IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
Whenever we're doing an update that has pointers, that generally means
we need to do the update in order to release open bucket references - so
we should be using the btree open bucket reserve.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Turns out it's possible during shutdown for the allocator to get stuck
spinning on bch2_invalidate_buckets() without hitting any of the other
checks.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
The code that checks lock ordering was recently changed to go off of the
pos of the btree node, rather than the iterator, but the btree cache
code didn't update to handle iterators that point to cached bkeys. Oops
Also, update various debug code.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Also tweak the allocator to be more aggressive about keeping it full.
The recent changes to make updates to interior nodes transactional (and
thus generate updates to the alloc btree) all put more stress on the
btree node reserves.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
This introduces a new kind of btree iterator, cached iterators, which
point to keys cached in a hash table. The cache also acts as a write
cache - in the update path, we journal the update but defer updating the
btree until the cached entry is flushed by journal reclaim.
Cache coherency is for now up to the users to handle, which isn't ideal
but should be good enough for now.
These new iterators will be used for updating inodes and alloc info (the
alloc and stripes btrees).
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Full mark and sweep gc doesn't (yet?) work with the new btree key cache
code, but it also blocks updates to interior btree nodes for the
duration and isn't really necessary in practice; we aren't currently
attempting to repair errors in allocation info at runtime.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
To be used the debug tool that dumps the contents of the journal.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Btree node lock ordering is based on the logical key. However, 'struct
btree' may be reused for a different btree node under memory pressure.
This patch uses the new six lock callback to check if a btree node is no
longer the node we wanted to lock before blocking.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
__bch2_btree_node_lock() was incorrectly using iter->pos as a proxy for
btree node lock ordering, this caused an off by one error that was
triggered by bch2_btree_node_get_sibling() getting the previous node.
This refactors the code to compare against btree node keys directly.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
This splits out the journalling code from the btree update code; prep
work for the btree key cache.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
This is better than skipping the journal pre-reservation if we already
have one - we should still acount for the journal reservation we're
going to have to get.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
We need a larger open bucket reserve now that the btree interior update
path holds onto open bucket references; filesystems with many high
through devices may need more open buckets now.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
The btree cache lock is needed for reclaiming from the btree node cache,
and memory allocation can potentially spin and sleep (for 100 ms at a
time), so.. don't do that.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Also, in the btree_update_start() path, if we already have a journal
pre-reservation we don't want to take another - that's a deadlock.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
bch2_btree_node_mem_alloc() uses memalloc_nofs_save()/GFP_NOFS, but
GFP_NOFS does include __GFP_IO - oops. We used to use GFP_NOIO, but as
we're a filesystem now GFP_NOFS makes more sense now and is looser.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
bch2_btree_iter_downgrade() was looping over all iterators in a
transaction; bch2_trans_downgrade() should be doing that.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
This will help narrow down which code is at fault when this happens.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
It's not needed anymore since we can now write to buckets before
updating the alloc btree.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
This also consolidates the various checks in bch2_mark_pointer() and
bch2_trans_mark_pointer().
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
There was a bad interaction with bch2_btree_iter_set_pos_same_leaf(),
which can leave a btree node locked that is just outside iter->pos,
breaking the lock ordering checks in __bch2_btree_node_lock(). Ideally
we should get rid of this corner case, but for now fix it locally with
verbose comments.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Intented to help debug deadlocks, since we can't use lockdep to check
btree node lock ordering.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Before we were setting features after allocating btree nodes, which
meant we were using the old btree pointer format.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Reflink might be buggy, so we're adding an option so users can help
bisect what's going on.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Now that interior btree updates are fully transactional, we don't need
to write out alloc info in a loop. However, interior btree updates do
put more things in the journal, so we still need a loop in the RO
sequence.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
This is to break a circular dependency in the shutdown path.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
We now update the alloc info (bucket sector counts) atomically with
journalling the update to the interior btree nodes, and we also set new
btree roots atomically with the journalled part of the btree update.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
When updates to interior nodes started being journalled, that meant that
after an unclean shutdown, until journal replay is done we can't walk
the btree without overlaying the updates from the journal.
The initial btree gc was changed to walk the btree overlaying keys from
the journal - but bch2_alloc_read() and bch2_stripes_read() were missed.
Major whoops...
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Previously, there was at least one error path where we could mark the
filesystem clean when we hadn't sucessfully written out alloc info.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
When a bkey_on_stack is passed to bch_read_indirect_extent, there is no
guarantee that it will be big enough to hold the bkey. And
bch_read_indirect_extent is not aware of bkey_on_stack to call realloc
on it. This cause a stack corruption.
This commit makes bch_read_indirect_extent aware of bkey_on_stack so it
can call realloc when appropriate.
Tested-by: Yuxuan Shui <yshuiv7@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Yuxuan Shui <yshuiv7@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
vmalloc() and vmap() don't take GFP_NOFS - this should be pushed further
up the IO path, but for now just doing the simple fix.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
We were marking the end of where we could insert incorrectly for
indirect extents.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
