IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
Commit 3d1ad640f8c94 ("KVM: arm/arm64: Fix GICv4 ITS initialization
issues") moved the vgic_supports_direct_msis() check in vgic_v4_init().
However when vgic_v4_init is called from vgic_its_create(), the has_its
field is not yet set. Hence vgic_supports_direct_msis returns false and
vgic_v4_init does nothing.
The gic/its init sequence is a bit messy, so let's be specific about the
prerequisite checks in the various call paths instead of relying on a
common wrapper.
Fixes: 3d1ad640f8c94 ("KVM: arm/arm64: Fix GICv4 ITS initialization issues")
Reported-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Before performing an unmap, let's check that what we have was
really mapped the first place.
Reviewed-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
We should only try to initialize GICv4 data structures on a GICv4
capable system. Move the vgic_supports_direct_msis() check inito
vgic_v4_init() so that any KVM VGIC initialization path does not fail
on non-GICv4 systems.
Also be slightly more strict in the checking of the return value in
vgic_its_create, and only error out on negative return values from the
vgic_v4_init() function. This is important because the kvm device code
only treats negative values as errors and only cleans up in this case.
Errornously treating a positive return value as an error from the
vgic_v4_init() function can lead to NULL pointer dereferences, as has
recently been observed.
Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Yet another braindump so I can free some cells...
Acked-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
We so far allocate the doorbell interrupts without taking any
special measure regarding the affinity of these interrupts. We
simply move them around as required when the vcpu gets scheduled
on a different CPU.
But that's counting without userspace (and the evil irqbalance) that
can try and move the VPE interrupt around, causing the ITS code
to emit VMOVP commands and remap the doorbell to another redistributor.
Worse, this can happen while the vcpu is running, causing all kind
of trouble if the VPE is already resident, and we end-up in UNPRED
territory.
So let's take a definitive action and prevent userspace from messing
with us. This is just a matter of adding IRQ_NO_BALANCING to the
set of flags we already have, letting the kernel in sole control
of the affinity.
Acked-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
The redistributor needs to be told which vPE is about to be run,
and tells us whether there is any pending VLPI on exit.
Let's add the scheduling calls to the vgic flush/sync functions,
allowing the VLPIs to be delivered to the guest.
Reviewed-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
The doorbell interrupt is only useful if the vcpu is blocked on WFI.
In all other cases, recieving a doorbell interrupt is just a waste
of cycles.
So let's only enable the doorbell if a vcpu is getting blocked,
and disable it when it is unblocked. This is very similar to
what we're doing for the background timer.
Reviewed-by: Christoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
When a vPE is not running, a VLPI being made pending results in a
doorbell interrupt being delivered. Let's handle this interrupt
and update the pending_last flag that indicates that VLPIs are
pending. The corresponding vcpu is also kicked into action.
Special care is taken to prevent the doorbell from being enabled
at request time (this is controlled separately), and to make
the disabling on the interrupt non-lazy.
Reviewed-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Let's use the irq bypass mechanism also used for x86 posted interrupts
to intercept the virtual PCIe endpoint configuration and establish our
LPI->VLPI mapping.
Reviewed-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
In order to control the GICv4 view of virtual CPUs, we rely
on an irqdomain allocated for that purpose. Let's add a couple
of helpers to that effect.
At the same time, the vgic data structures gain new fields to
track all this... erm... wonderful stuff.
The way we hook into the vgic init is slightly convoluted. We
need the vgic to be initialized (in order to guarantee that
the number of vcpus is now fixed), and we must have a vITS
(otherwise this is all very pointless). So we end-up calling
the init from both vgic_init and vgic_its_create.
Reviewed-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
