6 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Boris Ostrovsky
da63865a01 x86, microcode: Return error from driver init code when loader is disabled
Commits 65cef1311d5d ("x86, microcode: Add a disable chicken bit") and
a18a0f6850d4 ("x86, microcode: Don't initialize microcode code on
paravirt") allow microcode driver skip initialization when microcode
loading is not permitted.

However, they don't prevent the driver from being loaded since the
init code returns 0. If at some point later the driver gets unloaded
this will result in an oops while trying to deregister the (never
registered) device.

To avoid this, make init code return an error on paravirt or when
microcode loading is disabled. The driver will then never be loaded.

Signed-off-by: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1422411669-25147-1-git-send-email-boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com
Reported-by: James Digwall <james@dingwall.me.uk>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 3.18
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
2015-01-28 09:23:40 +01:00
Borislav Petkov
fbae4ba8c4 x86, microcode: Reload microcode on resume
Normally, we do reapply microcode on resume. However, in the cases where
that microcode comes from the early loader and the late loader hasn't
been utilized yet, there's no easy way for us to go and apply the patch
applied during boot by the early loader.

Thus, reuse the patch stashed by the early loader for the BSP.

Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
2014-12-06 13:03:03 +01:00
Boris Ostrovsky
a18a0f6850 x86, microcode: Don't initialize microcode code on paravirt
Paravirtual guests are not expected to load microcode into processors
and therefore it is not necessary to initialize microcode loading
logic.

In fact, under certain circumstances initializing this logic may cause
the guest to crash. Specifically, 32-bit kernels use __pa_nodebug()
macro which does not work in Xen (the code path that leads to this macro
happens during resume when we call mc_bp_resume()->load_ucode_ap()
->check_loader_disabled_ap())

Signed-off-by: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1417469264-31470-1-git-send-email-boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
2014-12-06 12:59:03 +01:00
Borislav Petkov
fb86b97300 x86, microcode: Update BSPs microcode on resume
In the situation when we apply early microcode but do *not* apply late
microcode, we fail to update the BSP's microcode on resume because we
haven't initialized the uci->mc microcode pointer. So, in order to
alleviate that, we go and dig out the stashed microcode patch during
early boot. It is basically the same thing that is done on the APs early
during boot so do that too here.

Tested-by: alex.schnaidt@gmail.com
Fixes: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=88001
Cc: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.9
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20141118094657.GA6635@pd.tnic
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2014-11-18 18:32:24 +01:00
Borislav Petkov
65cef1311d x86, microcode: Add a disable chicken bit
Add a cmdline param which disables the microcode loader. This is useful
mostly in debugging situations where we want to turn off microcode
loading, both early from the initrd and late, as a means to be able to
rule out its influence on the machine.

Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1400525957-11525-3-git-send-email-bp@alien8.de
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
2014-05-20 20:21:27 -07:00
Borislav Petkov
bad5fa631f x86, microcode: Move to a proper location
We've grown a bunch of microcode loader files all prefixed with
"microcode_". They should be under cpu/ because this is strictly
CPU-related functionality so do that and drop the prefix since they're
in their own directory now which gives that prefix. :)

While at it, drop MICROCODE_INTEL_LIB config item and stash the
functionality under CONFIG_MICROCODE_INTEL as it was its only user.

Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Tested-by: Aravind Gopalakrishnan <Aravind.Gopalakrishnan@amd.com>
2014-01-13 20:00:12 +01:00