IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
And extract sgx_set_attribute() out of sgx_ioc_enclave_provision() and
export it as symbol for KVM to use.
The provisioning key is sensitive. The SGX driver only allows to create
an enclave which can access the provisioning key when the enclave
creator has permission to open /dev/sgx_provision. It should apply to
a VM as well, as the provisioning key is platform-specific, thus an
unrestricted VM can also potentially compromise the provisioning key.
Move the provisioning device creation out of sgx_drv_init() to
sgx_init() as a preparation for adding SGX virtualization support,
so that even if the SGX driver is not enabled due to flexible launch
control not being available, SGX virtualization can still be enabled,
and use it to restrict a VM's capability of being able to access the
provisioning key.
[ bp: Massage commit message. ]
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/0f4d044d621561f26d5f4ef73e8dc6cd18cc7e79.1616136308.git.kai.huang@intel.com
Add a helper to update SGX_LEPUBKEYHASHn MSRs. SGX virtualization also
needs to update those MSRs based on guest's "virtual" SGX_LEPUBKEYHASHn
before EINIT from guest.
Signed-off-by: Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Acked-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Acked-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/dfb7cd39d4dd62ea27703b64afdd8bccb579f623.1616136308.git.kai.huang@intel.com
Add a helper to extract the fault indicator from an encoded ENCLS return
value. SGX virtualization will also need to detect ENCLS faults.
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Acked-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/c1f955898110de2f669da536fc6cf62e003dff88.1616136308.git.kai.huang@intel.com
EREMOVE takes a page and removes any association between that page and
an enclave. It must be run on a page before it can be added into another
enclave. Currently, EREMOVE is run as part of pages being freed into the
SGX page allocator. It is not expected to fail, as it would indicate a
use-after-free of EPC pages. Rather than add the page back to the pool
of available EPC pages, the kernel intentionally leaks the page to avoid
additional errors in the future.
However, KVM does not track how guest pages are used, which means that
SGX virtualization use of EREMOVE might fail. Specifically, it is
legitimate that EREMOVE returns SGX_CHILD_PRESENT for EPC assigned to
KVM guest, because KVM/kernel doesn't track SECS pages.
To allow SGX/KVM to introduce a more permissive EREMOVE helper and
to let the SGX virtualization code use the allocator directly, break
out the EREMOVE call from the SGX page allocator. Rename the original
sgx_free_epc_page() to sgx_encl_free_epc_page(), indicating that
it is used to free an EPC page assigned to a host enclave. Replace
sgx_free_epc_page() with sgx_encl_free_epc_page() in all call sites so
there's no functional change.
At the same time, improve the error message when EREMOVE fails, and
add documentation to explain to the user what that failure means and
to suggest to the user what to do when this bug happens in the case it
happens.
[ bp: Massage commit message, fix typos and sanitize text, simplify. ]
Signed-off-by: Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210325093057.122834-1-kai.huang@intel.com
kmap() is inefficient and is being replaced by kmap_local_page(), if
possible. There is no readily apparent reason why initp_page needs to be
allocated and kmap'ed() except that 'sigstruct' needs to be page-aligned
and 'token' 512 byte-aligned.
Rather than change it to kmap_local_page(), use kmalloc() instead
because kmalloc() can give this alignment when allocating PAGE_SIZE
bytes.
Remove the alloc_page()/kmap() and replace with kmalloc(PAGE_SIZE, ...)
to get a page aligned kernel address.
In addition, add a comment to document the alignment requirements so that
others don't attempt to 'fix' this again.
[ bp: Massage commit message. ]
Signed-off-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210324182246.2484875-1-ira.weiny@intel.com
The sgx_enclave_add_pages.length field is documented as
* @length: length of the data (multiple of the page size)
Fail with -EINVAL, when the caller gives a zero length buffer of data
to be added as pages to an enclave. Right now 'ret' is returned as
uninitialized in that case.
[ bp: Flesh out commit message. ]
Fixes: c6d26d370767 ("x86/sgx: Add SGX_IOC_ENCLAVE_ADD_PAGES")
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-sgx/X8ehQssnslm194ld@mwanda/
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201203183527.139317-1-jarkko@kernel.org
Fix
./arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/ioctl.c:666: warning: Function parameter or member \
'encl' not described in 'sgx_ioc_enclave_provision'
./arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/ioctl.c:666: warning: Excess function parameter \
'enclave' description in 'sgx_ioc_enclave_provision'
Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201123181922.0c009406@canb.auug.org.au
Return -ERESTARTSYS instead of -EINTR in sgx_ioc_enclave_add_pages()
when interrupted before any pages have been processed. At this point
ioctl can be obviously safely restarted.
Reported-by: Haitao Huang <haitao.huang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201118213932.63341-1-jarkko@kernel.org
Just like normal RAM, there is a limited amount of enclave memory available
and overcommitting it is a very valuable tool to reduce resource use.
Introduce a simple reclaim mechanism for enclave pages.
In contrast to normal page reclaim, the kernel cannot directly access
enclave memory. To get around this, the SGX architecture provides a set of
functions to help. Among other things, these functions copy enclave memory
to and from normal memory, encrypting it and protecting its integrity in
the process.
Implement a page reclaimer by using these functions. Picks victim pages in
LRU fashion from all the enclaves running in the system. A new kernel
thread (ksgxswapd) reclaims pages in the background based on watermarks,
similar to normal kswapd.
All enclave pages can be reclaimed, architecturally. But, there are some
limits to this, such as the special SECS metadata page which must be
reclaimed last. The page version array (used to mitigate replaying old
reclaimed pages) is also architecturally reclaimable, but not yet
implemented. The end result is that the vast majority of enclave pages are
currently reclaimable.
Co-developed-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Acked-by: Jethro Beekman <jethro@fortanix.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201112220135.165028-22-jarkko@kernel.org
The whole point of SGX is to create a hardware protected place to do
“stuff”. But, before someone is willing to hand over the keys to
the castle , an enclave must often prove that it is running on an
SGX-protected processor. Provisioning enclaves play a key role in
providing proof.
There are actually three different enclaves in play in order to make this
happen:
1. The application enclave. The familiar one we know and love that runs
the actual code that’s doing real work. There can be many of these on
a single system, or even in a single application.
2. The quoting enclave (QE). The QE is mentioned in lots of silly
whitepapers, but, for the purposes of kernel enabling, just pretend they
do not exist.
3. The provisioning enclave. There is typically only one of these
enclaves per system. Provisioning enclaves have access to a special
hardware key.
They can use this key to help to generate certificates which serve as
proof that enclaves are running on trusted SGX hardware. These
certificates can be passed around without revealing the special key.
Any user who can create a provisioning enclave can access the
processor-unique Provisioning Certificate Key which has privacy and
fingerprinting implications. Even if a user is permitted to create
normal application enclaves (via /dev/sgx_enclave), they should not be
able to create provisioning enclaves. That means a separate permissions
scheme is needed to control provisioning enclave privileges.
Implement a separate device file (/dev/sgx_provision) which allows
creating provisioning enclaves. This device will typically have more
strict permissions than the plain enclave device.
The actual device “driver” is an empty stub. Open file descriptors for
this device will represent a token which allows provisioning enclave duty.
This file descriptor can be passed around and ultimately given as an
argument to the /dev/sgx_enclave driver ioctl().
[ bp: Touchups. ]
Suggested-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201112220135.165028-16-jarkko@kernel.org
Enclaves have two basic states. They are either being built and are
malleable and can be modified by doing things like adding pages. Or,
they are locked down and not accepting changes. They can only be run
after they have been locked down. The ENCLS[EINIT] function induces the
transition from being malleable to locked-down.
Add an ioctl() that performs ENCLS[EINIT]. After this, new pages can
no longer be added with ENCLS[EADD]. This is also the time where the
enclave can be measured to verify its integrity.
Co-developed-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Tested-by: Jethro Beekman <jethro@fortanix.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201112220135.165028-15-jarkko@kernel.org
SGX enclave pages are inaccessible to normal software. They must be
populated with data by copying from normal memory with the help of the
EADD and EEXTEND functions of the ENCLS instruction.
Add an ioctl() which performs EADD that adds new data to an enclave, and
optionally EEXTEND functions that hash the page contents and use the
hash as part of enclave “measurement” to ensure enclave integrity.
The enclave author gets to decide which pages will be included in the
enclave measurement with EEXTEND. Measurement is very slow and has
sometimes has very little value. For instance, an enclave _could_
measure every page of data and code, but would be slow to initialize.
Or, it might just measure its code and then trust that code to
initialize the bulk of its data after it starts running.
Co-developed-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Tested-by: Jethro Beekman <jethro@fortanix.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201112220135.165028-14-jarkko@kernel.org
Add an ioctl() that performs the ECREATE function of the ENCLS
instruction, which creates an SGX Enclave Control Structure (SECS).
Although the SECS is an in-memory data structure, it is present in
enclave memory and is not directly accessible by software.
Co-developed-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Tested-by: Jethro Beekman <jethro@fortanix.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201112220135.165028-13-jarkko@kernel.org
