linux

iv/linux

Fork 0

Commit Graph

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Ingo Molnar	ebd9026d9f	stackprotector: fix multi-word cross-builds Stackprotector builds were failing if CROSS_COMPILER was more than a single world (such as when distcc was used) - because the check scripts used $1 instead of $*. Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>	2009-02-11 12:17:29 +01:00
Tejun Heo	5d707e9c8e	stackprotector: update make rules Impact: no default -fno-stack-protector if stackp is enabled, cleanup Stackprotector make rules had the following problems. * cc support test and warning are scattered across makefile and kernel/panic.c. * -fno-stack-protector was always added regardless of configuration. Update such that cc support test and warning are contained in makefile and -fno-stack-protector is added iff stackp is turned off. While at it, prepare for 32bit support. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>	2009-02-10 00:41:54 +01:00
Arjan van de Ven	4f7fd4d7a7	[PATCH] Add the -fstack-protector option to the CFLAGS Add a feature check that checks that the gcc compiler has stack-protector support and has the bugfix for PR28281 to make this work in kernel mode. The easiest solution I could find was to have a shell script in scripts/ to do the detection; if needed we can make this fancier in the future without making the makefile too complex. Signed-off-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de> CC: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de> CC: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>	2006-09-26 10:52:39 +02:00

Author

SHA1

Message

Date

Ingo Molnar

ebd9026d9f

stackprotector: fix multi-word cross-builds

Stackprotector builds were failing if CROSS_COMPILER was more than
a single world (such as when distcc was used) - because the check
scripts used $1 instead of $*.

Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

2009-02-11 12:17:29 +01:00

Tejun Heo

5d707e9c8e

stackprotector: update make rules

Impact: no default -fno-stack-protector if stackp is enabled, cleanup

Stackprotector make rules had the following problems.

* cc support test and warning are scattered across makefile and
  kernel/panic.c.

* -fno-stack-protector was always added regardless of configuration.

Update such that cc support test and warning are contained in makefile
and -fno-stack-protector is added iff stackp is turned off.  While at
it, prepare for 32bit support.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

2009-02-10 00:41:54 +01:00

Arjan van de Ven

4f7fd4d7a7

[PATCH] Add the -fstack-protector option to the CFLAGS

Add a feature check that checks that the gcc compiler has stack-protector
support and has the bugfix for PR28281 to make this work in kernel mode.
The easiest solution I could find was to have a shell script in scripts/
to do the detection; if needed we can make this fancier in the future
without making the makefile too complex.

Signed-off-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
CC: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
CC: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>

2006-09-26 10:52:39 +02:00

3 Commits