IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
ACPICA doesn't include protections around address space checking, Linux
build tests always complain increased sparse warnings around ACPICA
internal acpi_os_map/unmap_memory() invocations. This patch tries to fix
this issue permanently.
There are 2 choices left for us to solve this issue:
1. Add __iomem address space awareness into ACPICA.
2. Remove sparse checker of __iomem from ACPICA source code.
This patch chooses solution 2, because:
1. Most of the acpi_os_map/unmap_memory() invocations are used for ACPICA.
table mappings, which in fact are not IO addresses.
2. The only IO addresses usage is for "system memory space" mapping code in:
drivers/acpi/acpica/exregion.c
drivers/acpi/acpica/evrgnini.c
drivers/acpi/acpica/exregion.c
The mapped address is accessed in the handler of "system memory space"
- acpi_ex_system_memory_space_handler(). This function in fact can be
changed to invoke acpi_os_read/write_memory() so that __iomem can
always be type-casted in the OSL layer.
According to the above investigation, we drew the following conclusion:
It is not a good idea to introduce __iomem address space awareness into
ACPICA mostly in order to protect non-IO addresses.
We can simply remove __iomem for acpi_os_map/unmap_memory() to remove
__iomem checker for ACPICA code. Then we need to enforce external usages
to invoke other APIs that are aware of __iomem address space.
The external usages are:
drivers/acpi/apei/einj.c
drivers/acpi/acpi_extlog.c
drivers/char/tpm/tpm_acpi.c
drivers/acpi/nvs.c
This patch thus performs cleanups in this way:
1. Add acpi_os_map/unmap_iomem() to be invoked by non-ACPICA code.
2. Remove __iomem from acpi_os_map/unmap_memory().
Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
From ACPICA's perspective, <acpi/actypes.h> should be included after
inclusion of <acpi/platform/acenv.h>. But currently in Linux,
<acpi/platform/aclinux.h> included by <acpi/platform/acenv.h> has
included <acpi/actypes.h> to find ACPICA types for inline functions.
This causes the following problem:
1. Redundant code in <asm/acpi.h> and <acpi/platform/aclinux.h>:
Linux must be careful to keep conditions for <acpi/actypes.h> inclusion
consistent with the conditions for <acpi/platform/aclinux.h> inclusion.
Which finally leads to the issue that we have to keep many useless macro
definitions in <acpi/platform/aclinux.h> or <asm/acpi.h>.
Such conditions include:
COMPILER_DEPENDENT_UINT64
COMPILER_DEPENDENT_INT64
ACPI_INLINE
ACPI_SYSTEM_XFACE
ACPI_EXTERNAL_XFACE
ACPI_INTERNAL_XFACE
ACPI_INTERNAL_VAR_XFACE
ACPI_MUTEX_TYPE
DEBUGGER_THREADING
ACPI_ACQUIRE_GLOBAL_LOCK
ACPI_RELEASE_GLOBAL_LOCK
ACPI_FLUSH_CPU_CACHE
They have default implementations in <include/acpi/platform/acenv.h>
while Linux need to keep a copy in <asm/acpi.h> to avoid build errors.
This patch introduces <acpi/platform/aclinuxex.h> to fix this issue by
splitting conditions and declarations (most of them are inline functions)
into 2 header files so that the wrong inclusion of <acpi/actypes.h> can be
removed from <acpi/platform/aclinux.h>.
This patch also removes old ACPI_NATIVE_INTERFACE_HEADER mechanism which is
not preferred by Linux and adds the platform/acenvex.h to be the solution
to solve this issue.
Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
