IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
We use sentinal values that aren't NULL to indicate there's a btree node
at a higher level; occasionally, this may result in
btree_iter_up_until_good_node() stopping at one of those sentinal
values.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
The code that checks lock ordering was recently changed to go off of the
pos of the btree node, rather than the iterator, but the btree cache
code didn't update to handle iterators that point to cached bkeys. Oops
Also, update various debug code.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
This introduces a new kind of btree iterator, cached iterators, which
point to keys cached in a hash table. The cache also acts as a write
cache - in the update path, we journal the update but defer updating the
btree until the cached entry is flushed by journal reclaim.
Cache coherency is for now up to the users to handle, which isn't ideal
but should be good enough for now.
These new iterators will be used for updating inodes and alloc info (the
alloc and stripes btrees).
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Btree node lock ordering is based on the logical key. However, 'struct
btree' may be reused for a different btree node under memory pressure.
This patch uses the new six lock callback to check if a btree node is no
longer the node we wanted to lock before blocking.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
__bch2_btree_node_lock() was incorrectly using iter->pos as a proxy for
btree node lock ordering, this caused an off by one error that was
triggered by bch2_btree_node_get_sibling() getting the previous node.
This refactors the code to compare against btree node keys directly.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
bch2_btree_iter_downgrade() was looping over all iterators in a
transaction; bch2_trans_downgrade() should be doing that.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
There was a bad interaction with bch2_btree_iter_set_pos_same_leaf(),
which can leave a btree node locked that is just outside iter->pos,
breaking the lock ordering checks in __bch2_btree_node_lock(). Ideally
we should get rid of this corner case, but for now fix it locally with
verbose comments.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Intented to help debug deadlocks, since we can't use lockdep to check
btree node lock ordering.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
This will help with iterator overflow bugs.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Previously, BTREE_ID_INODES was special - inodes were indexed by the
inode field, which meant the offset field of struct bpos wasn't used,
which led to special cases in e.g. the btree iterator code.
Now, inodes in the inodes btree are indexed by the offset field.
Also: prevously min_key was special for extents btrees, min_key for
extents would equal max_key for the previous node. Now, min_key =
bkey_successor() of the previous node, same as non extent btrees.
This means we can completely get rid of
btree_type_sucessor/predecessor.
Also make some improvements to the metadata IO validate/compat code.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
We were incorrectly not restarting the transaction when re-traversing
iterators.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Ever since the btree code was first written, handling of overwriting
existing extents - including partially overwriting and splittin existing
extents - was handled as part of the core btree insert path. The modern
transaction and iterator infrastructure didn't exist then, so that was
the only way for it to be done.
This patch moves that outside of the core btree code to a pass that runs
at transaction commit time.
This is a significant simplification to the btree code and overall
reduction in code size, but more importantly it gets us much closer to
the core btree code being completely independent of extents and is
important prep work for snapshots.
This introduces a new feature bit; the old and new extent update models
are incompatible when the filesystem needs journal replay.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Introduce a new iterator method that provides a consistent view of the
btree plus uncommitted updates.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Ensure that iter->pos always lies between the start and end of iter->k
(the last key returned). Also, bch2_btree_iter_set_pos() now invalidates
the key that peek() or next() returned.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
More aggressively checking iterator invariants, and fixing the resulting
bugs. Also greatly simplifying iter_next() and iter_next_slot() - they
were hyper optimized before, but the optimizations were getting too
brittle.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
All iterators should be released now with bch2_trans_iter_put(), so
TRANS_RESET_ITERS shouldn't be needed anymore, and TRANS_RESET_MEM is
always used.
Also convert more code to __bch2_trans_do().
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
NULL is used to mean "reach end of traversal" - we were only
initializing the leaf node in the iterator to the right sentinal value.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Prep work for changing the core btree update path to handle extents like
regular keys; we need to reduce the scope of what BTREE_ITER_IS_EXTENTS
means
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
This one takes an additional argument for whether we're searching for >=
or > the search key.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
This wasn't originally required, but this is the model we're moving
towards.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
- Rework some of the helper comparison functions for consistency
- Currently trying to refactor all the logic that's different for
extents in the btree iterator code. The main difference is that for non
extents we search for a key greater than or equal to the search key,
while for extents we search for a key strictly greater than the search
key (iter->pos).
So that logic is now handled by btree_iter_search_key(), which computes
the real search key based on iter->pos and whether or not we're
searching for a key >= or > iter->pos.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
On transaction restart (-EINTR), we need to traverse all iterators.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Previously, when doing multiple update in the same transaction commit
that overwrote each other, we relied on doing the updates in the same
order as the bch2_trans_update() calls in order to get the correct
result. But that wasn't correct for triggers; bch2_trans_mark_update()
when marking overwrites would do the wrong thing because it hadn't seen
the update that was being overwritten.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
This should be private to btree_update_leaf.c, and we might end up
removing it.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Clean up a bit of duplicated code.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
This assertion was wrong for interior nodes (and wasn't terribly useful
to begin with)
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
When traversing nodes and we've reached the end of the btree, the
current btree node will be NULL.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
This is considerably cheaper than bch2_btree_node_iter_fix(), for cases
where the key was only modified and key ordering isn't changing.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
The main optimization here is that if we let
bch2_replicas_delta_list_apply() fail, we can completely skip calling
bch2_bkey_replicas_marked_locked().
And assorted other small optimizations.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Improve a few paper cuts that've shown up during profiling.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
We have to free the old (in memory) btree node _before_ unlocking the
new nodes - else, some other thread with a read lock on the old node
could see stale data after another thread has already updated the new
node.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
It's possible to get -EIO in __btree_iter_traverse_all() after looping,
with orig_iter NULL.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
The btree_trans struct needs to memoize/cache btree iterators, so that
on transaction restart we don't have to completely redo btree lookups,
and so that we can do them all at once in the correct order when the
transaction had to restart to avoid a deadlock.
This switches the btree iterator lookups to work based on iterator
position, instead of trying to match them up based on the stack trace.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Last of the basic operations for iterating forwards and backwards over
the btree: we now have
- peek(), returns key >= iter->pos
- next(), returns key > iter->pos
- peek_prev(), returns key <= iter->pos
- prev(), returns key < iter->pos
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Call bch2_btree_iter_verify from bch2_btree_node_iter_fix(); also verify
in btree_iter_peek_uptodate() that iter->k matches what's in the btree.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Being more rigorous about noting when the key the iterator currently
poins to has changed - which should also give us a nice performance
improvement due to not having to check if we have to skip other bsets
backwards as much.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
