IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
As talked about in commit d2aacaf07395 ("drm/panel: Check for already
prepared/enabled in drm_panel"), we want to remove needless code from
panel drivers that was storing and double-checking the
prepared/enabled state. Even if someone was relying on the
double-check before, that double-check is now in the core and not
needed in individual drivers.
This pile of panel drivers appears to be simple to handle. Based on
code inspection they seemed to be using the prepared/enabled state
simply for double-checking that nothing else in the kernel called them
inconsistently. Now that the core drm_panel is doing the double
checking (and warning) it should be very clear that these devices
don't need their own double-check.
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230804140605.RFC.1.Ia54954fd2f7645c1b86597494902973f57feeb71@changeid
The DT of_device.h and of_platform.h date back to the separate
of_platform_bus_type before it as merged into the regular platform bus.
As part of that merge prepping Arm DT support 13 years ago, they
"temporarily" include each other. They also include platform_device.h
and of.h. As a result, there's a pretty much random mix of those include
files used throughout the tree. In order to detangle these headers and
replace the implicit includes with struct declarations, users need to
explicitly include the correct includes.
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Reviewed-by: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
Acked-by: Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham+renesas@ideasonboard.com>
Acked-by: Robert Foss <rfoss@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230714174545.4056287-1-robh@kernel.org
Some Lenovo J606F tablets come with a 2K (2000x1200) 60Hz 11" 5:3
video mode display. Add support for these panels.
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Jianhua Lu <lujianhua000@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230412-topic-lenovopanel-v3-4-bcf9ba4de46f@linaro.org
Some bright vendors mount their display panels upside down. Add the
required pieces to allow for accounting for that.
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Jianhua Lu <lujianhua000@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230412-topic-lenovopanel-v3-3-bcf9ba4de46f@linaro.org
This chip supports controlling the backlight via DCS commands, on at
least some panels. Add support for doing so.
Note this may only concern the NT36523*W* variant. Nobody knows, really,
there's no docs.
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Jianhua Lu <lujianhua000@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230412-topic-lenovopanel-v3-2-bcf9ba4de46f@linaro.org
