IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
The function detect_harden_bp_fw() is gone after commit d4647f0a2ad7
("arm64: Rewrite Spectre-v2 mitigation code"). Update this comment to
reflect the new state of affairs.
Fixes: d4647f0a2ad7 ("arm64: Rewrite Spectre-v2 mitigation code")
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201020214544.3206838-3-swboyd@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Spectre-v2 can be mitigated on Falkor CPUs either by calling into
firmware or by issuing a magic, CPU-specific sequence of branches.
Although the latter is faster, the size of the code sequence means that
it cannot be used in the EL2 vectors, and so there is a need for both
mitigations to co-exist in order to achieve optimal performance.
Change the mitigation selection logic for Spectre-v2 so that the
CPU-specific mitigation is used only when the firmware mitigation is
also available, rather than when a firmware mitigation is unavailable.
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
The PR_SPEC_DISABLE_NOEXEC option to the PR_SPEC_STORE_BYPASS prctl()
allows the SSB mitigation to be enabled only until the next execve(),
at which point the state will revert back to PR_SPEC_ENABLE and the
mitigation will be disabled.
Add support for PR_SPEC_DISABLE_NOEXEC on arm64.
Reported-by: Anthony Steinhauser <asteinhauser@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
The kbuild robot reports that we're relying on an implicit inclusion to
get a definition of task_stack_page() in the Spectre-v4 mitigation code,
which is not always in place for some configurations:
| arch/arm64/kernel/proton-pack.c:329:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'task_stack_page' [-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
| task_pt_regs(task)->pstate |= val;
| ^
| arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h:268:36: note: expanded from macro 'task_pt_regs'
| ((struct pt_regs *)(THREAD_SIZE + task_stack_page(p)) - 1)
| ^
| arch/arm64/kernel/proton-pack.c:329:2: note: did you mean 'task_spread_page'?
Add the missing include to fix the build error.
Fixes: a44acf477220 ("arm64: Move SSBD prctl() handler alongside other spectre mitigation code")
Reported-by: Anthony Steinhauser <asteinhauser@google.com>
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202009260013.Ul7AD29w%lkp@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Patching the EL2 exception vectors is integral to the Spectre-v2
workaround, where it can be necessary to execute CPU-specific sequences
to nobble the branch predictor before running the hypervisor text proper.
Remove the dependency on CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_BASE and allow the EL2 vectors
to be patched even when KASLR is not enabled.
Fixes: 7a132017e7a5 ("KVM: arm64: Replace CONFIG_KVM_INDIRECT_VECTORS with CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_BASE")
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202009221053.Jv1XsQUZ%lkp@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Rewrite the Spectre-v4 mitigation handling code to follow the same
approach as that taken by Spectre-v2.
For now, report to KVM that the system is vulnerable (by forcing
'ssbd_state' to ARM64_SSBD_UNKNOWN), as this will be cleared up in
subsequent steps.
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
As part of the spectre consolidation effort to shift all of the ghosts
into their own proton pack, move all of the horrible SSBD prctl() code
out of its own 'ssbd.c' file.
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
The Spectre-v2 mitigation code is pretty unwieldy and hard to maintain.
This is largely due to it being written hastily, without much clue as to
how things would pan out, and also because it ends up mixing policy and
state in such a way that it is very difficult to figure out what's going
on.
Rewrite the Spectre-v2 mitigation so that it clearly separates state from
policy and follows a more structured approach to handling the mitigation.
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
The spectre mitigation code is spread over a few different files, which
makes it both hard to follow, but also hard to remove it should we want
to do that in future.
Introduce a new file for housing the spectre mitigations, and populate
it with the spectre-v1 reporting code to start with.
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
