IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
On a machine with a 64K PAGE_SIZE, the nested for loops in
test_check_nonzero_user() can lead to soft lockups, eg:
watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#4 stuck for 22s! [modprobe:611]
Modules linked in: test_user_copy(+) vmx_crypto gf128mul crc32c_vpmsum virtio_balloon ip_tables x_tables autofs4
CPU: 4 PID: 611 Comm: modprobe Tainted: G L 5.4.0-rc1-gcc-8.2.0-00001-gf5a1a536fa14-dirty #1151
...
NIP __might_sleep+0x20/0xc0
LR __might_fault+0x40/0x60
Call Trace:
check_zeroed_user+0x12c/0x200
test_user_copy_init+0x67c/0x1210 [test_user_copy]
do_one_initcall+0x60/0x340
do_init_module+0x7c/0x2f0
load_module+0x2d94/0x30e0
__do_sys_finit_module+0xc8/0x150
system_call+0x5c/0x68
Even with a 4K PAGE_SIZE the test takes multiple seconds. Instead
tweak it to only scan a 1024 byte region, but make it cross the
page boundary.
Fixes: f5a1a536fa ("lib: introduce copy_struct_from_user() helper")
Suggested-by: Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@cyphar.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Reviewed-by: Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@cyphar.com>
Acked-by: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191016122732.13467-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>
While writing the tests for copy_struct_from_user(), I used a construct
that Linus doesn't appear to be too fond of:
On 2019-10-04, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> Hmm. That code is ugly, both before and after the fix.
>
> This just doesn't make sense for so many reasons:
>
> if ((ret |= test(umem_src == NULL, "kmalloc failed")))
>
> where the insanity comes from
>
> - why "|=" when you know that "ret" was zero before (and it had to
> be, for the test to make sense)
>
> - why do this as a single line anyway?
>
> - don't do the stupid "double parenthesis" to hide a warning. Make it
> use an actual comparison if you add a layer of parentheses.
So instead, use a bog-standard check that isn't nearly as ugly.
Fixes: 341115822f ("usercopy: Add parentheses around assignment in test_copy_struct_from_user")
Fixes: f5a1a536fa ("lib: introduce copy_struct_from_user() helper")
Signed-off-by: Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@cyphar.com>
Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191005233028.18566-1-cyphar@cyphar.com
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>
Clang warns:
lib/test_user_copy.c:96:10: warning: using the result of an assignment
as a condition without parentheses [-Wparentheses]
if (ret |= test(umem_src == NULL, "kmalloc failed"))
~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
lib/test_user_copy.c:96:10: note: place parentheses around the
assignment to silence this warning
if (ret |= test(umem_src == NULL, "kmalloc failed"))
^
( )
lib/test_user_copy.c:96:10: note: use '!=' to turn this compound
assignment into an inequality comparison
if (ret |= test(umem_src == NULL, "kmalloc failed"))
^~
!=
Add the parentheses as it suggests because this is intentional.
Fixes: f5a1a536fa ("lib: introduce copy_struct_from_user() helper")
Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/731
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@cyphar.com>
Acked-by: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191003171121.2723619-1-natechancellor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>
A common pattern for syscall extensions is increasing the size of a
struct passed from userspace, such that the zero-value of the new fields
result in the old kernel behaviour (allowing for a mix of userspace and
kernel vintages to operate on one another in most cases).
While this interface exists for communication in both directions, only
one interface is straightforward to have reasonable semantics for
(userspace passing a struct to the kernel). For kernel returns to
userspace, what the correct semantics are (whether there should be an
error if userspace is unaware of a new extension) is very
syscall-dependent and thus probably cannot be unified between syscalls
(a good example of this problem is [1]).
Previously there was no common lib/ function that implemented
the necessary extension-checking semantics (and different syscalls
implemented them slightly differently or incompletely[2]). Future
patches replace common uses of this pattern to make use of
copy_struct_from_user().
Some in-kernel selftests that insure that the handling of alignment and
various byte patterns are all handled identically to memchr_inv() usage.
[1]: commit 1251201c0d ("sched/core: Fix uclamp ABI bug, clean up and
robustify sched_read_attr() ABI logic and code")
[2]: For instance {sched_setattr,perf_event_open,clone3}(2) all do do
similar checks to copy_struct_from_user() while rt_sigprocmask(2)
always rejects differently-sized struct arguments.
Suggested-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Signed-off-by: Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@cyphar.com>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191001011055.19283-2-cyphar@cyphar.com
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>
Based on 1 normalized pattern(s):
this software is licensed under the terms of the gnu general public
license version 2 as published by the free software foundation and
may be copied distributed and modified under those terms this
program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful but
without any warranty without even the implied warranty of
merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose see the gnu
general public license for more details
extracted by the scancode license scanner the SPDX license identifier
GPL-2.0-only
has been chosen to replace the boilerplate/reference in 285 file(s).
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Alexios Zavras <alexios.zavras@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Allison Randal <allison@lohutok.net>
Cc: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190529141900.642774971@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
A lot of Kconfig symbols have architecture specific dependencies.
In those cases that depend on architectures we have already removed,
they can be omitted.
Acked-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Acked-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
The AVR32 architecture support has been removed from the Linux kernel,
hence remove all the check for this architecture in test_user_copy.c.
Signed-off-by: Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt <egtvedt@samfundet.no>
On a NOMMU ARM kernel, we get this link error:
ERROR: "__get_user_bad" [lib/test_user_copy.ko] undefined!
The problem is that the extended get_user/put_user definitions
were only added for the normal (MMU based) case.
We could add it for NOMMU as well, but it seems easier to just not
call it, since no other code needs it.
Fixes: 4c5d7bc637 ("usercopy: Add tests for all get_user() sizes")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
The existing test was only exercising native unsigned long size
get_user(). For completeness, we should check all sizes. But we
must skip some 32-bit architectures that don't implement a 64-bit
get_user().
These new tests actually uncovered a bug in ARM's 64-bit get_user()
zeroing.
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Under SMAP/PAN/etc, we cannot write directly to userspace memory, so
this rearranges the test bytes to get written through copy_to_user().
Additionally drops the bad copy_from_user() test that would trigger a
memcpy() against userspace on failure.
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
During usercopy the destination buffer will be zeroed if copy_from_user()
or get_user() fails. This patch adds testcases for it. The destination
buffer is set with non-zero value before illegal copy_from_user() or
get_user() is executed and the buffer is compared to zero after usercopy
is done.
Signed-off-by: Hoeun Ryu <hoeun.ryu@gmail.com>
[kees: clarified commit log, dropped second kmalloc]
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To help avoid an architecture failing to correctly check kernel/user
boundaries when handling copy_to_user, copy_from_user, put_user, or
get_user, perform some simple tests and fail to load if any of them
behave unexpectedly.
Specifically, this is to make sure there is a way to notice if things
like what was fixed in commit 8404663f81 ("ARM: 7527/1: uaccess:
explicitly check __user pointer when !CPU_USE_DOMAINS") ever regresses
again, for any architecture.
Additionally, adds new "user" selftest target, which loads this module.
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
