IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
Normally, we do reapply microcode on resume. However, in the cases where
that microcode comes from the early loader and the late loader hasn't
been utilized yet, there's no easy way for us to go and apply the patch
applied during boot by the early loader.
Thus, reuse the patch stashed by the early loader for the BSP.
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Hand down the cpu number instead, otherwise lockdep screams when doing
echo 1 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/microcode/reload.
BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: amd64-microcode/2470
caller is debug_smp_processor_id+0x12/0x20
CPU: 1 PID: 2470 Comm: amd64-microcode Not tainted 3.18.0-rc6+ #26
...
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1417428741-4501-1-git-send-email-bp@alien8.de
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Save the patch while we're running on the BSP instead of later, before
the initrd has been jettisoned. More importantly, on 32-bit we need to
access the physical address instead of the virtual.
This way we actually do find it on the APs instead of having to go
through the initrd each time.
Tested-by: Richard Hendershot <rshendershot@mchsi.com>
Fixes: 5335ba5cf475 ("x86, microcode, AMD: Fix early ucode loading")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.13+
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Konrad triggered the following splat below in a 32-bit guest on an AMD
box. As it turns out, in save_microcode_in_initrd_amd() we're using the
*physical* address of the container *after* we have enabled paging and
thus we #PF in load_microcode_amd() when trying to access the microcode
container in the ramdisk range.
Because the ramdisk is exactly there:
[ 0.000000] RAMDISK: [mem 0x35e04000-0x36ef9fff]
and we fault at 0x35e04304.
And since this guest doesn't relocate the ramdisk, we don't do the
computation which will give us the correct virtual address and we end up
with the PA.
So, we should actually be using virtual addresses on 32-bit too by the
time we're freeing the initrd. Do that then!
Unpacking initramfs...
BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 35d4e304
IP: [<c042e905>] load_microcode_amd+0x25/0x4a0
*pde = 00000000
Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP
Modules linked in:
CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 3.17.1-302.fc21.i686 #1
Hardware name: Xen HVM domU, BIOS 4.4.1 10/01/2014
task: f5098000 ti: f50d0000 task.ti: f50d0000
EIP: 0060:[<c042e905>] EFLAGS: 00010246 CPU: 0
EIP is at load_microcode_amd+0x25/0x4a0
EAX: 00000000 EBX: f6e9ec4c ECX: 00001ec4 EDX: 00000000
ESI: f5d4e000 EDI: 35d4e2fc EBP: f50d1ed0 ESP: f50d1e94
DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 00e0 SS: 0068
CR0: 8005003b CR2: 35d4e304 CR3: 00e33000 CR4: 000406d0
Stack:
00000000 00000000 f50d1ebc f50d1ec4 f5d4e000 c0d7735a f50d1ed0 15a3d17f
f50d1ec4 00600f20 00001ec4 bfb83203 f6e9ec4c f5d4e000 c0d7735a f50d1ed8
c0d80861 f50d1ee0 c0d80429 f50d1ef0 c0d889a9 f5d4e000 c0000000 f50d1f04
Call Trace:
? unpack_to_rootfs
? unpack_to_rootfs
save_microcode_in_initrd_amd
save_microcode_in_initrd
free_initrd_mem
populate_rootfs
? unpack_to_rootfs
do_one_initcall
? unpack_to_rootfs
? repair_env_string
? proc_mkdir
kernel_init_freeable
kernel_init
ret_from_kernel_thread
? rest_init
Reported-and-tested-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
References: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1158204
Fixes: 75a1ba5b2c52 ("x86, microcode, AMD: Unify valid container checks")
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.14+
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20141101100100.GA4462@pd.tnic
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
For additional coverage, BorisO and friends unknowlingly did swap AMD
microcode with Intel microcode blobs in order to see what happens. What
did happen on 32-bit was
[ 5.722656] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at be3a6008
[ 5.722693] IP: [<c106d6b4>] load_microcode_amd+0x24/0x3f0
[ 5.722716] *pdpt = 0000000000000000 *pde = 0000000000000000
because there was a valid initrd there but without valid microcode in it
and the container check happened *after* the relocated ramdisk handling
on 32-bit, which was clearly wrong.
While at it, take care of the ramdisk relocation on both 32- and 64-bit
as it is done on both. Also, comment what we're doing because this code
is a bit tricky.
Reported-and-tested-by: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1391460104-7261-1-git-send-email-bp@alien8.de
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
We've grown a bunch of microcode loader files all prefixed with
"microcode_". They should be under cpu/ because this is strictly
CPU-related functionality so do that and drop the prefix since they're
in their own directory now which gives that prefix. :)
While at it, drop MICROCODE_INTEL_LIB config item and stash the
functionality under CONFIG_MICROCODE_INTEL as it was its only user.
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Tested-by: Aravind Gopalakrishnan <Aravind.Gopalakrishnan@amd.com>
