iv/linux
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
1,187,284 Commits 104 Branches 1,843 Tags 5.7 GiB
9338c2233b
Commit Graph

6 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Linus Walleij
9cd9e23ae3 gpio: idt3243x: Convert to immutable irq_chip 
Convert the driver to immutable irq-chip with a bit of
intuition.

Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>
Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
 2023-03-10 16:17:30 +01:00
Schspa Shi
3c938cc5ce gpio: use raw spinlock for gpio chip shadowed data 
In case of PREEMPT_RT, there is a raw_spinlock -> spinlock dependency
as the lockdep report shows.

__irq_set_handler
  irq_get_desc_buslock
    __irq_get_desc_lock
      raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock, *flags);  // raw spinlock get here
  __irq_do_set_handler
    mask_ack_irq
      dwapb_irq_ack
        spin_lock_irqsave(&gc->bgpio_lock, flags); // sleep able spinlock
  irq_put_desc_busunlock

Replace with a raw lock to avoid BUGs. This lock is only used to access
registers, and It's safe to replace with the raw lock without bad
influence.

[   15.090359][    T1] =============================
[   15.090365][    T1] [ BUG: Invalid wait context ]
[   15.090373][    T1] 5.10.59-rt52-00983-g186a6841c682-dirty #3 Not tainted
[   15.090386][    T1] -----------------------------
[   15.090392][    T1] swapper/0/1 is trying to lock:
[   15.090402][    T1] 70ff00018507c188 (&gc->bgpio_lock){....}-{3:3}, at: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28
[   15.090470][    T1] other info that might help us debug this:
[   15.090477][    T1] context-{5:5}
[   15.090485][    T1] 3 locks held by swapper/0/1:
[   15.090497][    T1]  #0: c2ff0001816de1a0 (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at: __device_driver_lock+0x98/0x104
[   15.090553][    T1]  #1: ffff90001485b4b8 (irq_domain_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: irq_domain_associate+0xbc/0x6d4
[   15.090606][    T1]  #2: 4bff000185d7a8e0 (lock_class){....}-{2:2}, at: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28
[   15.090654][    T1] stack backtrace:
[   15.090661][    T1] CPU: 4 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.10.59-rt52-00983-g186a6841c682-dirty #3
[   15.090682][    T1] Hardware name: Horizon Robotics Journey 5 DVB (DT)
[   15.090692][    T1] Call trace:
......
[   15.090811][    T1]  _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28
[   15.090828][    T1]  dwapb_irq_ack+0xb4/0x300
[   15.090846][    T1]  __irq_do_set_handler+0x494/0xb2c
[   15.090864][    T1]  __irq_set_handler+0x74/0x114
[   15.090881][    T1]  irq_set_chip_and_handler_name+0x44/0x58
[   15.090900][    T1]  gpiochip_irq_map+0x210/0x644

Signed-off-by: Schspa Shi <schspa@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Doug Berger <opendmb@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
 2022-04-25 12:10:02 +02:00
Yang Li
7c1cf55577 gpio: idt3243x: Fix an ignored error return from platform_get_irq() 
The return from the call to platform_get_irq() is int, it can be
a negative error code, however this is being assigned to an unsigned
int variable 'parent_irq', so making 'parent_irq' an int.

Eliminate the following coccicheck warning:
./drivers/gpio/gpio-idt3243x.c:167:6-16: WARNING: Unsigned expression
compared with zero: parent_irq < 0

Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@linux.alibaba.com>
Fixes: 30fee1d746 ("gpio: idt3243x: Fix IRQ check in idt_gpio_probe")
Signed-off-by: Yang Li <yang.lee@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
 2022-01-20 09:05:46 +01:00
Miaoqian Lin
30fee1d746 gpio: idt3243x: Fix IRQ check in idt_gpio_probe 
platform_get_irq() returns negative error number instead 0 on failure.
And the doc of platform_get_irq() provides a usage example:

    int irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
    if (irq < 0)
        return irq;

Fix the check of return value to catch errors correctly.

Fixes: 4195926aed ("gpio: Add support for IDT 79RC3243x GPIO controller")
Signed-off-by: Miaoqian Lin <linmq006@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
 2022-01-17 14:18:11 +01:00
Wei Yongjun
622096fdff gpio: idt3243x: Fix return value check in idt_gpio_probe() 
In case of error, the function devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname()
returns ERR_PTR() and never returns NULL. The NULL test in the return
value check should be replaced with IS_ERR().

Fixes: 4195926aed ("gpio: Add support for IDT 79RC3243x GPIO controller")
Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
 2021-06-11 20:57:59 +02:00
Thomas Bogendoerfer
4195926aed gpio: Add support for IDT 79RC3243x GPIO controller 
IDT 79RC3243x SoCs integrated a gpio controller, which handles up
to 32 gpios. All gpios could be used as an interrupt source.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
 2021-06-07 15:57:50 +02:00