IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
- Add support for the ARMv8.6 WFxT extension
- Guard pages for the EL2 stacks
- Trap and emulate AArch32 ID registers to hide unsupported features
- Ability to select and save/restore the set of hypercalls exposed
to the guest
- Support for PSCI-initiated suspend in collaboration with userspace
- GICv3 register-based LPI invalidation support
- Move host PMU event merging into the vcpu data structure
- GICv3 ITS save/restore fixes
- The usual set of small-scale cleanups and fixes
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=mh7W
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Merge tag 'kvmarm-5.19' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kvmarm/kvmarm into HEAD
KVM/arm64 updates for 5.19
- Add support for the ARMv8.6 WFxT extension
- Guard pages for the EL2 stacks
- Trap and emulate AArch32 ID registers to hide unsupported features
- Ability to select and save/restore the set of hypercalls exposed
to the guest
- Support for PSCI-initiated suspend in collaboration with userspace
- GICv3 register-based LPI invalidation support
- Move host PMU event merging into the vcpu data structure
- GICv3 ITS save/restore fixes
- The usual set of small-scale cleanups and fixes
[Due to the conflict, KVM_SYSTEM_EVENT_SEV_TERM is relocated
from 4 to 6. - Paolo]
Zen renumbered some of the performance counters that correspond to the
well known events in perf_hw_id. This code in KVM was never updated for
that, so guest that attempt to use counters on Zen that correspond to the
pre-Zen perf_hw_id values will silently receive the wrong values.
This has been observed in the wild with rr[0] when running in Zen 3
guests. rr uses the retired conditional branch counter 00d1 which is
incorrectly recognized by KVM as PERF_COUNT_HW_STALLED_CYCLES_BACKEND.
[0] https://rr-project.org/
Signed-off-by: Kyle Huey <me@kylehuey.com>
Message-Id: <20220503050136.86298-1-khuey@kylehuey.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
[Check guest family, not host. - Paolo]
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
NMI-watchdog is one of the favorite features of kernel developers,
but it does not work in AMD guest even with vPMU enabled and worse,
the system misrepresents this capability via /proc.
This is a PMC emulation error. KVM does not pass the latest valid
value to perf_event in time when guest NMI-watchdog is running, thus
the perf_event corresponding to the watchdog counter will enter the
old state at some point after the first guest NMI injection, forcing
the hardware register PMC0 to be constantly written to 0x800000000001.
Meanwhile, the running counter should accurately reflect its new value
based on the latest coordinated pmc->counter (from vPMC's point of view)
rather than the value written directly by the guest.
Fixes: 168d918f2643 ("KVM: x86: Adjust counter sample period after a wrmsr")
Reported-by: Dongli Cao <caodongli@kingsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Like Xu <likexu@tencent.com>
Reviewed-by: Yanan Wang <wangyanan55@huawei.com>
Tested-by: Yanan Wang <wangyanan55@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>
Message-Id: <20220409015226.38619-1-likexu@tencent.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
The pmu_ops should be moved to kvm_x86_init_ops and tagged as __initdata.
That'll save those precious few bytes, and more importantly make
the original ops unreachable, i.e. make it harder to sneak in post-init
modification bugs.
Suggested-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Like Xu <likexu@tencent.com>
Reviewed-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Message-Id: <20220329235054.3534728-4-seanjc@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
AMD EPYC CPUs never raise a #GP for a WRMSR to a PerfEvtSeln MSR. Some
reserved bits are cleared, and some are not. Specifically, on
Zen3/Milan, bits 19 and 42 are not cleared.
When emulating such a WRMSR, KVM should not synthesize a #GP,
regardless of which bits are set. However, undocumented bits should
not be passed through to the hardware MSR. So, rather than checking
for reserved bits and synthesizing a #GP, just clear the reserved
bits.
This may seem pedantic, but since KVM currently does not support the
"Host/Guest Only" bits (41:40), it is necessary to clear these bits
rather than synthesizing #GP, because some popular guests (e.g Linux)
will set the "Host Only" bit even on CPUs that don't support
EFER.SVME, and they don't expect a #GP.
For example,
root@Ubuntu1804:~# perf stat -e r26 -a sleep 1
Performance counter stats for 'system wide':
0 r26
1.001070977 seconds time elapsed
Feb 23 03:59:58 Ubuntu1804 kernel: [ 405.379957] unchecked MSR access error: WRMSR to 0xc0010200 (tried to write 0x0000020000130026) at rIP: 0xffffffff9b276a28 (native_write_msr+0x8/0x30)
Feb 23 03:59:58 Ubuntu1804 kernel: [ 405.379958] Call Trace:
Feb 23 03:59:58 Ubuntu1804 kernel: [ 405.379963] amd_pmu_disable_event+0x27/0x90
Fixes: ca724305a2b0 ("KVM: x86/vPMU: Implement AMD vPMU code for KVM")
Reported-by: Lotus Fenn <lotusf@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Like Xu <likexu@tencent.com>
Reviewed-by: David Dunn <daviddunn@google.com>
Message-Id: <20220226234131.2167175-1-jmattson@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
The third nybble of AMD's event select overlaps with Intel's IN_TX and
IN_TXCP bits. Therefore, we can't use AMD64_RAW_EVENT_MASK on Intel
platforms that support TSX.
Declare a raw_event_mask in the kvm_pmu structure, initialize it in
the vendor-specific pmu_refresh() functions, and use that mask for
PERF_TYPE_RAW configurations in reprogram_gp_counter().
Fixes: 710c47651431 ("KVM: x86/pmu: Use AMD64_RAW_EVENT_MASK for PERF_TYPE_RAW")
Signed-off-by: Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>
Message-Id: <20220308012452.3468611-1-jmattson@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Add a new capability, KVM_CAP_PMU_CAPABILITY, that takes a bitmask of
settings/features to allow userspace to configure PMU virtualization on
a per-VM basis. For now, support a single flag, KVM_PMU_CAP_DISABLE,
to allow disabling PMU virtualization for a VM even when KVM is configured
with enable_pmu=true a module level.
To keep KVM simple, disallow changing VM's PMU configuration after vCPUs
have been created.
Signed-off-by: David Dunn <daviddunn@google.com>
Message-Id: <20220223225743.2703915-2-daviddunn@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
The new module parameter to control PMU virtualization should apply
to Intel as well as AMD, for situations where userspace is not trusted.
If the module parameter allows PMU virtualization, there could be a
new KVM_CAP or guest CPUID bits whereby userspace can enable/disable
PMU virtualization on a per-VM basis.
If the module parameter does not allow PMU virtualization, there
should be no userspace override, since we have no precedent for
authorizing that kind of override. If it's false, other counter-based
profiling features (such as LBR including the associated CPUID bits
if any) will not be exposed.
Change its name from "pmu" to "enable_pmu" as we have temporary
variables with the same name in our code like "struct kvm_pmu *pmu".
Fixes: b1d66dad65dc ("KVM: x86/svm: Add module param to control PMU virtualization")
Suggested-by : Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Like Xu <likexu@tencent.com>
Message-Id: <20220111073823.21885-1-likexu@tencent.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Since we set the same semantic event value for the fixed counter in
pmc->eventsel, returning the perf_hw_id for the fixed counter via
find_fixed_event() can be painlessly replaced by pmc_perf_hw_id()
with the help of pmc_is_fixed() check.
Signed-off-by: Like Xu <likexu@tencent.com>
Message-Id: <20211130074221.93635-4-likexu@tencent.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
The find_arch_event() returns a "unsigned int" value,
which is used by the pmc_reprogram_counter() to
program a PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE type perf_event.
The returned value is actually the kernel defined generic
perf_hw_id, let's rename it to pmc_perf_hw_id() with simpler
incoming parameters for better self-explanation.
Signed-off-by: Like Xu <likexu@tencent.com>
Message-Id: <20211130074221.93635-3-likexu@tencent.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
For Intel, the guest PMU can be disabled via clearing the PMU CPUID.
For AMD, all hw implementations support the base set of four
performance counters, with current mainstream hardware indicating
the presence of two additional counters via X86_FEATURE_PERFCTR_CORE.
In the virtualized world, the AMD guest driver may detect
the presence of at least one counter MSR. Most hypervisor
vendors would introduce a module param (like lbrv for svm)
to disable PMU for all guests.
Another control proposal per-VM is to pass PMU disable information
via MSR_IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES or one bit in CPUID Fn4000_00[FF:00].
Both of methods require some guest-side changes, so a module
parameter may not be sufficiently granular, but practical enough.
Signed-off-by: Like Xu <likexu@tencent.com>
Message-Id: <20211117080304.38989-1-likexu@tencent.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
If we run the following perf command in an AMD Milan guest:
perf stat \
-e cpu/event=0x1d0/ \
-e cpu/event=0x1c7/ \
-e cpu/umask=0x1f,event=0x18e/ \
-e cpu/umask=0x7,event=0x18e/ \
-e cpu/umask=0x18,event=0x18e/ \
./workload
dmesg will report a #GP warning from an unchecked MSR access
error on MSR_F15H_PERF_CTLx.
This is because according to APM (Revision: 4.03) Figure 13-7,
the bits [35:32] of AMD PerfEvtSeln register is a part of the
event select encoding, which extends the EVENT_SELECT field
from 8 bits to 12 bits.
Opportunistically update pmu->reserved_bits for reserved bit 19.
Reported-by: Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>
Fixes: ca724305a2b0 ("KVM: x86/vPMU: Implement AMD vPMU code for KVM")
Signed-off-by: Like Xu <likexu@tencent.com>
Message-Id: <20211118130320.95997-1-likexu@tencent.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
These function names sound like predicates, and they have siblings,
*is_valid_msr(), which _are_ predicates. Moreover, there are comments
that essentially warn that these functions behave unexpectedly.
Flip the polarity of the return values, so that they become
predicates, and convert the boolean result to a success/failure code
at the outer call site.
Suggested-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Message-Id: <20211105202058.1048757-1-jmattson@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
MSR_F15H_PERF_CTL0-5, MSR_F15H_PERF_CTR0-5 MSRs are only available when
X86_FEATURE_PERFCTR_CORE CPUID bit was exposed to the guest. KVM, however,
allows these MSRs unconditionally because kvm_pmu_is_valid_msr() ->
amd_msr_idx_to_pmc() check always passes and because kvm_pmu_set_msr() ->
amd_pmu_set_msr() doesn't fail.
In case of a counter (CTRn), no big harm is done as we only increase
internal PMC's value but in case of an eventsel (CTLn), we go deep into
perf internals with a non-existing counter.
Note, kvm_get_msr_common() just returns '0' when these MSRs don't exist
and this also seems to contradict architectural behavior which is #GP
(I did check one old Opteron host) but changing this status quo is a bit
scarier.
Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210323084515.1346540-1-vkuznets@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Change kvm_pmu_get_msr() to get the msr_data struct, as the host_initiated
field from the struct could be used by get_msr. This also makes this API
consistent with kvm_pmu_set_msr. No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Wei Wang <wei.w.wang@intel.com>
Message-Id: <20200529074347.124619-2-like.xu@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Move svm.c and pmu_amd.c into their own arch/x86/kvm/svm/
subdirectory.
Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
Message-Id: <20200324094154.32352-2-joro@8bytes.org>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
