IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
Currently, we have an active reference for the request until it is
retired. Though it cannot be retired before it has been executed by
hardware, the request may be completed before we have finished
processing the execute fence, i.e. we may continue to process that fence
as we free the request.
Fixes: 5590af3e115a ("drm/i915: Drive request submission through fence callbacks")
Fixes: 23902e49c999 ("drm/i915: Split request submit/execute phase into two")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161125131718.20978-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
(cherry picked from commit 48bc2a4a427ad81578f887d71d45794619a77211)
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Localise the static struct lock_class_key to the caller of
i915_sw_fence_init() so that we create a lock_class instance for each
unique sw_fence rather than all sw_fences sharing the same
lock_class. This eliminate some lockdep false positive when using fences
from within fence callbacks.
For the relatively small number of fences currently in use [2], this adds
160 bytes of unused text/code when lockdep is disabled. This seems
quite high, but fully reducing it via ifdeffery is also quite ugly.
Removing the #fence strings saves 72 bytes with just a single #ifdef.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161114204105.29171-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
In forthcoming patches, we want to be able to dynamically allocate the
wait_queue_t used whilst awaiting. This is more convenient if we extend
the i915_sw_fence_await_sw_fence() to perform the allocation for us if
we pass in a gfp mask as an alternative than a preallocated struct.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161028125858.23563-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
This is really a core kernel struct in disguise until we can finally
place it in kernel/. There is an immediate need for a fence collection
mechanism that is more flexible than fence-array, in particular being
able to easily drive request submission via events (and not just
interrupt driven). The same mechanism would be useful for handling
nonblocking and asynchronous atomic modesets, parallel execution and
more, but for the time being just create a local sw fence for execbuf.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20160909131201.16673-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
