IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
Support uint / sint types in specs and YNL.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Extend the support to full range of min/max checks.
None of the existing YNL families required complex integer validation.
The support is less than trivial, because we try to keep struct nla_policy
tiny the min/max members it holds in place are s16. Meaning we can only
express checks in range of s16. For larger ranges we need to define
a structure and link it in the policy.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231018163917.2514503-3-kuba@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
There is no good reason to specify the version for new protocols.
Forbid it in genetlink schema.
If the future proves me wrong, this restriction could be easily lifted.
Move the version definition in between legacy properties
in genetlink-legacy.
Suggested-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231010074810.191177-1-jiri@resnulli.us
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
In case an attribute is used in a subset, the type has to be currently
specified. As the attribute is already defined in the original set, this
is a redundant information in yaml file, moreover, may lead to
inconsistencies.
Example:
attribute-sets:
...
name: pin
enum-name: dpll_a_pin
attributes:
...
-
name: parent-id
type: u32
...
-
name: pin-parent-device
subset-of: pin
attributes:
-
name: parent-id
type: u32 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
Remove the requirement from schema files to specify the "type" for
attribute subsets.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231006114436.1725425-2-jiri@resnulli.us
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Allow user to specify GENL_DONT_VALIDATE_DUMP_STRICT flag for validation
and add this flag to netlink spec schema.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230803111340.1074067-2-jiri@resnulli.us
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Add a display-hint property to the netlink schema that is for providing
optional hints to generic netlink clients about how to display attribute
values. A display-hint on an attribute definition is intended for
letting a client such as ynl know that, for example, a u32 should be
rendered as an ipv4 address. The display-hint enumeration includes a
small number of networking domain-specific value types.
Signed-off-by: Donald Hunter <donald.hunter@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230623201928.14275-2-donald.hunter@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Chuck wanted to put the UAPI header in linux/net/ which seems
reasonable, allow genetlink families to choose the location.
It doesn't really matter for non-C-like languages.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
I relicensed Netlink spec code to GPL-2.0 OR BSD-3-Clause but
we still put a slightly different license on the uAPI header
than the rest of the code. Use the Linux-syscall-note on all
the specs and all generated code. It's moot for kernel code,
but should not hurt. This way the licenses match everywhere.
Cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Fixes: 37d9df224d ("ynl: re-license uniformly under GPL-2.0 OR BSD-3-Clause")
Reviewed-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
I was intending to make all the Netlink Spec code BSD-3-Clause
to ease the adoption but it appears that:
- I fumbled the uAPI and used "GPL WITH uAPI note" there
- it gives people pause as they expect GPL in the kernel
As suggested by Chuck re-license under dual. This gives us benefit
of full BSD freedom while fulfilling the broad "kernel is under GPL"
expectations.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230304120108.05dd44c5@kernel.org/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230306200457.3903854-1-kuba@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
I had a (bright?) idea of introducing the concept of enum-models
to account for all the weird ways families enumerate their messages.
I've never finished it because generating C code for each of them
is pretty daunting. But for languages which can use ID values directly
the support is simple enough, so clean this up a bit.
"unified" model is what I recommend going forward.
"directional" model is what ethtool uses.
"notify-split" is used by the proposed DPLL code, but we can just
make them use "unified", it hasn't been merged :)
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Add schemas for Netlink spec files. As described in the docs
we have 4 "protocols" or compatibility levels, and each one
comes with its own schema, but the more general / legacy
schemas are superset of more modern ones: genetlink is
the smallest followed by genetlink-c and genetlink-legacy.
There is no schema for raw netlink, yet, I haven't found the time..
I don't know enough jsonschema to do inheritance or something
but the repetition is not too bad. I hope.
Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
