IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
Currently extent and index i are both being incremented causing an array
out of bounds read on extent[i]. Fix this by removing the extraneous
increment of extent.
Ernesto said:
: This is only triggered when deleting a file with a resource fork. I
: may be wrong because the documentation isn't clear, but I don't think
: you can create those under linux. So I guess nobody was testing them.
:
: > A disk space leak, perhaps?
:
: That's what it looks like in general. hfs_free_extents() won't do
: anything if the block count doesn't add up, and the error will be
: ignored. Now, if the block count randomly does add up, we could see
: some corruption.
Detected by CoverityScan, CID#711541 ("Out of bounds read")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180831140538.31566-1-colin.king@canonical.com
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Reviewed-by: Ernesto A. Fernndez <ernesto.mnd.fernandez@gmail.com>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Hin-Tak Leung <htl10@users.sourceforge.net>
Cc: Vyacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Inserting a new record in a btree may require splitting several of its
nodes. If we hit ENOSPC halfway through, the new nodes will be left
orphaned and their records will be lost. This could mean lost inodes or
extents.
Henceforth, check the available disk space before making any changes.
This still leaves the potential problem of corruption on ENOMEM.
There is no need to reserve space before deleting a catalog record, as we
do for hfsplus. This difference is because hfs index nodes have fixed
length keys.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/ab5fc8a7d5ffccfd5f27b1cf2cb4ceb6c110da74.1536269131.git.ernesto.mnd.fernandez@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Ernesto A. Fernández <ernesto.mnd.fernandez@gmail.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This patch makes hfs stop using the VFS '->write_super()' method along with
the 's_dirt' superblock flag, because they are on their way out.
The whole "superblock write-out" VFS infrastructure is served by the
'sync_supers()' kernel thread, which wakes up every 5 (by default) seconds and
writes out all dirty superblocks using the '->write_super()' call-back. But the
problem with this thread is that it wastes power by waking up the system every
5 seconds, even if there are no diry superblocks, or there are no client
file-systems which would need this (e.g., btrfs does not use
'->write_super()'). So we want to kill it completely and thus, we need to make
file-systems to stop using the '->write_super()' VFS service, and then remove
it together with the kernel thread.
Tested using fsstress from the LTP project.
Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
If inode size hasn't changed, don't do anything further in truncate, which
also prevents a dirty inode, what might upset some readonly devices quite
badly.
Signed-off-by: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
infrastructure for it.
Let it rip!
