IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
The SDM630 and SDM660 both use RPM (not RPMh) for managing the PM660 and
PM660L. The SDM670 uses RPMh to manage them as PMIC 4s. To support the
SDM670, add the PM660 and PM660L to the RPMh regulator driver.
Link: 58064f13c0%5E%21/#F0
Link: f676d3d24f%5E%21/#F3
Signed-off-by: Richard Acayan <mailingradian@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220920223331.150635-3-mailingradian@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Merge series from AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>:
In an effort to give some love to the apparently forgotten MT6795 SoC,
I am upstreaming more components that are necessary to support platforms
powered by this one apart from a simple boot to serial console.
This series adds support for the regulators found in MT6331 and MT6332
main/companion PMICs.
Adding support to each driver in each subsystem is done in different
patch series as to avoid spamming uninteresting patches to maintainers.
Tested on a MT6795 Sony Xperia M5 (codename "Holly") smartphone.
The .bypass_val_on setting does not match the .bypass_mask setting, so the
.bypass_mask bit will never get set. Fix it by removing .bypass_val_on
setting, the regulator_set_bypass_regmap and regulator_get_bypass_regmap
helpers will use rdev->desc->bypass_mask as val_on if the val_on is 0.
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@ingics.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220828120153.1512508-1-axel.lin@ingics.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
On recent kernels, the PM8058 L16 (or any other PM8058 LDO-regulator)
does not come up if they are supplied by an SMPS-regulator. This
is not very strange since the regulators are registered in a long
array and the L-regulators are registered before the S-regulators,
and if an L-regulator defers, it will never get around to registering
the S-regulator that it needs.
See arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8060-dragonboard.dts:
pm8058-regulators {
(...)
vdd_l13_l16-supply = <&pm8058_s4>;
(...)
Ooops.
Fix this by moving the PM8058 S-regulators first in the array.
Do the same for the PM8901 S-regulators (though this is currently
not causing any problems with out device trees) so that the pattern
of registration order is the same on all PMnnnn chips.
Fixes: 087a1b5cdd55 ("regulator: qcom: Rework to single platform device")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>
Cc: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@somainline.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220909112529.239143-1-linus.walleij@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
By using a ratio of delay to poll_enabled_time that is not integer
time_remaining underflows and does not exit the loop as expected.
As delay could be derived from DT and poll_enabled_time is defined
in the driver this can easily happen.
Use a signed iterator to make sure that the loop exits once
the remaining time is negative.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Rudolph <patrick.rudolph@9elements.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220909125954.577669-1-patrick.rudolph@9elements.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
I would like to stop exporting OF-specific devm_gpiod_get_from_of_node()
so that gpiolib can be cleaned a bit, so let's switch to the generic
fwnode property API.
While at it switch the rest of the calls to read properties in
bd957x_probe() to the generic device property API as well.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220903-gpiod_get_from_of_node-remove-v1-9-b29adfb27a6c@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
I would like to stop exporting OF-specific devm_gpiod_get_from_of_node()
so that gpiolib can be cleaned a bit, so let's switch to the generic
fwnode property API.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220903-gpiod_get_from_of_node-remove-v1-8-b29adfb27a6c@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
In "regulator: core: Resolve supply name earlier to prevent
double-init", we introduced a bug that prevented the regulator names
from registering properly with sysfs.
Reorder regulator_register such that supply names are properly resolved
and registered.
Fixes: 8a866d527ac0 ("regulator: core: Resolve supply name earlier to prevent double-init")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/58b92e75-f373-dae7-7031-8abd465bb874@samsung.com/
Signed-off-by: Christian Kohlschütter <christian@kohlschutter.com>
Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220829165543.24856-1-christian@kohlschutter.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Apparently the device trees of some boards have the property
"regulator-allow-set-load" for some of their regulators but then they
don't specify anything for "regulator-allowed-modes". That's not
really legit, but...
...before commit efb0cb50c427 ("regulator: qcom-rpmh: Implement
get_optimum_mode(), not set_load()") they used to get away with it, at
least on boards using RPMH regulators. That's because when a regulator
driver implements set_load() then the core doesn't look at
"regulator-allowed-modes" when trying to automatically adjust things
in response to the regulator's load. The core doesn't know what mode
we'll end up in, so how could it validate it?
Said another way: before commit efb0cb50c427 ("regulator: qcom-rpmh:
Implement get_optimum_mode(), not set_load()") some boards _were_
having the regulator mode adjusted despite listing no allowed
modes. After commit efb0cb50c427 ("regulator: qcom-rpmh: Implement
get_optimum_mode(), not set_load()") these same boards were now
getting an error returned when trying to use their regulators, since
simply enabling a regulator tries to update its load and that was
failing.
We don't really want to go back to the behavior from before commit
efb0cb50c427 ("regulator: qcom-rpmh: Implement get_optimum_mode(), not
set_load()"). Boards shouldn't have been changing modes if no allowed
modes were listed. However, the behavior after commit efb0cb50c427
("regulator: qcom-rpmh: Implement get_optimum_mode(), not set_load()")
isn't the best because now boards can't even turn their regulators on.
Let's choose to detect this case and return "no error" from
drms_uA_update(). The net-result will be _different_ behavior than we
had before commit efb0cb50c427 ("regulator: qcom-rpmh: Implement
get_optimum_mode(), not set_load()"), but this new behavior seems more
correct. If a board truly needed the mode switched then its device
tree should be updated to list the allowed modes.
Reported-by: Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@redhat.com>
Fixes: efb0cb50c427 ("regulator: qcom-rpmh: Implement get_optimum_mode(), not set_load()")
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220824142229.RFT.v2.2.I6f77860e5cd98bf5c67208fa9edda4a08847c304@changeid
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
The get_optimum_mode() for regulator drivers is passed the input
voltage and output voltage as well as the current. This is because, in
theory, the optimum mode can depend on all three things.
It turns out that for all regulator drivers in mainline only the
current is looked at when implementing get_optimum_mode(). None of the
drivers take the input or output voltage into account. Despite the
fact that none of the drivers take the input or output voltage into
account, though, the regulator framework will error out before calling
into get_optimum_mode() if it doesn't know the input or output
voltage.
The above behavior turned out to be a probelm for some boards when we
landed commit efb0cb50c427 ("regulator: qcom-rpmh: Implement
get_optimum_mode(), not set_load()"). Before that change we'd have no
problems running drms_uA_update() for RPMH regulators even if a
regulator's input or output voltage was unknown. After that change
drms_uA_update() started to fail. This is because typically boards
using RPMH regulators don't model the input supplies of RPMH
regulators. Input supplies for RPMH regulators nearly always come from
the output of other RPMH regulators (or always-on regulators) and RPMH
firmware is initialized with this knowledge and handles enabling (and
adjusting the voltage of) input supplies. While we could model the
parent/child relationship of the regulators in Linux, many boards
don't bother since it adds extra overhead.
Let's change the regulator core to make things work again. Now if we
fail to get the input or output voltage we'll still call into
get_optimum_mode() and we'll just pass error codes in for input_uV
and/or output_uV parameters.
Since no existing regulator drivers even look at input_uV and
output_uV we don't need to add this error handling anywhere right
now. We'll add some comments in the core so that it's obvious that (if
regulator drivers care) it's up to them to add the checks.
Reported-by: Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@redhat.com>
Fixes: efb0cb50c427 ("regulator: qcom-rpmh: Implement get_optimum_mode(), not set_load()")
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220824142229.RFT.v2.1.I137e6bef4f6d517be7b081be926059321102fd3d@changeid
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Return the value from regmap_write() directly instead of storing it
in another redundant variable.
Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@zte.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: ye xingchen <ye.xingchen@zte.com.cn>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220824074707.221159-1-ye.xingchen@zte.com.cn
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Merge series from Iskren Chernev <iskren.chernev@gmail.com>:
This patch series adds SPMI and SMD regulator support for the PM6125 found on
SM4250/SM6115 SoCs from QCom.
This code has been tested on:
* OnePlus Nord N100 (oneplus,billie2, SoC sm4250)
* Redmi 9T (redmi,lemon, SoC sm6115)
The main source used for this change is qpnp pm6125 support patch from caf [1]:
[1]: https://source.codeaurora.org/quic/la/kernel/msm-5.4/commit/?h=kernel.lnx.5.4.r1-rel&id=d1220daeffaa440ffff0a8c47322eb0033bf54f5
v3: https://lkml.org/lkml/2022/7/31/303
v2: https://lkml.org/lkml/2022/7/26/885
v1: https://lkml.org/lkml/2021/8/28/144
Changes from v3:
- fix compilation issue reported by kernel test robot
- reorder HFSMPS/LDO+FTSMPS patches
- add new slew-rate computation for HFSMPS
- add proper pull-down support for new regs
- name new regs/vals after HFSMPS instead of FTSMPS
- address indentation/newline issues reported by Krzysztof
- improve commit messages on SPMI/RPM related patches
Changes from v2:
- split spmi new regulator support in 2 patches
- FTS and LDOs now have set_load and set_pull_down ops
- add better commit messages on spmi patches
- fix sob header order
- fix tested device info (Redmi 9T, NOT Xiaomi 9T)
- improve formatting in spmi binding docs
- sort alphabetically in smd binding docs
- sort alphabetically spmi pmics
- sort alphabetically smd pmics
Changes from v1:
- add dt-bindings
- split SPMI patch into new reg types and the new PMIC
- add correct supply mapping
Iskren Chernev (13):
dt-bindings: regulator: qcom_spmi: Improve formatting of if-then
blocks
dt-bindings: regulator: qcom_spmi: Document PM6125 PMIC
dt-bindings: regulator: qcom_smd: Sort compatibles alphabetically
dt-bindings: regulator: qcom_smd: Document PM6125 PMIC
regulator: qcom_spmi: Add support for HFSMPS regulator type
regulator: qcom_spmi: Add support for LDO_510 and FTSMPS
regulator: qcom_spmi: Sort pmics alphabetically (part 1)
regulator: qcom_spmi: Sort pmics alphabetically (part 2)
regulator: qcom_spmi: Add PM6125 PMIC support
regulator: qcom_smd: Sort pmics alphabetically (part 1)
regulator: qcom_smd: Sort pmics alphabetically (part 2)
regulator: qcom_smd: Sort pmics alphabetically (part 3)
regulator: qcom_smd: Add PM6125 RPM regulators
.../regulator/qcom,smd-rpm-regulator.yaml | 26 +-
.../regulator/qcom,spmi-regulator.yaml | 32 ++
drivers/regulator/qcom_smd-regulator.c | 400 ++++++++++--------
drivers/regulator/qcom_spmi-regulator.c | 378 ++++++++++++-----
4 files changed, 551 insertions(+), 285 deletions(-)
--
2.37.1
The regulators set consists of 3 bucks DCDCs and 4 LDOs. The output
voltages are configurable and are meant to supply power to the
main processor and other components.
Validation:
Visual check: cat /sys/kernel/debug/regulator/regulator_summary
Validation: userspace-consumer and virtual-regulator required
to test further
Enable/Disable:
cat /sys/devices/platform/userspace-consumer-VDDSHV_SD_IO_PMIC/state
echo disabled > /sys/devices/platform/
userspace-consumer-VDDSHV_SD_IO_PMIC/state
echo enabled > /sys/devices/platform/
userspace-consumer-VDDSHV_SD_IO_PMIC/state
Change voltage:
cat /sys/devices/platform/regulator-virtual-ldo1/min_microvolts
echo 1000000 > /sys/devices/platform/regulator-virtual-ldo1/
min_microvolts
echo 3000000 > /sys/devices/platform/regulator-virtual-ldo1/
max_microvolts
Signed-off-by: Jerome Neanne <jneanne@baylibre.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220805121852.21254-9-jneanne@baylibre.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Add support for PM6125 PMIC which is found on SM4250/6115 SoCs.
S1, S2, S3, S4, S8 are FTS+FTSMPS_510, rev 2
- range is 0.3-1.372V by 4mV increments
S5, S6, s7 are BUCK+HFSMPS_510, rev 4
- range is 0.32-2.04V by 8mV increment
L1, L3, L7 are LDO+N600_510, rev 2
L2, L4, L8, L17, L18 are LDO+N300_510, rev 2
L6 is LDO+N1200_510, rev 2
- range is 0.32-1.304V by 8mV increment
L5 is LDO+MV_P50_510, rev 2
L15, L19, L20 are LDO+MV_P150_510, rev 2
L21, L22, L23, L24 are LDO+MV_P600_510, rev 2
- range is 1.504-3.544V by 8mV increment
L9, L11, L14 are LDO+LV_P600_510, rev 2
L10, L16 are LDO+LV_P150_510, rev 2
L12, L13 are LDO+LV_P300_510, rev 2
- range 1.504-2V by 8mV increment
Signed-off-by: Adam Skladowski <a39.skl@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Iskren Chernev <iskren.chernev@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220802221112.2280686-10-iskren.chernev@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
This is preparation for supporing PM6125.
The HFSMPS is a BUCK type regulator with subtype 0x0a, same as the
existing HFS430 regulator.
Even though the HFSMPS and HFS430 share a type and subtype, the HFSMPS has
an updated register map, including different mode values, moved pull down
register, and different slew rate address and formula.
In addition to NORMAL (NPM), FAST (AUTO_LPM) and IDLE (LPM), the
regulator also supports RETENTION and AUTO_RM which are currently
unselectable by the driver.
The inspiration of this is taken from [1].
[1] https://source.codeaurora.org/quic/la/kernel/msm-5.4/commit/?h=kernel.lnx.5.4.r1-rel&id=d1220daeffaa440ffff0a8c47322eb0033bf54f5
Signed-off-by: Iskren Chernev <iskren.chernev@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220802221112.2280686-6-iskren.chernev@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Previously, an unresolved regulator supply reference upon calling
regulator_register on an always-on or boot-on regulator caused
set_machine_constraints to be called twice.
This in turn may initialize the regulator twice, leading to voltage
glitches that are timing-dependent. A simple, unrelated configuration
change may be enough to hide this problem, only to be surfaced by
chance.
One such example is the SD-Card voltage regulator in a NanoPI R4S that
would not initialize reliably unless the registration flow was just
complex enough to allow the regulator to properly reset between calls.
Fix this by re-arranging regulator_register, trying resolve the
regulator's supply early enough that set_machine_constraints does not
need to be called twice.
Signed-off-by: Christian Kohlschütter <christian@kohlschutter.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220818124646.6005-1-christian@kohlschutter.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Merge series from Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com>:
A few* drivers seem to use pattern demonstrated by pseudocode:
- devm_regulator_get()
- regulator_enable()
- devm_add_action_or_reset(regulator_disable())
Introducing devm helpers for this pattern would remove bunch of code from
drivers. Typically following:
- replace 3 calls (devm_regulator_get[_optional](), regulator_enable(),
devm_add_action_or_reset()) with just one
(devm_regulator_get_enable[_optional]()).
- drop disable callback.
- remove stored pointer to struct regulator - which can lead to problem
when an devm action for regulator_disable is used.
I believe this simplifies things by removing some dublicated code.
The suggested managed 'get_enable' APIs do not return the pointer to
regulators for user because any call to regulator_disable()
(or regulator_enable()) may easily lead to regulator enable count imbalance
upon device detach. (Eg, if someone calls regulator_disable() and the
device is then detached before user has re-enabled the regulator). Not
returning the pointer to obtained regulator to caller is a good hint that
the enable/disable should not be manually handled when these APIs are used.
OTOH, not returning the pointer reduces the use-cases by not allowing
the consumers to perform other regulator actions. For example request the
voltages. A few drivers which used the "get, enable,
devm_action_to_disable" did also query the voltages. The API does not suit
needs of such users.
A few regulator consumer drivers seem to be just getting a regulator,
enabling it and registering a devm-action to disable the regulator at
the driver detach and then forget about it.
We can simplify this a bit by adding a devm-helper for this pattern.
Add devm_regulator_get_enable() and devm_regulator_get_enable_optional()
Signed-off-by: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/ed7b8841193bb9749d426f3cb3b199c9460794cd.1660292316.git.mazziesaccount@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
A couple of small fixes that came in since my pull request, nothing
major here.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAmL7fYcACgkQJNaLcl1U
h9DAwgf/SFy3kudCyIA3KVx8FynN133eC+dUt5xNtyNWwWJaJ4NNqZXvRISMup0j
laCTWZ6pFLottgiYM4JoHwbgYvQmtC44jKFKceCVwUNY5mgJXv/bs9w1lgebFzQK
Van7I4s/rTCrYHAg1Jyp9SPi8xTJsDaTd53OB0LUW2CgrI6GJ098LAs+4nArL3fv
PbXueww1F9bcPs57OOow+zan4RZ6IB1CcrOmyl6Yuc9fU/tx4RiCznbCH3Z7mgIv
SJeNxVgaVIlvZ5mVvYPwUItz6QS1RhyJh+L6vZl/uzgrIpt33I8YHlneACz6rlHL
Ld3ISdk0IPSrhbPEtzyq3Y9O3dF8ZA==
=Ix+X
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Merge tag 'regulator-fix-v6.0-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator
Pull regulator fixes from Mark Brown:
"A couple of small fixes that came in since my pull request, nothing
major here"
* tag 'regulator-fix-v6.0-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator:
regulator: core: Fix missing error return from regulator_bulk_get()
regulator: pca9450: Remove restrictions for regulator-name
Since we don't actually pass the load to the firmware, switch to using
get_optimum_mode() instead of open-coding it.
This is intended to have no effect other than cleanup.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220726102024.1.Icc838fe7bf0ef54a014ab2fee8af311654f5342a@changeid
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
In commit 6eabfc018e8d ("regulator: core: Allow specifying an initial
load w/ the bulk API") I changed the error handling but had a subtle
that caused us to always return no error even if there was an
error. Fix it.
Fixes: 6eabfc018e8d ("regulator: core: Allow specifying an initial load w/ the bulk API")
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220809142738.1.I91625242f137c707bb345c51c80c5ecee02eeff3@changeid
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Here is the set of SPDX comment updates for 6.0-rc1.
Nothing huge here, just a number of updated SPDX license tags and
cleanups based on the review of a number of common patterns in GPLv2
boilerplate text. Also included in here are a few other minor updates,
2 USB files, and one Documentation file update to get the SPDX lines
correct.
All of these have been in the linux-next tree for a very long time.
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iG0EABECAC0WIQT0tgzFv3jCIUoxPcsxR9QN2y37KQUCYupz3g8cZ3JlZ0Brcm9h
aC5jb20ACgkQMUfUDdst+ynPUgCgslaf2ssCgW5IeuXbhla+ZBRAzisAnjVgOvLN
4AKdqbiBNlFbCroQwmeQ
=v1sg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Merge tag 'spdx-6.0-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/spdx
Pull SPDX updates from Greg KH:
"Here is the set of SPDX comment updates for 6.0-rc1.
Nothing huge here, just a number of updated SPDX license tags and
cleanups based on the review of a number of common patterns in GPLv2
boilerplate text.
Also included in here are a few other minor updates, two USB files,
and one Documentation file update to get the SPDX lines correct.
All of these have been in the linux-next tree for a very long time"
* tag 'spdx-6.0-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/spdx: (28 commits)
Documentation: samsung-s3c24xx: Add blank line after SPDX directive
x86/crypto: Remove stray comment terminator
treewide: Replace GPLv2 boilerplate/reference with SPDX - gpl-2.0_406.RULE
treewide: Replace GPLv2 boilerplate/reference with SPDX - gpl-2.0_398.RULE
treewide: Replace GPLv2 boilerplate/reference with SPDX - gpl-2.0_391.RULE
treewide: Replace GPLv2 boilerplate/reference with SPDX - gpl-2.0_390.RULE
treewide: Replace GPLv2 boilerplate/reference with SPDX - gpl-2.0_385.RULE
treewide: Replace GPLv2 boilerplate/reference with SPDX - gpl-2.0_320.RULE
treewide: Replace GPLv2 boilerplate/reference with SPDX - gpl-2.0_319.RULE
treewide: Replace GPLv2 boilerplate/reference with SPDX - gpl-2.0_318.RULE
treewide: Replace GPLv2 boilerplate/reference with SPDX - gpl-2.0_298.RULE
treewide: Replace GPLv2 boilerplate/reference with SPDX - gpl-2.0_292.RULE
treewide: Replace GPLv2 boilerplate/reference with SPDX - gpl-2.0_179.RULE
treewide: Replace GPLv2 boilerplate/reference with SPDX - gpl-2.0_168.RULE (part 2)
treewide: Replace GPLv2 boilerplate/reference with SPDX - gpl-2.0_168.RULE (part 1)
treewide: Replace GPLv2 boilerplate/reference with SPDX - gpl-2.0_160.RULE
treewide: Replace GPLv2 boilerplate/reference with SPDX - gpl-2.0_152.RULE
treewide: Replace GPLv2 boilerplate/reference with SPDX - gpl-2.0_149.RULE
treewide: Replace GPLv2 boilerplate/reference with SPDX - gpl-2.0_147.RULE
treewide: Replace GPLv2 boilerplate/reference with SPDX - gpl-2.0_133.RULE
...
Merge series from Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>:
The main goal of this series is to make a small dent in cleaning up
the way we deal with regulator loads. The idea is to add some extra
functionality to the regulator "bulk" API so that consumers can
specify the load using that.
Drivers tend to want to define the names of their regulators somewhere
in their source file as "static const". This means, inevitable, that
every driver out there open codes something like this:
static const char * const supply_names[] = {
"vcc", "vccl",
};
static int get_regulators(struct my_data *data)
{
int i;
data->supplies = devm_kzalloc(...)
if (!data->supplies)
return -ENOMEM;
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(supply_names); i++)
data->supplies[i].supply = supply_names[i];
return devm_regulator_bulk_get(data->dev,
ARRAY_SIZE(supply_names),
data->supplies);
}
Let's make this more convenient by doing providing a helper that does
the copy.
I have chosen to have the "const" input structure here be the exact
same structure as the normal one passed to
devm_regulator_bulk_get(). This is slightly inefficent since the input
data can't possibly have anything useful for "ret" or consumer and
thus we waste 8 bytes per structure. This seems an OK tradeoff for not
introducing an extra structure.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220726103631.v2.6.I38fc508a73135a5c1b873851f3553ff2a3a625f5@changeid
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
There are a number of drivers that follow a pattern that looks like
this:
1. Use the regulator bulk API to get a bunch of regulators.
2. Set the load on each of the regulators to use whenever the
regulators are enabled.
Let's make this easier by just allowing the drivers to pass the load
in.
As part of this change we need to move the error printing in
regulator_bulk_get() around; let's switch to the new dev_err_probe()
to simplify it.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220726103631.v2.4.Ie85f68215ada39f502a96dcb8a1f3ad977e3f68a@changeid
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
With the following configuration options:
CONFIG_OF is not set
CONFIG_REGULATOR_MT6380=y
we get the following build warning:
CC drivers/regulator/mt6380-regulator.o
drivers/regulator/mt6380-regulator.c:322:34: warning: ‘mt6380_of_match’ defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=]
Fix this by annotating that array with __maybe_unused, as done in
various regulator drivers.
Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/202207240252.ZY5hSCNB-lkp@intel.com/
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>
Cc: Chenglin Xu <chenglin.xu@mediatek.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220727132637.76d6073f@endymion.delvare
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Regulators marked with "regulator-always-on" or "regulator-boot-on"
as well as an "off-on-delay-us", may run into cycling issues that are
hard to detect.
This is caused by the "last_off" state not being initialized in this
case.
Fix the "last_off" initialization by setting it to the current kernel
time upon initialization, regardless of always_on/boot_on state.
Signed-off-by: Christian Kohlschütter <christian@kohlschutter.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/FAFD5B39-E9C4-47C7-ACF1-2A04CD59758D@kohlschutter.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
We should call the of_node_put() for the reference returned by
of_get_child_by_name() which has increased the refcount.
Fixes: 40e20d68bb3f ("regulator: of: Add support for parsing regulator_state for suspend state")
Signed-off-by: Liang He <windhl@126.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220715111027.391032-1-windhl@126.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
PMP8074 is a companion PMIC for the Qualcomm IPQ8074 WiSoC-s.
It features 5 HF-SMPS and 13 LDO regulators.
HF-SMPS regulators are Buck HFS430 regulators.
L1, L2 and L3 are HT_N1200_ST subtype LDO regulators.
L4 is HT_N300_ST subtype LDO regulator.
L5 and L6 are HT_P600 subtype LDO regulators.
L7, L11, L12 and L13 are HT_P150 subtype LDO regulators.
L10 is HT_P50 subtype LDO regulator.
This commit adds support for all of the buck regulators and LDO-s except
for L10 as I dont have documentation on its output voltage range.
S3 is the CPU cluster voltage supply, S4 supplies the UBI32 NPU cores
and L11 is the SDIO/eMMC I/O voltage regulator required for high speeds.
Signed-off-by: Robert Marko <robimarko@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220704212402.1715182-7-robimarko@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
HT_P600 is a LDO PMOS regulator based on LV P600 using HFS430 layout
found in PMP8074 and PMS405 PMIC-s.
Both PMP8074 and PMS405 define the programmable range as 1.704 to 1.896V
but the actual MAX output voltage depends on the exact LDO in each of
the PMIC-s.
Their usual voltage that they are used is 1.8V.
It has a max current of 600mA, voltage step of 8mV.
Signed-off-by: Robert Marko <robimarko@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220704212402.1715182-5-robimarko@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
HT_P150 is a LDO PMOS regulator based on LV P150 using HFS430 layout
found in PMP8074 and PMS405 PMIC-s.
Both PMP8074 and PMS405 define the programmable range as 1.616V to 3.304V
but the actual MAX output voltage depends on the exact LDO in each of
the PMIC-s.
It has a max current of 150mA, voltage step of 8mV.
Signed-off-by: Robert Marko <robimarko@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220704212402.1715182-4-robimarko@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
The patch makes sense but these are not compile warnings.
They come from scripts/checkversion.pl, which can be called
by 'make versioncheck', so I suppose that something in your
build system is running 'make versioncheck'.
Eliminate the follow versioncheck warning:
./drivers/regulator/max597x-regulator.c: 21 linux/version.h not needed.
Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong@linux.alibaba.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220711034011.46096-1-jiapeng.chong@linux.alibaba.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Drivers should depend on rather than select their MFDs.
Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220707111753.16581-1-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
