla: Minor tweaks to subject and change log]
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Having added the support for SCMI protocols as modules in order to let
vendors extend the SCMI core with their own additions it seems odd to
then force SCMI drivers built on top to use a static device table to
declare their devices since this way any new SCMI drivers addition
would need the core SCMI device table to be updated too.
Remove the static core device table and let SCMI drivers to simply declare
which device/protocol pair they need at initialization time: the core will
then take care to generate such devices dynamically during platform
initialization or at module loading time, as long as the requested
underlying protocol is defined in the devicetree.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210316124903.35011-39-cristian.marussi@arm.com
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Extend SCMI protocols accounting mechanism to address possible module
usage and add the support to possibly define new protocols as loadable
modules.
Keep the standard protocols built into the SCMI core.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210316124903.35011-38-cristian.marussi@arm.com
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Notification private data is currently accessible via handle->notify_priv,
this data was indeed meant to be private to the notification core support
and not to be accessible by SCMI drivers. Make it private hiding it
inside instance descriptor struct scmi_info and accessible only via
dedicated helpers.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210316124903.35011-36-cristian.marussi@arm.com
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Remove unused core scmi_xfer wrappers now that we have migrated all
protocols to the new interface based on protocol handles.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210316124903.35011-34-cristian.marussi@arm.com
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Now that all protocols and drivers have been ported to the new interface
based on protocol handles and get/put operations, remove all the legacy
transient initialization code.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210316124903.35011-33-cristian.marussi@arm.com
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Now that all the protocol private variable data have been moved out of
struct scmi_handle, mark all of its references as const.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210316124903.35011-32-cristian.marussi@arm.com
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Port the SCMI base protocol to new protocol handles based interface.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210316124903.35011-11-cristian.marussi@arm.com
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Add an helper to access from a protocol handle, the SCMI version data
which is exposed on sysfs. Such helper will be needed by SCMI base
protocol initialization once it will be moved to new protocol handles
scheme.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210316124903.35011-10-cristian.marussi@arm.com
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Add new core SCMI transfer operations based on protocol handles to
enable protocols to builds and send their own protocol specific messages.
Keep old original scmi_xfer_ operations interface as wrappers around the
new interface in order to let coexist old and new interfaces to ease
protocol by protocol migration.
In order to support such migration the above wrappers and some
additional transient code is also introduced in this commit. It will be
later removed as a whole once the full migration of protocols and SCMI
drivers will have been completed.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210316124903.35011-9-cristian.marussi@arm.com
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Add a new refactored protocol events registration helper and invoke it
from the centralized initialization process triggered by get_ops() and
friends.
Also add a `get_num_sources` as a new optional callback amongst protocol
events operations. Finally remove events registration call-sites from
within the legacy protocol init routines.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210316124903.35011-7-cristian.marussi@arm.com
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Add basic protocol handles definitions and private data helpers.
A protocol handle identifies a protocol instance initialized against a
specific handle, it embeds all the references to the core SCMI transfer
methods that will be needed by a protocol implementation to build and
send its own protocol specific messages using common core methods.
As such, in the interface, a protocol handle will be passed down from
the core to the protocol specific initialization callback at init time.
Anyways, at this point only definitions are introduced, all protocols
initialization code and SCMI drivers probing is still based on the old
interface, so no functional change.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210316124903.35011-3-cristian.marussi@arm.com
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Extend common protocol registration routines and provide some new generic
protocols get/put helpers that can track protocols usage and automatically
perform the proper initialization and de-initialization on demand when
required.
Convert all standard protocols to use this new registration scheme while
keeping them all still using the usual initialization logic bound to SCMI
devices probing.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210316124903.35011-2-cristian.marussi@arm.com
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
SCMI v3.0 introduces voltage domain protocol which provides commands to:
- Discover the voltage levels supported by a domain
- Get the configuration and voltage level of a domain
- Set the configuration and voltage level of a domain
Let us add support for the same.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201119191051.46363-2-cristian.marussi@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Few commands provide the list of description partially and require
to be called consecutively until all the descriptors are fetched
completely. In such cases, we don't release the buffers and reuse
them for consecutive transmits.
However, currently we don't reset the Rx size which will be set as
per the response for the last transmit. This may result in incorrect
response size being interpretted as the firmware may repond with size
greater than the one set but we read only upto the size set by previous
response.
Let us reset the receive buffer size to max possible in such cases as
we don't know the exact size of the response.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201012141746.32575-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com
Fixes: b6f20ff8bd94 ("firmware: arm_scmi: add common infrastructure and support for base protocol")
Reported-by: Etienne Carriere <etienne.carriere@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
In preparation to enable building SCMI as a single module, let us move
the SCMI protocol registration call into the driver. This enables us
to also add unregistration of the SCMI protocols.
The main reason for this is to keep it simple instead of maintaining
it as separate modules and dealing with all possible initcall races
and deferred probe handling. We can move it as separate modules if
needed in future.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200907195046.56615-4-sudeep.holla@arm.com
Tested-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
In preparation to enable building scmi as a single module, let us move
the scmi bus {de-,}initialisation call into the driver.
The main reason for this is to keep it simple instead of maintaining
it as separate modules and dealing with all possible initcall races
and deferred probe handling. We can move it as separate modules if
needed in future.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200907195046.56615-3-sudeep.holla@arm.com
Tested-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
