IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
devm_* simplifies the code.
Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@linaro.org>
devm_* simplifies the code.
Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@linaro.org>
devm_* simplifies the code.
Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@linaro.org>
devm_* simplifies the code.
[Fixups from rebase onto v3.12 code -- broonie]
Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@linaro.org>
Commit e398b51a ("regulator: s2mps11: Convert to devm_regulator_register()")
intended to do this conversion. However the actual conversion to devm_* got
missed out. Fix this.
Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@linaro.org>
Many regulator drivers have a remove function that consists solely of
calling regulator_unregister() so provide a devm_regulator_register()
in order to allow this repeated code to be removed and help eliminate
error handling code.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@linaro.org>
With gcc 4.1.2:
drivers/regulator/da9063-regulator.c: In function ‘da9063_regulator_probe’:
drivers/regulator/da9063-regulator.c:847: warning: ‘da9063_reg_matches’ is used
uninitialized in this function
If the parent device already has platform data, da9063_reg_matches will
not be initialized.
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@linaro.org>
Provide the rail supply voltage through descriptor to the
core and remove the callbacks which implement the get_voltage
and list_voltage.
Signed-off-by: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@linaro.org>
If given rail has the single voltage (n_voltages = 1) then provide the
rail voltage through regulator descriptor so that core can use this
value for finding voltage.
This will avoid the implementation of the callback for get_voltage() or
list_voltage() callback on regulator driver.
Signed-off-by: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@linaro.org>
If CONFIG_OF=n:
drivers/regulator/da9063-regulator.c: In function ‘da9063_parse_regulators_dt’:
drivers/regulator/da9063-regulator.c:712: warning: passing argument 1 of ‘PTR_ERR’ makes pointer from integer without a cast
drivers/regulator/da9063-regulator.c:712: warning: return makes pointer from integer without a cast
Use ERR_PTR() to encode an error code in a pointer.
PTR_ERR() is meant to decode an error code from a pointer.
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@linaro.org>
As per datasheet (Referred TPS65913), the on-time for LDO is
500micro second. If LDO6 is in vibrator mode then the on-time
is 2000us.
Set the enable_time on regulator descriptor accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@linaro.org>
up with PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(), and replacing or fixing all the usages.
This has been sitting in linux-next for a whole cycle.
Thanks,
Rusty.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)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=LeaW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Merge tag 'PTR_RET-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rusty/linux
Pull PTR_RET() removal patches from Rusty Russell:
"PTR_RET() is a weird name, and led to some confusing usage. We ended
up with PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(), and replacing or fixing all the usages.
This has been sitting in linux-next for a whole cycle"
[ There are still some PTR_RET users scattered about, with some of them
possibly being new, but most of them existing in Rusty's tree too. We
have that
#define PTR_RET(p) PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(p)
thing in <linux/err.h>, so they continue to work for now - Linus ]
* tag 'PTR_RET-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rusty/linux:
GFS2: Replace PTR_RET with PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO
Btrfs: volume: Replace PTR_RET with PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO
drm/cma: Replace PTR_RET with PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO
sh_veu: Replace PTR_RET with PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO
dma-buf: Replace PTR_RET with PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO
drivers/rtc: Replace PTR_RET with PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO
mm/oom_kill: remove weird use of ERR_PTR()/PTR_ERR().
staging/zcache: don't use PTR_RET().
remoteproc: don't use PTR_RET().
pinctrl: don't use PTR_RET().
acpi: Replace weird use of PTR_RET.
s390: Replace weird use of PTR_RET.
PTR_RET is now PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(): Replace most.
PTR_RET is now PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO
With the following change
---------
commit ad02e846878ca35e9d3fa584be8ee770e9e14fce
Author: Axel Lin <axel.lin@ingics.com>
regulator: palmas: Return raw register values as the selectors in [get|set]_voltage_sel
Don't adjust the selector in [get|set]_voltage_sel, fix it in list_voltage() instead.
For smps*(except smps10), the vsel reg-value and voltage mapping as below:
----------
The list_voltage() takes the true value of selector which is
programmed in the register. As per smsp voltage table
reg-value volt (uV) ( Assume RANGE is x1 )
0 0
1 500000
2 500000
3 500000
4 500000
5 500000
6 500000 (0.49V + 1 * 0.01V) * RANGE
7 510000 (0.49V + 2 * 0.01V) * RANGE
8 520000 (0.49V + 3 * 0.01V) * RANGE
9 530000 (0.49V + 4 * 0.01V) * RANGE
....
121 1650000 (0.49V + 116 * 0.1) * RANGE
Hence making n_voltages for smps to 122.
Signed-off-by: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@linaro.org>
